It has been
obvious to me for a long time that the stats for chemotherapy were set up to be
deliberately cooked. Anytime you insist
on a defined time frame to measure a positive result the door swing open to
gaming the numbers.
Well, it is
worse than that. Read the following
material and weep. If you happen to have
a diagnosis of cancer, please go to a naturopathic doctor and see if he can
help you. That is an excellent start. At worst he will work to build up your immune
system and get you on a regimen that will help you rather than a toxin system
that is systemically killing you.
Yes there are
clear protocols out there that actually work either some of the time or even a
lot of the time. The difficulty is that
it is rarely a simple matter of taking a pill and going home. You must become involved and you must
understand enough science to be able to test methods out if you cannot get
help.
97
Percent of The Time, Chemotherapy Does Not Work And Continues To Be Used Only
For One Reason
March 31, 2014
Dave Mihalovic,
Doctors and pharmaceutical companies make money from it. That’s the only reason chemotherapy is still used. Not because it’s effective, decreases morbidity, mortality or diminishes any specific cancer rates. In fact, it does the opposite. Chemotherapy boosts cancer growth and long-term mortality rates. Most chemotherapy patients either die or are plagued with illness within 10-15 years after treatment. It destroys their immune system, increases neuro-cognitive decline, disrupts endocrine functioning and causes organ and metabolic toxicities. Patients basically live in a permanent state of disease until their death. The cancer industry marginalizes safe and effective cures while promoting their patented, expensive, and toxic remedies whose risks far exceed any benefit. This is what they do best, and they do it because it makes money, plain and simple.
The reason a 5-year relative survival rate
is the standard used to assess mortality rates is due to most cancer patients
going downhill after this period. It’s exceptionally bad for business and the
cancer industry knows it. They could
never show the public the true 97% statistical failure rate in treating
long-term metastatic cancers. If they did publish the long-term statistics
for all cancers administered cytotoxic chemotherapy, that is 10+ years and
produced the objective data on rigorous evaluations including the
cost-effectiveness, impact on the immune system, quality of life, morbidity and
mortality, it would be very clear to the world that chemotherapy makes little
to no contribution to cancer survival at all. No such study has ever been
conducted by independent investigators in the history of chemotherapy. The only
studies available come from industry funded institutions and scientists and
none of them have ever inclusively quantified the above variables.
Why? Money, greed and profits run the cancer
industry–nothing else. The cancer establishment must retreat from the truth to
treat cancer because there will never be any profit for them in in eradicating
the disease. There is no governing body in the world that protects consumers
from being subjected to these toxic therapies or even known carcinogens in our
foods our environment, because that too, will prevent the profits from rolling
in. It’s a business of mammoth proportions and must be treated as such. The
most powerful anti-carcinogenic plants
in the world such as cannabis must
be demonized and be made illegal because they are so effective at killing
cancer cells without side effects. Cannabinoids are so efficient at treating
disease, that the U.S. Government patented
them in 2003.
If orthodox medicine were truly interested
in curing cancer and healing people, don’t you think they would look for a way
to target cancer cells with the intent of killing them while sparing normal
cells?
Chemotherapy
does not target cancer cells, and
because of this, chemotherapy:
1) Kills far more normal cells than cancer cells, and
2) Damages
and toxifies many of the normal cells that do survive.
If a “magic bullet” were
used FIRST by orthodox medicine, meaning the cut/burn/slash/poison
treatments were avoided, a 90%
true cure rate would be easy to achieve. But the fact is that the leaders in
the medical community have absolutely no interest in finding a “magic bullet.”
A “magic bullet” would cost the drug companies hundreds of billions of dollars,
and patients would have less hospitalization and less doctor visits, etc.
You might ask your oncologist why your
chances of survival are only 3% (ignoring all of their statistical gibberish
such as “5-year survival rates” and deceptive terms like “remission” and “response”),
when your chance of survival would be over 90% if they used something
like DMSO. Actually, bring up DMSO to any
oncologist and most of them won’t even talk to you about it. Why? Because DMSO is a natural product, cannot be patented and cannot be made
profitable because it is produced by the ton in the wood industry.
Why
Is Chemotherapy Killing So Many People?
Why does concentrated cyanide kill you? How
do anthrax, arsenic, and zyklon B kill you? They are all poisons. Consume or
inject enough poison into your body and you will eventually die. Toxic
chemotherapy drugs just happen to take a little longer than many of those
above, and they’re designed that way. We couldn’t have people dropping like
flies one week after receiving chemo or the gig would be over. Again, that
would be bad for business.
