The surprise of course is that the culture used abstract ideas for siting their mounds and indirectly their communities. The usual and reasonable assumption of such sites been tied to geography as dominant elsewhere proves completely wrong.
We already know that the South East USA was linked directly to the Maya in much the same way as England was to Virginia. Even that their culture survived contact into the eighteenth century. What is now becoming apparent is the likely extent of this culture in the USA. Again tens of thousands in population.
What i find interesting is the earliest date for coastal occupation. it was 1150 BC. We already know that 1159 BC, a mere decade earlier, saw the demise of the Atlantean trade world both globally but critically in the Atlantic Basin. This meant huge coastal tsunamis.
Thus we are looking at successor populations moving in to take over shell fisheries after this calamity. A thousand years later we hear of the advent of the tale peopels which may well have been part of the Mayan contact.
Recall earlier postings in which i suggested that evacuating Atlanteans including their tall allies in North America may well have traveled to Olmec Mayan country after 1159 BC.
I also suspect that the coast saw minor subsidence as well related to significant subsidence of the Bahama Bank which is as large as France. All this plausibly collapsed a huge population as well. While we are at let us not forget ley lines in Bronze Age Europe.
Were Southeastern towns also sited according to the stars?
The
archaeological news headline this week is that a 15 year old youth
correctly predicted the location of an previously unknown Maya city by
matching the sites of known Maya cities with a star map. It has always
been a mystery what determined the location of Maya cities. Those in
the mountains, such as Waka, Palenque and Bonampak are associated with
shoals on rivers, but elsewhere, they seemed randomly placed.
Several
POOF members wrote me last night and asked if the same phenomenon
occurred in the Southeast, or at least in Georgia, Southern Florida,
Western Mississippi and Southeastern Tennessee, where there were so many
towns are in close proximity. The current answer is that no one has
studied that question on a regional scale in the Southeast.
A
Yale University astronomer, Dr. Vance Tiede, did study Ocmulgee
National Monument in 2004 and state that he thought that the locations
of mounds and satellite villages there seemed to be the map of a
constellation. However, he did not name the constellation.
Ancient town sites
Until
this past three years, when I began intensively studying the
archaeological reports of Archaeologists Robert Wauchope and William
Sears, I did not realize how really old the town sites were in North
Georgia and extreme Southern Florida. In both regions, most date back
to the Late Archaic or Early Woodland Periods. They were occupied for
many, many centuries. Several in Georgia were occupied most of the time
from at least as early as 1000 BC to the late 1700s or even the early
1800s. As we mentioned in an earlier article, this longevity breaks
all the orthodoxies of American anthropology. This phenomenon is also
seen in some Southwestern Florida towns, but exposure to the Spanish
ended their occupation in the late 1600s or early 1700s.
The most
promising location in the Southeast for being laid out according to the
stars in a constellation is the former capital of the Calusa People on
Mound Key near Fort Myers, Florida. The island was initially an oyster
bar, utilized by the ancestors of the Calusa as early as 1150 BC.
Around 0 AD, the Calusa began expanding the bar into an island for
permanent habitation. These construction projects seem to mark the
arrival of another, extreme tall, ethnic group, who became the permanent
elite of the Calusa People.
Over the centuries, the man-made
island grew to about 120 acres and contained canals, shell platforms for
elite housing and shell mounds for temples and the ruling family’s
residences. The commoners lived in massive communal structures shaped
like pup tents. Early Spanish explorers saw the same type structures in
certain provinces along the coast of South Carolina and Georgia. Thus,
some Calusa probably migrated to that region in the past.
The
virtual reality image above portrays the capital of Calos at its peak
size. The Calusa Civilization collapsed in the early 1700s due to
European diseases and Spanish repression.
Mainstream references
reflect the uncertainty by Florida academicians toward the etymology of
Calos and Calusa. They might consider the purchase of Creek-Seminole
dictionaries. Calos is the Creek word for star and the Creeks called
these people, Calosi, which means, “Children of the Stars.” If anyone
would have laid out their towns according to star maps, it would likely
be the Children of the Stars.
The
Ortona town site near Lake Okeechobee is another strong candidate for
being laid out according to a star map. It was first settled during the
Early-Middle Woodland Period along a series of shoals on the
Calusahatchee River like many Native towns in Georgia, but as seen
below, the plan of the town does not seem to relate to geography, but to
an abstract concept.
