Pretty good. The problem is unusual, but also not unique to us either. all our domesticates also suffer. This makes assigning one food type tricky. dogs and cats do not get into our treats. So right away, we have a counter example.
This aricle certainly shows us how complex the pathways have to be.
Still a start.
The fructose survival hypothesis for obesity
Published:24 July 2023
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rstb.2022.0230?
Abstract
The fructose survival hypothesis proposes that obesity and metabolic disorders may have developed from over-stimulation of an evolutionary-based biologic response (survival switch) that aims to protect animals in advance of crisis. The response is characterized by hunger, thirst, foraging, weight gain, fat accumulation, insulin resistance, systemic inflammation and increased blood pressure. The process is initiated by the ingestion of fructose or by stimulating endogenous fructose production via the polyol pathway. Unlike other nutrients, fructose reduces the active energy (adenosine triphosphate) in the cell, while blocking its regeneration from fat stores. This is mediated by intracellular uric acid, mitochondrial oxidative stress, the inhibition of AMP kinase and stimulation of vasopressin. Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation is suppressed, and glycolysis stimulated. While this response is aimed to be modest and short-lived, the response in humans is exaggerated due to gain of ‘thrifty genes’ coupled with a western diet rich in foods that contain or generate fructose. We propose excessive fructose metabolism not only explains obesity but the epidemics of diabetes, hypertension, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, obesity-associated cancers, vascular and Alzheimer's dementia, and even ageing. Moreover, the hypothesis unites current hypotheses on obesity. Reducing activation and/or blocking this pathway and stimulating mitochondrial regeneration may benefit health-span.
This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Causes of obesity: theories, conjectures and evidence (Part I)’.
1. Introduction
An often overlooked approach to scientific discovery is to investigate how nature, and its accompanying powerhouse of evolution, have found solutions to vexing problems [1,2]. Such biomimetic approaches can provide insights for new therapies based on the ingenious approaches animals use in the wild to combat adversity [3,4]. However, evolution might also have an unwitting role in causing disease. Indeed, it has been suggested that genetic adaptations (thrifty genes) to assist survival in a world of scarce resources might ‘backfire’ in a world of plenty where it might increase the risk for obesity and diabetes [5].
Here, we discuss a recently discovered protective mechanism that we have named ‘the survival switch’ that is initiated before resources become scarce. Our work suggests that the effect is mediated by fructose, and that, unlike glucose whose primary biologic function is to provide an immediate fuel, that the primary function of fructose is to aid in the storage of fuel. These different biologic functions are consequences of how glucose and fructose metabolism modulate intracellular energy levels. We discuss the varied sources of fructose and how it mediates its biological actions. We also suggest that two events occurred that converted this protective pathway into one causing disease. The first was the acquisition of ‘thrifty genes’ (or more accurately the loss of genes that created a thrifty genotype), and the second event was the marked increase in foods that either contain or produce fructose. These two events have led to an overactivation of the ‘survival switch’ that we propose is driving both obesity and many of the ‘burden of life’ non-communicable diseases affecting us today.
2. Sources of fructose, the trigger of the survival switch
Fructose is a simple sugar that is the primary nutrient in fruit and honey. However, in the western diet, its main source is table sugar (sucrose), which consists of fructose and glucose bound together, and high fructose corn syrup (HFCS), which consists of a blended mixture of fructose and glucose, often with slightly higher concentrations of fructose as testing has suggested humans prefer slightly more fructose as it is sweeter than glucose. Today these ‘added sugars’ account for ≈15% of overall energy intake, with some groups ingesting as much as 20% or more [6].
