Showing posts sorted by relevance for query reverse engineering UFO. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query reverse engineering UFO. Sort by date Show all posts

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Area 51 With Annie Jacobsen




'Area 51 – an uncensored history of america’s top secret military base by annie Jacobsen


I have just finished reading this recent book and can strongly advise everyone to read it first before you attempt any other books on the subject.  The whole enigma has been massively clouded by any number of witnesses who always had a partial understanding to begin with.  It really has become the committee of the blind attempting to describe an elephant that they have briefly touched here and there.

That is the good news. This volume does capture reports from a large number of active witnesses and participants from the fifties and the sixties in particular.  Yet recent work just as compelling is opaque going back to the early seventies.  Yet much is gained as we eliminate a lot of confusion that has arisen.

The most important disclosure is that the USA has been flying post U2 aircraft since the mid sixties on a daily basis whose speed was Mach 3 or better and operating ceiling of almost twenty miles or nearly twice any other craft in normal use.

This means that such craft were anywhere in US airspace and in position if the right conditions existed to be seen as an UFO.  In fact any such observable could obviously be seen then by many folks.  For that reason alone a great number of UFO reports are surely these craft.  The distance was always too great to discern detail and the most likely sighting would be a reflection from miles distant.

I had always suspected that a great number of UFO sightings were just that.  The missing factor was the sheer number of opportunities afforded.

The other disclosure that comes out of all this is that the Roswell incident was perceived and understood as an attempt by the Russians to hoax the US.  Roswell was the base used to support major atomic tests conducted in the Pacific the previous couple of years.  That made it an excellent target for a UFO hoaxing scenario.

The bodies are understood as lab modified humans in an era in which this was actually been attempted.  The craft appeared to have Russian script and one presumes the material collected were of accepted alloy mixtures.

I disagree with this interpretation on the basis of what I have seen of the evidence but this was a very reasonable interpretation in the late forties.

Our knowledge of DNA did not exist and our knowledge of Russian and captured German Science capabilities was largely in fantasy land also.

Once such an interpretation became accepted at the upper levels, a better theory never had a chance.

After sixty years we have a large body in individual UFO sighting that include sightings of the non human operators and which confirms a magnetic field exclusion technology able to explain all the observed behavior.  A Roswell incident today would be treated very differently.

I also think that security compartmentalization has actually worked to box evidence into deep dead ends.  A researcher would be assigned the task of reverse engineering an object but not be allowed to share his information freely.  This would lead to a failed effort which would simply get set aside and plausibly never be looked at again.

The other key factoid is that all such projects had an important third player in the Atomic Energy Commission which is presently part of the DOE. Most documentary secrets are there and few have ever looked.  Been originally compartmentalized, one would have to get lucky just to get the proper address. 

Saturday, November 13, 2010

Earth Based UFO Stations




There is a fair body of literature promoting not just the existence of UFO’s, but also a fairly consistent story of a plausibly alien involvement in the development of Earth.  I have taken a minimalist position on all this by simply positing the emergence of a human society during the fifty thousand years preceding what is clearly the Pleistocene nonconformity some 13,000 years ago which ended the ice age by shifting the crust.

My position is that humanity had the time and the natural ability to produce a space faring civilization able to reside in space habitats.  This allowed adaptation to space and complete migration off planet before they brought about the Pleistocene nonconformity.  They then re established humanity in starter colonies on each continent and in time got out of the way while we got on with the job of terraforming the planet in ignorance.

My first conjecture is that all apparent reports of so called alien creatures reported so far could be human derived through genetic engineering.  The two skulls reported, one confirmed as real, fit nicely into this paradigm.  In practice I am able to interpret what I am seeing in the evidence rather consistently,

It is reasonable that once genetic engineering was undertaken, that a range of styles and specialized characteristics would have been entertained and applied.  Recall space habitats could maintain earth gravity in part and this would constrain too flamboyant redesign.

The sighting evidence for UFOs is presently massive and worldwide.  I have to presume that a huge population exists and that visiting Earth is largely routine although the craft lend themselves to stealth.  The craft observed are generally small in size as far as such craft could be.  See my article on reverse engineering the UFO in Viewzone or here.

I suspect that the principle reason for travel in our atmosphere is to transport individuals to long term bases on Earth.  This also makes a great deal of practical sense to retain bases here even if no access to the Earth’s surface can be allowed.  It allows for some gathering of biological materials and other similar needs that may be impossible to easily establish in a space habitat.

Such bases can be accessed from subsea access ports that would never be discovered by ourselves and can be as large as needed.  It is not difficult to produce domed rooms in sedimentary rock such as sandstone and not difficult to secure such rooms against water.  Miles of such structures can be built and populations of thousands can be easily accommodated in this manner.  Such structures could even have been built before the oceans rose to cover entrances.

We know that UFOs are able to submerge in water and thus could easily access such sites.

Potential locations have been noted and many more could easily exist.


Again, once you add in the presence of such stations, we have a clear rational for small UFOs transiting out atmosphere.

I do not wish to promote the idea of ‘aliens’ actually walking among us, but it should be obvious that it would be standard operating procedure used in order to track our actual progress and to collect data as may be needed.  They would avoid disclosure completely.

