Showing posts with label Sandia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sandia. Show all posts

Friday, September 4, 2009

Solar Energy Conversion Sprint




As mentioned this is a sprint race in the labs to pass the fifty percent mark. Forty three percent is pretty well down the road.

What no one bothers to mention is that commercial product is still running a marathon. The best is shipping with conversion levels closer to fifteen. See last story.

In fact, we cannot be too optimistic that this will improve soon. After all, we have been trying for years to make it better. We have unending lab improvements but a very slow transmission into deliverable hardware.

I would like to see more focus on structured quantum waveguides to see if that can change things.

The good news is that once you set aside the effort to maximize yield and turn to lowering costs, we are getting progress. Nanosolar likely achieves yields of around 10 to 13% but using print methods is bringing costs down to under $1.00 per watt. So we need 400 square miles of desert instead of 100 square miles of desert. No one will care because the cost is right and any improvement is easily implemented on a plug and play protocol.

The real sprint race is in the real world as the race is on to supply solar power at $1.00 per watt to everyone.

We are entering a new energy world in which we have a huge national grid, solar roofing and siding perhaps, geothermal and ample wind power and were needed and small nuclear were necessary to supply a central heat supply.
There are three separate stories appended.

Australians Break Solar Power Record

August 25, 2009

In a record reminiscent of a 100-meter dash, scientists at the University of South Wales in Sydney, Australia, have created the world's most efficient solar power cell ever...by a hair.

Professor Martin Green and his colleague Anita Ho-Baillie led a team of U.S. researchers to victory with a multi-cell combination that is able to convert 43 percent of sunlight into electricity. The previous record was 42.7 percent.

To capture light at the red and infrared end of the spectrum, the researchers threw everything into the cells--gallium, phosphorous, indium, and arsenic, plus silicon. While a bunch of the semiconductors used are expensive, the scientists did raise the efficiency bar.

Ho-Baillie and Green broke a different solar record with a silicon solar cell last October. If they continue to combine their efficient cells with technology from the folks at the National Renewable Energy Lab and Emcore, maybe they'll make ones that can convert 50 percent. I can't wait for the sunny day when that happens.

New solar cell efficiency record set

By Noel McKeegan
22:36 January 26, 2009 PST

New world record solar cell (Image: Fraunhofer ISE)

Researchers at the Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE have set a new record for solar cell efficiency. Using concentrated sunlight on a specially constructed multi-junction solar cell, the research group lead by Frank Dimroth has achieved 41.1% efficiency for the conversion of sunlight into electricity.

The breakthrough, which surpasses the 40.7 percent efficiency previously demonstrated by Spectrolab , involved the use of sunlight concentrated by a factor of 454 and focused onto a small 5 mm? multi-junction solar cell made out of GaInP/GaInAs/ Ge (gallium indium phosphide, gallium indium arsenide on a germanium substrate). Even at a higher sunlight concentration of 880, an efficiency of 40.4% was measured.

“We are elated by this breakthrough,” says Frank Dimroth, head of the group “III-V – Epitaxy and Solar Cells” at Fraunhofer ISE. “At all times the entire team believed in our concept of the metamorphic triple-junction solar cells and our success today is made possible only through their committed work over the past years.”

Multi-junction solar cells combine semiconductor compounds in layers to absorb almost all of the solar spectrum. The problem is that in combining these materials in a process known as metamorphic growth, defects occur in the lattice structure making it difficult to grow the III-V semiconductor layers with a high crystal quality. The Fraunhofer ISE researchers have overcome this issue by discovering a way to localize these defects in a region of the solar cell that is not electrically active, meaning that the active regions stay relatively defect free and higher efficiencies can be achieved.

“The high efficiencies of our solar cells are the most effective way to reduce the electricity generation costs for concentrating PV systems,” says Dr. Andreas Bett, Department Head at Fraunhofer ISE. “We want that photovoltaics becomes competitive with conventional methods of electricity production as soon as possible. With our new efficiency results, we have moved a big step further towards achieving this goal!”