Fructose is also generated in the body from glucose (figure 1). This occurs when glucose levels (i.e. the substrate) are excessive, such as in diabetes, following the ingestion of high glycaemic carbohydrates, and by high carbohydrate diets [7–9]. The enzymatic conversion of glucose to fructose is called the polyol pathway and the rate-limiting enzyme is aldose reductase (AR). AR is activated by stress, such as dehydration (hyperosmolarity), starvation (such as with ischaemia) or with hypoxia. Fructose generation is also stimulated by salty foods and alcohol (both which raise serum osmolality) as well as by fructose itself [7,10,11]. Umami foods (rich in glutamate and nucleosides such as adenosine monophosphate (AMP) and inosine monophosphate (IMP)) also generate uric acid which stimulates fructose production [12,13]. All of these nutrients stimulate fructose generation in the liver where it is sufficient to fully activate the survival switch [14]. Fructose generation can also be stimulated in other organs, such as the brain, kidney, vasculature and heart. Indeed, fructose is generated locally in the brain with hyperglycaemia [9], in the heart with cardiac ischaemia [15], in the kidney with ischemic-reperfusion injury [16], in the circulation of the naked mole rat when it is crawling through hypoxic burrows [17], and in the placenta and fetus in the first trimester during the hypoxic period before placental circulation is fully intact [18]. Alcohol, due to its ability to raise osmolality, can also stimulate fructose production [11].
Figure 1.While most studies evaluating endogenous fructose production have been conducted in laboratory animals, there is data suggesting that endogenous fructose production in young lean adults may amount to greater than 5 g/day, with a tripling or more in fructose production rates following a high glycaemic soft drink [8]. Production is expected to be much higher in subjects on high glycaemic, high salt or on high sugar diets as it is known that AR is upregulated in this setting. High glycaemic and high salt diets can also induce a marked increased production of fructose in the brain [9,10]. Thus, fructose can be obtained and/or generated from the diet (sugar, HFCS, high glycaemic carbs, salty foods, umami foods, alcohol) as well as under conditions of stress (ischaemia, hypoxia and dehydration). Indeed, the three attractive tastes (sweet, salt, umami) all encourage intake of foods that generate fructose [7,10,12,19], while the bitter and sour tastes likely were developed to avoid foods that might carry toxins.
3. Fructose triggers the survival switch by lowering ATP levels
Weight is normally tightly regulated, especially for animals in the wild [20,21]. One of the strongest regulators appears to be lean (fat-free) body mass, and this measurement correlates with both energy intake and resting energy metabolism [22]. It is not surprising that muscle mass is a key characteristic the animal tries to protect, and in turn this is guided by the level of mitochondrial function [23]. As such, animals try to preserve intracellular ATP levels as this represents their active energy, and they do this by having metabolic flexibility in which any ATP that is expended can be rapidly replaced from ATP generated from nutrient intake or from fat stores (figure 1). In this setting, the administration of hypercaloric diet at levels that are not compensated acutely by an increase in energy expenditure will result in weight gain (and fat accumulation), while a hypocaloric diet will lead to weight loss (and a depletion of fat stores). In both conditions, energy balance is maintained and ATP levels preserved.
By contrast, fructose metabolism works differently, although it also follows the rules of energy balance. Specifically, fructose actively lowers intracellular ATP while at the same time reducing the ability to make new ATP (figure 1). Thus, the metabolic flexibility is blocked. ATP levels do not fall so far as to threaten survival, but drop enough to activate an alarm that usable energy stores are at risk of being depleted. For example, in studies in humans, ATP levels can fall 20 per cent in the liver following oral ingestion of fructose [24], and up to 60–70 per cent if given intravenously [25]. The level of ATP depletion relates to the concentration of fructose that the liver is exposed to, which relates to the amount ingested and the speed of absorption, which is greater when the fructose is given as a liquid [26,27]. This triggers a set of biological responses that result in increased energy intake. However, the continued suppression of mitochondrial function results in the calories being shunted to stored energy (fat). Eventually ATP levels are replaced, but at the expense of storing more fat such that overall energy levels (i.e. active and stored energy) are higher.
