Friday, November 1, 2024

Giant Clams Are Marvels of Solar Energy



turns out that an opened giant clam can convert about two thirds of incoming light.  Somehow we need to master giant clam husbandry.


we are already thinking about sea based floating complexes.  now imagine an outer surround holding thousands of giant clams along with many other shell fish.  such a construct would be continuously washed by wave action.  


It is not hard to imagine a robust grid system with screen floors able to mimic a working reef..  One can also imagine dropping the construct to the ocean floor after twenty years of operation and a ready replacement.


Giant Clams Are Marvels of Solar Energy


What we can learn from the critically endangered species.

By Brian Gallagher
October 30, 2024

https://nautil.us/giant-clams-are-marvels-of-solar-energy-1040970/?

You might think tree leaves were the best thing nature had come up with to harvest the sun’s light. But they are nowhere near as efficient at turning photons into chemical energy as giant clams. These creatures’ fleshy, colorful mantle—the wavy, psychedelic-patterned tissue sandwiched between their shells—could even inspire more efficient solar energy technology.

Unfortunately, there are a lot of other things people find attractive about giant clams: There’s the spectacle of their proportions—the largest species of giant clam, Tridacna gigas, can grow almost five feet in length and weigh around 700 pounds—which leads some people to repurpose the shells as decorative ornaments. Their meat is also considered a delicacy in many places, from Japan to France, which has led to an overfishing problem. Add to this their susceptibility to the warming effects of climate change, and it’s easy to see why a new assessment shifted T. gigas’ status from “vulnerable” to “critically endangered,” the highest level of extinction risk.


If the giant clam becomes extinct, it will have huge impacts on tropical oceans.

Ruiqi Li, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Colorado’s Museum of Natural History, and Mei Lin Neo, a senior research fellow at the National University of Singapore, co-authored the assessment. They found that T. gigas’ population numbers have dramatically dwindled over the past century, dropping by 80 percent. It’s not clear how many individual giant clams still exist.

“Unlike mammals like mountain lions, it is hard to estimate the population size of marine invertebrates given the nature of marine habitats,” writes Ri in an email. So they calculated their estimate by counting the number of populations of giant clams that remain, a standard way of assessing extinction risk when the actual population size is unavailable. Like coral reefs, giant clams play central roles in their ecosystem niches, mainly the shallow waters surrounding the coasts of Malaysia, Australia, and Fiji. If the giant clam becomes extinct, it will have huge impacts on tropical oceans.


Credit: Ruiqi Li / University of Colorado, Boulder

The tremendous bodies of these clams are also home to symbiotic algae, much like the algae that live in partnership with coral. The clam keeps the algae safe, and the algae nourish the clam via their photosynthesis. Translucent cells in the clam’s flesh called iridocytes scatter incoming light, which, when it aligns in just the right geometry within the mantle, makes it accessible and efficient for the algae to turn it into energy—for themselves and for their giant clam hosts.

In a 2024 study, Yale University biophysicist Alison Sweeney and her colleagues note that giant clams’ quantum efficiency—how well they convert photons to electrons—was 67 percent. (Leaves in a tropical environment, by contrast, work at 14 percent quantum efficiency.) This radical efficiency is inspiring some scientists to look to the dynamics between the algae and the clam to design better solar energy technology

If we want to learn from nature’s designs to improve our own technology, we’ll have to act to preserve Earth’s rich biodiversity. That’s where efforts like Li’s, using up-to-date results to drive new policy, can make a difference. He thinks more biologists should be doing it. “Evolutionary biologists should be devoting some time to population assessment and conservation, especially people who work on invertebrates,” Ri writes in an email. “Invertebrates make up over 95 percent of all animal species on Earth, but they receive so little attention compared to mammals.”

The focus on mammals is understandable. They are like us, and so understanding them helps us understand ourselves. But to gaze into the hypnotizing mantle of a giant clam is to appreciate the radical variety of life—and in that radical variety may lie the solutions to some of Earth’s most pressing problems.