According to official statistics, one
person out of two is claimed to recover from cancer through conventional
methods. Although dramatic, the information nevertheless contains a certain
amount of hope, as implicitly it provides something positive for both
scientists and patients. To the scientists it says: continue the research
because it is producing results; do not try preventive, alternative theoretical
or therapeutic roads, nor get discouraged by the fact that patients keep on
dying every day. To the patients, on the other hand, it provides a warning: you
have a 50 percent chance of making it, as long as you follow the conventional
therapeutic protocols without trying what they claim are the useless
alternatives.
There is an international classification
(the TNM system) that classifies tumors on the basis of their gravity. They are
subdivided into stages I, II, III, IV, and into sub-groups. It is clear to any
trained eye that initial lesions that are doubtful or at the limit of
malignancy represent the overwhelming majority of the observed “neoplasias”.
It is equally clear how often these
presumed neoplasias, which are often subject to both misunderstanding and
manipulation, inflate those statistics to the point of implausibility.
So, in the early stages of tumors (the
dubious ones) the recovery rates are extremely high, while in the following
stages — that is, where they certainly are tumors — the rates are barely
above zero. The reason for the discrepency is the qualification of the data
and how a patient is assessed in terms of recovery. Immune reconstitution and
tolerance, organ and metabolic toxicities, endocrine challenges, functional outcomes,
quality of life, and neurocognitive outcomes are NEVER inclusively assessed in
any clinical study discussing the long-term survival and recovery rates of
cancer patients. The damage to these systems slowly develops after
chemotherapy, however if often does not begin to manifest throughout the body
until several months or even years have passed. It takes time, but within a 3-5
year period, most chemotherapy patients begin to have many more symptoms of
disease than they every had before their diagnosis, due to and as a direct
result of cytotoxic drug intervention.
Adjuvant
chemotherapy is often given to patients who might not really need it at all. Oncologists do not consider the whole
spectrum of chemotherapy risks versus benefits and thus compromise quality of
life for every patient they treat. A study in the Annals of
Oncology is one of few which
assessed the different potential long-term adverse events associated with
adjuvant chemotherapy in cancer, with a particular focus on long-term cardiac
toxicity, secondary leukemia, cognitive function, and neurotoxicity. The
authors stated that the adverse events are frequently overshadowed by the well-demonstrated
clinical efficacy and/or reassuring short-term safety profiles of the different
chemotherapy regimens commonly used today.
Another study in the American Society of Clinical
Oncology determined whether
long-term survivors of metastatic testicular cancer have an increased risk of
cardiovascular morbidity more than 10 years after chemotherapy. They observed a
significantly increased risk for occurrence of cardiac events accompanied by a
persisting unfavorable cardiovascular risk profile likely due to
chemotherapeutic agents.
Peter Glidden, BS, ND in the video above
describes the 12-year meta-analysis published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology which
observed adults who had developed cancer and treated with chemotherapy. The
12-year study looked at adults who had developed cancer as an adult. 97% of the
time, chemotherapy did not work in regressing the metastatic cancers.
It’s
a Business
Why would any corporation have an interest
in treating cancer when it generates well over $100 BILLION DOLLARS annually?
Follow the money and you’ll discover quickly why people continue to get cancer.
When 50% of the population is developing a disease within their lifetime,
something is very wrong. In 2011, cancer was the #1 cause
of death in the Western world,
and #2 in developing countries.
Dr. Glidden further explains: If you go to a
medical doctor with a sinus infection and that doctor prescribes an antibiotic,
he gets no financial kickback. Now, if he prescribes 5,000 units of that
antibiotic in one month, the drug company that makes it might send him to
Cancun for a conference, but he gets no direct remuneration. With
chemotherapeutic drugs, it’s different. Chemotherapeutic
drugs are the only classification of drugs that the prescribing doctor gets a
direct cut of.
So, if your doctor prescribes chemotherapy
for you, here’s how it goes more or less: The doctor buys it from the
pharmaceutical company for $5,000, sells it to the patient for $12,000,
insurance pays $9,000, and the doctor pockets the $4,000 difference. If Ford
Motor Company made an automobile that exploded 97% of the time, would they
still be in business? No.
With cancer treatment in the United States,
we have lost the war on cancer. Why? Because cancer is not a reductionistic
phenomenon. Cancer is a holistic phenomenon. When you try to bring a
reductionistic methodology like drugs and surgery to bear on a holistic
phenomenon, you will completely miss the boat each and every time. You cannot
do it.
Medical doctors are like colorblind art
critics. They can see that that’s a boat. They can see the black and white
outline, but they’re completely blind to all of the colors and textures that
make up the substance of the thing. There’s no difference with cancer. The
reason that people get cancer in the United States and the reason that we have
completely lousy outcomes is because medical doctors are driving the research
bus.
