Friday, October 19, 2007

Algae production for the feed lot

I quote the following summary from a paper on feeding algae to cattle. The paper is well worth reading in its entirety because they discuss feeding protocols to cattle. The results were very positive and even suggestive.

The possibility of using unicellular algae (Chlorella and Scenedesmus) as feed for cattle has been studied. Mixed algal culture was grown in a shallow polythene-lined pond and gave a recorded daily yield of 95 tonnes of algal suspension (packed cell volume 5-10 ml/litre) or 247 kg dry substances per hectare. The cost was about $1.25 (Tk. 50) per tonne of algal suspension production. Dried algal cells contained 613 g crude protein (N x 6.25) and 155 g fibre per kg DM. In a 120 d feeding trial 8 growing cattle (7 females and 1 male), of indigenous breed with mean initial live weight kg 146"9 kg, were fed ad libitum urea- molasses-straw and 2 kg/d wheat bran as basal diet. The treatments were 0.5 kg/d Til (sesame) oil cake per head in group I and ad libitum algal suspension in group II. The suspension was drunk at 10% of animal live weight. These animals received no other liquid (water).

Inclusion of algal suspension did not improve total metabolizable energy (ME) or crude protein (N x 6.25) intake but increased daily gain, although insignificantly (P > 0.05) from 399 g for the oil cake treatment to 458 g in the algae group. The feed conversion efficiencies were 6.2 and 7.4 g live weight gain per MJ ME intake for the oil cake and algae groups, respectively. Crude fibre digestibility was significantly (P < 0.01) higher in the algae (81.1%) than the oil cake group (76.2%). For the 120 d feeding trial, the estimated net economic loss was $5.0 (Tk. 200)/animal on oil cake while there was a $14.4 (Tk. 576) profit/animal on algae.

This is actually along way down the road in the road in the mastering of algae husbandry. Dry weight algae is a prime animal feedstock on its own. If we successfully select an algae blend that also maximizes the production of biodiesel, we have a very economic protocol for the production of both feed and oil.

At present the best oil production is around ten times the oil production from oilseeds. The potential is ten times that. Of course at the present time I am mixing apples and oranges as these two applications must have some level of conflict which we need to overcome.

What I am reaching for, though is a least effort protocol for the algae production stream. A system that produces oil and feed through a one step process is very attractive to farm operation. You are continuously shipping oil at the farm gate and consuming the pressed algae as cattle feed. The indicated efficiency of the feed aspect means that any oil production is a bonus to the feed lot.

A conversion of the global cattle industry over to algae feed has the additional benefit of releasing huge amounts of acreage from feed grain production.

In fact this revelation will create a huge demand for an algae production protocol on the part of the agricultural industry. The oil aspect and the release of land will be a bonus.

It was also noted that the production rate approached 100 tons of dry product per hectare compared to a previously reported 10 tons per hectare. Comparing either figure to grain production of perhaps a ton per acre is very compelling. A lower oil yield may even be acceptable in this type of regime.

Of course, this requires a nitrogen fertilizer input that is significant but obviously vastly superior to cropland fertilization in which the bulk of the fertilizer is currently lost. and never used.

The idea of having a one acre algae field replacing as much as fifty acres of grain production is very compelling.

5 comments:

RAM said...

I thank you for the information. Is it possible you could provide the citation for this article ?

Lesa said...

Could you please share the name of the original article? I would like to read more.

arclein said...

This paper i recall came by way of a pretty obscure US gov't source that was published before the online environment. I also got it before I made it a habit of running down the links and throwing them in the posting, or at least I forgot to do so. Now there is so much recently published that it has become buried.

I recall that it dated back over twenty years to the last energy crisis, unless i am mixing it up with something else.

RAM said...

Arclein: thank you very much for responding to my question. In the meantime I think I have found the article. I include below the citation. You can Google it. I found it very interesting but have not found subsequent literature pertaining to this subject. If either you or Lesa have information, I am very interested. Thanks

Algae in Animal Production
S.A. Chowdhury*, K.S. Huque* and M. Khatun**
* Animal Production Research Division, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Dhaka
1341, Bangladesh
** Bangladesh Council For Scientific And Industrial Research, New Elephant Road, Dhaka,

arclein said...

this from Ken schultz

Check the following sites for possible solutions for scalable generation of algae – you may already know of them:



http://www.originoil.com/

http://www.valcent.net/

http://www.sapphireenergy.com/



My personal favorite at this point is Originoil, although Valcent gives more actual information like production yields, estimated costs, etc.



On a related note, you might find the advances developed by this company of interest as well.



http://www.virent.com/



Good luck and here’s to algae grown on MASSIVE scale – it has so very MANY applications, it’s astounding.



Thanks
Ken Schultz

Omaha, NE, USA,

kenlschultz@cox.net