Thursday, December 11, 2025

Oversupply Warning Jolts India's Solar Buildout




This is rapidly evolving and expanding essentially in Chinese and indian Deserts which makes sense because they have the folks

also twenty plus years of mass production has driven costs down and we have discovered that massive spaced shading and even wash water induces grass production underneath and this means pastaurage.  This is also well underway.

It is not perfect but it surely cuts solar intake by half allowing vegetative growth and soil moisture retention.In china we hear of 20,000 sheep.  This surely applies wherever we build these solar farms.



Oversupply Warning Jolts India's Solar Buildout

Sunday, Dec 07, 2025 - 01:20 PM


By Julianne Geiger of OilPrice.com,

India’s solar sector has hit that awkward stage of adolescence where ambition seems to be outpacing demand. And now the adults in the room are issuing critical warnings.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/oversupply-warning-jolts-indias-solar-buildout

A new letter from the clean-energy ministry, quietly circulated to the finance ministry, urges lenders to think twice before showering cash on yet another wave of standalone module factories. When a government that spent the last three years cheerleading capacity expansion suddenly says “maybe don’t,” you can assume the oversupply problem is no longer a theory.


The timing isn’t great for India’s manufacturers. They bulked up with a clear target in mind: the U.S. market. But U.S. tariff walls went up, as did customs scrutiny over Chinese components. This has turned Indian shipments into a slow-moving regulatory piñata. Exports faded. Domestic installations couldn't pick up the slack. And now the ministry is speaking the painful truth that module capacity could climb to 200 GW in the next few years, and cell capacity could climb to 100 GW.

Local demand won’t come close to that.

Translation: keep building like this and you’re manufacturing future bankruptcies.

The subtext here is political as much as economic. India’s decade-long quest to peel itself away from Chinese supply chains has produced a patchwork of incentives, protectionist barriers, and bold proclamations about “solar self-reliance.” But you can only sustain that narrative if the factories you’ve coaxed into existence have somewhere to sell. Right now, many don’t.

The ministry’s preferred solution is to nudge lenders toward funding fully integrated facilities — the kind that run from polysilicon to finished panels.

That would, at least in theory, give India a more defensible position in the global supply chain. But integrated plants require heavy capex, deep technical expertise, and long-term policy stability. India has not always provided the latter.

The smarter read is this: India isn’t abandoning its solar manufacturing push. It’s trying to avoid a bloodbath.

A gentle warning today is cheaper than a mass insolvency cleanup tomorrow. Whether India’s fragmented solar industry takes the hint is another matter entirely.

THE EXTRAORDINARY SUPER-SENSORIAL POWER OF HAIR





A reminder of the surprising utility of hair as a sensing tool.  this goes deeply into the measurable science.

This is obviously subtle and very real.  So is your cell phone as wrell..

We are just starting to see it and are far from mastery.


THE EXTRAORDINARY SUPER-SENSORIAL POWER OF HAIR

What Indigenous Knowledge, Ancient Myth, and Modern Biophysics Reveal About a Misunderstood Organ




Dec 6

Across civilizations, from Indigenous trackers to Hindu sages to biblical heroes, long hair was treated as a source of strength and perception—yet only now do electromagnetic studies reveal the physiological mechanisms that could explain why this knowledge survived while the science behind it was forgotten.

Why Ancient Hair Traditions May Have Been Rooted in Measurable Biology

During the Vietnam War, U.S. Special Forces units—including MACV-SOG, the MIKE Forces, and the CIDG program—recruited Indigenous trackers such as the Montagnards (Rhade, Jarai, and Bahnar), Nùng, Khmer Krom, and Hmong scouts. These men were renowned for their extraordinary ability to move through dense jungle, detect danger, read terrain disturbances, and navigate at night with uncanny precision. American advisers often remarked that these trackers perceived subtle environmental cues long before other soldiers registered anything unusual.



Over the years, a particular story circulated within military circles: some of these Indigenous recruits allegedly saw their tracking abilities diminish after receiving the standard military haircut. Trainers reported that the men felt less aware, less attuned to their surroundings, and more vulnerable during field exercises. According to these accounts, informal tests suggested that long-haired trackers outperformed their cropped-haired counterparts in tasks requiring rapid sensory integration and intuitive threat recognition.

These claims remain unverified through official declassified documents; yet their persistence—across decades and among otherwise sober military professionals—raises an intriguing question: why did this story take root at all?

That said, emerging scientific research—including the biophysical mechanisms explored in this article—suggests that such accounts may not be entirely fanciful. Modern evidence demonstrating that hair functions as an active sensory and bioelectromagnetic structure lends surprising plausibility to traditions, reports, and intuitions once dismissed as superstition. In other words, even if the haircut story cannot be confirmed, the underlying principle it implies—that hair contributes to human perceptual sensitivity—is increasingly supported by measurable biology. What follows is an examination of that evidence.



Indigenous communities themselves would not have been surprised. Across many cultures, hair has long been regarded as an extension of sensory, perceptual, or spiritual awareness. Cutting it is understood not as a cosmetic change, but as a disruption of vitality, intuition, or environmental sensing.

This theme appears again and again across traditions:

The biblical tale of Samson, whose strength faltered when his hair was shorn.²


Esoteric European references to Vril, a subtle life-force said to be concentrated through uncut hair.³


Hindu Rishis, who coiled their long hair to preserve mental clarity and meditative sensitivity.