The specific mechanism(s) by which fructose lowers intracellular ATP is shown in figure 2. Fructose is rapidly phosphorylated to fructose-1-phosphate by fructokinase C (also known as ketohexokinase-C, or KHK-C) that has no feedback system to protect ATP levels such that there is an acute fall in intracellular ATP and phosphate [28,29]. The fall in intracellular phosphate stimulates AMP deaminase-2 (AMPD2) that removes the AMP substrate [29], thereby slowing the regeneration of ATP, while at the same time stimulating the production of uric acid (from both the degradation of AMP to IMP as well as from de novo purine synthesis) [30,31]. This helps maintain a normal charge ratio of (AMP + ADP)/ATP. While some IMP could potentially be converted back to AMP and ATP by the purine salvage pathway [32], the production of uric acid appears to be favoured, and serum uric acid can increase by 0.3–2.0 mg dl−1 within the first hour following ingestion [30,33,34].
Figure 2.The production of uric acid by xanthine oxidoreductase generates oxidants (primarily hydrogen peroxide) [35] but uric acid itself also stimulates NADPH oxidase [36–40] that translocates to the mitochondria [41]. An increase in mitochondrial oxidative stress occurs from both NADPH oxidase and endogenous mitochondrial oxidative stress in conjunction with a simultaneous decrease in protective antioxidant systems (especially Nrf2) [41,42]. The oxidative stress reduces ATP production by inhibiting aconitase in the citric acid cycle [41,43–45] as well as blocking beta fatty acid oxidation by acetlating carnitine palmitoyl transferase-1a (CPT1α involved in fatty acid transport into mitochondria) [46] and enoyl Coa hydratase (an enzyme in the beta fatty acid oxidation pathway) [43,47], and blocks ATP regeneration by AMP-activated protein kinase [47,48]. The inhibition of aconitase stimulates the enzymes involved in lipogenesis [41,49] while acetate production by the microbiota in response to fructose is used to generate acetyl CoA that provides the substrate. Furthermore, there is some evidence that fructose metabolism can lead to the consumption of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+), reducing the NAD+/NADH ratio and affecting redox balance, and leading to a decrease in sirtuins, which may also confer metabolic effects [42,50] and augment the glycolytic response [51]. This may be responsible for the acetylation of CPT1α [46].
While mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and ATP generation is suppressed, the generation of fructose 1-phosphate stimulates the release of glucokinase from the nucleus, leading to glucose uptake and glycogen production, while the breakdown of fructose-1-phosphate generates glyceraldehyde and dihydroxyacetone phosphate. In a fasting state, this stimulates gluconeogenesis that can help provide glucose as an energy substrate [52], while in a fed state glycolysis is preferentially stimulated [53]. Lactate, for example, may account for as much of 25 per cent of the ingested fructose based on radiotracer studies [54]. While lactate can be used to generate acetyl CoA as a substrate for the citric acid cycle, when lactate builds up, it generates reactive oxygen species, impairs fatty acid uptake into the mitochondrial and reduces mitochondrial ATP generation [55]. The net stimulation of glycolysis by fructose [28,41,47,48] with suppression of oxygen consumption by the inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation likely was meant to provide survival benefits for animals at risk for hypoxia [17].
This trick of lowering intracellular ATP appears to be central to activating the survival response and disrupting weight regulation. In effect, the intake of calories is stimulated to correct for the ATP deficit, but the switch diverts the calories to fat. Eventually, ATP levels are repleted, but at the consequence of increasing adiposity. Over time there is a transition, as repeated oxidative stress to the mitochondria leads to permanent mitochondrial dysfunction and attrition [43,56,57]. Now ATP levels stay low all the time, but the body accommodates to the low ATP level with a decrease in fat mass and a fall in resting energy metabolism. Energy intake must stay low or weight regain will occur.
Consistent with the hypothesis that decreased intracellular ATP is an important trigger involved in obesity and the metabolic syndrome, low ATP can be induced in a variety of cell types and tissues by fructose [16,58–61], as well as by uric acid [12,43,44,62]. Fructose-induced ATP depletion in the liver can be partially reversed by allopurinol [45]. More importantly, a low intracellular ATP state is characteristic of obesity, diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and Alzheimer's disease [25,63–66].
