15 years after 9/11, it has become obvious that AA 77 did not hit the Pentagon

Something happened to those planes and it is obvious that the Pentagon was a target.  Could the plane that augered into the ground in Pennsylvania have been enroute for this Target?  That means that they then used a cruise missal as per a backup plan.

We know two planes impacted the twin towers and that provided cover for a controlled demolition.  All this leaves a forth plane missing and presumed lost somewhere.  What then happened there?  Did it auger into the ocean or was it landed and grabbed with the passengers snuffed.

An aircraft would not have collapsed those upper floors necessarily and such floor would provide a collapse structure largely intact in the form of broken slabs.  Here we see blast debris and there is no possible explosion with a jet liner of this scale and size.  So a targeted modern blast looks best here.


Something took place on 9/11 and it shapes up as a false flag operation to rigger a major war in the Middle East...

.

15 YEARS AFTER 9/11, IT HAS BECOME OBVIOUS THAT AMERICAN AIRLINES FLIGHT 77 NEVER HIT THE PENTAGON

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/15-years-later-become-obvious-american-airlines-flight-77-never-hit-pentagon/

Judicial Watch obtained the actual video security footage that day of the Pentagon being hit. Keeping in mind that a Boeing 757 is 179' in length, do you honestly think that NONE of that plane approaching the building could be visible? Of course not. Yet, miraculously, the official video footage failed to capture ANY of Flight 77 actually flying. How could that be?

by Geoffrey GriderMarch 27, 2017

NO, WE HAVE NOT BECOME “TRUTHERS”, AND DO NOT SUBSCRIBE TO MANY OF THE POPULAR 9/11 CONSPIRACY THEORIES. BUT NEITHER DO WE BELIEVE FLIGHT 77 HIT THE PENTAGON

Look closely in the photo at the top of this article. It is a Boeing 757, with a 124′ wing span drawn to scale. From end to end, a Boeing 757 is approximately twice as long as the hole that was created in the side of the Pentagon building on 9/11. Look at the red arrows to see where the wings would have hit the building had a plane actually struck that morning. Then take a good look at the actual damage to the Pentagon building itself. The resulting hole is much more consistent with a guided-missile strike than an airplane.

SOMETHING HIT THE PENTAGON, BUT IT WAS NOT A BOEING 757:

THE 9/11 PENTAGON EVENT – 9/11 DOCUMENTARY

This is a longer but sober minded and very well produced look at the event that took place at the Pentagon on 9/11.

No, we have not become “truthers”, and do not subscribe to many of the popular 9/11 conspiracy theories. But neither do we any longer believe a plane hit the Pentagon.

Judicial Watch obtained the actual video security footage that day of the Pentagon being hit. Keeping in mind that a Boeing 757 is 179′ in length, do you honestly think that NONE of that plane approaching the building could be visible? Of course not. Yet, miraculously, the official video footage failed to capture ANY of Flight 77 actually flying. How could that be?

JUDICIAL WATCH SEPTEMBER 11 PENTAGON VIDEO — 1 OF 2

Advance to the 1:20 mark, the impact of whatever hit the building happens at 1:27.

ANSWER: It is not possible for a plane that is 179 feet in length to completely evade detection from the stationary video cameras. Obviously the footage was doctored and frames removed before it got to Judicial Watch so you could not see what actually hit the building. Any reasonable person must come to that conclusion.

What do you think? Please comment below with intelligent responses after watching all the videos.