Q anon Tarriff action with EU.

 I do know that it is hard to take when Trump goes out and throws tariffs on all sorts of things.  Particularly when you know that he does not like them any more than you or I.  Please think about that.

All our trade deals typically enshrine tariff regimes, not least USA agricultural subsidies which are a problem globally in terms of serious trade distortion.  Free trade means just that with no tariffs and no subsidies and also managed market access.

Managed market access must happen because it cannot allow a pool of capital to use dumping to bankrupt competition in the short term in order to produce a long term monopoly like we have in the USA milk industry where local suppliers are pushed out of the market except at a raw milk discounter. 

The point of all this is to get concerned parties to the table to renegotiate their mutual interests.  It really needs to happen every twenty years in any event.  Preservation of market share can then be reset every twenty years in such a forum although i prefer that all market access agreements lapse at the rate of five percent per year in most cases.

 

Jul 25 2018

1702

 

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 126021 No.2284570   
Jul 25 2018 15:37:56 (EST) NEW

 

EU BLINKED.
CONCESSIONS MADE.
ZERO TARIFFS (US>EU).
AMERICA FIRST.
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE POTUS DOES NOT SELL OUT.
AFTER SUCH AN ENORMOUS ANNOUNCEMENT WHAT QUESTION(S) WERE SHOUTED @ POTUS?
>RUSSIA DELAY IN MEETING PUTIN (DC).
EYES OPEN?
MSM DOES NOT REPRESENT THE PEOPLE.
THE DAYS OF OUR LEADERS LINING THEIR POCKETS AT THE EXPENSE OF THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER ARE OVER.
RECENT EXAMPLE.
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/24/report-businesses-mccaskills-husband-131-million-federal-subsidies/
GO KANSAS!
Q

1701

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 1dc9cb No.2282104 
Jul 25 2018 13:10:51 (EST)

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 1dc9cb No.2282049 
Jul 25 2018 13:08:27 (EST)

— That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. —

Q

Di5V9BRW4AE1Wz9.jpg

>>2282049