4. A description of the ‘survival switch’ induced by fructose metabolism
The administration of fructose can fully replicate the metabolic syndrome, and lead to weight gain, visceral adiposity, insulin resistance, hypertriglyceridaemia, low HDL cholesterol, elevated blood pressure, fatty liver, microalbuminuria, hyperuricaemia and biomarkers of systemic inflammation (including low adiponectin, elevated leptin and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) [67]. These findings are also observed in animals preparing for hibernation, suggesting that the term ‘metabolic syndrome’ may be a misnomer and that these characteristics instead should be described as a ‘fat-storage syndrome’ [68]. All these features developed as part of a survival response (figure 3) and are described as follows:
Figure 3.(a) Search for food and water
Fructose encourages behavioural changes to aid the search for food and water. This includes stimulating hunger and bingeing behaviour through the activation of an orexin-hypothalamic circuit, although this does not by itself stimulate increased food intake [69,70]. Fructose also stimulates thirst, possibly by increasing serum osmolality due to a shifting of water into the cell associated with glycogen production [71]. Most importantly, fructose disrupts normal weight regulation by impairing satiety, resulting in excessive food (energy) intake. This requires several weeks to develop and is mediated by central (hypothalamic) leptin resistance [72,73]. Fructose also acts on the brain to stimulate a foraging response that includes the stimulation of exploratory behaviour, impulsivity, and increased locomotor activity [74,75]. Similar effects can be observed by raising uric acid [74,75]. Studies suggest that the effects are mediated by inhibition of insulin-sensitive areas of the brain involved in self-control, recent memory, and deliberation such as the cerebral cortex, the entorhinal cortex, the hippocampus and the posterior cingulate cortex [76,77].
(b) Increase fat and glycogen stores
In addition to stimulating excessive caloric intake by inducing leptin resistance [72,73], fructose increases intestinal villi length that may facilitate more effective absorption of food [78]. Fructose metabolism also stimulates lipogenesis [38,41,79], impairs beta fatty acid oxidation [57,80], and may reduce lipolysis by adipocytes due to the development of hyperinsulinaemia [81]. Glycogen stores also increase [82–84].
(c) Energy conservation
While the foraging response requires energy expenditure, this is compensated by a fall in resting energy metabolism likely related to reduced metabolism secondary to both the blockade of fatty acid oxidation and the effects of insulin resistance to reduce glucose metabolism in muscle [85]. In addition, the reduced glucose uptake by the skeletal muscle and adipocyte has the consequence of preserving blood glucose levels that may remain normal or high, thereby protecting those regions of the brain that are less dependent on insulin for glucose uptake [86]. Nevertheless, some regions of the brain are more dependent on insulin, especially those areas that are involved in inhibiting the foraging response [74]. Fructose impairs insulin signalling to areas [87] that are involved in self-control, deliberation and recent memory [76,77]. The consequence is a stimulation of foraging while energy conservation is assisted by both the systemic and cerebral insulin resistance [75,88].
(d) Preservation of key body functions
Animals in precarious conditions need to maintain robust circulation and excretory function. Not surprisingly, fructose metabolism results in an acute increase in blood pressure that is dependent on uric acid [89,90]. Kidney function is maintained by increasing glomerular filtration pressure, and similar findings have been observed with experimental hyperuricaemia [91,92]. Fructose also stimulates vasopressin production [93,94], which can help reabsorb water, and fructose also stimulates sodium absorption both in the kidney proximal tubule [95,96] and in the gut [97]. These effects aid survival (figure 4).
Figure 4.(e) Activation of the immune system
The generation of uric acid by fructose is associated with the stimulation of inflammatory pathways, including the activation of MAP kinases (p38), NF-ΚB and the stimulation of inflammasomes [98], as well as assisting dendritic cell function [99,100]. Elevated uric acid stimulates oxidative stress [37,101] as well as the production of chemokines, C-reactive protein, and inflammatory pathways [102,103]. Again, immune activation provides protection from infections.