There Never Was a “New Corona Virus”, There Never Was a Pandemic



There never was a pandemic, but there certainly was a JAB and that is linked to a lot of bad news including sudden death.

So called COVID deaths all look like mal practice with ample admin control.

At least we are now starting to say it out oud while i wait to see confirmation of a drop in the death rate.

The whole rollout looked like a plandemic with all the right creeps form the get go.


There Never Was a “New Corona Virus”, There Never Was a Pandemic

Global Research, October 30, 2024

https://www.globalresearch.ca/there-never-was-a-virus-there-never-was-a-pandemic/5841105

Dear Readers,

This article is controversial. It goes against the dominant Big Money, Big Pharma narrative which has been imposed Worldwide..

Many of my friends and colleagues, scientists and medical doctors who are actively involved in the campaign against the Covid-19 mRNA Vaccine, consider that what is at stake is solely a public health crisis. Given the political pressures, and threats exerted against them by politicians and the health authorities, I fully understand and respect their stance.

The complexity of this crisis has to be addressed. It affects humanity in its entirety. It is by no means limited to a dangerous “vaccine”. Below I provide a short summary, prior to dealing with the complexities.
 
Flash back to January 2020.

People worldwide were led to believe that there was a dangerous epidemic, and that the dramatic March 2020 Covid-19 Lockdown -confining people in their homes– applied and enforced Worldwide was a solution to combating a deadly virus, which had spread from country to country.

My research based on a careful review of WHO data, concepts and “methodologies” confirms that there never was a dangerous epidemic, and the identity of the new virus was never confirmed.

The official WHO number of confirmed Covid 19 cases used to justify the declaration of a Worldwide Emergency (PHEIC) on January 30th, 2020 was ridiculously low: 83 PCR Covid-19 “confirmed cases” Worldwide outside of China (6.4 billion people)

Three weeks later at a press conference on the 20th of February 2020 the WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus intimated that the pandemic was imminent:

“[I am] concerned that the chance to contain the coronavirus outbreak was “closing” … I believe the window of opportunity is still there, but that the window is narrowing.” (emphasis added)

What was the evidence put forth by Dr. Tedros in support of his bold statement? On February 20, 2020, there were only 1076 confirmed [cumulative] cases outside China.

The Fear campaign went into high gear alongside grotesque media lies: According to the BBC:


“The following day [March 12, 2020], …the government’s Sage committee of scientific experts was shown revised modelling of the likely death toll. The figures, according to the Sunday Times, were “shattering”. If nothing was done, there would be 510,000 deaths [UK]. Under the existing “mitigation” strategy – to shield the most vulnerable while letting everyone go about their business mostly as normal – there would be a quarter of a million.


In a press conference, the prime minister [Johnson] told anyone with a continuous cough or a fever to self-isolate. His instruction came with a warning that “many more families are going to lose loved ones before their time”. The bluntness was shocking. Some asked why, in that case, more wasn’t being done.” (BBC, emphasis added)

Another fraudulent BBC report quoting the “scientific analysis” of a Cambridge virologist, personalizes the virus presenting “it” as a “terrorist”:

“It behaves like a ‘hit and run’ killer …


So the virus is like a dangerous driver fleeing the scene – the virus has moved on to the next victim long before we either recover or die.


In stark terms, “the virus doesn’t care” if you die, says [Cambridge] Prof Lehner, “this is a hit and run virus”.

It does peculiar and unexpected things to the body (BBC, James Gallagher, October 22, 2020, emphasis added)

Bear in mind the BBC is generously funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Prof Lehner, is a member of Big Pharma’s Wellcome Trust.
Spread the Word

My objective is that this article will be extensively read and debated at the grassroots of society, The complexity of this crisis is overwhelming. This is not solely a “Public Health Crisis”.

The implications of my article are far-reaching because they refute and invalidate “everything” pertaining to the Covid pandemic. These include the policies related to The Lockdown which has resulted in mass poverty Worldwide and the Covid-19 “Vaccine”, not to mention the infamous Pandemic Treaty and The World Economic Forum’s “Great Reset”.

