The real take home is that breath testing is certain to be a
diagnostic gold mine simply because all reactions taking place inside
the body inevitably express themselves in terms of gaseous waste
dumped into the lungs.
Thus a simple protocol will be to determine and measure those outputs
and compare pathologies to establish associations. Once the foot
work is well done, we have the type of data to support almost
automatic diagnostic decisions with the use of a small handhold
sensor.
I anticipate that this methodology will be far superior to other
types of tests such as urine. Even better, it will be easy to
replicate as often as one likes. This provides great test data
security.
As mentioned here, the real surprise is that this has not been long
jumped on. Possobly it is a matter of allowing technology to catch
up to the need.
Exhaled breath is
unique fingerprint
By Jason Palmer
3 apr 2013
These "metabolites"
represent the waste products of the body's chemistry - but their
uniqueness had never been shown.
A study in PLOS ONE
suggests they could be as useful to medical diagnosis as those found
in urine or blood.
Because a breath test
is non-invasive and the results are instantaneous, it could prove
even more convenient for example in anaesthesia or doping tests.
"I don't
understand why breath hasn't been a widely used [means of] medical
science diagnosis," said the study's lead author Renato Zenobi
of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) in Zurich.
"In traditional
Chinese medicine, they feel your pulse, look at your tongue and smell
your breath," he told BBC News. "There are trained dogs who
can sniff cancer with a fairly good hit-rate - but the dog doesn't
tell you what the compounds are."
Prior work has
shown that the precise type of bacteria responsible for lung
infections or even the presence of stomach cancer could be
discerned in the breath.
What remained to be
seen was whether the breath's metabolic contents varied enough
between people - and varied little enough within an individual - to
be diagnostic - to act as a real and repeatable "breathprint".
"You need to show
there is a core individual signal that is stable over time,"
Prof Zenobi said. "If it changes a lot during the course of the
day or after you've had a coffee or smoked a cigarette, you
can just forget about it."
Personalised medicine
The team acquired
breath samples from 11 volunteers across four time slots of nine
working days.
These samples were run
through a mass spectrometer - a device that effectively measures all
the masses of the chemical compounds in the breath.
Miniaturisation
efforts could result in an incredibly sensitive device similar to
today's "breathalyser"
Some, such
as water vapour and carbon dioxide, were the same across
all participants, but those that differed proved to be unique to
individuals - and to stay the same for those individuals throughout
the course of the experiments.
In the course of
previous work, one of the collaborators' breath appeared to have one
markedly different mass "peak" - which turned out to be
connected to epilepsy medication he was taking.
When other patients on
the same drug were tested, the same peak was found: a new metabolite
of the drug that was subsequentlypublished in the journal Chemical
Communications.
It is the non-invasive
and immediate nature of the test that makes it most promising.
It could for example
help determine an appropriate dosage in anaesthesia, where an
effective but safe dose is dependent on a patient's tolerance and
metabolic rate - a small dose could be given to test how it
is metabolised. A quick, at-the-starting-line test could be
administered to check for doping in sport.
As the tests continue
and the stability and uniqueness of each individual's breathprint is
further verified, it could become a staple of the long-predicted
"personalised medicine", tailored to each person's
chemistry.
And the testing
equipment - currently a large, laboratory-based system - is likely to
be miniature.
For now the team is
taking steps toward that goal, working with pulmonologists to detect
signs of lung diseases such as asthma, sarcoidosis and cancer in the
breath.
"We're at the
onset of learning about what the compounds are. Just a small fraction
of the peaks that we see are identified at this point, so there's a
lot of footwork to be done," Prof Zenobi said.
No comments:
Post a Comment