In the Creek Motherland
All
but one of the major town sites in North and Central Georgia have
something in common. They are located on the shoals of major rivers.
Robert Wauchope found conurbations of towns and villages that stretched
for seven miles long on the headwaters of the Chattahoochee River and 12
miles long on the section of the Chattahoochee River that flows through
Metro Atlanta.
When Maya specialist and archaeologist, Garth
Norman, visited the stone ruins at Little Mulberry River Park (Gwinnett
County, GA) in April 2016, the rangers told him that they have found
almost continuous stone ruins along the entire 40 mile length of the
Mulberry-Apalachee River System. It is all white water. People of One
Fire teams have observed a similar phenomenon along other white water
tributaries of the Oconee River.
The largest towns
in the Southern Highlands and Piedmont are found where major trade
paths crossed the shoals of rivers. This is especially obvious at
Ocmulgee National Monument, Etowah Mounds, Carters Bottom (Kusa),
Columbus, GA-Phenix City, AL and Augusta, GA. Clearly, these towns were
sited and then prospered for pragmatic reasons, not arbitrary alignment
with a star maps.
There is one glaring exception . . . and it
was what made me start studying the regional placement of towns. The
town site called Shoulderbone Mounds is located in Hancock County, GA at
the southern edge of the Piedmont. The small stream that served it
would have been barely large enough to provide drinking water. It is
currently believed that the town was founded around 1150 AD, right after
the acropolis at Ocmulgee was abandoned.
Shoulderbone
contains the second oldest five sided mound in the Southeast . . . the
oldest being the Kenimer Mound in the Nacoochee Valley, which probably
dated from around 600 AD to 800 AD. Why would such an important
complex be in the middle of nowhere and not be associated with any major
riverine or ground trade routes?
Both principal mounds at
Shoulderbone and Etowah Mounds are five sided. Just on a hunch, I used
GIS to extend a True North from the center of Mound A at Shoulderbone. I
then used the same technique to extend the alignment of Mound A at
Etowah Mounds northeastward. Etowah’s alignment approximates the
azimuth of the Winter Solstice Sunset. The two lines intersected
somewhere at the state line between Georgia and North Carolina at the
headwaters of the Little Tennessee River.
They are never
mentioned in nationally published archaeology books, but there are a
cluster of Native America town sites with mounds on both sides of North
Carolina-Georgia Line along the headwaters of the Little Tennessee
River. The best known is the Koweta (Cherokee) or Coweeta
(English) Mound, which was built about a mile north of the state line
in the Late Mississippian Period and abandoned in the 1600s.
While the Koweta Creeks have always claimed that region, which is known as Itsate Gap as their homeland, the Coweeta Mound is now officially labeled by North Carolina archaeologists as a Cherokee. Even though Ani-koweta
is the Cherokee word for the Muskogee-Creek People, University of North
Carolina academicians have determined that Koweta and Coweeta are
ancient Cherokee words, whose meanings have been lost.
I drove up
to the Northeast corner of Georgia and asked around the town of
Dillard, if they knew of a mound right on the state line. That’s where
my Etowah and Shoulderbone lines intersected. Most folks knew about
the Dillard Mound. It was a classic oval Lamar Culture mound on the
river just east of Dillard. However, a few folks told me, “Yes,
there is a mound right on the state line just past the bridge over the
Little Tennessee on the right. We call it the Otto Mound.”
By
golly, there it was, a five sided mound right where those two vectors
intersected. Further study of the side with infrared imagery revealed
that it was aligned at the same angle as Etowah’s Mound A and was a
scaled down mirror image of Mound A and its plaza.
I
uncovered a 1989 archaeological survey from the Western District Office
of the North Carolina State Archaeologist Division. It stated that
during the Middle Woodland Period, the village was occupied by people
making Hopewell Style pottery. However, during Late Woodland and
Mississippian Periods, the pottery styles were identical to those found
in the Etowah River Valley, 103 miles to the Southeast. The site had
been abandoned around 1600 AD then reoccupied for about four decades in
the 1700s by Cherokees.
Using GIS again, I marked the center
points of all known five sided mounds in Georgia, Southeastern Alabama
and Western North Carolina. They formed a triangular matrix that was
about 250 miles across. Why or how these five-sided mounds were sited
so precisely over such a long distance is still in the realm of the
unknown.
And now you know!
No comments:
Post a Comment