The official “corona narrative” is predicated on a “Big Lie” endorsed by corrupt politicians.

That “official consensus” is exceedingly fragile.

What is ultimately at stake is the value of human life and the future of humanity.

“‘You Were Right, Vaccines Are Killing Millions of Our Loved Ones”, Kazuhiro Haraguchi, Japan’s former Minister of Internal Affairs’s

Our objective is to save lives including those of newly born babies who are the victims of the Covid-19 “Vaccine”.

At this juncture in our history, the priorities are to: Reveal the Truth regarding the Impacts of the Lockdown, Reveal the Fraud pertaining to the Identity of the “New Virus”: 2019 nCoV and the alleged Pandemic and “Disable the Fear Campaign” and Media Disinformation, “Cancel the Vaccine” Worldwide

Hopefully this will set the stage for the development of a Worldwide movement of solidarity, which questions the legitimacy of the powerful “Big Money” financial elites which are behind this infamous project.

Dear Readers, you may wish to view the video below before reading the article.

You can also download my E-Book (free of charge)

Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, December 5, 2023, revised October 30, 2024



“When the Lie Become the Truth, There is No Moving Backwards”

CENSORSHIP: The original Global Research video produced by Ariel Rodriguez in February 2021. It was taken down by Vimeo on March 5, 2022.

Below is the Version on Rumble.

The Most Devastating Crisis in Human History

Starts At 6’47”


Our thanks to Vaccine Choice Canada

“Hell is Empty and the Devils are All Here”. William Shakespeare, “The Tempest”, 1623


My response to Shakespeare: “Send the Devils Back to Where They Belong”

“When the Lie Becomes the Truth, There Is No Moving Backwards”

“Get off that crazy train. I know, it is scary, it can hurt. Take back your physical and intellectual autonomy and protect your children”. Dr. Pascal Sacré, Belgian author and Medical Doctor, November 2021.

***

Introduction

Destabilizing the social, political and economic structure of 190 sovereign countries cannot constitute a “solution” to combating a novel coronavirus which mysteriously emerged in Wuhan, Hubei province (PRC) in late December 2019. That was the imposed “solution” —implemented in several stages from the very outset–, leading to The March 2020 Lockdown and the Rollout of a so-called Covid 19 “Vaccine” in December 2020, which since its inception has resulted in an upward trend in excess mortality.

It’s the destruction of people’s lives Worldwide. It is the destabilization of civil society.

Fake science was supportive of this devastating agenda. The lies were sustained by a massive media disinformation campaign. 24/7, Incessant and Repetitive “Covid alerts” in the course of more than three years. In turn, the ongoing fear campaign had devastating impacts on people’s health.

The historic March 11, 2020 lockdown triggered economic and social chaos Worldwide. It was an act of “economic warfare”: a war against humanity.
The New Virus: 2019-nCoV

The official story is that a dangerous NEW VIRUS was detected in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China in December 2019. It was entitled 2019-nCoV which stands for “2019 New (n) Corona (Co) Virus (V)”.

On January 1, 2020, “the Chinese health authorities closed the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan following Western media reports claiming that wild animals sold there may have been the source of the virus.

As of early January 2020, it was the object of extensive media coverage and an unfolding Worldwide fear campaign. Media disinformation 24/7 went into high gear.

The Chinese authorities (allegedly) “identified a new type of virus” on January 7, 2020, using the RT-PCR test. No specific details were provided regarding the process of isolation of the virus.
Failed Identification of the Novel Coronavirus

In late January 2020, the WHO confirmed that:

It did not possess an isolate of 2019-nCoV from a purified sample from an infected patient, which meant that they were unable to confirm the identity of the novel coronavirus:


We report here on the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation, designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens. Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.


February 11, 2020. The Alleged “New Virus” is Renamed

In early February. 2020, following the failure to identify the novel coronavirus, a decision was taken to change its name to:

“Severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus”: SARS-CoV-2 which (according to the WHO) is “similar” to a 20 year old virus entitled:

2003-SARS-CoV.

