This is very encouraging. I am certain that many separated
populations arose during the Ice Age and developed most of the
distinct features associated with those regions. It just makes good
sense. On the other hand, a new influx of genes, particularly if
they are highly adaptive, would soon integrate into the indigenous
populations.
We have always tried to explain this process as one of violence in
which the losers die when it is nothing of the kind. The losers may
well die, but the breeding women are inevitably conserved. Thus a
successful adaptation inevitably finds its way everywhere.
During the past ten thousand years we have had the particular
emergence of agricultural man in several separate locations around
the world. Mere population expansion has subsumed all other local
generic material but has not expunged any of it. Such loss is
actually a rarity.
In time we will have enough data to begin the interesting task of
unraveling treads of inheritance even back to origination point.
Scientists who cracked
the provenance of Beijing bones have proved to be trailblazers in
retrieving and analysing ancient human DNA
Stephen Chen
7 February, 2013
The discovery of
ancient human bones in Tianyuan Cave, in Zhoukoudian, Beijing, 10
years ago caused a sensation. They showed Tianyuan Man died about
40,000 years ago.
It was the first time
that early human remains had been found in the area since the
discovery of Peking Man in 1920s. But Peking Man's skull and other
specimens were lost in the chaos of the Japanese invasion during the
second world war.
The remains of
Tianyuan Man consisted of more than 30 fragments, including lower jaw
and leg bones, but no skull - not enough to tell how closely the
ancient human related to present-day Chinese. Some
palaeoanthropologists were not even sure the bones belonged to a
male.
Tianyuan Man reclined
quietly in the fossil room of the Institute of Vertebrate
Palaeontology and Palaeoanthropology in Beijing. He was almost
forgotten until a team of Chinese and German researchers reopened the
dusty box and scrutinised the bones with the newest tools of DNA
analysis.
What they found was
important: Tianyuan Man's DNA came from people who were ancestors
not only of many present-day Asians but also Native Americans. It
also suggested that people in China at the time were already
different from Europeans. The results were published last month in
theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in the United
States.
But the biggest
surprise in the study by the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Max
Planck Society was not the results, but the method used to achieve
them.
It was the first
time scientists had found an effective method to retrieve and analyse
ancient human DNA from remains outside permanent frost zones.
Detective work on
ancient DNA has become a science fiction cliché, with DNA preserved
in amber being used to resurrect dinosaurs in the Hollywood
blockbuster Jurassic Park. In real life, however, it has never
been so easy, and palaeoanthropologists had only been able to recover
the DNA of Neanderthals in Germany and Denisovans in Russia, extinct
homo species who lived in arctic-like cold.
For the team studying
the Tianyuan remains, contamination posed the first challenge.
Institute deputy
director Gao Xing said that when palaeoanthropologists found the
bones a decade ago they had not considered the possibility of DNA
analysis and took no precautions against contamination. Researchers
passed the bones from hand to hand for examination and at the press
conference announcing the find, the bones were laid out on a table
for viewing and photos. Many people were so close that their breath
could have carried their DNA to the bones.
Max Planck Society
researcher Fu Qiaomei , the first author of the paper, said she had
flown one of the bones to Germany and prepared the samples with
laborious procedures in the finest laboratory for ancient DNA
analysis. They were delighted to find the DNA had not been
contaminated by modern people.
But the scientists
immediately encountered another problem. The DNA of Tianyuan Man
accounted for less than 0.03 per cent of the total DNA extracted from
the sample; the rest was mostly the DNA of germs. No commercially
available equipment could analyse such a tiny amount of material.
A new method had to be
developed to overcome the shortage of material, which had doomed many
previous attempts to decode ancient DNA.
Fu said the
traditional approach in DNA analysis was like casting a net in a lake
- useful when fish were abundant but ineffective when there were only
a few small fish in the water. "We came up with a method similar
to pole fishing," she said. "With the right bait we could
fish out the ancient DNA to fill up a more or less complete genome
template."
The method worked, and
the results solved some suspenseful scientific puzzles about Tianyuan
man.
Although some Chinese
researchers had theorised that he was an ancestor of present-day
Chinese, the scarcity of bones made it a wild guess at best. But the
DNA results confirmed it, showing that Tianyuan Man was not only
an ancestor of Han Chinese but also of many people in Asia,
including Thais and Koreans. He was also quite similar to Native
Americans.
Scientists have more
or less agreed that the first ancestor of humans originated in Africa
millions of years ago, but they still have heated debates on the
origins of modern humans.
Some scientists
proposed in the 1980s that all present-day humans could be traced
back to an African Eve who left the continent more than 220,000 years
ago.
In recent years,
however, the African Eve theory, which relied heavily on the
evolution of the mitochondrial genome, has come under fire.
Some
palaeoanthropologists in China, for instance, said fossil evidence
showed that present-day Chinese evolved from a population that had
survived bitter ice ages and resisted the invasion of new migrants
from Africa.
The new technology
used to study Tianyuan Man will enable scientists to study the DNA of
much more ancient humans and cast more light on the ongoing debate.
Gao said they hoped to establish a long, continuous record of human
evolution from numerous bones unearthed in China, dating from a few
hundred years ago to hundreds of thousands of years ago.
"We have many
challenges in palaeoanthropology today," Gao said. "We have
difficulty establishing a meaningful link between two prehistoric
sites. We are running short on specimens. We are puzzled by the
culture of early humans. But the future looks bright."
No comments:
Post a Comment