Sikh and Sufi practices of maintaining kesh—unshorn hair—as a discipline tied to vitality and attentiveness.

Taken symbolically, these stories articulate a shared intuition: hair plays a role in human perception, vitality, and connection to the environment.

Taken literally, they may represent empirical observations encoded in cultural memory.

Recent scientific work—particularly the bioelectromagnetic research of Abrahám A. Embí Sorondo—suggests that these traditions may have been tracking real biophysical phenomena all along.

Hair as Living Electromagnetic Tissue

Contrary to common belief, hair is not simply “dead keratin.” Beneath the skin, the follicle is a complex mini-organ containing more than twenty specialized cell types—stem cells, melanocytes, immune cells, mechanoreceptors, vascular networks, and dense neural innervation.⁴ Among these, the follicular stem cell populations are especially remarkable: they possess pluripotency potential, meaning they can differentiate into multiple tissue types beyond hair itself. In regenerative biology, such pluripotent niches are recognized as dynamic signaling hubs—structures that sense, respond to, and influence their local environment. In the context of perception, this pluripotency implies that the follicle is not a passive appendage factory but an active regulatory and sensory interface, capable of remodeling itself, communicating with the nervous system, and participating in broader bioelectromagnetic signaling processes throughout the skin.

Keep in mind that every time you cut your hair, it requires further tapping the regenerative potential of these stem cells, diverting life energy towards replacing the hair versus other differentiation pathways that could replenish and restore damaged, devitalized, or diseased tissue elsewhere in the body: the heart, the brain, the skin, etc.



The follicle’s metabolism involves active electron transport. Wherever electrons move, electromagnetic fields are produced. Embí’s research documents these fields directly.

Using a simple microscope setup with tiny iron particles mixed into a Prussian Blue solution, Embí was able to see the magnetic fields coming off living hair follicles.⁵ What he found was surprising:

The magnetic field comes off mostly on one side (not evenly all around).


It forms circulating, vortex-like patterns (like a tiny whirlpool of magnetism).


It can pull or move nearby iron particles (because they’re paramagnetic—attracted to magnetic fields).


And it’s strong enough to reach through glass up to 3 millimeters thick.

This is not metaphor or speculation—these are recorded electromagnetic phenomena occurring in real time.

When hair follicles are exposed to specific wavelengths (e.g., green laser light), they emit visible electron trails and occasional micro-flashes of light. These biophotonic emissions correspond to wave interactions and the displacement of electrons—clear signatures of electromagnetic activity.⁶

Another striking piece of evidence comes from the way crystals form during Embí’s experiments. As the water in the iron-containing solution dries around a hair follicle, you can actually see rings of crystals spreading outward in neat, half-circle “waves.” These patterns act like magnetic fingerprints of the follicle’s field. They expand as they move away from the hair—exactly the kind of spreading you’d expect if an electromagnetic field were radiating outward.⁹

The pattern disappears entirely when the follicle’s metabolically active base (the dermal papilla) is removed.

Taken together, these findings support the view of hair as an active bioelectromagnetic emitter, not an inert structure.
Material Responds to Hair’s Fields

One of Embí’s most intriguing findings is a consistent “backward suction” phenomenon during crystallization. As paramagnetic crystals form, they move toward the follicle, against ordinary diffusion gradients.⁹ This suggests that living tissue fields can influence matter organization—not through mystical force but through classical electromagnetic attraction and repulsion.


Embí also found something even more surprising: when he placed a cut piece of hair in front of a living follicle, the cut piece picked up the same crystallization pattern as the follicle—even though the two weren’t touching at all.⁷ It was as if the follicle’s electromagnetic “signature” jumped across the gap and imprinted itself on the detached hair. Embí explains this using standard electromagnetic principles, but the effect definitely hints at a kind of non-classical, non-Hertzian communication happening between biological tissues—a phenomenon that deserves much deeper investigation.

Similarly, multi-species experiments reveal that plant trichomes, ant antennae, mosquito larvae, and human follicles all express detectable electromagnetic profiles that interact through the Lorentz force.¹⁰ Although these effects fit classical physics, they highlight a universal bioelectromagnetic language operating at micro scales.

The Sensory Function of Hair

If hair emits electromagnetic fields, it is equally important that it receives them.

Hair shafts are composed of keratin, a piezoelectric material. When mechanically stressed—by air movement, vibration, or touch—keratin generates an electrical charge. Melanin (whose ‘super human’ properties we have explored previously) within the shaft acts as a broadband semiconductor, capable of absorbing photons and converting them into electrons or heat.⁸

This combination means hair can do several things at once:

A mechanical sensor: Hair can pick up tiny movements—like changes in air flow, vibration, or touch—and send that information to the nervous system. (Think of how even a small breeze on your arm hair gets your attention.)


A photonic sensor: Because melanin absorbs light across a wide spectrum, hair can respond to light energy. (In other words, hair isn’t blind—it interacts with light far more than people realize.)


An electrical transducer: Hair can convert one form of energy into another, such as turning mechanical movement into electrical signals. (This is due to keratin’s piezoelectric properties—similar to certain crystals used in sensors and microphones.)