Monday, July 18, 2011

Roswell Tests Confirm Extraterrestrial Origin





I have generally avoided the whole Roswell story for the obvious reason that it is the largest single UFO event in the public domain and was certainly responsible for the development of all official response since.  At the time, folks on the ground fumbled and plenty got out.  Afterward, any such event would have a lid slammed on it and it has become nearly impossible to get data into the public domain.

The mere fact that no similar flap has arisen ever since speaks volumes.


What Kimbler has done for us, has been to go to the debris field and collect metallic remnant.  Inasmuch as the craft effectively blew up throwing fine debris everywhere in the debris field, this was a logical first step.  He was successful.  He also observed that the debris field continues to be visible from satellite imaging which is very surprising.  Of course, the blast surely destroyed vegetation in an extremely arid area, but one cannot help but think that there is more to it than that.

1                    Debris field remains extant.
2                    Metallic debris is recoverable.

Recall that so far we have learned nothing that is new except to confirm that the blast was significant and likely could nor be easily replicated by a crashing large plane or exploding large plane or ridiculously the original weather balloon cover story.  Thus the core story of an exploding UFO is actually confirmed by the debris field itself.

Kimbler then went out and applied modern testing methods to the scraps of metal acquired.

The second significant finding is that the isotope ratio is clearly not from Earth.  The chart tells it all. This fully confirms the original explanation.  Pretending that the metal trash was from an earthly source fails here and it does so categorically.

3                    Metal debris isotope ratio is not Terran


The third finding, and it is not so easily understood unless you have read my article on the reverse engineering of the UFO in Viewzone and this blog, is that atomic level layering is observable.  This must be so if it is an UFO for fundamental physical reasons.

4                    Atomic layering is observed in the fragments.  This confirmation of the type of manufacturing required to make a UFO.

We can dismiss all claims other than the original event story of a UFO crash as been outright disinformation.  This is exactly the hard evidence that has been missing and that no agency can hope to hide.

As a side issue, any metallic material in foil form that is ever attributed to an UFO event needs to be inspected for evidence of layering.  The metal is laid down in single atomic layers to achieve specific physical effects central to the operation of the craft.  Such evidence may be accepted as evidence of such a source.  I have known this for some time and have noted other such occurrences.


Test confirms Roswell debris is not from Earth
                                                          

Alejandro Rojas | Jul 12, 2011






The artifact that has been analyzed. Specimen size about 10 mm long. End fragment clipped off for testing. (image credit: Frank Kimbler)

A teacher at the New Mexico Military Institute in Roswell may have discovered the first scientific evidence of manufactured debris made on another planet. Furthermore, this debris was found near the location where pieces from an alleged flying saucer were discovered outside of Roswell in 1947.



Frank Kimbler (image credit: Alejandro Rojas)

Frank Kimbler teaches high school level Earth Sciences and college level Geology at the New Mexico Military Institute in Roswell. He says he has always had an interest in UFOs, and actually had his own unusual sighting in his twenties. So when he moved to Roswell, he decided to put his expertise to the test and take a shot at investigating the most famous UFO incident of all time, the crash at Roswell.

He says his main goal was to find some physical evidence. He started by looking at some satellite imagery of the alleged “debris site.” This is where rancher, Mac Brazel, had told the Air Force he had found pieces of the crashed object. Kimbler used these images to enhance the infra-red in order to highlight areas where the ground was disturbed. He was surprised to find an area that was similar to what witnesses had described. It was about ¾ of a mile long and a few hundred feet wide, and facing the direction witnesses had reported. He also noticed this area had very straight edges, something unusual for a natural occurrence.

His next step was to get out there with a metal detector to see what he could find. He began making trips to the site in May 2010. Using a metal detector that could find a piece the size of a BB, three inches below the surface, he would be able to find small pieces, which was exactly his goal. In previous archeological digs in the area they had sifted dirt through screens with holes large enough for very small pieces to fall through. Kimbler figured that if there was anything left it would be very small and perhaps in animal burrows, or ant hills. An ant hill was actually where he found his first piece.



Landsat multi-spectral satellite image showing the debris field. The image clearly shows a burn (or disturbed area) covering the exact location of the debris field as described by witnesses. (image credit: Frank Kimbler)

What he found was a silvery metal that looked aluminum. This was strange because there were no indications of any sort of aluminum objects in the area. He occasionally found tin, which would come from parts of tin roofs blowing around, and some nails. He eventually found more of these silvery pieces, and says they looked shredded. Some of the edges even appear melted. He also found some aluminum buttons that appear to be the type used on military fatigues in the later 40’s. If that is the case it demonstrates that the military was in the area.




The buttons. Tentatively identified as military fatigue buttons late 40's early 50's. (image credit: Frank Kimbler)

Kimbler felt the small silvery pieces were interesting enough for further analysis. To get some help he went to theRoswell International UFO Museum and Research Center. Located in downtown Roswell, the museum is the main hub for Roswell UFO crash research. He showed the material to the museum’s director, Julie Shuster, and was able to meet with researcher Don Schmitt. They decided to fund the first test which was done by New Mexico Tech in Socorro. Using a micro-probe, they were able to determine the material’s composition. It turned out to be an aluminum, silicon, manganese, copper alloy. It is not unknown, but it is used in construction and not usually found in a foil form.

This further inspired Kimbler to get some isotope work done on the piece. Kimbler says the isotope work is so important because the ratios are “very much like our fingerprints.” Certain concentrations of elements on earth are unique to Earth. So if you know isotopic ratios for magnesium, it will be the same for anything on earth with magnesium, but if it is not from Earth, it will have a different ratio. For instance meteorites have different ratios because they are not from Earth. Isotopic analysis is necessary to determine if a material is from Earth or another world.



