Thursday, February 25, 2010
Organic Feed Influences Chicken Gene Expression
Just in case you thought the science of genetics and DNA is settled, read this. Of course we do not know if this means anything at all, but it surely means that more cherished beliefs on the subject will come under question.
Life is a woven tapestry of biochemistry that holds together under an unusual logic system that it may be possible to reconstruct someday. This continues to reveal the richness of the tapestry. What it is not is a system that responds well to the simple logic our own minds enjoy.
Instead it is a huge intellectual challenge that has remained well beyond our present reach.
So what is the cause of this difference in gene expression? Good luck. I find it confounding myself.
Organic feed influences gene expression in chickens
January 7, 2010 by Albert Sikkema
(PhysOrg.com) -- Organically fed chickens develop a different process of gene expression in their small intestines than that of chickens which get conventional feed. The organic chickens have higher expressed genes involved in the creation of cholesterol, but do not have raised cholesterol levels in their blood. This surprising conclusion was drawn by Wageningen animal researchers (The
) last month in the British Journal of Nutrition. Netherlands
We had not expected much difference in gene expression between the two groups of chickens because the same ingredients were found in both types of feed, and these differed only in the way they are cultivated', says researcher Astrid de Greeff of Livestock Research in Lelystad. 'But it appears that another cultivation method can result in significant differences at the expression level. Much to our surprise, 49 genes seemed to be regulated differently.' The research was commissioned by the Louis Bolk Institute in Driebergen as part of a bigger research project into possible health effects of feed from different production methods.
De Greeff and her colleagues compared the gene expression of two generations of chickens which received organically cultivated feed with the gene expression of chickens which received the usual feed. They isolated RNA from the small intestines of the chickens. The amount of RNA is a measurement of the expression of a particular gene. The RNA of the organically fed chickens was labelled with a green colour; the RNA of the conventional chickens had a red label. Both RNA's were brought together in a micro-array which comprises almost all chicken genes, and comparison was carried out. De Greeff compared pairs of five organically fed chickens and five conventionally fed chickens. She concluded afterwards that there were significant differences in expression.
A differential expression of 49 genes among a total of twenty thousand chicken genes may seem subtle, says De Greeff. But if you consider the fact that the cultivation method is the only difference in the feed, this is in fact a big difference. Moreover, seven of the 49 genes are involved in cholesterol biosynthesis, when only thirty genes are involved in total in the process.
What happens biologically when these genes become expressed higher is still unknown. 'Cholesterol is a building material for many substances, such as hormones. We don't know yet what the cholesterol does in the chickens.'