Now
that it is no longer an exercise in futility, everybody is piling onto the pot
bandwagon. More surprising is that the
science for using pot is turning out to be far better than I had expected. This is made better by our ability to simply
abandon smoking for vaporization and raw juice ingestion.
More
astonishing is that even smoking appears not to cause lung cancer.
The
most important point though is that we have limited choices for pain
relief. Worse, opiates need to be the
last choice. Pot allows this to be the
case and even allows a victim to come of an opiate addiction as well.
This
item goes through the propaganda and clears the air for the record. The remarkable truth happens to be that
Marijuana will turn out to be wonderful product with an excellent therapeutic
profile and a complete blessing to the professional healer.
Science
Debunks 10 Biggest Pot Myths
By any objective analysis, cannabis and cannabinoids exceed the
FDA’s existing standards for medicine.
Medical cannabis opponents are fond of promoting many myths and misconceptions about
the herb. Here are the facts.
Medical cannabis is too
dangerous to recommend as a medicine
The cannabis plant and its biologically active constituents, known as cannabinoids, possess an impressive safety profile compared to other conventional therapeutic agents. According to the National Academy of Sciences, Institute of Medicine, marijuana possesses an estimated dependence liability of less than ten percent. (Others have acknowledged that pot’s true dependence potential is likely even lower.) This percentage is approximately the same as anxiolytic drugs like Xanax and Valium and far lower than that of many other licit prescription drugs or recreational substances, like alcohol (15 percent) and tobacco (32 percent).
Moreover, unlike the
active compounds in many conventional prescription medicines, cannabinoids
are relatively non-toxic to fully developed
healthy cells and organs. Cannabis also possesses no lethal overdose potential. As acknowledged by no less than the
DEA’s own administrative law judge, “Marijuana,
in its natural form, is one of the safest therapeutically active substances
known to man.”
Medical marijuana hasn’t
yet been subjected to adequate scientific study
Cannabis possesses a far
longer history of human use as a safe and effective therapeutic agent than
virtually any comparable substance. Archeologists have identified cannabis-based
textiles dating to 7,000 B.C. in northern China and the plant’s use as a
medicinal and agent date back nearly as far. For example, in 2008,
archeologists in Central Asia discovered over two pounds of cannabis buried in
the 2,700-year-old grave of an ancient mummified shaman. After conducting
extensive testing on the material’s potency, researchers affirmed, “[T]he most
probable conclusion … is that [ancient] culture[s] cultivated cannabis for
pharmaceutical, psychoactive, and divinatory purposes.”
In addition, the
marijuana plant is also one of the most studied biologically active substances
of modern times. A search on PubMed, the repository for all peer-reviewed
scientific papers, using the term “marijuana” yields nearly 20,000 scientific papers referencing the plant
and/or its constituents, nearly half of which have been published just within
the past decade. By comparison, a keyword search using the term “Tylenol”
yields 17,370 published papers. A keyword search using the term “ibuprofen’
yields 10,500 published paper. A keyword search using the term “Ritalin” yields
7,012 published papers, and a keyword search using the term “hydrocodone”
yields only 630 published papers.
More than 100 controlled trials, involving thousands of subjects, have evaluated the safety and efficacy of cannabis and/or individual cannabinoids. Most recently, a review of FDA-approved pot trials conducted by various California Universities concluded, “Based on evidence currently available the Schedule I classification (for cannabis) is not tenable; it is not accurate that cannabis has no medical value, or that information on safety is lacking.”
This body of clinical
evidence exceeds that of many FDA-approved prescription drugs. According to a
2014 review published in the
Journal of the American Medical Association, of the 188 novel therapeutic agents approved by the FDA between the years
2005 to 2012, “The median number of pivotal trials per indication was two [and]
74 indications (37%) were approved on the basis of a single trial.”
No major medical or
health organizations support medical marijuana access
Numerous medical and health organizations – such as the American Nurses Association, the American Public Health Association, and the Epilepsy Foundation of America – support allowing qualified patients to legally access to cannabis therapy. Most practicing physicians do too. According to survey data released this year by WebMD/Medscape, nearly 70 percent of doctors, including over 80 percent of oncologists and hematologists, acknowledge the therapeutic qualities of cannabis and 56 percent agree that it should be a legal option for patients.