A Twenty Year Old 2003 Coronavirus Categorized in February 2020 as a “New Virus”?


“A Novel Coronavirus Associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome”

which broke out in China’s Southern Guangdong Province in 2002 WAS identified and categorized as a “new virus” on May 15, 2003. (More than 20 years ago).

See Screenshot 0f NEJM May 15 2003 article below:

(Scroll down for analysis and details pertaining to the identification and renaming of 2019-nCoV)
Video: The Non-existent “New Corona Virus”?

Michel Chossudovsky, Interview with Caroline Mailloux, Lux Media

.
“Big Money” and “Big Pharma” Meet at Davos


The alleged new virus was actively debated at the World Economic Forum (WEF), meeting in Davos Switzerland (January 22, 2020).

Proposed by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) an entity financed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, a 2019-nCoV vaccine program was put forth. Announced at Davos, Seattle-based Moderna (with the support of CEPI) was to manufacture an mRNA vaccine to build immunity against 2019-nCoV.

The evidence as well as the statements at Davos suggest that the 2019-nCoV vaccine project was already underway in early 2019. And CEPI had foreknowledge regarding the announcement of the 2019-nCoV. (Michel Chossudovsky, Chapter VIII).


The development of a 2019 nCoV vaccine was announced at Davos, 2 weeks after the January 7, 2020 announcement, and barely a week prior to the official launching of the WHO’s Worldwide Public Health emergency on January 30. The WEF-Gates-CEPI Vaccine Announcement precedes the WHO Public Health Emergency (PHEIC) (January 30, 2020) which was predicated on 83 positive Covid-19 confirmed PCR cases outside China (official WHO statistics)

Lies and Falsehoods

All of this was unfolding at a time when the alleged new coronavirus named 2019-nC0V had not been isolated, it’s identity had not been confirmed and the number of reported cases in China was exceedingly low: “As of 3 January 2020, there were 44 cases reported, 11 are severely ill, while the remaining 33 patients are in stable condition” (WHO Report).

There was no evidence of an unfolding epidemic in China, nor was there evidence of a lab leak, CEPI’s statement at Davos regarding “The Rapid Global Spread of the Novel Coronavirus” is a bold face lie. (See image above)

And then on January 30th, 2020, the Director General of the WHO Dr. Tedros declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) with absolutely no evidence of a threatening epidemic.

On that same day there were 83 positive cases Worldwide out of China for a population of 6.4 billion people. See table below: 5 positive cases in the U.S, 3 in Canada, 4 in France and 4 in Germany. Ask yourself does that constitute a Worldwide emergency?

And those (cumulative) cases were based on the RT-Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Test which does not detect the identity of the virus. (See Appendix).




Screenshot from WHO, January 29, 2020.

Number of confirmed positive cases in US, Canada, France and Germany



Three weeks later at a press conference on the 20th of February 2020 the WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus intimated that the pandemic was imminent:

“[I am] concerned that the chance to contain the coronavirus outbreak was “closing” …

“I believe the window of opportunity is still there, but that the window is narrowing.”

What was the evidence put forth by Dr. Tedros in support of his bold statement?

On February 20, 2020, there were only 1076 confirmed [cumulative] cases outside China (including those of the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship stranded in Japan’s territorial waters).

On that same day, the WHO provided the data of confirmed cases “by countries, territories or areas outside China”: 15 in the U.S., 8 in Canada, 16 in Germany, 12 in France, 9 in the U.K.



Click Screenshot below to enlarge (Tedros’ opening remarks at media briefing)



“Outside China there are now 1076 cases in 20 countries, with a total of seven deaths….

Of all cases outside China, more than half are among passengers on the Diamond Princess cruise ship“

Official Statement of WHO Director General Dr. Tedros, Geneva, 20 February 2020
Wow!