Via: Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE (http://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/)

Suntech Claims New World Record in Silicon Panel Efficiency

The Fraunhofer Institute verifies that a Suntech Power multicrystalline silicon panel has beaten Sandia’s record. Suntech intends to have a 300MW capacity to produce its new Pluto cells in 2010.

Suntech Power said Wednesday it now holds the world record in producing the most efficiency multicrystalline silicon panels, beating a record previously held by Sandia National Laboratories.

A panel sporting the company's newly developed Pluto cells was able to convert 15.6 percent of the sunlight that strike it into electricity, Suntech said.

The Fraunhofer Institute of Solar Energy Systems in Germany, one of the few labs in the world whose test results are recognized by the industry, verified the efficiency of the panel. The panel rolled off a new factory line China-based Suntech set up to start shipping Pluto panels earlier this year.

The new record will be included by the science journal Progress in Photovoltaics (PIP) that periodically publishes a list of record-holding efficiency for different types of solar cells and panels.

"Improving the conversion efficiency of multicrystalline silicon modules has proven particularly challenging and this is a very impressive achievement for such a large module from a commercial supplier," said Martin Green, research director of the ARC Photovoltaics Centre of Excellence at the University of New South Wales in Australia, in a statement.

"I can confirm that the 15.6% multicrystalline module result is the highest known conversion efficiency measured by a PIP-recognized test center," added Green, who is on the journal's committee.

Suntech's efficiency number isn't much higher than the 15.5 percent record previously held by Sandia. But Suntech contends its panel could have surpassed 16 percent if it were tested without its frame, as was the case with Sandia's panel.

The new record is a boost to Suntech's plan to market panels assembled with Pluto cells, which it developed with technology licensed from the University of New South Wales. Suntech's founder and CEO Zhengrong Shi taught at the university for years.

The university holds the world record for silicon cells made in a lab, which were tested by Sandia and yielded 25 percent efficiency. Cells made in the labs tend to be able to achieve higher efficiencies than those from commercial production lines.

The Pluto technology focuses on improving the cell's ability to trap light to boost electricity production. Pluto cells also use copper instead of silver for its collector and bus lines, which act as highways for transporting the electricity produced by the cells.

Silver is the common material from these lines, but it can be pricey. Copper has similar conductivity but is cheaper. Suntech also uses less copper to further reduce cost, said Steve Chan, Suntech's chief strategy officer, in an interview. Chan who declined to disclose Pluto's manufacturing costs.

Pluto can be used to make either monocrystalline or multicrystalline cells. The technology has produced monocrystalline cells with close to 19 percent efficiency and multicrystalline cells over 17 percent, Suntech said.

In general, monocrystalline cells are more expensive to make partly because growing single-crystal silicon is more time consuming and energy intensive, but they yield higher efficiencies. Most of the silicon panels on the market today are of the multicrystalline variety.

SunPower, in San Jose, Calif., is known for producing the most efficient monocrystalline silicon cells for the market today. It is making cells with 22.5 percent efficiency. Its panels could achieve a little over 19 percent efficiency.

Suntech started shipping Pluto panels earlier this year, but the volume has been small. Suntech is producing them at about 1 megawatt to 2 megawatts per month, Chan said.

The company expects to ship 10 megawatts to 15 megawatts of Pluto panels by the end of 2009. Pluto panels have been installed in China and Australia. Suntech is waiting for IEC and UL certification to sell them in Europe and the United States.

Suntech is ramping up its production to mass produce them in 2010, when Suntech is set to have the manufacturing capacity to produce 300 megawatts of Pluto cells per year, Chan said.

Suntech already has a 1-gigawatt capacity to produce silicon cells with an older technology, making it one of the few in the world with that much production capability.