Some of the metal alloy fragments found buried and scattered over the debris field area. (image credit: Frank Kimbler)

Kimbler went to the University of New Mexico Institute of Meteoritics, and talked to their expert on isotopes to get an analysis done. Kimbler had not told the expert anything about the samples. He looked Kimbler “square in the eye” and told him that the only reason he would want to get this sort of test done is because he suspected the material was from outer space. He wanted to know where the material was from, and when Kimbler told him he refused to do the test, stating that the idea of a spaceship crashing at Roswell was “a bunch of hooey.” One of the other scientists in the office actually argued the point that if it is something unusual, the importance of that possibility makes it worth taking a look at. However, the expert didn’t budge and refused to do the work. The second scientist was a micro-probe specialist at the University and although he could not do any isotope work, he was able to get more specific information about the material’s composition and confirm the early work that had been done.

Bigelow Aerospace showed some interest in helping Kimbler with his analysis, but after spending months with little results, Kimbler had to go elsewhere. Kimbler was able to find another lab with multiple certifications willing to do the work. The UFO Museum put up the money, and the results were back in five days. Kimbler says he almost fell over when he saw the information. The ratios were off, and as he puts it there were only two answers to explain the results, “either the lab made an analytical error or the material is not from Earth.”





Magnesium isotope fractionation chart modified from the graph used by Dr. Peter Sturrock in his analysis of the Ubatuba UFO fragment. Magnesium bearing compounds, metals, and minerals should all plot on or very close to the line. A chondite is a type of meteorite and since it does not originate from Earth does not plot on the line. The Roswell AH-1 alloy plots way of the line. The AH-1 plot is an anomaly that is either an analytical error or the material is not from Earth. More testing is needed to verify the data to see if it is an error or its from another world. (image credit: Frank Kimbler)

However, Kimbler’s work is not finished. He says, “Following good scientific method protocol one set of data is not going to cut it.” In order to prove the lab did not make a mistake he needs to get more work done. He says he does have two more certified labs lined up to do more isotopic testing to confirm the work done thus far, and that he may have this work done within the next few weeks. Kimbler says in order to confirm the material is not from Earth, it is necessary to have two or three labs showing the same results.

Another important aspect of the material being aluminum and showing unearthly origins is that aluminum must be manufactured. Unlike some natural elements, such as gold or silver that can be found as nuggets in its raw form, aluminum is not found in nature. If this proves to be material not of this earth, it means this was something that was manufactured elsewhere. Thus far humans are not manufacturing anything in space, let alone something that would fall out of space and land outside of Roswell in a location where an alleged spacecraft was found in 1947.

Kimbler says he is being careful before making any definitive claims, but he is “hopeful.” He says certified labs don’t normally make mistakes, and that these people who did the work are some of the best in the business.

The implications if Kimbler’s material turns out to be of extraterrestrial origins and manufacture are of course startling. Could he have the smoking gun to prove we are being visited by an intelligent civilization from another planet, and that they crashed outside of Roswell in 1947? Kimbler says he will keep us up to date, and has been gracious enough to provide us with pictures of the material and the analysis.

Listen to Frank Kimbler discussing his finding on Open Minds Radio.

Note: Most captions provided by Frank Kimbler.








New Mexico Tech microprobe data shows element composition of AH-1. Na and Cl values from small salt crystals embedded on the surface analysis shows AH-1 contains AL Si Mg Mn and Cu with small amounts of Fe. (image credit: Frank Kimbler)

## CH3





University of New Mexico microprobe data shows element composition. Verified the NMT data with analysis showing AL Si Mg Mn Cu with a some Fe. (image credit: Frank Kimbler)







Magnesium isotope values from the certified lab that did the analysis. (image credit: Frank Kimbler)





AH-1 alloy element composition from the same lab. Shows the AH-1 alloy is a AL-Mg-Mn-Si-Cu alloy. (image credit: Frank Kimbler)




AH-1 under magnification shows banded or layered structures in AH-1. (image credit: Frank Kimbler)




AH-1 under magnification shows more areas of banding. (image credit: Frank Kimbler)
Share and Enjoy:

Thursday, June 6, 2013

The Dechmont Woods UFO Encounter Recalled






 This is another old report and worth recalling. A lot of the details are quite different from other reports while the witness appears highly reliable. Again what is observed is another plausible configuration for a Magnetic Field Exclusion Vessel (MFEV). Better, we also observe two drones. These have been seen before in other reports and this is by far the best inasmuch as they actually interacted with the witness.

The stems with propellers were plausibly docking devices for the drones. I do not imagine that the 'propellers' were ever rotating. Yet a three leaf petal would be ideal for capturing and securing a spherical drone. This would be necessary as both craft use magnetic field exclusion preventing close docking without a mechanical assist.

We are steadily building up a data base of close observation of these craft and much detail is been added. Not all craft are the same, nor even of the same origin, but all conform to the MFEV protocol described in my article on reverse engineering the UFO. There is additional indication that these craft also have gravity management hardware aboard, otherwise it is doubtful that they could operate as tightly as they appear to do.