“Without the Diamond Princess data, the so-called confirmed cases worldwide outside China on February 20, 2020 were of the order of 452, out of a population of 6.4 billion.”( pages 18-19)

***
March 11, 2020: The historic COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, “Closing Down” of approximately 190 National Economies


The WHO Director-General had already set the stage in his February 20th Press Conference.

“The world should do more to prepare for a possible coronavirus pandemic.”


The WHO officially declared a worldwide pandemic at a time when there were 44,279 (cumulative) positive PCR Covid cases outside China for a population of 6.4 billion. (For details and analysis see Michel Chossudovsky, Chapter II).

The 80,981 cases for China are also confirmed cumulative PCR positive cases. Note the new positive PCR-RT positive cases for China recorded on March 12, 2020: a modest “26 new” indicating that the pandemic in China was over on March 11, 2020.

Even if the alleged 2019 nCoV had been detected and duly identified, the number of PCR-RT confirmed (cumulative) positive cases published on March 12, 2020 (44,279) used as a justification to enforce the Lockdown of more than 190 countries was ridiculously low, (and this without accounting for the failure of the PCR-RT test, which does not detect or identify the virus) (See Appendix for review of the PCR-RT Test.)
The WHO “Risk Assessment” Borders on Ridicule

And yet it was accepted by 190 Member Nation States of the United Nations

WHO RISK ASSESSMENT
GLOBAL LEVEL

The data below was released on March 12, 2020



Confirmed by the WHO, in the United States, recorded on March 9, 2020, there were 3,457 “confirmed cases” (RT-PCR positive) out of a population of 329.5 million people (Screenshot of WHO graph Interactive WHO graph) [The link on WHO is no longer available]


Screenshot from WHO Report

In Canada on March 9, 2020, there were 125 “confirmed cases” out of a population of 38.5 million people



Screenshot of WHO graph Interactive WHO graph. Data for Canada

In Germany on March 9, 2020, there were 2948 “confirmed cases” out of a population of 83.2 million people


Screenshot of WHO Report

As a result of the Fear Campaign and the Worldwide expansion of PCR-RT testing, the number of so-called ” PCR-RT “Confirmed Cases” went Fly High.




The October 2019 “Event 201” Simulation of a “Dangerous Virus” entitled nCoV-2019



Event 201 was a table top simulation of a coronavirus epidemic, sponsored by John Hopkins and the Gates Foundation.

The WHO initially adopted the same acronym, namely 2019-nCoV (to designate the novel coronavirus), as that of the Johns Hopkins simulated Pandemic Event 201 Exercise.

The name of the new coronavirus was (with the exception of the placement of 2019) identical to that of the Event 201 simulation.

Attended by prominent personalities, The Simulation was held on October 18, 2019, less than three months before the announcement in early January 2020 of a new coronavirus.

Among the participants, were representatives (aka. decision-makers) from the WHO, US Intelligence, the Gates Foundation, the Global Alliance on Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) (financed by the Gates Foundation), the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), the World Economic Forum (WEF), the United Nations, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), China’s Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, Director Dr. George Fu Gao), Big Pharma, the World Bank, among others.
 
These various organizations played a key role when the so-called pandemic went live in early 2020. Many features of the 201 “simulation exercise” did in fact correspond to what actually happened when the WHO Director-General launched a Global Public Health Emergency (PHEIC) on January 30, 2020.
.


Moreover, the sponsors of Event 201 — including the WEF and the Gates Foundation — as well the participants were actively involved from the very outset in coordinating (and financing) COVID-19-related policies including the RT-PCR test, the March 2020 lockdown as well as as the mRNA vaccine, launched in December 2020


China’s CDC Director Dr. George Fu Gao –who participated in the Event 201 simulation– played a central role in overseeing the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan in early 2020, acting in close liaison with his mentor Dr. Anthony Fauci, as well as with the Gates Foundation, CEPI, et al.

Dr. Gao Fu is an Oxford graduate with links to Big Pharma. He was also for several years a fellow of the Wellcome Charitable Foundation owned by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK, plc).

