by Staff Writers
Friday, March 9, 2012
Canadian Farmers Trust Supply Management
The squabble over supply management is ongoing and poorly understood. The real problem has been the role of capital in agriculture itself which has transitioned from peonising huge populations to the present practice of controlling market access through size alone. Neither solution was ever satisfactory and the Canadian supply management approach appears a good compromise that is actually worth thinking through and actually improving.
In milk production there are huge advantages accruing to quality and secondary processing if herd size is restricted to a creditable level within the capacity of individual operators. That is what has happened in
the use of secondary processing has been retarded by a lack of innovative
thinking in terms of regulations.
Pressure is building to overcome this limitation. Canada
The real advantage however is that all agriculture needs to have management input on its natural local market and the heavy hand of tariffs is a blunt instrument. A better system may well be operating a farmer owned coop that becomes the effective manager of a determined market district. Such a Coop is able to handle imports as needed and profit accordingly, yet unable to prevent its own members form selling into this local market. That would at least keep them honest and face to face with their own members.
The conflict between capital and best practice has gone on for a long time and it is long time that agriculture globally gets a grip on this problem. After all if I had my druthers, I would acquire all the lands in the
Midwest, eliminate everything except easily grown cash
crops to sell globally and staff the place with illegal aliens to optimize my
margins. The problem of course, is that
my imagination is far too limited to do much more. It is the much more that we need to promote
and yes properly protect. We do not need
to drive our farmers into bankruptcy because the farmers a hundred miles away
had a bumper crop and just dumped the surplus into our market on a one time hit
never to be seen again.
My point is that these profoundly local markets need an organized approach to managing demand and supply that allows true optimization rather than capital optimization.
Canadian farmers trust regulated dairy industry
by Staff Writers
"There was some concern from dairy farmers that the government wouldn't continue to protect them, but once the World Trade Organization was formed in 1995 and the level of protection didn't change, we learned that farmers are not too concerned, even with the new round of negotiations," said University of Illinois agricultural economist Lia Nogueira.
Nogueira explained that under the protection of the supply system, the government estimates what the demand of milk will be based on the population and past trends and allocates quotas to producers accordingly.
"Because farmers need to buy that quota, it's a really big investment in their dairy operation," she said. "And just as the subsidies are viewed in the
, they aren't conducive to a
free-trade world. In order to maintain higher milk prices in
States Canada, the government
restricts imports of milk and dairy products into . Canada
"We weren't trying to analyze the pros and cons of the quota system, but rather what it has meant for farmers. Farmers have a lot of capital invested in those quota, and if the system goes away, those quotas will be worth nothing. From one day to the next, they would lose a lot of their capital investment," she said.
Nogueira looked at data from the 1980s to 2006 that includes trade negotiations and the Uruguay Round in 1986, the precursor to the World Trade Organization of 1995.
The study calculated how secure farmers feel under government protection based on the price of the quota and other economic variables such as the interest rate and appreciation rate. She suspected that farmers would fear that the government would eliminate the supply management system because it goes against free trade.
became a part of the World Trade Organization, farmers could have felt that the
government might stop protecting them, but that wasn't the case," she
"The government made some drastic changes in the way prices were set for the milk that goes into cheese and other industrial uses because processors were complaining that the price of milk was too expensive and they were not competitive. We found that farmers were concerned around the WTO time, but later on they were secure that the government would continue to support them."
Although the system was implemented to protect farmers and stabilize their income and farmers appear to feel secure, Nogueira said there are drawbacks.
"Farmers may change their management practices because quotas are now the single largest capital investment, which restricts herd size," she said.
"They don't have an incentive to export their milk because the price that they would get in the world market is much lower than the domestic market. It shows that government intervention and controlling an industry can change the way farmers do things. Once you establish a system and people are so invested in that system, it's going to be very hard to make any substantial changes even if it's clear that the program is inefficient."
"Policy Risk in the Canadian Dairy Industry" was published in Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. Co-authors are Richard R. Barichello, Kathy Baylis, and Hayley H. Chouinard.