The Dechmont Woods Encounter

Posted: 23 May 2013 12:08 PM PDT



Robert Taylor was sixty-one-years-old at the time that he had the most unusual encounter of his life. He was an unassuming man, steady, phlegmatic, with a thick brush of white hair and a craggy outdoorsman's face. He liked a pint, and a dram too, but not when he was working. He smoked, but not too many. He had worked as a forester all of his adult life in the Dechmont woods located in Livingston, West Lothian, Scotland. On the morning of Friday, November 9, 1979, Mr Taylor set off that morning, with his red setter Lara, to check the woods on Dechmont Law for stray sheep and cattle. It was a damp day and, after he had parked the van and set off down the forest track, even the noise of the Edinburgh-Glasgow motorway was muffled by thick, dark fir trees. The dog ran, and Mr Taylor's trudging wellingtons made the only sound. Then he turned a corner into a clearing filled with light, and saw it...a UFO!


The object was a dark gray color, and its texture was like an emery board: small brighter highlighted areas against a darker background. The appearance of the exterior seemed to change from time to time. Taylor thought that the UFO was attempting to camouflage itself. He estimated the size of the object as 18-20 feet around, and about 12 feet high. It looked to be mounted on a ring, making the object look like a hat with a brim. There were also protruding from the outside of the craft stems topped by propellers. Nothing at the time moved on the object.
[this is very odd and inexplicable and non conforming to other sightings - arclein]


Suddenly, two small spheres rushed at him. They were like the large craft, only a much smaller version. They made a sound as they moved toward him, as spikes on the outside made ground contact. They stopped by his side, and attached themselves to his trousers. They began to drag him back to the UFO. He also was sickened by an extremely strong smell which caused him to pant for air. He soon lost consciousness.


When Taylor came to, the UFO and the smaller spheres were gone. His red setter was still with him. The dog was unsettled, running around the area, and barking madly. Trying to holler at the setter, he had no voice. He could not stand either. Eventually, he crawled back the way he had come for about 300 feet. In time, he was able to stand up and walk back to his pick-up. He attempted to contact the forestry headquarters with his two-way radio, but found his voice was still not back.


Taylor tried to go back home in his pick-up truck, but only got stuck in the mud. He then began the long walk back to his house, approximately a mile distance, and finally arrived at 11:15 AM. His entire experience had lasted just over an hour. His voice had now returned. He had developed a headache, and a great thirst by the time he came to his home. It took some two days for his thirst to abate, though he could still smell remnants of the awful odor from the small spheres. He generally felt ill.


Arriving at this house, his wife was stunned to see his condition. He was covered with mud, and his pants were torn. He began to tell her the story of his experience. His wife wanted to call the police, but Taylor was against it, considering the subject of the matter. He did allow her to call his job supervisor, and the head of the forestry department, Malcom Drummond. He took a bath while she made the calls.


Drummond called a physician, and drove straight to Taylor's house. He was so anxious to find out what happened that he questioned him while he was still in the bathtub. Taylor and Drummond agreed that there must be some kind of physical evidence left on the ground by either the craft or the small spheres, and Drummond headed to the area to check it out, but he was unable to find the exact location.




Dr. Gordon Adams arrived and began to check out Taylor's condition. He found a grazed area on Taylor's left leg, and another graze under his chin. There were no apparent head injuries. At this time, anyway, Taylor's body temperature, blood pressure, and other body functions seemed normal. Adams called in for an ambulance to transport Taylor to the hospital for a head X-ray and an interview with a counselor. Taylor refused to make the hospital visit until later.


After Drummond came back to Taylor's house, the two men set out to return to the scene of the UFO, and attack of the small spheres. They found the ground markings, and called the police. Shortly thereafter, Taylor, accompanied by his wife, went to the hospital for the X-ray, but he was kept waiting so long, he decided to leave unattended. He was anxious to make a planned trip to see relatives on the weekend.


Soon, the press heard about the encounter in the woods, and by Sunday, it was known about all over the United Kingdom. News of the event was known all over the world within a week. The story would be the subject of television documentaries, magazines, and books. The company that Taylor worked for even erected a plaque at the site, commemorating the event. It was later stolen.


The local police department had no experience in dealing with UFO cases. Because of this, at least they never discounted Taylor's description of the incident. They did take testimony from Taylor, his wife, and Dr. Adams. Because an assault was involved, the police were required to send his clothing of that day for forensic examination. A cursory overview showed that both of his pant legs were torn at the hip area. Also found by the exam were traces of a powder.


This powder turned out to be nothing more than a maize starch which was transferred to the trousers by the bag they were sent in. The police also checked for any flights that might have occurred that day of planes, helicopters, or any other equipment that might have been in the area. Nothing was found, and none of the forestry equipment matched the marks found at the scene.




There were two types of ground markings found at the scene. The first marks were two parallel ladder-like tracks, each about 2.5 meters long, and the same distance apart. There were also 40 holes around the tracks. They were 10 centimeters across. To cut to the chase, there was ample physical evidence to prove that "something" had been on the spot that Taylor indicated. Taylor was known by many people in the area, and they all viewed him as honest and responsible. There is nothing to indicate that he would hoax an incident of this nature. He did have a history of several illnesses, and surgeries, but there was nothing in his medical history that would indicate he had any type of head injury or psychosis.


There would also be a timeline done by an investigator to determine the length of time that Taylor was unconscious. This accounting indicated that he was probably out of it for about twenty minutes, give or take.