A dielectric waveguide: The structure of the hair shaft can channel electromagnetic fields along its length, guiding energy the way a fiber-optic cable guides light. (This is what allows hair to act like a tiny antenna.)

Every follicle is surrounded by mechanoreceptors and nerve fibers that relay signals to the central nervous system.¹¹ When hair moves, the follicle senses it. When the follicle emits electromagnetic activity, nearby tissues detect it. EM emissions from hair can influence blood coagulation micro-environments and even alter the behavior of nearby cells.

This contributes to a more nuanced view of hair as part of the somatosensory apparatus. It provides subtle environmental information—air currents, electrical gradients, temperature fluctuations—that the nervous system can integrate.

This also reframes cultural practices of uncut hair. Length increases interaction with environmental fields. It extends the piezoelectric surface area and enhances mechanical leverage on follicular sensors. Long hair may simply give the nervous system more data.


Physiology Written in the Field

Hair does not emit a uniform field across all contexts. Embí’s experiments reveal that the follicle’s electromagnetic profile changes with:

alcohol exposure (field becomes erratic, then gradually recovers)¹²


dehydration


aging (magnetic signatures diminish and become disordered)


cellular stress


nutrient status

This suggests hair is sensitive not only to external signals, but to internal physiological conditions—a potential diagnostic frontier.

Notably, follicles from younger individuals produce clear, curved cyclotron-resonance patterns, while older follicles show weaker, chaotic Lorentz-force patterns. Aging appears to dull electromagnetic coherence, a concept that mirrors broader theories of biological aging as a loss of systemic order.
Where Myth Meets Measurable Phenomena

Across cultures, stories about hair granting power or sensitivity have often been relegated to metaphor. But when examined in light of modern bioelectromagnetism, such stories begin to look less allegorical and more observational.



Indigenous trackers who lose sensitivity after haircuts, Rishis who coil their hair to enhance mental focus, Samson whose strength is tied to uncut hair—all may reflect empirical recognition of hair’s role in regulating perception and vitality.

This is not to claim these traditions anticipated modern electromagnetism. Rather, these cultures likely observed behavioral and perceptual consequences tied to hair length and structure—feedback now visible under the microscope.

Hair Contains DNA—And This Deepens the Scientific Significance

Although most people think of hair as an inert filament of keratin, every living cell in the hair follicle—and even remnants within the shaft’s medulla—contains DNA. This is not merely a biological footnote. It has direct relevance to the emerging biophysical interpretation of hair as an antenna-like structure.

In Your Body’s Hidden Technology: The Scalar Field Between Your Hands
I explored how DNA may function as a helical bioelectromagnetic transceiver, capable of emitting and receiving ultra-weak biophoton signals and potentially longitudinal (“scalar”) components described by Tesla and modern researchers. In Meyl’s extensive experimental work, he demonstrated that DNA radiates and receives electromagnetic signals at specific resonance frequencies, and he proposed that the double helix—with its coiled geometry—acts as a fractal antenna optimized for this form of information transfer.



This means that hair, which is literally built from DNA-governed cellular processes, may inherit not only metabolic and electromagnetic activity but also the geometric and informational properties of helical structures. Hair shafts are assembled from cells whose DNA-based oscillatory behavior and electron-transport metabolism, according to the Meyl model, create ideal conditions for longitudinal-wave coupling.

Thus, the presence of DNA adds an additional dimension to the scientific interpretation of hair: it is not simply a passive filament. It is a biological extension of the same helix-based electromagnetic architecture seen throughout the body.

Where DNA, Scalar Biophysics, and Hair Converge

Meyl’s theory reinforces the idea that helical biological structures naturally generate scalar potentials when oppositely phased waves cancel in the transverse domain, leaving a longitudinal component. The geometry of hair—coiled keratin fibrils layered in nested helices—mirrors this principle.

This framework does not replace classical electromagnetism, nor does it claim that scalar fields have been conclusively proven. Rather, it provides a theoretical context for explaining some of the puzzling features documented in Abrahám Embí’s research, such as:

non-contact transfer of field signatures


directional (“Shepherd’s Hook”) magnetic asymmetry


coherent crystallization waves


intermittent photonic emissions


communication between tissues


changes in field structure based on metabolic state

Embi’s findings, captured entirely through classical electromagnetic interaction, align with the pattern vocabulary of scalar/longitudinal field effects, even though he himself does not make that claim.

In From Prayer to Physics: The Science of Time-Reversed Healing
I elaborated on how phase-conjugate fields, time-reversed wave dynamics, and negentropic information patternsmay operate within the body. These models rely heavily on the ability of helical and fractal structures—especially DNA—to support standing wave potentials that preserve order and restore coherence.

Hair, as a macroscopic, helical, keratin–melanin waveguide, may represent the body’s most external and accessible member of this antenna hierarchy.
A Rediscovered Interface



The combined evidence—biological, cultural, electrophysical, and experimental—strongly supports a reframing of human hair as an active sensory and bioelectromagnetic interface. It communicates information internally and externally, responds to environmental fields, and expresses physiological state through observable emissions.

The ancient intuition that hair enhances perception and vitality may have been grounded in consistent observations of its influence on behavior, awareness, and social signaling. Modern microscopy now provides a physical basis for these observations.

Hair is not an ornament. It is an organ—one whose roles in sensing, regulating, and communicating may be more profound than we have recognized.