The Mysterious “Identity of the New Virus”

The name of the virus was first identified: –October 2019: Event 201 Simulation Scenario: nCoV-2019
–December 2019, Wuhan: 2019-nCoV

And then mysteriously another change in the name of the novel coronavirus took place on February 11, 2020.

from 2019-nCoV to SARS-CoV-2, which stands for “Severe acute respiratory syndrome”: SARS – Corona (Co) Virus(V)-2″.


There was no longer a “n” prefix (indicating that it was a NEW VIRUS). The “n” prefix was replaced by a “2” suffix

What is the meaning of SARS-CoV-2. More specifically what is the meaning of the mysterious “2” suffix? It pertains to a 20 year old virus entitled:

2003 -SARS-CoV, which can by no means be categorized as a NEW VIRUS

“New Virus” versus “Old Virus”: the 2002-2003 “Severe acute respiratory syndrome” (SARS)

SARS-CoV-2 –which since February 11, 2020 had become the official name of the 2019 novel coronavirus– is by no means A NEW VIRUS.

Flash Back to China, Guangdong Province 2002-2003. Confirmed by the WHO and peer reviewed reports:

“A Novel Coronavirus Associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome” broke out in Guangdong, Province, PRC in 2002. (NEJM, May 2003)


SARS was categorized as a Novel Coronavirus in 2003. i.e no longer NEW. It was detected and isolated 20 years ago in early 2003.

.
The Essential Features of the 2003-SARS-CoV Virus

Confirmed by the WHO

“the Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a viral respiratory disease caused by a SARS-associated coronavirus. It was first identified at the end of February 2003 [more than 20 years ago] during an outbreak that emerged in China and spread to 4 other countries. …

A worldwide outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) has been associated with exposures originating from a single ill health care worker from Guangdong Province, China. We conducted studies to identify the etiologic agent of this outbreak.

… a novel coronavirus was isolated from patients who met the case definition of SARS. … Consensus coronavirus primers designed to amplify a fragment of the polymerase gene by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were used to obtain a sequence that clearly identified the isolate as a unique coronavirus only distantly related to previously sequenced coronaviruses.

What is significant in this report is that the WHO confirmed that the novel 2003 coronavirus entitled 2003 SARS-CoV had been isolated from patients’ samples, identified and designated “severe acute respiratory syndrome” in May 2003.

.





The identification of the virus adopted in the NEJM (May 15, 2003) is as follows: (emphasis added)

“We received clinical specimens from patients in seven countries and tested them, using virus-isolation techniques, electron-microscopical and histologic studies, and molecular and serologic assays, in an attempt to identify a wide range of potential pathogens
.
RESULTS: None of the previously described respiratory pathogens were consistently identified. However, a novel coronavirus was isolated from patients who met the case definition of SARS. Cytopathological features were noted in Vero E6 cells inoculated with a throat-swab specimen. Electron-microscopical examination revealed ultrastructural features characteristic of coronaviruses. Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence staining revealed reactivity with group I coronavirus polyclonal antibodies.
.
Consensus coronavirus primers designed to amplify a fragment of the polymerase gene by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were used to obtain a sequence that clearly identified the isolate as a unique coronavirus only distantly related to previously sequenced coronaviruses.”

.

In the course of the last twenty years it must have resulted in multiple variants of the original 2003-SARS-Coronavirus.

.
Absence of An Isolate of the “New 2019 Virus (2019-nCoV)”

While the 2003 SARS-CoV was duly isolated, the WHO acknowledged in January 2020 that it did not have an isolate and purified sample of the NEW 2019 coronavirus from an infected patient, which meant that they were unable to confirm the identity of the (“dangerous”) 2019 novel coronavirus entitled 2019-nCoV. That was the reason given. Sounds Absurd.

How was this matter resolved. Following advice from the Gates Foundation, the WHO was in liaison with the Berlin Virology Institute at Charité Hospital.