“I know what I saw,” said Mr Taylor. So stringently did he stick to his tale (and kept a camera with him ever after, to take the aliens' pictures if they ever came for him again) that the police opened a criminal investigation for assault, the only one in Britain to arise from a UFO “sighting”. It remains open.


Mr Taylor's neighbors proving much more skeptical, he eventually moved away to an undisclosed address. But he also became the most famous “witness” to aliens in Britain. His trousers were taken to spiritualist meetings to be analyzed by psychics (“I feel pain from these trousers”), and on anniversaries of the sighting UFO-spotters would gather in the clearing, just on the off-chance.


The aliens, meanwhile, did not give up. Since that November day they have filled the skies of West Lothian with glimmering discs, strange lights and bouncing balls of fire. The “Falkirk Triangle” now registers more UFO sightings, around 300 a year, than any other spot on Earth. A good many happen outside the Forge restaurant in Bonnybridge, where fireballs sail over the trees and “wingless planes” are seen in the fields. Some experts say West Lothian may be a “thin place”, offering a window from the Earth into another dimension. 


If we take Taylor's account as is, he was abducted by something "other-worldly" on November 9, 1979 for about twenty minutes. There has been no evidence presented to discount his story. By all accounts Taylor was well respected by friends, neighbors, co-workers, etc., and never attempted to make money from his alleged experience.


Robert Taylor passed away on March 14, 2007, aged 88.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Trans-en-Provence UFO Incident





This is an old report from 1981, but it was well documented and the physical traces were also fully investigated.

It is the best confirmation yet of the technology conjecture that I made in my article titled ‘Reverse Engineering the UFO’  that I placed in Viewzone. And posted here also.




I noticed in this report that we have the craft behaving exactly as a magnetic field exclusion vessel would.  No thrusters are observer and it lands heavily as if it was a pilot error even though it was travelling at survivable speeds close to the ground.  Perhaps the pilot was out practicing.

Once he settled down, he reengaged the craft, got lift established and then tilted the craft in the direction of departure.  The most important observation is that this is exactly how one would fly a magnetic field exclusion vessel.

This is an important addition to the many current observations of the crafts in flight as it displays take off procedures.




The Trans-en-Provence, France UFO Incident


FRIDAY, MARCH 18, 2011



Left to right: Dr. Jacques F. Vallee. Dr. Michel Bounias and the witness, Mr. Renato Nicolai

On the afternoon of January 8, 1981, a strange craft landed on a farm near the village of Trans-en-Provence in the Var region in southeastern France. Physical traces left on the ground were collected by the Gendarmerie within 24 hours and later analyzed in several French government laboratories. Extensive evidence of anomalous activity was detected.

The case was investigated by the Groupe d'Etudes des Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non-identifiés (GEPAN), or Unidentified Aerospace Phenomena Study Group, established in 1977 within the National Center for Space Studies (CNES) in Toulouse, the French counterpart of NASA. (The functions of GEPAN were reorganized in 1988 into the Service d'Expertise des Phénomènes de Rentrées Atmosphériques or SEPRA). The primary investigator was Jean-Jacques Velasco, the current head of SEPRA.

The witness was the farmer Renato Nicolai, 55, on whose property the UFO landed and then took-off almost immediately. Thinking that it was a military experimental device, Nicolai notified the local gendarmes on the following day. The gendarmes interviewed Nicolai and collected soil and plantsamples from the landing site within 24 hours of the occurrence, notifying GEPAN on January 12 as part of a cooperation agreement for UFO investigation between the two agencies. Further collection of samples and measurements of the site were undertaken by the GEPAN team, and the samples were thoroughly analyzed by several government laboratories.

The first detailed report on the case was published by GEPAN in 1983 in its "Technical Note No. 16, Inquiry 81/01, Analysis of a Trace."



The Trans-en-Provence Case


A celebrated physical evidence case occurred on January 8, 1981, in Trans-en-Provence, France. The case attracted widespread interest, partly because a UFO was seen landing and physical markings found shortly after it departed, but mostly because a French government agency analyzed the samples and announced anomalous results.

The actual sighting was brief, but its effects on the environment were the key aspect of the event. A 52-year-old technician, Renato Nicolai, was outside working on an upper-level terraced portion of his property at about 5:00 p.m. when he heard a whistling sound to the east. Turning, he observed an object resembling "a somewhat bulging disk like two plates glued to each other by the rim, with a central ring some 20 cm wide." The disc passed over two trees adjacent to Nicolai's garden, descended, and abruptly landed about 50 meters away. Because his property was elevated, however, the object was blocked from his view, and Nicolai was obliged to seek a vantage point near a small outbuilding where he could look down on the object.

After some seconds on the ground, the object ascended, kicking up some dust, and retraced its incoming flight path, once again emitting a low whistle, and disappeared in the east. As it flew away, Nicolai saw two round protrusions on the underside like landing gear, and two circular areas that looked like "trap doors." The total elapsed time was 30-40 seconds.

Nicolai went to inspect the landing site and found a circle about 2 meters in diameter with tracks or traces at certain spots on the circumference of the circle. Investigators described findingtwo concentric circles about 10 cm wide, one 2.2 meters in diameter and the other 2.4 meters in diameter. The next day, after having been notified by a neighbor, the Gendarmerie arrived at the scene and gathered samples of the traces and control samples from outside the circular area.