(f) Entering low power mode
The reduction in mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation with stimulation of glycolysis induced by fructose metabolism places the body in low power mode and reduces its oxygen needs [17]. This provides an initial benefit in areas of inflammation with local ischaemia, whereas long-term it might drive inflammation and fibrosis. For example, with cardiac ischaemia, there is the production of fructose with inhibition of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and stimulation of glycolysis that drives cardiac remodelling [104]. This appears to be dependent in part on the activation of the transcription factor, HIF-1α [104,105]. Reduced mitochondrial function with stimulation of glycolysis is also characteristic of diabetic kidney disease [106,107]. We have reported that diabetic kidney disease is mediated by the conversion of glucose to fructose in the kidney [108]. It seems possible that the benefit of SGLT2 inhibitors in cardiac and renal disease may be by blocking the glucose uptake into the diseased tissues, thereby preventing its subsequent conversion to fructose [109]. The blockade in fructose metabolism may initiate fat oxidation and AMP-activated protein kinase activity similar to that observed in estivating animals [80,110]. The effect of fructose to decrease mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and stimulate glycolysis (Warburg effect) provides an explanation for why cancer cells prefer fructose as a growth media [111], and why cancer cell growth is stimulated by both fructose and uric acid [112,113].
5. Role of fructose metabolism in the obesity and metabolic syndrome epidemics
The epidemics of obesity and diabetes began in the early twentieth century [114,115]. One likely mechanism is related to the dramatic rise in intake of sugar, with a sharp inflection when HFCS was introduced [115,116]. Soft drinks, and other liquids containing fructose, are particularly effective at activating the pathway as the fall in ATP is directly related to the concentration the hepatocyte is exposed to, which will relate not only to the amount of fructose but also the speed of ingestion [26]. Indeed, we found that slowing down the intake of fructose-containing apple juice could reduce activation of the survival pathway [27]. Indeed, sugary beverage intake correlates with the risk for obesity and metabolic syndrome. Likewise, the global obesity and diabetes epidemic correlates with the rise in sugar intake and with the introduction of sugar into non-western cultures [117]. In addition, the increased intake of processed foods rich in sugar and salt as well as intake of high glycaemic carbs and alcohol also contribute to the amount of fructose ingested or endogenously produced and the risk for obesity, type 2 diabetes and hypertension [118].
However, there is evidence that humans are more sensitive to fructose, as mice and rats are often relatively resistant to the effects of fructose unless large doses are given. In this regard, our group has identified two genetic mutations that markedly enhanced the risk for fructose-induced metabolic syndrome. The first was the mutation in vitamin C that occurred approximately 61 Ma [119] and that was relatively close in time to the asteroid impact that ended the Cretaceous Period [120]. Vitamin C is an antioxidant that can block fructose effects and has been found to have beneficial effects on various components of the metabolic syndrome [121]. Our group has found that fructose-fed vitamin C deficient mice show a dose response in which higher doses of vitamin C result in less obesity for the same amount of fructose ingested (unpublished observation). Thus, the vitamin C mutation may have provided a natural selection advantage to early primates trying to survive during the ‘impact winter’ that occurred following the asteroid collision [122].
The other mutation that likely benefited our primate ancestors was the uricase mutation, that occurred stepwise from around 24 Ma until the gene was fully extinguished in the mid Miocene. Uricase is an enzyme that degrades uric acid, and uricase-deficient mice show a dramatically greater rise in uric acid in response to fructose [123]. We have discussed the evidence that the loss of uricase likely represented a true ‘thrifty gene’ [124]. The mutation occurred during a period of near extinction of ancestral apes from global cooling [125]. Evidence that it might be a thrifty gene was shown by the fact that inhibiting uricase can markedly amplify the ability of fructose to induce metabolic syndrome in rats [126], while resurrecting the ancestral uricase was shown to block the lipogenic effects of fructose in human hepatocytes [127]. Of note, when the mutation occurred, it only doubled serum uric acid levels (to ≈3–4 mg dl−1) and thereby acted primarily to protect against starvation as opposed to driving obesity [128]. However, during the twentieth century, serum uric acid levels rose dramatically in parallel with increasing sugar intake and the rise in obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease [128]. People with uric acid levels greater than 8 mg dl−1 are much more likely to develop obesity and metabolic syndrome, and experimental and pilot studies suggest that the uric acid is playing a contributory role [124].