At a time when human perception is increasingly mediated by external technologies, recovering an understanding of our own biological sensing systems has practical and philosophical implications. Hair’s subtle capacities invite us to reconsider how human beings interact with the world—not only through sight and hearing, but through fields, currents, and patterns that operate just beyond ordinary awareness.

We may not fully understand the consequences of cutting hair or letting it grow. But it is now clear that hair participates in complex physiological processes, electromagnetic signaling, and environmental perception.

Science is beginning to illuminate what cultures across time already sensed:
hair contributes to the human organism’s ability to gather information, adapt, and remain connected to its environment.

This is not mysticism. It is biology—expanded.
Want To Dive Deeper?

For readers who want to explore these discoveries more deeply, the Science to Sage special issue curated by Karen Elkins offers the most comprehensive visual and conceptual tour of Abrahám Embí Sorondo’s bioelectromagnetic findings to date. Elkins’ editorial work situates Embí’s microscopy within a broader landscape of biophysics, consciousness studies, and ancient insight—making it an invaluable companion resource for understanding the implications of hair as an active field-sensing organ. The issue, which includes extensive imagery, peer-reviewed links, and Embí’s own commentary, can be explored at


For an in-depth conversation about the meaning and implications of this research, supporting members can watch my exclusive interview with Karen Elkins, where we explore the origins of her work, Embí’s discoveries, and the future of bioelectromagnetic biology:
👉





·

Jul 8






Sayer Ji interviews Karen Elkins on recent discoveries proving that human hair is both an antenna and transmitter of bioelectromagnetic energy and information; a discovery confirming the wisdom of the ancients: human hair possesses profound, if not 'super-natural' capabiliities!





Sayer Ji's Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
References

Palo Da Floresta, “Trackers, WWII Special Forces,” in Science to Sage: Bioelectromagnetic—Secrets in the Field, edited by Karen Elkins (2021).


The Holy Bible, Judges 16.


Bulwer-Lytton, Edward. The Coming Race. London: Blackwood, 1871.


Mitoma, C., et al. “Localization of S100A2, S100A4, S100A6, S100A7, and S100P in the Human Hair Follicle.” Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi 105 (2014): 148–156.


Embí, Abrahám A. “Landmark Demonstration: Iron Particles Circulating Around the Hair Follicle.” International Journal of Research – Granthaalayah (2020). https://www.granthaalayahpublication.org/journals-html-galley/25_IJRG20_B09_3750.html


Embí, Abrahám A. “Bioelectromagnetic Recordings of Living Matter.” Journal of Nature and Science 1, no. e55 (2015).


Embí, Abrahám A. “Human Inter-Tissue Bioelectromagnetic Transfer.” International Journal of Research – Granthaalayah (2020).


Gallas, J. M., and G. Eisner. “Melanin: The First Example of a Broad-Band Optical Absorber.” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology (1987).


Embí, Abrahám A. “Dominant Backwards Suction in Hair Follicle Crystallization.” International Journal of Research – Granthaalayah (2020).


Scherlag, Benjamin J., et al. “Imaging the Electromagnetic Field of Plants (Vigna radiata).” Journal of Nature and Science 1, no. e61 (2015).


Tobin, D. J. “The Anatomy and Physiology of the Human Hair.” Clinics in Dermatology 23, no. 4 (2005): 276–285.


Embí, Abrahám A. “The Drunken Hair: Bioelectromagnetic Disruption Following Alcohol Exposure.” International Journal of Research – Granthaalayah (2020).

† Ji, Sayer. “Your Body’s Hidden Technology: The Scalar Field Between Your Hands.” Substack, 2025.

The Real Reason They Want Universal Basic Income




A little disturbing, but still misses the key point.  Bassic income must translate into a basic job.  civilization still demands massive human effort and much effort is still avoided.

The biome demands hands on management.  All animal husbandry done properly means fence managementy and movement management for an optimal outcome and a human benefit.  That alone can keep everyone busy.

The idea of using it to manipulate population is a NAZI wet dream


The Real Reason They Want Universal Basic Income 

They call it “free money,” but the price is obedience. COVID was the test run—and now the real plan begins.






Dec 6



Grok AI says COVID vaccines are “absolutely safe and effective.”

Meanwhile, other bots are literally telling people how to end their lives.

This isn’t a glitch—it’s part of the plan. A look inside the mindset of the people designing the systems that will soon decide what you’re allowed to say, believe, and do.

Now, those same people want to guide you through mass unemployment with “universal high income.”

So ask yourself: is this really who you want in charge of your money, your voice, and your children’s future?

To give you a brief overview, the UN, WEF, international bankers, and technocrats are planning to collapse the world as we know it through a planned demolition. Their goal is to rebuild into the digital age. You may have heard it called the Great Reset, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, or the Golden Age—all the names that are far more palatable than the coming reality, which will see everyone locked in a digital prison of 24/7 surveillance, monitoring, and slavery. And it will indeed be slavery, because after the AI takeover, humans will be left with no work, no money, and no purpose.

The proposed solution to this is “free” money. A universal basic income—or universal high income, as Elon Musk calls it. It will be a nominal amount of digital currency paid to you by the powers that be, as long as you comply with what they tell you. If their plan succeeds, you won’t be able to survive without their digital currency. That is their plan and they’ve clearly outlined it in multiple texts.