Medical cannabis laws are
associated with increased crime
Not so concludes a study published earlier
this year in the scientific journal PLoS ONE. Investigators tracked crime rates
across all 50 states in the years between 1990 and 2006, during which time 11
states legalized medical cannabis access. Authors reviewed FBI Uniform Crime
Report data to determine whether there was any association between the
enactment of medical pot laws and rates of statewide criminal activity,
specifically the number of reported crimes involving homicide, rape,
robbery, assault, burglary, larceny, and auto theft. They concluded, “The
central finding gleaned from the present study was that MML (medical marijuana
legalization) is not predictive of higher crime rates and may be related to
reductions in rates of homicide and assault. … [T]hese findings run counter to
arguments suggesting the legalization of marijuana for medical purposes poses a
danger to public health in terms of exposure to violent crime and property
crimes.”
Similarly, a 2012
federally commissioned study reported that the establishment of cannabis dispensaries
is not associated with elevated rates of either violent crimes or property
crimes. It concluded, “There were no observed cross-sectional associations
between the density of medical marijuana dispensaries and either violent or
property crime rates in this study. These results suggest that the density of
medical marijuana dispensaries may not be associated with crime rates.”
Medical cannabis laws
increase pot use by adolescents
Wrong again. Writing in
the Journal of Adolescent Health in April, researchers at Rhode Island Hospital
and Brown University assessed the impact of medical cannabis laws over a
20-year period by examining trends in self-reported drug use by high schoolers
in a cohort of states before and after legalization. Investigators compared
these trends to geographically matched states that had not adopted medical
marijuana access laws during this time. They determined, “[O]ur study of
self-reported marijuana use by adolescents in states with a medical marijuana
policy compared with a sample of geographically similar states without a policy
does not demonstrate increases in marijuana use among high school students that
may be attributed to the policies. … [C]oncerns about (medical marijuana laws)
‘sending the wrong message’ may have been overblown.”
Inhaling medical cannabis
significantly damages the lungs
According to a 2012 study published in the
Journal of the American Medical Association, subjects exposed to moderate
levels of cannabis smoke over an extended period of time do not experience the
sort of significant pulmonary harms associated with tobacco smoking. “Our findings suggest that occasional use of marijuana … may
not be associated with adverse consequences on pulmonary function,” the study
concluded.
Further, the long-term
inhalation of pot smoke is not associated with increased incidents of
lung-related cancers. According to the results of the largest
case-controlled study ever to investigate
the matter, ganja smoking is not associated with higher incidences of cancers
of the lung or upper aero-digestive tract, even among subjects who reported
smoking more than 22,000 joints over their lifetime. Summarizing the study’s
findings to the Washington Post, the study’s lead researcher, Dr. Donald
Tashkin of the University of California at Los Angeles affirmed: “We hypothesized
that there would be a positive association between marijuana use and lung cancer, and that the association would be more positive with heavier
use. What we found instead was no association at all, and even a suggestion of
some protective effect.”
No medicine is smoked
Yet patients inhale many
conventional medications, such as anti-asthma drugs. These patients inhale
conventional medications for largely the same reasons as do medical cannabis
smokers: they require rapid onset of therapeutic drug effect, they desire the
flexibility to self-regulate their dosage depending on the circumstances, and
the medication they are administering lacks lethal overdose potential.
Further, clinical studies
assessing the efficacy of vaporization as a cannabinoid delivery device have
determined it to be a safe alternative to smoking, concluding: “Vaporization of marijuana does not result in exposure to
combustion gases and [was] preferred by most subjects compared to marijuana
cigarettes. … [It] is an effective and apparently safe vehicle for THC
delivery.”
There is no legitimate
need for medical cannabis because Marinol is already available by prescription
Marinol is an FDA-approved
synthetic version of a single isolated compound in cannabis. Consequently,
Marinol lacks dozens of other identified, therapeutically active
components available in the plant, as well many of the terpenes present in pot.
It possesses poor bioavailability compared to inhaled plant cannabinoids, and
its mood-altering effects tend to be far more dysphoric. Not surprisingly, when
given the choice between Marinol and whole-plant cannabis, the majority of
patients choose the herbal
alternative.
Cannabis isn’t medicine
because the FDA has not approved its therapeutic use
The FDA evaluates
patented, synthetic products developed by private companies. It does not
evaluate naturally occurring botanical products such as cannabis. Of course,
that is not to say that the plant, in particular a standardized variety of the
herb, could not arguably meet the conventional FDA standards of safety and
efficacy. After all, humans have consumed cannabis for thousands of years and
it possesses adequate safety profile. Further, its therapeutic utility is
demonstrated in numerous controlled trials. Arguably, by any objective
analysis, cannabis and cannabinoids exceed the FDA’s existing standards for
safety and efficacy.
No comments:
Post a Comment