6. How does fructose cause weight gain?
The observation that fructose stimulates food intake as well as lowers resting energy metabolism suggests that both increased energy intake and reduced energy expenditure could be responsible for causing obesity, as determined by gain in body weight and fat mass. However, the reduction in resting energy expenditure is compensated in part by the increased energy used in the foraging response.
To evaluate the importance of both mechanisms, we conducted paired feeding studies in which rats were given foods high in fructose (and in some cases, sugar) and compared with diets of the same composition and caloric content except that the fructose was replaced by starch [129–132]. In some studies, animals were placed on a caloric restriction but with equivalent calories ingested per group [132]. The primary finding was that animals fed the same number of calories showed similar changes in weight whether the diet contained fructose or not. While there was a tendency for a slight increase in weight in the animals fed sugar or fructose (which was likely due to the reduced resting energy metabolism), the overall changes in weight were not significant [132]. Thus, weight gain is primarily accounted for by increased caloric intake [129–132], at least in studies of four months or less in duration.
To identify what drives the increased energy intake, we performed additional studies. First, we found that sweet taste encouraged fructose intake, but mice that lacked taste still preferred fructose compared to water and still became fat (even more so than controls) over time [19]. The preference for fructose was dependent on the metabolism of fructose, as mice lacking fructokinase showed minimal liking of fructose, although they still liked sucrose, likely due to its glucose content [19,133]. Importantly, the preference for fructose was not what drove increased caloric content, based on our studies in which we knocked out fructokinase in specific organs. Indeed, the preference for fructose was mediated by intestinal fructokinase, while the metabolic syndrome was driven by hepatic fructose metabolism. Importantly, liver-specific KHK KO mice would drink large amounts of fructose but were completely protected from both weight gain and the metabolic syndrome [14].
The primary mechanism for increased energy intake was the development of leptin resistance. Initially, animals fed sucrose or fructose reduced their chow intake to maintain neutral energy balance so weight gain would not occur. However, after several weeks the animals increased their chow intake such that total caloric intake became hypercaloric, and this correlated with weight gain. Studies documented that this was due to the development of central leptin resistance, and that it could be prevented by blocking fructose metabolism [72,73]. Indeed, we found that this mechanism was specifically mediated by the fructokinase C isoform, and that it was mediated by the side-chain reaction driving energy depletion [129,134] and unpublished).
Animals preparing for hibernation show similar features of the survival switch (e.g. hyperphagia, leptin resistance, weight gain and fat accumulation, fatty liver and insulin resistance) but shortly before they hibernate they reduce their food intake even though food may still be available and this is associated with a decrease in their metabolism [135,136]. One likely mechanism may relate to reaching a weight that triggers biologic response to reduce food intake (the gravitostat) [137,138]. While this mechanism still occurs in obese humans [139], it is apparent that it can be overrun, which we speculate may relate to continued exposure to high concentrations of fructose.
(a) Role of fat
Leptin resistance appears to be driven by either ingested or endogenous fructose, whereas other foods such as high fat diets do not cause leptin resistance [72,73]. While fructose mediates leptin resistance, weight gain is amplified by the intake of energy dense, high fat foods in animals who have become leptin resistant [72,73].