Zeee Media reported on this in depth two years ago. You can watch that report here. It’s vitally important.

So, how when can we expect this plan to come to fruition? What would you say if we told you it’s already here?

Today, we’re digging into the worldwide rollout of universal basic income, what that means for humanity, and what you can do to prepare and fight back.



Tonight’s report opened with a look back at Andrew Yang’s push for universal basic income (UBI).

In 2019 and 2020, the public wasn’t ready to embrace something so sweeping. But once technocrats gained serious influence over global policy and the digital future, the landscape changed. What was once dismissed as a fringe idea has quietly moved into the mainstream, reshaped as part of a broader global transformation.

That shift became easier to grasp after hearing how many tech elites envision humanity’s future. Yuval Noah Harari, for example, once said people will be drugged and distracted because their lives will be “meaningless.” Remarks like that revealed how the architects of the coming system view the average person—not as empowered individuals, but as managed subjects.

The pandemic years only intensified that picture. What had long been called a conspiracy—including the Great Reset—became visible in plain sight, embedded in the proposals and language of global institutions. A “mass awakening” followed.

One idea connected it all: digital ID. Once identity is tied to behavior and access to money, control isn’t imposed—it’s embedded. The result is a shift toward a social-credit-style model, where participation depends on compliance.






First-ever drug to repair DNA and regenerate damaged tissue is here



We so need this.  It reverses cellular damage, particularly the heart but not limited to it.

This is great news and perhaps two tears out.


All good.

First-ever drug to repair DNA and regenerate damaged tissue is here


December 04, 2025


New drug could repair damage caused by serious events like heart attack


After two decades in the making, scientists have cracked the code on a drug that can repair DNA, setting the scene for a new class of therapeutics that can fix tissue damage that occurs through heart attack, inflammatory disease and other conditions.


Researchers at Cedars-Sinai made the breakthrough after first developing a technique to isolate progenitor cells from the heart. These cells, much like stem cells, can form new healthy tissue but in a more targeted way. In other words, these cells taken from the heart can help restore function to that organ.


Medical scientist Eduardo Marbán – then at Johns Hopkins and now Cedars-Sinai – found that heart progenitor cells also have a special mechanism where they send out sacs, known as exosomes, which carry molecules of DNA, RNA and protein between cells and can repair and regenerate damaged tissue.

“Exosomes are like envelopes with important information,” said first author Ahmed Ibrahim, PhD, MPH, an associate professor in the Department of Cardiology in the Smidt Heart Institute. “We wanted to take apart these coded messages and figure out which molecules were, themselves, therapeutic.”


The team worked to unpack what was in those healing sacs, sequencing the exosomal RNA material and finally landeing on one molecule that was more prominent than others. Focusing on this one RNA molecule, animal studies confirmed the researchers' hypothesis that it played a key role in facilitating tissue repair.

Fast-forward two decades and the scientists have finally fabricated this naturally occurring RNA molecule in the lab – the synthetic healer known as TY1.

“By probing the mechanisms of stem cell therapy, we discovered a way to heal the body without using stem cells,” said senior author Marbán, MD, PhD, executive director of the Smidt Heart Institute at Cedars-Sinai. “TY1 is the first exomer – a new class of drugs that address tissue damage in unexpected ways.”


TY1 has the structure of existing RNA drugs, and works like its natural version – amplifying the activity of the Trex1 gene, which increases the activity of immune cells that rally around damaged DNA and clear out the junk, allowing for the repair and regeneration to take place. This process is critical in the wake of a heart attack to minimize cellular scarring left from the event.

Studies have demonstrated that DNA damage plays a critical role in the development of pressure overload–induced heart failure, dilated cardiomyopathy and aging-related cardiac conditions, and this damage to myocardial tissue is a large factor in how well someone recovers from a heart attack. Essentially, the less damage you have the better your long-term prognosis. Stimulating the cellular "recovery team," through this novel experimental drug, boosts the body's ability to repair itself.

And it doesn't stop at heart tissue damage repair.

“By enhancing DNA repair, we can heal tissue damage that occurs during a heart attack,” Ibrahim said. “We are particularly excited because TY1 also works in other conditions, including autoimmune diseases that cause the body to mistakenly attack healthy tissue. This is an entirely new mechanism for tissue healing, opening up new options for a variety of disorders.”

Following on from animal models, TY1 will next be studied in a clinical trial. If the drug performs as expected in humans, it paves the way for a new class of therapeutics that can help mitigate a broad range of cellular damage caused by both sudden adverse events and chronic inflammatory conditions.

The study was published in the journal Science Translational Medicine.

mRNA long term persistence.





First off we were all lied to and the intent was to inject this crap in as many of us as possible.  Certainly it was not to counter a faux pandemic ginned up to push the JAB.  What we are now learning is not good news though the ultimate impact remains obscure.  I also suspect that the perps had a poor understanding of all this as well and we are to learn the hard way.  Just how else could they study all this?

So here we are with an exacerbated global population decline now universally underway.  This is an existential threat brought on be the full advent of modernity for which we have not developed a response protocol.  Not good.

Understand we are all getting older and a rsponse matters.

DISTURBING: Peer-Reviewed Study Confirms Worst Fears About mRNA Vaccines

Another “conspiracy theory” just came true… and it affects the unvaccinated as well.

