I came across this in the NASA newsletter. What took me aback is that I live close enough (like five miles or so) to the telescope at UBC to have picked up any buzz as local news and have not heard about it. It attracted little coverage that I was ever aware of. This article will surely make it much better known.
The astounding cost puts this device well into the budget capabilities of every university. So we can now expect a renaissance of the teaching of astronomy at that level, which I think is actually very appropriate. We really need to do a high resolution scan of the sky that is able to pick up and track every potentially dangerous asteroid or comet out there and that really takes hundreds of dedicated eyeballs. Boring work, but it is the only way you discover the objects.
History and geological history has shown us that a major impact is at best catastrophic to life on Earth. The only way to prevent such an event is early detection. That permits the application of a fine nudge at a very great distance that nicely eliminates the treat. We do not have the hardware today, but we certainly could if we put our minds to it. And it truly behooves us to eliminate such treats once and for all, rather than rely of the god of chance.
The large problem we have here in Vancouver is the high number of cloudy nights. And we do not have a nice tall mountain that gets above them as in Hawaii. On the other hand, when your telescope only costs a million dollars, you do not mind so much. That is actually inside the budget of a wealthy amateur who has a nice piece of desert to retire to.
Maybe we should develop a privately owned telescope farm a few miles outside of Las Vegas and Phoenix, designed to have no exterior lighting to permit unimpeded observation. There are surely a few dozen enthusiasts to support such an operation.
More critically, we clearly can build hundreds of these on earth all over the place and at every university, restoring astronomy to its glory days.
Liquid Mirror Telescopes on the Moon
The astounding cost puts this device well into the budget capabilities of every university. So we can now expect a renaissance of the teaching of astronomy at that level, which I think is actually very appropriate. We really need to do a high resolution scan of the sky that is able to pick up and track every potentially dangerous asteroid or comet out there and that really takes hundreds of dedicated eyeballs. Boring work, but it is the only way you discover the objects.
History and geological history has shown us that a major impact is at best catastrophic to life on Earth. The only way to prevent such an event is early detection. That permits the application of a fine nudge at a very great distance that nicely eliminates the treat. We do not have the hardware today, but we certainly could if we put our minds to it. And it truly behooves us to eliminate such treats once and for all, rather than rely of the god of chance.
The large problem we have here in Vancouver is the high number of cloudy nights. And we do not have a nice tall mountain that gets above them as in Hawaii. On the other hand, when your telescope only costs a million dollars, you do not mind so much. That is actually inside the budget of a wealthy amateur who has a nice piece of desert to retire to.
Maybe we should develop a privately owned telescope farm a few miles outside of Las Vegas and Phoenix, designed to have no exterior lighting to permit unimpeded observation. There are surely a few dozen enthusiasts to support such an operation.
More critically, we clearly can build hundreds of these on earth all over the place and at every university, restoring astronomy to its glory days.
Liquid Mirror Telescopes on the Moon
10.09.2008 October 9, 2008: A team of internationally renowned astronomers and opticians may have found a way to make "unbelievably large" telescopes on the Moon.
"It's so simple," says Ermanno F. Borra, physics professor at the Optics Laboratory of Laval University in Quebec, Canada. "Isaac Newton knew that any liquid, if put into a shallow container and set spinning, naturally assumes a parabolic shape—the same shape needed by a telescope mirror to bring starlight to a focus. This could be the key to making a giant lunar observatory."
Borra, who has been studying liquid-mirror telescopes since 1992, and Simon P. "Pete" Worden, now director of NASA Ames Research Center, are members of a team taking the idea for a spin.
On Earth, a liquid mirror can be made quite smooth and perfect if it its container is kept exactly horizontal and rests on a low-vibration low-friction air bearing that is spun by a synchronous motor having one stable speed. "It doesn't need to spin very fast," says Borra. "The rim of a 4-meter–diameter mirror—the largest I've made in my lab—travels only 3 miles per hour, about the speed of a brisk walk. In the low gravity of the Moon, it would spin even slower."