Under the scientific guidance of Dr. Christian Drosten, the Berlin Virology study was entitled:


The Berlin Virology Institute study firmly acknowledged that:

[While]… several viral genome sequences had been released,… virus isolates or samples [of 2019-nCoV] from infected patients were not available …”


What the Berlin team recommended to the WHO was that in the absence of an isolate of the 2019-nCoV virus, a similar 2003 SARS-CoV virus should be used as a “proxy” (point of reference) of the novel 2019 coronavirus:

“The genome sequences suggest presence of a virus closely related to the members of a viral species termed severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-related CoV, a species defined by the agent of the 2002/03 outbreak of SARS in humans [3,4].

We report on the the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation [using the RT-PCR test], designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens. Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.” (Eurosurveillance, January 23, 2020, emphasis added).

What this ambiguous statement suggests is that the identity of 2019-nCoV was not required and that “COVID-19 confirmed cases” (aka infection resulting from the 2019 novel coronavirus) would be validated by “the close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV.”

How could the new virus be categorized as similar without having been identified, i.e. without an “isolate”? Moreover, bear in mind that while the PCR test does not detect the virus, it detects genetic fragments (of numerous viruses).
Smoking Gun

What this means is that a coronavirus detected 20 years ago (at the time of writing) in Guangdong Province (2003 SARS-CoV) has been used to “validate” the identity of a so-called “novel coronavirus” first detected in China’s Hubei Province in late December 2019.

The recommendations of the Drosten study (financed with a grant of $249,550 from the Gates Foundation) were then transmitted to the WHO.

They were subsequently endorsed by the Director- General of the WHO, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

The WHO did not have in its possession the “virus isolate” required to identify the new virus.

“Never mind”. It was decided that an isolate of the new coronavirus was not required.

It stands to reason that if the PCR test uses the 2003 SARS-CoV virus as a proxy or “point of reference”, there can be no “confirmed” cases pertaining to the novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV.

The 2019 new coronavirus 2019 nCoV was renamed SARS-CoV-2 on February 11, 2020 by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. That explains the 2 suffix.

The 2019 novel coronavirus is said to be “similar” to 2003-SARS-CoV, which was subsequently renamed SARS-CoV-1 (to distinguish it from SARS-CoV-2).

The NEW Virus (2019 nCoV) is “non-existent” (no RT-PCR confirmed cases).
The RT-PCR Test Declared Invalid by the WHO

Amply documented, the RT-PCR test detects genetic fragments of numerous viruses without being able to identify the virus.

See the article below:


By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, December 10, 2023

See also our review of the RT- PCR in the Appendix of this article.

The significance and ambiguity of the WHO decision –following the advice of the Berlin Virology Institute– namely the issue of the “isolate” of the novel coronavirus have been casually overlooked. “No Questions Asked”

The British Media reported on February 6, 2020 the change in the name of the virus:

“[The] Deadly coronavirus will FINALLY get a name: Scientists plan to officially label the disease ‘within days’ – but it won’t be called after any places or animals. The International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses has submitted a name. …
Big Money, Big Pharma. Patent Rights

Let’s bear in mind: The Covid Crisis which is still ongoing is a Big Money Operation Worldwide, with numerous Big Pharma products, extending from the global misuse of the RT-PCR test, to the multibillion dollar Big Pharma vaccine project, largely dominated by Pfizer.

Was the change in the name of the virus to SARS-CoV-2 an issue of “royalties” and intellectual property rights? The U.S Patent Rights, pertaining to 2003 SARS-CoV was filed in April 2004 and assigned in May 2007 to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:

Patent No.: US 7,220,852 B1 Date of Patent: May 22 2007. (This is a matter for further investigation.)
“The Big Lie” and the “Non-Existent New Virus”. What are the Consequences?

As documented above (confirmed by the WHO) the new 2019 corona virus was never identified.

The use of a 20 year old virus entitled 2003 SARS-CoV as a proxy for the alleged new virus confirms that there was NO PANDEMIC resulting from a NEW CORONAVIRUS in January-March 2020.