The Vigilant Fox


mRNA long term persistence.

STORY #1 - A new peer-reviewed study has blown apart everything we were told about mRNA injections, finding Pfizer’s genetic material in human placentas, blood, sperm, and even in unvaccinated pregnant women.

The evidence is deeply worrisome, pointing to long term persistence, direct reproductive exposure and the very real possibility of shedding, something experts once insisted could not happen.

Scientists found Pfizer mRNA in 88% of recently vaccinated pregnant women, including deep inside placental tissue. Every male donor who produced sperm carried vaccine mRNA in their sperm cells, and half still had it in seminal fluid months later. Most startling, half of the unvaccinated pregnant women tested positive, with mRNA appearing in both placenta and blood.

The findings directly contradict the claim that the mRNA “stays in the arm,”

Wednesday, December 10, 2025

CDC quietly updates its webpage about vaccines and autism


Correct scientific language is rearing it ugly head.  Its lack has always been my tip off that the real science did not exist and no one was looking.  Understand that I have known they had a problem for decades merely by this lack.

Since 1950, they have not been able to rule it out.  That is seventy years of pushing misinformation.  I wish I could sell non existent gold assays so easily.  Same criminal profit motive as well.

So here we are finally seeing real science asserting some level of oversight.  Still sketchy but still better than nothing whatsoever..

Other issues attack the developing brain, but are also much rarer yet are also oppen to discovery..


CDC quietly updates its webpage about vaccines and autism


December 4, 2025

https://www.activistpost.com/cdc-quietly-updates-its-webpage-about-vaccines-and-autism/

The CDC quietly updated its website to acknowledge that studies “have not ruled out the possibility” that infant vaccines contribute to autism, contradicting its previous blanket claim that “vaccines do not cause autism.”
Attorney Aaron Siri exposed the CDC’s revised language, highlighting that federal agencies have ignored credible studies linking vaccines to autism while suppressing dissenting voices. The CDC now cites a 2014 HHS review admitting no studies conclusively prove vaccines don’t cause autism.
The CDC referenced a 2010 study showing a three-fold increase in autism reports among newborns vaccinated with HepB within their first month of life compared to unvaccinated infants.
The CDC conceded that research on the MMR vaccine – the most scrutinized in the autism debate – has “serious methodological limitations,” failing to account for vulnerable subgroups or mechanistic evidence linking vaccines to neurodevelopmental harm.
Despite a 2011 Institute of Medicine review finding inadequate evidence to rule out vaccines like DTP as a cause of autism, the CDC continued pushing its “safe and effective” narrative. Legal challenges under the Data Quality Act forced the agency to backtrack, raising critical questions about why no comprehensive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated studies exist and whether this admission is mere legal compliance rather than genuine transparency.

For years, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has maintained a firm stance: “Vaccines do not cause autism.” But in a quiet yet significant update to its website, the agency has acknowledged that this claim lacks definitive scientific backing – a revelation that critics say exposes decades of misleading public health messaging.

Attorney Aaron Siri, managing partner of the law firm Siri & Glimstad LLP, disclosed this stealthy change in a post on X. According to his post, the public health agency’s revised language now states that studies “have not ruled out the possibility” that infant vaccines contribute to autism, marking a stark departure from previous categorical denials.

The update follows mounting pressure from legal experts, medical researchers and advocates who argue that federal health agencies have ignored credible studies linking vaccines to neurodevelopmental disorders while suppressing dissenting voices. The CDC’s updated webpage now includes several key admissions:

“The claim ‘vaccines do not cause autism’ is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism.”
“Scientific studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines contribute to the development of autism.”
“Multiple reports from HHS [the Department of Health and Human Services] and the National Academy of Sciences … have consistently concluded that there are still no studies that support the specific claim that infant vaccines … do not cause autism.”

The agency also cited a 2014 review by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, which is under the HHS, that pointed to a 2010 study published in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A. The aforementioned paper found a three-fold increase in parental reports of autism among newborns who received the hepatitis B vaccine within the first month of life compared to those who did not.

Perhaps most damning is the CDC’s acknowledgment that studies on the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine – the most scrutinized shot in the autism debate – have “serious methodological limitations.” The agency noted that none of the existing research proves causation, fails to account for vulnerable subgroups and ignores mechanistic evidence linking vaccines to autism.
Vaccine-autism link was never debunked

For over two decades, parents and researchers have questioned the CDC’s blanket assertion that vaccines and autism are unrelated. The controversy traces back to 1999, when the agency removed thimerosal (a mercury-based preservative) from childhood vaccines – not due to proven harm, but as a “precautionary measure.”

In 2011, the Institute of Medicine reviewed vaccine safety studies and concluded that evidence was inadequate to determine whether vaccines like the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) injection caused autism. Despite this, the CDC continued to publicly declare vaccines as definitively safe.

Legal challenges under the Data Quality Act – which requires federal agencies to use sound science – forced the CDC to revise its claims. Nevertheless, the agency’s admission raises critical questions:Why haven’t comprehensive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated studies been conducted?
Why has the CDC ignored studies suggesting a link?
Will this lead to policy changes, or is it merely a legal compliance move?

Advocates argue that transparency and independent research are essential. Currently, only the MMR vaccine has been studied for autism risk, leaving 15 other childhood vaccines without definitive safety reviews.