Ultimately, Groupe d'Etude des Phenomenes Aerospatiaux Non-ldentifies (GEPAN) -- a unit of the French space agencyorganized to investigate UFO reports -- was called in by the Gendarmerie, and some days after the landing they examined the site, collecting additional soil and vegetation samples for analysis. Their investigation also included an assessment of the witness (his background and story), a check of atmospheric conditions at the time of the UFO encounter, and air traffic on the day in question. GEPAN, in conjunction with the Gendarmerie, continued its investigation over the course of the next two years.

No terrestrial or mundane cause for the event could be discovered. When the final report, entitled, Technical Note 16, was released, it reached the following conclusions:

1. Evidence indicates a strong mechanical pressure on the ground surface, probably due to a heavy weight, of about 4 to 5 tons.

2. At the same time or immediately after this pressure, the soil was heated up to between 300 and 600 degrees C.

3. Trace quantities were found of phosphate and zinc.

4. The chlorophyll content of the wild alfalfa leaves in the immediate vicinity of the ground traces was reduced 30 percent to 50 percent, inversely proportional to distance.

5. Young alfalfa leaves experienced the highest loss of chlorophyll and, moreover, exhibited "signs of premature senescence."

6. Biochemical analysis showed numerous differences between vegetation samples obtained close to the site and those more distant. - 'The UFO Evidence: Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report' - Richard H. Hall




Surface evidence magnified

-----

Renato Nicolai's Testimony


"My attention was drawn to a small noise, a kind of little whistling. I turned around and I saw, in the air, a ship which was just about the height of a pine tree at the edge of my property. This ship was not turning but was descending toward the ground. I only heard a slight whistling. I saw no flames, neither underneath or around the ship.


"While the ship was continuing to descend, I went closer to it, heading toward a little cabin. I was able to see very well abovethe roof. From there I saw the ship standing on the ground.


"At that moment, the ship began to emit another whistling, a constant, consistent whistling. Then it took off and once it was at the height of the trees, it took off rapidly... toward the northeast. As the ship began to lift off, I saw beneath it four openings from which neither smoke nor flames were emitting.The ship picked up a little dust when it left the ground.


"I was at that time about 30 meters [100 feet] from the landing site. I thereafter walked towards the spot and I noticed a circle about two meters [7 feet] in diameter. At certain spots on the curve of the circle, there were tracks (or traces).


"The ship was in the form of two saucers upside down, one against the other. It must have been about 1.5 meters [5 feet] high. It was the color of lead. The ship had a border or type of brace around its circumference. Underneath the brace, as it took off, I saw two kinds of round pieces which could have been landing gear or feet. There were also two circles which looked like trap doors. The two feet, or landing gear, extended about 20 centimeters [8 inches] beneath the body of the whole ship."
-----



The samples of soil and wild alfalfa collected from the landing site, as well as the control samples from varying distances from the epicenter, were subjected to a number of analyses: physico-chemical analysis at the SNEAP laboratory, electronic diffraction studies at Toulouse University, mass spectrometry by ion bombardment at the University of Metz, and biochemical analysis of the vegetable samples at the National Institute of Agronomy Research (INRA), among others. The findings report included the following statements:


"Traces were still perceptible 40 days after the event.


"There was a strong mechanical pressure forced (probably the result of a heavy weight) on the surface.


"A thermatic heating of the soil, perhaps consecutive to or immediately following the shock, the value of which did not exceed 600 degrees.


"The chlorophyll pigment in the leaf samples was weakened from 30 to 50 percent... The young leaves withstood the most serious losses, evolving toward the content and composition more characteristic of old leaves."


"The action of nuclear irradiation does not seem to be analogous with the energy source implied with the observed phenomenon; on the other hand, a specific intensification of the transformation of chlorophyll... could be tied to the action of a type of electric energy field.


"On the biochemical level, the analysis was made on the entirety of the factors of photosynthesis, lipids, sugars and amino acids. There were many differences between those samples further from the spot of the landing and those that were closer to the spot.


"It was possible to qualitatively show the occurrence of an important event which brought with it deformations of the terrain caused by mass, mechanics, a heating effect, and perhaps certain transformations and deposits of trace minerals.


"We cannot give a precise and unique interpretation to this remarkable combination of results. We can state that there is, nonetheless, another confirmation of a very significant event which happened on this spot."


-----


Elapsed Time Event Comments


0-3 secs Witness first sees the object which appears to be above two tall conifers approx 35 m from the impact point. Distance estimate is based on map and statement that the cabin is 35 m away from impact point; comparison of that distance on the map[8] with the distance to the tree suggests an additional 35 m to the tree.


3 secs Object strikes the ground with a sound like a stone falling. The motion from the trees to the impact point is fast and continuous. Assuming the distance from the impact point to be 35m for the top of the tree, and assuming the altitude to be above the tree (stated to be "dozens of meters high"[9],[10]); because of the error in translation, resolved to 10 m, we take 10 m as the altitude of the object; the distance traversed between first sight and impact is therefore 14 m.


The following assume a constant deceleration:


The deceleration based on a 3 second time to cross this distance is -0.32G from a speed of 34 kph.


According to Velasco, an upper limit to the weight based on the ground trace is 700 kg. To accomplish the noted deceleration at that weight would require a thrust of 7,171 kg.