When people get together and do a 5K run for
breast cancer, all of that money–do you think any of that money goes to
nutritional research? Do you think any of that money goes to homeopathic
research or acupuncture or traditional Chinese medicine or naturopathic
research? No. All of it goes to drugs and surgery, which do not work.
Why aren’t those women running for
selenium? If every girl in this country took 200 mcg of selenium, in one
generation we’d eliminate breast cancer by 82%. That’s a big number. Why
aren’t we doing that? Because medicine in the United States is a for-profit
industry, and most people are completely unaware of this, and most people bow
down to the altar of MD-directed high-tech medicine at their own demise.
There has been a 68% increase in the use of
chemotherapy drugs since 2003 and despite the massive increase in the incidence
of cancer since then; the risk factors (according to the cancer industry) for primary
and secondary cancers are still related to tobacco, alcohol, occupational
exposures and genetic determinants. Cancer
treatment or diagnostics is never mentioned as a cause of any primary or
secondary cancers.
How Chemotherapy Actually Boosts Cancer
Growth
Researchers tested the effects of a type of chemotherapy on tissue collected from men with prostate cancer, and found “evidence of DNA damage” in healthy cells after treatment, the scientists wrote in Nature Medicine.
Chemotherapy works by inhibiting
reproduction of fast-dividing cells such as those found in tumours.
The scientists found that healthy cells
damaged by chemotherapy secreted more of a protein called WNT16B which boosts
cancer cell survival.
“The increase in WNT16B was completely
unexpected,” study co-author Peter Nelson of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer
Research Center in Seattle told AFP.
The protein was taken up by tumour cells
neighbouring the damaged cells.
“WNT16B, when secreted, would interact with
nearby tumour cells and cause them to grow, invade, and importantly, resist
subsequent therapy,” said Nelson.
In cancer treatment, tumours often
respond well initially, followed by rapid regrowth and then resistance to
further chemotherapy.
Rates of tumour cell reproduction have been
shown to accelerate between treatments.
“Our results indicate that damage responses
in benign cells… may directly contribute to enhanced tumour growth kinetics,”
wrote the team.
The researchers said they confirmed their
findings with breast and ovarian cancer tumours.
Patients with incurable cancers are promised
much greater access to the latest drugs which could offer them extra months or
years of life, however many doctors have been urged to be more cautious in
offering cancer treatment to terminally-ill patients as chemotherapy can often
do more harm than good, advice supported by Nelson’s study.
Doctors Speak Out About The Cancer Industry
Dr. Robert Atkins, MD, of Atkins Diet fame
once announced there are several cures
for cancer, but there’s no money in them. They’re natural, effective,
and inexpensive, no expensive drugs are involved but they require quite a lot
of self-discipline from patients. It costs millions to fund research and
clinical trials needed to produce a new cancer drug that can be patented and
sold. Often these drugs create more illness. It has been said that the key to
success in the health business is to pull off the trick of making people
patients for life. Consider how many people who registered a couple of abnormal
blood pressure readings have been kept on medication until the medication
killed them, when a quick fix course of drugs supported by major changes of
diet and lifestyle would have returned their physical condition to an
unmedicated healthy state.
According to Dr. John Diamond, M.D., “A
study of over 10,000 patients shows clearly that chemo’s supposedly strong
track record with Hodgkin’s disease (lymphoma) is actually a lie. Patients
who underwent chemo were 14 times more likely to develop leukemia and 6 times
more likely to develop cancers of the bones, joints, and soft tissues than
those patients who did not undergo chemotherapy.”
Dr. Glenn Warner, who died in 2000, was one
of the most highly qualified cancer specialists in the United States. He used
alternative treatments on his cancer patients with great success. On the
treatment of cancer in this country he said: “We have a multi-billion dollar industry that is killing people, right
and left, just for financial gain. Their idea of research is to see whether
two doses of this poison is better than three doses of that poison.”
Dr. Alan C. Nixon, past president of the
American Chemical Society writes, “As a chemist trained to interpret data,
it is incomprehensible to me that physicians can ignore the clear evidence that
chemotherapy does much, much more harm than good.” And according to
Dr. Charles Mathe, French cancer specialist, “…if I contracted cancer, I
would never go to a standard cancer treatment centre. Only cancer victims who
live far from such centres have a chance.”
Dr. Allen Levin stated: “Most cancer
patients in this country die of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy does not
eliminate breast, colon, or lung cancers. This fact has been documented for
over a decade, yet doctors still use chemotherapy for these tumors.” In his
book, The Topic of Cancer: When the Killing Has to Stop, Dick Richards cites a
number of autopsy studies which have shown that cancer patients actually
died from conventional treatments before the tumor had a chance to kill them.
Dave Mihalovic is a
Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in vaccine research, cancer prevention and
a natural approach to treatment.
No comments:
Post a Comment