THERE WAS NO “NEW VIRUS”.

What this signifies is that both the Devastating Lockdown policies imposed on 190 countries (March 11, 2020) as well the Worldwide Rollout of the Covid-19 Vaccine (mid December 2020) are fraudulent. They are based on a “Big Lie”, which has contributed in the course of almost four years to literally destroying people’s lives.

In turn the incessant fear campaign had a devastating impact on people’s health, their mental health, including a Worldwide wave of suicides. In several countries suicides among school children were recorded (See Michel Chossudovsky, Chapter VI)
“The Big Lie” Precipitates the Lockdown

The unspoken truth is that the novel coronavirus has provided a pretext and a justification to powerful financial interests and corrupt politicians to precipitate the entire world into a spiral of mass unemployment, bankruptcy, extreme poverty and despair.

The lockdown was an act of economic and social warfare. The labor force was confined, the work place was frozen, leading to an engineered Worldwide economic collapse.

This crisis is by no means over. The entire World is currently strangled in the Most Serious Debt Crisis is World history. All categories of indebtedness (private and public). US National Debt Tops $35 Trillion for the First Time in History, according to the US House of Representatives Budget Committee, announced on July 29, 2024.

In the words of the WEF billionaires to those who are loosing their homes or cannot pay their monthly rent: their motto is:

“Own Nothing Be Happy”.

OpenAI ChatGPT Search Is Live. Google Search Killer?




If you may recalk, before google which is now almost 30 years ago, search algorithms were awful and ineffective.  Google sort of changed all that with a pretty decent algorithm

This advantage has been damaged by front loading advertising.  thus good value ends up been suppressed, often by nothing related to the query.

So there is a real window for superior search now.  Google is no longer good enough.

OpenAI ChatGPT Search Is Live. Google Search Killer?

By Brian Wang


Oct 31


AI for Search is already a big thing and could become dominant. The big loser if it succeeds is Google search.


This is a threat to Google Search and Perplexity.

ChatGPT can now search the web in a much better way than before. You can get fast, timely answers with links to relevant web sources, which you would have previously needed to go to a search engine for. This blends the benefits of a natural language interface with the value of up-to-date sports scores, news, stock quotes, and more.

This is How They Built the Inca Stone Walls



This item is an excellent walk through of the observed construction.  All this so far, strikes me as been produced during the Bronze Age.  Most important though is that these blocks are fitted on the edges and not surface to surface.  Actual filler is used out of sight.


Obviously, we are cutting granite blocks and moving them a fair distance.  Movement is possible with dragging for all of these blocks.  Using an acid can be used to tighten the contact.  they had it to hand and easily could have applied it.


This paper tells us how it was done in the time and place using tech that could be assembled in place.


There are plenty of difficult questions for ancient construction, but this is no longer one of them.  And surface glazing is using a blow torch to hand normally for popcorning a mine face.



This is How They Built the Inca Stone Walls | Ancient Architects

0:56 / 19:21

<iframe width="853" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/_KbSFphHCZY" title="This is How They Built the Inca Stone Walls | Ancient Architects" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>



On the reddish, glittery mud the Inca used for perfecting their stone masonry

2017, Sift Desk Journals

Due to its impressive appearance, Inca masonry, which mostly consists of volcanic, silica containing rock material, has received much attention. A high level of understanding has consequently been reached of the diverse working steps and tools applied. An exception is the reddish mud, “llancac alpa” in the quechua language, and the “gold”, mentioned by early chroniclers as mortar which fitted the stones and later disappeared. Such techniques were related to folklore and not taken seriously. This study tries to understand them and the question was asked: did Inca builders have access to very acid mud? They did, and used the acid mud from their mines, which generated sulphuric acid through bacterial oxidation of pyrite (fools gold). It reaches an acidity of up to pH = 0.5, which is 104 times more acid than humic acid which is known to weather silica containing rocks via silica gel to the clay mineral kaolin. This acid mud allowed dissolving and softening the rock material superficially to a viscoelastic silica gel. The process could be