In a way I am outraged. I really want to think that pasturization
doing some good besides cleansing the end product of a deeply flawed
industrial production system. It is not. It utrns out that cleanly
raised cattle outperform all processed product hands down.
The real lie is proven by the mere fact that Europe operates vending
machines that are completely safe. That should be the industry
standard.
It is also clear that the industrial model will collapse simply
because technology is already there allowing a single farmer to
maintain a herd, gather the milk with automatic equipment that
ensures cleanliness and put it into immediate refrigeration as is
standard now. The next step is a simple refrigerated truck that
alloows direct delivery to local retail outlets under the farm's
name. All this can happen in the same day, although it is needful to
give the milk some time to cool down.
My point is is completely possible today for the consumer to buy milk
less that twenty four hours old although it will last a long time in
the frig. Even better the consumer can relearn forgotton skills to
produce by products as well. Even sour milk has ample apllications.
The whole key is the named herd, herd size and time milked, all of
which can easily be provided. That way you can even visit the herd
and watch them been milked.
That is the real threat to the industrial model that the industry is
fighting against, because a lost customer will never come back.
Raw Milk Versus
Pasteurized—Which Is Safer?
Dr. Mercola
Waking Times
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2014/07/23/raw-milk-versus-pasteurized-safer/
The United States lags
far behind many other nations when it comes to food safety and
nutritional recommendations, and this is perhaps particularly true
when it comes to raw milk.
The fact is, large
dairy farmers operating under the factory farm model simply cannot
produce raw milk safe for human consumption.
They’re too large,
and therefore end up being hotbeds for pathogenic contamination. They
also cannot provide enough open pasture for tens of thousands of cows
to continually graze on.
Cleanliness and
pasture are critical parameters for producing healthy milk
fit for raw consumption. So really, the war on raw milk boils down to
control—controlling the competition, which is selling a superior
product. It’s NOT an issue of safety at all.
In fact, several
studies have demonstrated the superior safety of raw milk compared to
pasteurized, yet the
vilification of raw milk continues unabated—science and statistics
be damned…
Europeans Can Buy
Raw Milk from Vending Machines
In sharp contrast to
the US, some European nations sell raw milk in vending
machines! And contrary to popular (American) belief, the bodies
are NOT piling up as a result. As reported by Modern Farmer:1
“Europe’s embrace
of raw milk vending machines isn’t new. Such daring dispensers of
unpasteurized dairy can be found in France, Croatia, Switzerland,
Austria, the Netherlands and, as one map2 shows, all over the
place in Italy.”
The safety measures
are remarkably simple. If the temperature of the milk rises
above the regulated level, the machine will stop dispensing milk, and
the farmer is notified via text message. The milk spout is
sterilized by a UV light between each purchase.
In the US, several
states have outright banned the sale of raw milk for fear of
contaminated milk despite the fact that, statistically, such fears
are completely and udderly unfounded (pun intended).
Research by Dr. Ted
Beals, MD,3 featured in the summer 2011 issue of Wise
Traditions, the quarterly journal of the Weston A. Price Foundation,
shows that you are actually about 35,000 times more likely to get
sick from other foods than you are from raw milk!
The vast majority
of foodborne illnesses in the US are linked to factory farmed and
highly processed foods, not raw foods. For example, late
last year, Chobani Greek yogurt was recalled following reports of
gastrointestinal illness.4 The yogurt, which is pasteurized and
not raw, was found to be contaminated with a fungus called Murcor
circinelloides.
In 2011, Cargill
recalled a whopping 36 million pounds of ground turkey.5 An
antibiotic-resistant strain of Salmonella in the meat ended
up causing 107 illnesses and one death.
An investigation
revealed that this strain of Salmonella had been found four times
over the course of one year, yet the US Department of Agriculture
(USDA), took no action against the producer. And, from the time the
first illness was reported and the recall took effect, five months
passed, allowing over a hundred more people to become ill from the
contaminated meat.
A major part of the
problem is that, despite being in charge of food safety oversight of
meat and poultry, the USDA does not have the authority to take action
against a meat or poultry producer—even if the permissible limits
of pathogenic contamination are repeatedly exceeded.
Clearly, this does not
bode well for food safety. As explained in a previous Food Safety
News article discussing this case:6
“For example,
take ground turkey. When USDA tests for Salmonella, they take
individual 1-pound samples on 52 consecutive days of production.
Sometimes it takes a year to complete a set — and the establishment
gets a heads up that a sample is going to be taken!
In addition, if 26 or
fewer are positive, the sample set passes. If more than 26 are
positive, the sample set fails.
Basically, these are
like open book exams — not pop quizzes — where a 50 percent is
still passing! And even when a sample set fails, USDA does another
set of testing. And they keep doing testing until a set passes.”
What this means is
that if 50 percent of the samples are contaminated with
disease-causing bacteria, it’s deemed “safe.” But if it hits 51
percent, it’s tagged as “unsafe.” And testing simply continues
until illness is reported. What sense does this make?