The company plans to convert its existing lines to make Pluto products, a process that would take about three years, Chan said. Suntech has historically produced mostly multicrystalline silicon cells. Chan declined to say whether the company would shift that strategy with its Pluto lines.

Suntech is scheduled to announce its second-quarter earnings on Thursday.

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Nuclear Mass Production

We are getting further down the road to having several mass produced nuclear reactors much smaller than the large plants built decades ago. This is also good news as we are on the verge of a massive grid build out that will be needed to support the coming automotive power market.

Having many reactors situated in zones of high demand is becoming necessary and is no longer a market for natural gas. Also small reactors are far less intrusive and may even be better integrated.

The industry has obviously shaken itself of the mega project mindset and has seen its future in having many small facilities.

I will make one other observation. These devices should be built around a thermal supply market. That is not out in the country. In a city center, production of hot water can be fed directly into surrounding infrastructure. In effect the hot water is free and the city itself provides the needed heat sink.

This is a certain improvement over a thermal plant using natural gas as is done in Vancouver city center. There a small nuclear plant would nicely provide city center power and city center heat for the large buildings. All the necessary infrastructure is already built to handle plug and play.

Again, mass production will also drive cost down and soon cities with ambition and insufficient size will be also building.


August 31,2009

Sandia Designing Factory Mass Producable Right Sized Reactor

http://nextbigfuture.com/2009/08/sandia-designing-factory-mass.html

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgAO9gZbAg_rLJ4jMrPWq3rXCO5xoELwrD3xhQVVf2aNcrkYKVHjMB7sR_5sb1s90pwUmOpM6zz91YpzKkqStZoMqPJlYwLG0efjfvnYiLCQDDDtWt4LBc66H1ZZ2jvmnI8ArPInBo3LKM/s1600-h/sandia1.jpg


Tom Sanders, Vice President/President Elect American Nuclear Society, is promoting "Global Energy Needs: Defining a Role for a “Right Sized Reactor” [32 page pdf]

There is some conflicting information in the 32 page presentation and a Sandia press release. The presentation (May, 2009) talks about a variety of reactor technologies include light water, gas cooled, liquid metal cooled (breeders), and molten salt. The Sandia press release talks only about a breeder reactor with a design that is 85% completed. There are no specifics about the 85% completed design other than it is proliferation resistant and has integrated safety.The presentation talks about a goal of $1500/KW for construction and the press release a financial target of 5 cents per kwh. Those are price levels that already being achieved in China. China is already making progress to factory built modular nuclear reactor (230 modules for Toshiba/Westinghosue AP1000) and factory mass produced pebble bed reactors [Pebble bed would be right sized 200 MWe]. China's PM-HTR breaks ground Sept 2009 and China is expecting to follow up with dozens of reactors as the technology and design are proven.Russia is also looking to produce a "right sized" factory mass produced breeder reactor.


The guidelines for developing large-scale nuclear power in Russia were set out as follows early in the decade: - Power costs not more than 3 cents/kWh, - Capital costs under US$ 1000/kW, - Service life at least 50 years, - Utilisation rate at least 90%. The technology future for Russia was focused on four elements:- Serial construction of AES-2006 units, - Fast breeder BN-800, - Small and medium reactors - KLT-40 and VBER-300 (100-300 MWe), - HTGR. (High Temperature Gas Reactor)


The new reactors in China and Russia would enable the low cost manufacturing of nuclear reactors to be exported.There are several companies and nations proposing factory built modular nuclear reactorsConsistent aspects of Sandia's plan:* Use super critical CO2 (SC-CO2) to make a smaller turbine to convert heat to electricity* Factory Mass produced reactors in the 100-300 MWe range* Costs in the $1500/KW and 5 cents per kwh* Proliferation resistant and exportable* This is where the global energy market is headed* This will displace the natural gas reactors of the same size and costTom led a team at Sandia which has completed 85% of the reactor core design.