4-25 secs Object is on the ground and the witness is continuing to move to a new location. Assuming 8 secs to walk 10m (a reasonably brisk walk), walking 30 m takes 24 secs, of which it is assumed 1-2 secs are used while object is descending, since the report refers to "while it was continuing to come down, I went closer by walking".


25-28 secs Witness observes the object on the ground. According to the statement: "several seconds"; also, "From that position I clearly saw the device resting on the ground."


28-35 secs Object lifts from the ground, tilts, and departs. Altitude appears to be that of the tops of the trees, here estimated to be 10 m ("it lifted off... reaching a point above the trees, it left at high speed").


It took from 1-3 secs to accomplish this.


The following assume a constant acceleration / deceleration:


If it took 3 sec, then it accelerated at approximately 0.45 G for 1.5 sec to 5 m and then decelerated at -0.45G to 10 m; the thrust required in the acceleration phase is 10,204 kg assuming a 700 kg weight.


If it took 1 sec, it accelerated at approximately 4G for 0.5 sec to 5 m and then decelerated at -4G for 0.5 sec to 10 m; the thrust required in the acceleration phase is 91,840 kg, assuming a 700 kg weight.


The GEPAN account differs somewhat, claiming "it rose vertically over several meters, tilted above the platform, continued to rise in this position and disappeared in the sky." Hopefully "several" is 10 or so.


-----

Description Of The Trace Evidence


The trace was found by the witness immediately after the departure of the object. The trace was circular, 2.4 m in diameter, and had the form of a ring, 0.2 m in width (it is claimed that there is a "crown" to the trace which is only 0.1 m in width. Note that the witness reported the object surrounded by a shelf approximately 0.15 m in width.


Photographs show the trace as lighter in color than the surrounding dirt. Vegetation remains (leaves and sticks) from the edges of the path where the object landed are seen to cross the trace (as of the next day). There does not appear to be any preferential orientation for this material, nor does it appear affected by pressure or heating. In combination, this indicates the possibility that either a) the force which produced the trace had no outward and no inward components, or b) the material was swept back over the trace either at or after the object departure. Note that the witness mentioned the object's departure as having raised some dust.


The soil of the trace is lighter than neighboring soil, appears to be slightly raised or crusty, and bears radial striations. These striations are not perfectly radial, but are slightly curved in a clockwise direction, and are slightly irregular. The trace ring shows these formations most prominently on the directly east and west sides of the ring. The north side of the trace shows a slightly lower degree of the same effect.


The width of the ring as photographed and diagrammed shows no notable deviation, nor does the circularity of the ring show any notable deviation. - GEPAN - "Technical Note No. 16, Inquiry 81/01, Analysis of a Trace"


-----



Overall Conclusion


The Trans-en-Provence UFO observation lasted under a minute. However, in that minute, information was gained by an alert witness and extracted by focused and experienced investigators which allow an analyst to form and validate hypotheses about the nature of the object.


The Trans-en-Provence UFO was able to dissipate considerable kinetic energy without affecting the ground beneath it. This may have resulted in the observed "whistling" sound, which indicates a motion of air away from the object. The object was then able to create close to 600 degrees C of ground heating on departure, despite the apparent insufficiency of mere thrust pressure to produce those temperatures. It then departed after tilting, and did not produce any further effects on the environment at that time.


Many previous observations have indicated that the UFO rim is a source of energetic phenomena. The Trans-en-Provence case continues to support that pattern.


Sources:

"The UFO Evidence: Volume II: A Thirty-Year Report" - Richard H. Hall – 2000

Jean-Jacques Velasco - "Report on the Analysis of Anomalous Physical Traces: The 1981 Trans-en-Provence UFO Case," – 1990

Michel Bounias - "Research Note: Further Quantification of Distance-Related Effects in the Trans-en-Provence Case," – 1995
www.bibliotecapleyades.net
www.ufoevidence.org
www.scientificexploration.org
www.jacquesvallee.net
www.ufocasebook.com

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Alien Cadaver? With Dr. Greer





Dr Greer, who has made himself a center for UFO – ET disclosure is presently working on an apparent corpse of a very small humanoid shaped entity and has been able to collect excellent samples for DNA work.  This gives us a second clear DNA sample of a likely alien.  The other one is the Starchild.  The Starchild is undoubtedly alien by current DNA work.

Unless DNA work is done, every feature out of terran synch can be dismissed as a pathological abnormality, however intellectually specious.

What is more Dr Greer appears to have resources and media support able to distribute the information.  He is working toward establishing full disclosure of the ET reality that appears isolated with Chinese walls in government service.

One argument that I disagree with is the idea that we have received any guidance in terms of scientific progress.  That is nonsense.  At best we have recognized possibilities only.  I long ago used the UFO phenomena to ask key questions, ultimately answered in my article titled ‘Reverse engineering of the UFO’  I published after certain key lab results became available that confirmed my conjectures.

Besides, if I handed you a sample of a UFO skin, I am certain you would fail to inspect it properly or immediately dismiss it.  You have to be properly prepared in terms of working physics.  We are now getting there.


Published October 18, 2012 | By drgreer


After many weeks of travel, we are back to report that amazing results have been obtained from our study of the small possible ET body which was discussed in an earlier blog post.

Dr. Bravo, Emery Smith and I traveled to the country that is now home to this small possible ET body and were able to successfully obtain extensive X-Ray and CT Scans of the entire body. We were also able to obtain DNA samples under sterile, surgical conditions. These DNA samples are now being studied by one of the world’s top geneticists.