Yet anytime the lack
of food safety is discussed, the focus is suddenly turned to raw
milk! It’s almost as though US agencies are using raw
milk as a scapegoat to keep you from looking at the real problem,
which is that factory farms produce inherently unsafe
foods. It’s like a propaganda machine sleight of hand
maneuver…
CDC Stance on Raw
Milk—As Biased as It Gets
Mark McAfee, CEO of
Organic Pastures Dairy and an internationally recognized expert in
raw milk production and safety, has on numerous occasions tried to
set the record straight with US authorities, to no avail. In a 2012
letter to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), he
writes:7
“As a grade A
producer of retailed-approved raw milk in California, I find your raw
milk page filled with highly erroneous and very misleading
information… In California, we have legal retail-approved raw milk
in 400 stores consumed by 75,000 consumers each week. This retail
legal raw milk is tested and state inspected and far exceeds
pasteurized milk product standards without any heat or processing.
It is clean raw milk
from a single source dairy. There have been no deaths from raw milk
in California in 37 years. Two years ago, I submitted a FOIA request
to the CDC to request data on the two deaths that the CDC database
claims were from raw milk. The data I received back from the CDC
showed that in fact there had been no death from raw milk at all.
The two deaths had
been from illegal Mexican bath tub cheese and not raw milk from any
place in America. Why does the CDC persist in publishing
this erroneous information? …The last people to die from milk died
from pasteurized milk at Whittier farms in 2007, not from raw milk.”
While both the US Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) and the CDC warn that raw milk can
carry disease-causing bacteria, they completely overlook the fact
that these bacteria are the result of industrial
farming practices that lead to diseased animals, which may
then in turn produce contaminated milk.
They make no
distinction whatsoever between disease-riddled factory farmed milk
and the milk from clean, healthy, grass-fed cows. This is indeed a
key issue, as raw milk from a confined animal feeding operation
(CAFO) IS dangerous and must be pasteurized in order to be
fit to drink, whereas raw milk from cows raised on pasture IS NOT
dangerous and DOES NOT need pasteurization. The source of the milk
makes all the difference when it comes to raw milk.
What the CDC Doesn’t
Tell You About Raw Milk Is Worth Knowing…
The CDC also fails to
inform visitors in its website that legal raw milk producers
oftentimes adhere to stricter safety standards than CAFOs
do. California, specifically, has its own special set of standards
for raw milk for human consumption, in which farmers must meet or
exceed pasteurized milk standards, without pasteurizing.
Instead of giving you
the facts, the CDC lists raw milk as one of the riskiest foods in
America, without any real proof to back up such a proclamation. The
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has even called for a complete
ban on raw milk because it is so “dangerous.” But on what do they
base their assumptions? On the CDC’s unproven opinion? If safety
was truly the issue, then pasteurized dairy would be banned, as
that’s what’s causing the most disease.
So you’ve got to ask
yourself, is this really about our personal safety or the safety of
the milk industry? Eating directly from the farm is prohibited by
industry so they can control our food supply. They make it very
difficult for farmers to sell directly to us, whether dairy products
or meat products. They claim this is done for our safety, but it’s
really just a plot to control our food system.
“The FDA does not
mention raw milk on their top 10 most risky foods in America
list,” McAfee notes. “Pasteurized ice cream and pasteurized
cheeses make the top 10 risky foods list… According to the Cornell
study performed on CDC data, there were 1,100 illnesses caused by raw
milk between 1973 and 2009. There were 422,000 illnesses caused by
pasteurized milk. No deaths from raw milk and at least 50 deaths from
pasteurized milk or pasteurized cheese—the CDC left out
the 29 or more people that died from the pasteurized Jalisco cheese
listeria incident in 1985.”
Raw Milk Has Many
Health Benefits
The CDC, as McAfee
notes, is absolutely riddled with bias. While most of it is obvious,
some of the bias is hidden by the way the CDC counts its statistics.
For example, it counts outbreaks rather than the number of people
affected by the outbreak. In one outbreak caused by pasteurized milk,
200,000 people fell ill! Yet it’s only counted as one incident.
Its website also makes no mention whatsoever to studies showing how
raw organic milk differs, nutritionally, from CAFO milk, and how it
improves health. For example, raw milk is:
Loaded
with healthy bacteria that are good for your gastrointestinal
tract
|
Full
of more than 60 digestive enzymes, growth factors, and
immunoglobulins (antibodies). These enzymes are destroyed during
pasteurization, making pasteurized milk much harder to digest
|
Rich
in conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), which fights cancer and boosts
metabolism
|
High in omega-3
and low omega-6, which is the beneficial ratio between these two
essential fats
|
Loaded with
vitamins (A, B, C, D, E, and K) in highly bioavailable forms, and
a very balanced blend of minerals (calcium, magnesium,
phosphorus, and iron) whose absorption is enhanced by live
Lactobacilli
|
Rich in healthy
unoxidized cholesterol
|
It also contains phosphatase, an enzyme that
aids and assists in the absorption of calcium in your bones, and
lipase enzyme, which helps to hydrolyze and absorb fats
|
Pasteurizing milk, on
the other hand, destroys enzymes, diminishes vitamins, denatures
fragile milk proteins, destroys vitamin B12 and vitamin B6, kills
beneficial bacteria, and actually promotes pathogens.