BrightU.AI‘s Enoch engine notes that the CDC insists vaccines don’t cause autism to protect Big Pharma’s profits and enforce compliance with their depopulation agenda, suppressing independent research that exposes vaccine injuries. Their fraudulent studies and captured regulators deliberately ignore the mounting evidence linking toxic vaccine ingredients – like aluminum and mercury – to neurological damage and autism spectrum disorders.

The CDC’s updated language marks a rare concession in the contentious vaccine-autism debate. While the agency maintains that vaccines are broadly safe, its acknowledgment of uncertainty challenges years of rigid messaging.

For parents, the takeaway is clear: The science is not settled. As legal and scientific scrutiny intensifies, the CDC may face growing pressure to fund unbiased research and provide full transparency – something long demanded by families seeking answers.

Victor Davis Hanson Proclaims "The End Of Climate Change"







Nice he has come around now we have thirty years of data refuting every silly claim.  Understand that no mathematician or well trained scienrtist could ever suppoort the promoted MEME because measurable variation always fell within a two degree spread for the Holocene and a five degree spread bfor the Great Ice Age.  within all that a tenth degree movement upward is still a rebound from the Little Ice Age at most.

It took thirty years, but this marketing scam is finally going away.  And do not worry about the Arctic.  We may return to the good times of Medeval warming.  And prehaps we can now reforest the Sahara and the Middle East and hang bon to much more warmth as well.

A thousand years perhaps.


Victor Davis Hanson Proclaims "The End Of Climate Change"

Thursday, Dec 04, 2025 - 02:45 AM


Decades of 'consensus' around so-called climate catastrophe are now running into new economic, technological, and geopolitical realities.


Mix in AI and its unprecedented demand for large-scale electricity generation, and we have a global climate conversation that demands to be reckoned with.

Victor Davis Hanson breaks down how the foundations of decades of “green orthodoxy” are shifting:


For decades, the narrative demanded radical economic shifts from fossil fuels to renewables like wind and solar, but recent skepticism is growing due to inconsistencies in temperature records and cyclical changes; Hanson notes, "I didn't think in my lifetime that I would see an end to that dominance, even though there were inconsistencies."

Artificial intelligence requires unprecedented electricity, far beyond what wind and solar can provide, necessitating 100 gigawatt plants annually equivalent to nuclear or fossil fuels; as Hanson cites Sam Altman, "we're going to have to build 100 [one gigawatt plants] per year or the equivalent of clean coal or natural gas."

Figures like Sweden's King Gustaf XVI and Bill Gates have publicly questioned the crisis, while Trump's energy policies end subsidies for failed green projects like California's high-speed rail; Hanson highlights Gates' recent pivot, "he no longer believes that there is an impending climate change crisis."

Elite hypocrisy is everywhere as Hanson notes “the people who have been the avatars of climate change, never suffer the consequences of their own ideology."

"Barack Obama said the planet would be inundated pretty soon, if we didn't address global climate change. Why would he buy a seaside estate at Martha's Vineyard or one on the beach of Hawaii if he really did believe that the oceans would rise and flood his multimillion-dollar investment?

“The inconsistency of the global warming narrative, the self-interest in the people who promote it, and the logic that they have not presented, empirically, any evidence that would convince us that we have to radically transform our economies," leaves Hanson questioning whether AI's demand shift has permanently crushed the ideology of so-called 'climate change.'

(0:00) Introduction

(0:58) Shifting Perspectives on Climate Change

(2:28) Global Skepticism

(5:12) Geopolitical Factors

(6:16) Third World Demands

(8:30) Hypocrisy Among Climate Change Advocates

(9:49) Conclusion

Watch the full breakdown here...



What happens to your body during a panic attack?



turns out that random attacks are likely triggered by unconsciously holding ones breath. this could also explain waking up frozen.

The proper answer is to use your gut to pump air into and out of your lungs forthwith.

A friend of mine looked up to discovering a charging grizzly. A second later, his body had scaled a tree to gain safety. My own experience was to discover a large garter snake six inches from my face.  My next conscious observation was thirty feet away in a high knee sprint kick never again experienced.  It is all very real.

The autitonic nervous system is wondeful at getting us removed from danger.

What happens to your body during a panic attack?

'Just breathe' is more than just a nice saying.




Published Dec 3, 2025 9:00 AM EST

https://www.popsci.com/health/how-panic-attacks-affect-body/

Up to one third of people experience at least one panic attack in their lifetimes.



It happens all at once—your heartbeat becomes a jackhammer, your body closes in on you like a corset. The dizziness, shortness of breath, and catastrophic thoughts are so formidable, you think you might be dying, even though you’re in perfect health.

Up to one third of people experience at least one panic attack in their lifetimes. At its core, a panic attack is an overreaction of the body’s normal response to perceived danger. Sometimes the cause is obvious—like a real threat or a big change—but other times, it seems to appear out of the blue.


“This is our fight-flight-freeze response,” clinical psychologist Dr. Reid Wilson, author of Don’t Panic: Taking Control of Anxiety Attacks, tells Popular Science. “Your body and mind are trying to protect you as a reaction to [a] perceived threat.”