A smaller scale, economically efficient nuclear reactor that could be mass-assembled in factories and supply power for a medium-size city or military base has been designed by Sandia National Laboratories. The exportable, proliferation-resistant “right-sized reactor” was conceived by a Sandia research team led by Tom Sanders. Sanders has been collaborating with numerous Sandians on advancing the small reactor concept to an integrated design that incorporates intrinsic safeguards, security and safety. This opens the way for possible exportation of the reactor to developing countries that do not have the infrastructure to support large power sources. The smaller reactor design decreases the potential need for countries to develop an advanced nuclear regulatory framework. Incorporated into the design, said team member Gary Rochau, is what is referred to as “nuke-star,” an integrated monitoring system that provides the exporters of such technologies a means of assuring the safe, secure, and legitimate use of nuclear technology. “This small reactor would produce somewhere in the range of 100 to 300 megawatts of thermal power and could supply energy to remote areas and developing countries at lower costs and with a manufacturing turnaround period of two years as opposed to seven for its larger relatives,” Sanders said. “It could also be a more practical means to implement nuclear base load capacity comparable to natural gas-fired generating stations and with more manageable financial demands than a conventional power plant.” About the size of half a fairly large office building, a right-sized reactor facility will be considerably smaller than conventional nuclear power plants in the U.S. that typically produce 3,000 megawatts of power. With approximately 85 percent of the design efforts completed for the reactor core, Sanders and his team are seeking an industry partner through a cooperative research and development agreement (CRADA). The CRADA team will be able to complete the reactor design and enhance the plant side, which is responsible for turning the steam into electricity. Team member Steve Wright is doing research using internal Sandia Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program funding.These smaller reactors would be factory built and mass-assembled, with potential production of 50 a year. They all would have the exact same design, allowing for quick licensing and deployment. Mass production will keep the costs down, possibly to as low as $250 million per unit.Because the right-sized reactors are breeder reactors — meaning they generate their own fuel as they operate — they are designed to have an extended operational life and only need to be refueled once every couple of decades, which helps alleviate proliferation concerns. The reactor core is replaced as a unit and “in effect is a cartridge core for which any intrusion attempt is easily monitored and detected,” Sanders said. The reactor system has no need for fuel handling. Conventional nuclear power plants in the U.S. have their reactors refueled once every 18 months. The goal of the right-sized reactors is to produce electricity at less than five cents per kilowatt hour, making them economically comparable to gas turbine systems.


https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjGUjDpdMOC410W_Vp6h3JOAeo2uM0WFgIApaxkA5n3nXmASn-8C4uHBUx1zKUx-GOGYk8LLs9QnrottBinhUY7KTPug9BV0hRLMgBUPf40zIllWEJsST70vu268SCnX_Ty8Wwe3i2DdN0/s1600-h/sandia5.jpg


https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiZz2rW3-De37b_a2DVkM569-y8wCeU3wiawBuu1qoX7qIIwjPSxqT6sEX3LIcCmp8Vd7pGulp28H2XK1X8ytRUj7Pj01OvEPwG9yRIg9ogwa8PwvoiMOPwrQqBV-V-AMQyeqL3YjiXleg/s1600-h/sandia3.jpg


https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiZz2rW3-De37b_a2DVkM569-y8wCeU3wiawBuu1qoX7qIIwjPSxqT6sEX3LIcCmp8Vd7pGulp28H2XK1X8ytRUj7Pj01OvEPwG9yRIg9ogwa8PwvoiMOPwrQqBV-V-AMQyeqL3YjiXleg/s1600-h/sandia3.jpg


https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj62rDJErc1Jh1bcFYzC2ZKZfPnHDchel_HVPfBVJqeeKuECbBCMLFv44eB21XXd1pp7ZJWylM0-ViENy4JoWEUCEFtl9kHfrunSug65N_1sRMZjTBCG7Macfbj1nDmdpiPzKcch9cgAZ4/s1600-h/sandia4.jpg