Indeed, the blocking of leptin signalling stimulates the preference for high fat foods [140], which makes sense as it would favour more rapid weight gain and fat accumulation. Ground squirrels preferentially eat seeds that contain high polyunsaturated fats when they are actively gaining weight before hibernation [141]. In addition, recently, it was shown that there is a taste for fat mediated by the TRPM5 taste receptor [142] as well as gut-vagal pathways that drive fat preference [143]. This is why the combination of fat with fructose or sugar dramatically increases fat accumulation and weight gain more than either fat or fructose alone [144]. Furthermore, people on a western diet are likely eating sufficient amounts of sugar, salt, high glycaemic carbohydrates and alcohol to induce some leptin resistance in most individuals. We reported, for example, that endogenous fructose could drive ageing changes in mice fed a carbohydrate diet similar to a western diet (50% carbohydrates) despite low sugar content—mice lacking fructokinase remained lean and healthy [145]. These findings also explain why the Inuit remained lean despite a high fat, high protein diet [146], and why ‘low carb’ diets do not cause weight gain despite high fat content. Lard, for example, does not cause weight gain in normal mice unless they are first made leptin resistant with fructose [73].
(b) Role of glucose
Most of the fructose we ingest is from added sugars (sucrose and HFCS) that also contain glucose. Glucose can markedly enhance fructose absorption and thereby accentuate fructose effects [147,148]. Nevertheless, there is also evidence that glucose administered alone can also induce obesity and metabolic syndrome [7]. A popular hypothesis is that added sugars and high glycaemic carbohydrates may cause obesity by excessive stimulation of insulin [149], which not only stimulates the storage of fat but also blocks lipolysis in the adipocyte [81]. However, as mentioned earlier, high glycaemic foods can also activate the polyol pathway and generate endogenous fructose [7,14].
To evaluate the role of the glucose–insulin axis in driving obesity, we administered glucose to KHK-KO mice or control mice [7]. The control mice showed remarkable weight gain with fatty liver and insulin resistance, but also had high levels of fructose in their livers. Mice lacking KHK drank the same amount of glucose but ate less chow and while they developed mild obesity, it was approximately half that observed in the wild-type controls. The KHK-KO mice also had minimal fatty liver or insulin resistance. These studies thus documented that glucose likely causes some obesity from repeated stimulation of insulin, but that a major mechanism by which high glycaemic carbohydrates cause obesity and metabolic syndrome is via endogenous generation of fructose. Further support came later when we administered HFCS to mice lacking KHK and found that it provided even more protection from obesity, fatty liver and insulin resistance, with about one-quarter of the effect from the glucose–insulin pathway [14]. Thus, while the carbohydrate–insulin model remains an important mechanism for driving obesity the conversion of fructose has an important role in how high glycaemic carbohydrates cause obesity. Interestingly, the insulin resistance induced by fructose results in high fasting insulin levels that act to inhibit lipolysis as the adipocyte remains sensitive to the anti-lipolytic effects of insulin in the insulin resistant state [81]. Thus, the insulin resistant state induced by fructose also supports the glucose–insulin hypothesis but has endogenous fructose as an intermediary step.
(c) Role of protein
Protein is critical to maintain lean body mass, and there is some evidence that low protein diets may stimulate increased energy intake to accomplish this goal, but with the consequence of increasing body fat stores (protein leverage hypothesis) [150]. However, most low protein diets are high carbohydrate diets making it difficult to know which is more important in driving obesity, and low protein diets also stimulate FGF21 which counters the effects of fructose by stimulating the oxidation of fat, especially in the liver [151].
Furthermore, certain proteins, such as red meats and processed meats, may confer increased risk for diabetes, obesity, gout and chronic kidney disease [152–157]. One likely explanation is that red meats and shellfish are high in glutamate and nucleotides such as IMP and AMP [158]. IMP is a key component of the fructose energy depletion pathway, and glutamate is also metabolized to uric acid in the liver. Indeed, we found that umami (both glutamate and IMP) could generate uric acid and cause hepatic ATP depletion, leptin resistance and obesity and metabolic syndrome similar to fructose [12]. Blocking uric acid production with allopurinol could block the effect of monosodium glutamate to cause obesity [12]. The mechanism by which glutamate stimulates uric acid may relate to the conversion to glutamine and de novo synthesis of uric acid [159,160]. It is known that gouty subjects tend to have high serum glutamate levels and also develop gout from glutamate-rich foods (such as tomatoes) [161,162]. However, most purine-rich vegetables appear to be less likely to raise uric acid and cause gout [163], likely because the purines tend to be relatively poor in AMP and IMP [158].