Most liquid-mirror telescopes on Earth have used mercury. Mercury remains molten at room temperature, and it reflects about 75 percent of incoming light, almost as good as silver. The biggest liquid-mirror telescope on Earth, the Large Zenith Telescope operated by the University of British Columbia in Canada, is 6 meters across—a diameter 20 percent larger than the famous 200-inch mirror of the Hale telescope at Palomar Observatory in California. Yet when completed in 2005, the Canadian Palomar-class liquid-mirror telescope cost less than $1 million to build—only a few percent the cost of a solid-mirror telescope of the same diameter--and, for that matter, only a sixth of Palomar's original cost in 1948.
Those economics are making astronomers sit up and begin noodling out plans for a lunar observatory.
"Our study [with Borra] started when I was still an astronomy professor at the University of Arizona before I came to NASA in 2006," Worden recalls. "The real appeal of this approach is that we could get an unbelievably large telescope on the Moon."
Mercury is unworkable on the Moon: it's very dense and thus heavy to launch, it's very expensive, and it would evaporate quickly when exposed to the lunar vacuum. In recent years, however, Borra and his colleagues have been experimenting with a class of organic compounds known as ionic liquids. "Ionic liquids are basically molten salts," Borra explains. "Their evaporation rate is almost zero, so they would not vaporize in the lunar vacuum. They can also remain liquid at very low temperatures." He and his colleagues are now seeking to synthesize ionic liquids that remain molten even at liquid-nitrogen temperatures.
Much less dense than mercury, ionic liquids are only slightly denser than water. Although not highly reflective themselves, a spinning mirror of an ionic liquid can be coated with an ultrathin layer of silver just as if it were a solid mirror. Weirdest of all, the silver layer is so thin—only 50 to 100 nanometers—that it actually solidifies. In the vacuum of space, a liquid mirror coated with a thin solid layer of silver would neither evaporate nor tarnish.
A liquid mirror can't be tilted away from the horizontal because the fluid would pour out, destroying the mirror. But that does not mean a liquid mirror telescope cannot be pointed. Optical designers are now experimenting with ways of electromechanically warping secondary mirrors suspended above a liquid mirror—or even slightly warping the liquid mirror itself—to aim at angles away from the vertical. Similar techniques are used to point the great Arecibo radio telescope in Puerto Rico.
Furthermore, says Borra, "if the telescope is located anywhere other than exactly at the poles, with each rotation of Earth or Moon it would scan a circular strip of sky. And the rotational axis of the Moon wobbles with a period of 18.6 years; so over a period of 18.6 years, the telescope would actually look at a good-sized region of the sky."
Locating a major liquid-mirror telescope near the lunar poles is appealing. The telescope itself could reside near the bottom of a permanently shadowed crater where it would stay at cryogenic temperatures, desirable for the best infrared astronomy. Yet solar panels could be erected on nearby permanently illuminated mountain peaks to generate power to keep the mirror spinning.
The fact that a liquid-mirror telescope always looks straight up vastly simplifies its construction and reduces mass by eliminating heavy mounts, gearing, and pointing-control systems needed for a steerable telescope. "All you'd need is the liquid-mirror container, which might be an umbrella-like device that self-deploys, plus a nearly frictionless superconducting bearing and its drive motor," Borra says. Worden estimates that all the materials for an entire lunar telescope 20 meters across would be "only a few tons, which could be boosted to the Moon in a single Ares 5 mission in the 2020s." Future telescopes might have mirrors as large as 100 meters in diameter—larger than a football field.
"A mirror that large could peer back in time to when the universe was very young, only half a billion years old, when the first generation of stars and galaxies were forming," Borra exclaimed. "Potentially more exciting is pure serendipity: new things we might discover that we just don't expect."
Says Worden: "Putting a giant telescope on the Moon has always been an idea of science fiction, but it soon could become fact."