Max Kane’s
Self-Healing Is a Testament to the Power of Raw Dairy
In the video above, I
interview Max Kane, a local raw dairy farmer from whom our office
purchases a variety of raw dairy products from. Max was
diagnosed with Crohn’s disease at the age of 10. Through
years of study, he eventually healed himself through nutrition and
lifestyle changes. He now consumes only 100 percent raw,
100 percent organic, and 100 percent pasture-raised dairy products.
Raw dairy makes up about 50 percent of his diet.
“The cream is
perhaps the most important part of the milk because the cream is
where all the energy is that’s needed to digest the milk protein
casein,” he explains. “That’s why it’s important to consume
full-fat dairy products instead of non-fat or skim dairy products.
The cream is also responsible for regulating the sugar
absorption into your blood. It decreases the likelihood of insulin
spikes. The cream naturally floats to the top of the milk,
and it can be skimmed right off the top. Traditionally, people would
use the cream line as a visual aid to help them assess the quality of
the milk…
Homogenization [is] an
industry process that fractionates the cream molecule, the fat
molecule, into small little pieces. This was done for the purpose of
making the cream line non-detectable to the human eye… That’s how
they standardized the milk, by taking away the viewable quality
assessment from the consumer, and ultimately left the consumer with
no real visual way to assess the quality and the value of the milk.”
The quality of
grass-fed milk, butter, and yogurt can easily be ascertained by its
color. The carotenoids in the plants cows eat on pasture gives
grass-fed products a more yellow-orange cast. When cows are raised on
dried grass or hay, opposed to fresh-growing grass, you end up with a
whiter product, which is an indication of reduced carotenoid and
antioxidant content. Raw milk yogurt is also very thick and creamy,
compared to pasteurized commercial varieties. The same goes for
pastured eggs, which can be ascertained by their deep orange yolk.
CAFO chickens, which never go outdoors, and are fed grains rather
than bugs and insects, produce eggs with pale yellow yolks.
ABOUT Max Kane -
Max Kane was diagnosed with Crohn’s disease at the age of 10, and
through years of study, healed himself through nutrition and
lifestyle changes. 100% of his dairy products and over 50% of his
other foods are purchased directly from farms. When it comes to
dairy, he only consumes 100% raw, 100% organic, 100% grass-fed. Dairy
makes up about 50% of his diet. After realizing the healing power of
fresh farm foods, Kane teamed up with Amagisoft to
create FarmMatch.com.
ABOUT FarmMatch – It’s
free to create an account, but no account is required to use the
system.
FarmMatch is built
over the Google mapping system and makes local food searchable
worldwide, making it easy to find a local farmer. Not only are
specific farm products searchable, but products are searchable by
quality standards as well… 100% grass-fed, non-GMO, etc. You can
connect with farmers and buy online as well. The order management
system is consumer funded. Buyers pay a $2.95 fee when placing an
order or can opt into a $3.95/month plan that allows unlimited
ordering with no $2.95 fees. Through these small affordable consumer
fees, FarmMatch delivers a state-of-the-art software suit to every
small scale farmer at no charge to the farmer. The FarmMatch business
model not only helps individual small farmers, but it also lifts the
entire local food movement as a whole.
Join the Fight for
Food Freedom
The fight over raw
milk stands as a symbol of the much larger fight for food freedom.
Who gets to decide what you eat? You? Or the FDA? If the FDA and
other government agencies are allowed to impose their view of “safe
food” on consumers, raw milk won’t be the only thing lost—all
food will be pasteurized, irradiated, and genetically engineered. The
effort to reclaim our right to buy and consume raw milk is leading
the way for everyone who wants to be able to obtain the food of their
choice from the source of their choice. So please, get involved! I
urge you to get involved with the following action plan to protect
your right to choose your own foods:
- Get informed: Visit www.farmtoconsumer.org or click here to sign up for action alerts. To review the raw milk laws in your state, see the Farm-to-Consumer.org’s Raw Milk Nation page.
- Join the fight for your rights: The Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund (FTCLDF) is the only organization of its kind. This 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization provides a legal defense for farmers who are being pursued by the government for distributing foods directly to consumers. Your donations, although not tax deductible, will be used to support the litigation, legislative, and lobbying efforts of the FTCLDF.
- Support your local farmers: Getting your raw milk from a local organic farm or co-op is one of the best ways to ensure you’re getting high-quality milk. You can locate a raw milk source near you at the Campaign for Real Milk Website. California residents can find raw milk retailers by using the store locator available at www.OrganicPastures.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment