A
better idea will be to mount sound devices on the blades that emit in the sound
range used by bats for navigation. Such an
effect would make the local environment impossible to use and the bats would be
forced to avoid it. We also may want to
try something like that to fend of birds while we are at it. This should turn out to be possible.
These
wind turbines have turned out to be far better killers of birds than we had
ever expected. The problem is big enough
to now take seriously and solve.
Sonic
devices certainly recommend themselves provided they operate outside our own
hearing range. If not then they have to
be narrowly constrained perhaps along the leading edge.
Wind
turbines are giant killers of bats
SUNDAY,
NOVEMBER 17, 2013
Alternative forms of
energy, such as solar power that relies on arrays of mirrors in the desert that
focus beams of sunlight to drive a generator, or wind turbines, have been shown
to have a significant environmental impact in some cases. A solar energy
complex located between Los Angeles and Las Vegas has been blamed for actually
singeing off the wings of migrating birds that were unlucky enough to fly
through the focused sunbeam. In another cases, wind turbines have been dubbed
‘bird Cuisinarts’ for supposedly shredding birds caught in the
propellers that catch air currents and turn generators.
A new study shows that
wind turbines may also be a menace for bats. Mark Hayes, a researcher at
the University of Colorado Denver said of the results of his study, "The
development and expansion of wind energy facilities is a key threat to bat
populations in North America." He added, "Dead bats are being found
underneath wind turbines across North America. The estimate of bat fatalities
is probably conservative." According to the study, more than 600,000 bats
were killed by wind energy turbines in 2012. Bats, while they often get a bad
rap, are prodigious eaters of flying insects such as houseflies and mosquitoes,
while they also serve as pollinators of economically important crops.
Hayes, who is an
expert in integrated biology, said that cities such as Buffalo, Tennessee and
Mountaineer, West Virginia in the Appalachians had the highest rate of
fatalities for bats. However, according to UCD, little is known so far
about bat deaths attributable to wind turbines west of the Rocky Mountains and
the Sierra Nevada range. The bats most represented in the study are the hoary
bat, eastern bat and the silver-haired bat. There are currently forty-five
known bat species in the lower 48 states of the U.S.
The study shows that hapless bats become
victims when they fly into the spinning blades of wind turbines, which can
rotate at 179 mph. Their blades can reach 130 feet. Before the study emerged,
the estimate of bat mortality ranged from 33,000 to 880,000. Hayes said that
the number of bat fatalities could be as high as 900,000.
UCD noted that
Hayes’ estimates may be conservative. Hayes chose the minimum estimate for bat
mortality when a range of deaths was reported. Also, the amount of mortality
came from estimates for only the migratory period for bats. Bats largely migrate
during the autumn months in North America.
Hayes said his
estimates are likely conservative for two reasons. First, when a range of
fatality estimates were reported at a wind facility, he chose the minimum
estimate. Secondly, the number of deaths was estimated for just migratory
periods, not the entire year, likely leaving out many other fatalities.
Researcher Hayes
suggests that bat mortality could be lessened if wind turbines are activated
only when there are higher wind speeds and thus during periods when bats are
not likely to fly. "A lot of bats are killed because the turbines move at
low wind speeds, which is when most bats fly around," said Hayes, who has
studied bats for 15 years, according to UCD. A decrease of operational
speeds for wind turbines from 10 mph to 18 or 20 mph could drop the fatalities
by 40 to 90 percent.
Hayes was
philosophical about the likelihood that more bats will die as more wind
turbines pop up. Said Hayes, "I am not against wind energy. It's clean, it
reduces pollution and it creates jobs. But there are negative impacts," he
said. "Still, I think this is a problem we can solve."
No comments:
Post a Comment