The X-Ray and CT scan show an intact, actual biological humanoid organism, without question. Astonishing 3-D images were able to be constructed of the  body from the detailed CT scan, and we were able to see internal organs such as lungs and what I am fairly sure is a heart structure.

These images have just been examined by the world’s foremost authority on skeletal abnormalities, dysplasias and fetal skeletal syndromes and he has stated that this being is unlike any known skeletal structure found in humans. We also know that it is not an ancient hominid, and while humanoid, not apparently human.

Both this expert as well as the radiologist who is head of the imaging center where all X-rays and CTs were done have stated that the bone density precludes the body being that of a 20-22 week aborted human fetus.  There is just too much calcium in the bone for this being to have been the result of a fetus of that age. Both doctors feel that the being was post-natal at the time of death (that is had lived for some time outside the womb, if indeed a womb is involved…).

The procedures for the DNA studies are complex and time-consuming. Literally the state-of-the-art technology available on earth will be brought to bear on this study, and the team of experts are without a doubt the most advanced and professional team that could possibly be assembled. The DNA studies will take around 2 months, and possibly longer.
We hope to provide some of these results, and the detailed CT and X-ray images, in the film Sirius. (See Sirius.Neverendinglight.com)

The STAR team has provided film footage of our trip including the examination and surgical procedures performed on the small being,  as well as the CT scan and X-rays to the A. Kaleka and the Neverending Light team to use in the film Sirius.

We have also completed the Sirius Lecture Event in Santa Monica CA which was a great success and standing room only. A big thank you to all of you who came out to make that event a wonderful and historic event!

We have  transferred to Neverending light hundred of UFO photos, video tapes, dozens of top-secret witness testimony and top-secret government documents as well as other materials for the film At this point there is enough evidence in hand for a 20 part series!  We hope the film Sirius will be completed in December, 2012 and I will be further interviewed by NEL in November prior to our Contact expedition to the CA desert Nov. 10-17.

I would like to thank all of you for the enthusiastic support you have provided to this historic film project Sirius. Without you, none of this would be possible!

Steven M. Greer MD

Published July 28, 2012 | By drgreer

A big thank you to everyone who has supported us atSirius.Neverendinglight.com !

Because of your incredibly generous support, coming from every corner of the globe, we can announce today that A. Kaleka’s production company will be able to be fully funded to complete the feature documentary “Sirius”!

The minimum they needed to do a broadcast quality, major documentary was $250,000 which we now have raised because of all of you!

Of course, this minimum is a minimum. And if we have more networking support from the public we can make an even better, more far-reaching and impactful film. So please contribute  all that you can to support this historic multi-media project.

Further funding will enable us to engage adequate publicity so the wider public learns of the film, do more extensive research on new evidence and ET/UFO cases and develop a multi-media presence that includes the Internet- and more. Let’s make this the number one crowd-funded film in history!

BREAKING NEWS: URGENT

There is a chance that we may be able to include in the film “Sirius” the scientific testing of a possible Extraterrestrial Biological Entity (EBE) that has been recovered and is deceased. This EBE is in the possession of a cooperative institute desiring further scientific evaluation of the possible ET. We cannot reveal at this time the location of this being or the name of the person or persons who possess it.

Dr. Jan Bravo- who is a STAR Board member and a fellow Emergency Physician- and I have actually visited the group that possesses this EBE and have personally and professionally examined the being. It is indeed an actual deceased body, and most certainly is not plastic or man-made. It has a head, 2 arms and 2 legs and is humanoid . We have seen and examined X-Rays of the being. Its anatomy however is not homo sapien (modern human) or any known hominid (predecessors to humans).

As you can imagine, the security and scientific issues surrounding the further testing of this potentially explosive and world- changing evidence are mind-boggling. However, we feel we simply must proceed expeditiously but cautiously. The cost of doing proper MRI testing, full and dispositive  forensic-level DNA testing and carbon dating with other isotope testing are considerable and certainly not currently funded. We must rule out other hominids, bizarre genetic defects and so forth. But it is most certainly an actual biological specimen – and it may be – well, what it looks like.

If you can assist further with funding the campaign for Sirius we will attempt to carry out this scientific inquiry, however daunting it may be. We are currently investigating what these costs will be, but they will certainly be in the tens of thousands of dollars and perhaps more.

Dr. Bravo, myself, Dr. Ted Loder, Professor Emeritus University of New Hampshire, and other scientists who wish to remain confidential will be doing the examinations and testing.  A top DNA lab will be engaged for appropriate DNA evaluation.

The only reason I mention this sensitive matter at this time is that in order for this possible ET body to be properly evaluated and disclosed in “Sirius” – which is planned for completion in December 2012- we must act immediately. We will need your help with funding this and the rest of “Sirius”. And we cannot buy the safety and security that millions of people knowing about what we are doing can afford.  Shadowy classified projects would prefer for us not to proceed, just as they wished that we not proceed with DisclosureProject.org in 2001. But we did. And we are here to tell the tale because millions of people knew what we were doing well before that historic event.

You the public are our shield. You are our protectors, along with providence. While the testing will be confidential and done very discreetly until results are known- the fact that we are pursuing this evidence must be known by millions of people in order for us to be protected. Tell everyone you know-now.

The worst case scenario is that this being is not what it appears to be. But if it is: My God!