It is really very simple. If you engineer a loss of credit for several
percentage points of the working population, the money supply shrinks. Until that is somehow reversed, and we are
doing it the slow way as was done after 1929 when it took decades to properly recover
the credit system itself, we will have anemic money supply growth.
The USA was quite right to prop up the
deflating banking system. They merely
forgot to reset the deflating borrower who is still not whole. Curiously, Iceland got it right. They did not even try to help the banks but
focused on putting the customers back into business. It is working well.
I called immediately in 2008 for
an effective reset in the mortgage business while it would have made the most
difference. That did not happen then and is unlikely to happen unless Romney is
up to it. We can still establish four
percent internal growth.
The credit loss is even deeper
than we imagined and the shrinkage of the money supply is awful. During this shrinkage there has also been a slowing
in the velocity of money also. What this
all means is a complete failure of fiscal policy to stimulate anything.
Worse than all that we are about
to increase the government’s take in the economy, just as they did in 1932,
just when bad policy has made it all super vulnerable to begin with.
Remember that in four years, the
Obama administration has not properly addressed the housing credit collapse nor
even really tried, yet it is the first thing that should have been addressed.
Why U.S.
is now in a credit crunch
Steve H. Hanke, Financial Post · Jun. 21, 2012
Since August 2008, the month before Lehman Brothers collapsed, the
supply of publicly produced base money has more than tripled, while privately
produced money has shrunk by 12.5% - resulting in a decline in the total money
supply (M4) of almost 2%. In consequence, the share of the total broad money
supply accounted for by the Fed has jumped from 5% in August 2008 to 15% today.
The disturbing course that has been taken by the money supply in the
U.S. shows why we had a bubble, and why the U.S. is mired in a growth
recession, at best (see the accompanying chart). If Fed chairman Ben Bernanke
had a money-supply indicator - any money-supply indicator - on his dashboard,
he would, well, see reality. Money matters.
It is clear that while Fed-produced money has exploded, privately
produced money has imploded. The net result is a level of broad money that is
way below where it would have been if broad money had followed a trend rate of
growth.
The post-crisis monetary-policy mix has brought about a massive opening
of the public moneysupply spigots, and a significant tightening of those in the
private sector. Since the private portion of the broad money supply in the U.S. is now
five and a half times larger than the public portion, the result has been a
decrease in the money supply since the Lehman Brothers collapse. So, when it
comes to money in the U.S. ,
policy has been, on balance, contractionary - not expansionary. This is bad
news, since monetary policy dominates fiscal policy.
Wrongheaded public policies have put the kibosh on banks and so-called
shadow banks, which are the primary private money-supply engines. They have
done this via new and prospective bank regulations flowing from the Dodd-Frank
legislation, new (more stringent) Basel III
capital and liquidity requirements, and uncertainty as to what Washington might do
next. All this has resulted in financial repression - a credit crunch. No
wonder we are having trouble waking up from this nightmare.
The picture for the eurozone, absent Germany ,
looks very similar to that of the U.S. , while the German picture
looks rather healthy. Indeed, Germany 's
money supply is above where it would have been if it was growing at a trend
rate. This peculiarity is occurring, in part, because hot money is taking
flight from places like Greece
and Spain and flowing into Germany . This
pumps up the German money supply. It's no surprise, therefore, that the German
economy is a picture of health relative to the rest of Europe .
This brings us to the Eurosystem's doom loop. It's clear that the sick
ones are pleading for an assist from the largest and healthiest one, Germany .
This, of course, is creating a great deal of angst among the Germans.
Today, German taxpayers' exposure to the weaker countries represents at least
one quarter of Germany 's
GDP, and it's rising. Facing a bill like that, German Chancellor Angela Merkel
has recently pushed back and stated the obvious: "Germany 's strength is not
infinite."
What can be done? For a start, new, excessive bank regulations should
be scaled back, or scrapped altogether - particularly when we're in the middle
of the worst slump since the Great Depression. Such a roll-back would alleviate
financial repression, allowing the banking system to increase the privately
produced portion of the broad money supply. Since excessive and untimely
regulation is what's holding down broad money growth, this is just what the
doctor ordered.
Remember, it's the money supply, stupid.
Steve H. Hanke is a professor of applied economics at The Johns Hopkins
University in Baltimore and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute in
Washington, D.C.
No comments:
Post a Comment