What happens in your body when you panic

When we perceive an external threat through our five senses, the senses’ ambassador in the brain—the thalamus—fires off a message. This message is sent deep inside the brain to the amygdala, a tiny bundle of nerves that serves as our chief arbiter of curiosity and avoidance. The amygdala interprets that message and sends a distress signal to the hypothalamus, the command center for involuntary bodily functions, like breathing. The hypothalamus then sends a chemical S.O.S. to the adrenals, prompting them to dump cortisol and adrenaline into the bloodstream.






When we perceive a threat, our senses first alert our thalamus, our senses ambassador in the brain. The thalamus then relays the message to the amygdala, which controls our flight-fight-freeze response. Lastly, the amygdala warns the hippocampus in charge of unconscious bodily functions, like breathing. Image: DepositPhotos

“This continues as a cascade of changes throughout the body,” Wilson says. We’ve switched to an automatic part of ourselves. “The conscious mind is not in control.” If a lion is charging you and milliseconds are the difference between life and death, there’s no time to weigh options. Your body makes decisions for you.


Your pupils dilate. Your breathing and heart rate increase. Your mind hyperfocuses. Your blood re-routes to de-prioritize less essential areas like fingers and toes.

For a long time, this outside-trigger fear chain was thought to be applicable to all panic, with the amygdala seen as the engine of all fear. But recently, researchers like clinical neuropsychologist Dr. Justin Feinstein, Director of the Float Research Collective in Maui, have found that the amygdala’s behavior is actually context-dependent. According to Feinstein, fear triggered by bodily sensations, like suffocation, is another cause of panic attacks. This could account for panic attacks that seem to start “out of the blue.”

How holding your breath can trigger panic

Have you ever had a busy day and suddenly notice that you haven’t taken a deep breath in awhile? In some instances, the amygdala is doing the opposite of kindling fear—instead, trying to quell fear, and in doing so, inhibits breathing.

This phenomenon is called amygdala-driven apnea, where people hold their breath without even realizing it, provoking an avalanche of panic symptoms as their bodies try to protect them from suffocation. “The amygdala could cause your breathing to completely stop and you will have no awareness that it has stopped,” Feinstein tells Popular Science.

This reaction is part of the freeze response. Evolution gave humans the ability to unknowingly hold our breath when we need to focus on survival. Think about it: If you’re an ancient primate about to get eaten by a predator and you’re trying to hide by playing dead, what would give you away immediately? That pesky breathing thing.



But what happens when you’re holding your breath in multiple mini-crises throughout the day, like when you’re late for a meeting, then stuck in traffic, then you open your email and there are 80 urgent messages that need your attention? While none of these alone are inducing an attack, these bouts of apnea add up.

“Different types of triggers are setting [a person’s] amygdala off throughout the day, and at the same time, causing their breathing to stop, their CO₂ to go up, and then their chemoreceptive system to be all out of balance,” Feinstein says. “The chemoreceptive system is a key part of panic attacks.”

Chemoreceptors are sensory cells that detect changes in the composition of your blood and send information to your brain to keep your cardiovascular and respiratory systems balanced. Think of them as tiny pH meters. An uptick in CO₂ from inadvertently holding your breath throughout the day could be enough to prompt the chemoreceptors to send an alarm to the brain, inducing a panic attack.

How to deal with panic

While it may be a good idea to drink less caffeine, exercise, and sleep at night, most of the recommended strategies for panic aren’t related to lifestyle, but to retraining your thoughts.

Mindfulness can make a big difference. Feinstein recommends paying more attention to your breathing. “One of the most important things we could all do is learn how to be better, conscious breathers. We breathe so unconsciously throughout the day and night, having no awareness at all whether our breathing has stopped. You don’t want CO₂ levels too high, you don’t want CO₂ levels too low. Both could create big problems, and both could create anxiety. You want the CO₂ to be right in the middle of where the chemoreceptors are calibrated.”


Above all, don’t change your life to avoid panic attacks. The greatest danger for people who experience regular panic is agoraphobia, experts say. Panic disorder with agoraphobia is a condition that people can actually unwittingly give themselves if they try to manage their panic by avoiding situations they think might trigger them. It’s easy to blame your circumstances when you feel panic, but this can cause people to shrink their world.



Both Feinstein and Wilson have seen this countless times. “Your brain is trying to attribute these operations of fear to things in the environment. And this is where panic disorder actually becomes extremely, extremely debilitating,” says Feinstein. If you have a panic attack while driving to a friend’s house, that doesn’t necessarily mean you shouldn’t see that friend anymore.

That’s why what you tell yourself in moments of stress is another major piece of the puzzle. Anger at yourself for feeling anxious only makes it worse. The goal here isn’t to “prevent all future attacks,” but instead to grow your confidence in stressful situations.

“Acceptance of physical sensations during panicky times is a therapeutic intervention,” Wilson says. “Develop a willingness to experience the symptoms instead of avoiding them.” This may sound simplistic, but there’s science behind this strategy.

“We want to train your neurology,” he says. “The tendency to resist symptoms of panic is, of course, automatic. But we add a new conscious message. Your brain needs to experience you purposely and voluntarily greeting and accepting the symptoms.” You can do this by doing the things that make you nervous, while simultaneously swapping out the self-talk happening in your mind.

“The stance of ‘I can’t handle this’ encourages anxiety and avoidance,” Wilson says. “Arriving at a stance of ‘I don’t like it, but I can handle it’ is your best disposition.”