Indonesia Approves Castration for Sex Offenders Who Prey on Children

I am no fan of the death penalty for two reasons.  The obvious one is that it is final and rift with error as well.  Throw in that the prisoner retains the ability to consider his actions for his remaining days on earth and never sees freedom.

The second one is less obvious.  We lose any residual economic value from the individual.  Not so clear with a dangerous killer, but much clearer with a rapist.   Such a person may well be seconded to provide labor in order to continue to support his family.  This certainly makes good sense in an agrarian society and could be extended.

The purpose of castration is to provide a truly effective form of deterrence.  There can not be anything more life changing than this that is also so survivable.  Imagining a life after such an event is painful for most and that is the point.  It still does not handle the problem of error though.

.

Indonesia Approves Castration for Sex Offenders Who Prey on Children

Image Suspects in the gang rape and murder of a 14-year-old schoolgirl before their trial in Curup, Bengkulu Province, Indonesia, this month. The seven teenagers were each sentenced to 10 years in prison for the crime.

 
By Joe Cochrane

 
May 25, 2016

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/26/world/asia/indonesia-chemical-castration.html
 

JAKARTA, Indonesia — The Indonesian president, Joko Widodo, signed a decree on Wednesday authorizing chemical castration for convicted child sex offenders and requiring those released on parole to wear electronic monitoring devices.

The new punishment comes in response to the brutal gang rape and murder in April of a 14-year-old girl on her way home on the island of Sumatra. Seven teenage boys were each sentenced to 10 years in prison for the crime, which prompted national outrage and revived previous calls for chemical castration as a punishment against child sex offenders.

Mr. Joko told a news conference at the presidential palace in Jakarta, the Indonesian capital, that he had signed a decree amending the country’s 2002 law on child protection to enable judges to hand down the punishment at their discretion.

“The inclusion of such an amendment will provide space for the judge to decide severe punishments as a deterrent effect on perpetrators,” Mr. Joko said.

“These crimes have undermined the development of children, and these crimes have disturbed our sense of peace, security and public order,” he said. “So, we will handle it in an extraordinary way.”

Mr. Joko said that “sexual violence against children has increased significantly” in Indonesia, although his government has not provided data to back his assertions. He also increased the jail sentences for child sex offenders to a maximum of 20 years from 10 years.

Last year, Mr. Joko, claiming Indonesia was facing a “drugs crisis,” removed an unofficial moratorium on capital punishment by executing 13 convicted drug traffickers by firing squad, all but one of them foreigners, prompting international condemnation. A second Indonesian was also executed for murder.

The local news media has cited the country’s National Commission on Violence Against Women as saying that around 35 Indonesian women a day are victims of sexual violence.

Through chemical castration, drugs are used to reduce a person’s sex drive. A number of countries have employed the punishment for convicted sex offenders and pedophiles, in many cases in exchange for more lenient prison sentences. They include Australia, Russia, South Korea and the United States.

However, there are many skeptics of the procedure, which was first performed in the 1940s.

“Chemical castration risks offering a false solution, and a simple one, to what is inevitably a complex and difficult problem,” said Heather Barr, a senior researcher on women’s rights with Human Rights Watch, the New York-based organization.

“Protecting children from sexual abuse requires a complex and carefully calibrated set of responses,” she said, including an effective social services system, school-based efforts to prevent and detect abuse, treatment services for people at risk of abusing children and criminal justice measures that focus on prevention.

“Chemical castration on its own addresses none of these needs,” Ms. Barr continued, “and medical interventions should be used, if at all, only as part of a skilled treatment program, not as a punishment.”