It is interesting that the purine- and glutamate-rich foods that raise uric acid tend to be umami foods that have their own taste, suggesting that these are foods animals tend to seek [164,165]. While uric acid has a direct role in activating the switch through its ability to stimulate mitochondrial oxidative stress and inhibit AMPK [41,47], it also can stimulate fructose production and enhance KHK expression [13,166]. Thus, much of the effect is by stimulating fructose production from glucose, which likely explains why high protein diets in the absence of carbohydrates do not cause obesity.
7. Fructose and metabolic syndrome: an effect independent of excessive calories
A remarkable effect of our pair-feeding studies was the observation that, while weight gain was driven by excessive calories, other effects of fructose occurred even when caloric intake was restricted [129–131]. Indeed, in one study in which rats were fed a hypocaloric, high sucrose diet, the sucrose-fed rats still developed severe fatty liver, hypertriglyceridaemia, insulin resistance and elevations in blood pressure [132]. We also found that the rats initially developed hyperinsulinaemia with normal blood glucose levels, but over time they showed progressive falls in insulin associated with the development of overt diabetes. The pancreatic islets also showed hyalinosis and inflammation, with de novo expression of urate transporters on the islet cells. The starch-fed control animals also developed some signs of mild hypertriglyceridaemia and insulin resistance, which we now believe is likely from low grade fructose generation. However, the overall differences between the two groups were striking [132]. These studies confirm that metabolic syndrome, including alterations in body composition that lead to increased fat, can be associated with minimal weight gain. Indeed, NAFLD can occur in lean individuals [167], especially if hyperuricaemia is present [41].
8. The unexpected role of salt, dehydration and vasopressin in obesity
Water is a critical resource, and it is not surprising that fructose increases vasopressin blood levels as a potential mechanism to increase the retention of water by vasopressin-dependent concentration of the urine [93,94,168]. We also found that fructose may have a fundamental role in the regulation of vasopressin, for dehydration (hyperosmolarity) was found to induce activation of the polyol pathway in the supraoptic nucleus in association with an increase in vasopressin synthesis, and KHK-KO mice showed a blunted vasopressin response to acute and chronic dehydration [169].
The big surprise was that vasopressin does more than stimulate water reabsorption in the kidney, but that it is downstream of fructose where it drives most of the features of the survival switch. For years it had been known that there is another vasopressin receptor known as the V1b receptor, but its physiological function was not well understood. We found that the V1b receptor knockout mouse was completely protected from fructose-induced metabolic syndrome [93]. While the exact mechanism is not fully understood, we do know that the V1b receptor stimulates adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and glucagon levels, and that it may also regulate KHK expression [93].
In retrospect, it has been known that fat is used by marine and desert mammals as a source of metabolic water generation [170,171]. Animals depend on metabolic water when they are hibernating, estivating, as do long-distance migrating birds. The ingestion of salt can induce hyperosmolarity and a dehydration-like state without the loss of water, and this can also activate the production of fructose and vasopressin and cause obesity and metabolic syndrome in laboratory mice that is dependent on fructokinase [10]. Salt intake is high in subjects with obesity and predicts the development of metabolic syndrome, diabetes and fatty liver [10]. Most people with obesity also show signs of dehydration and have high vasopressin levels (noted by measuring serum copeptin) [172–174]. Hydration with water to suppress vasopressin levels can also partially stop and even reverse features of metabolic syndrome [10]. These studies suggest that the survival switch is intricately linked with a nutrient (fructose), a metabolic waste product (uric acid) and a hormone (vasopressin), and that obesity truly is a hormonal disorder.
9. The short and long-term health consequences of the survival switch
One of the most serious consequences of continued activation of the fructose-mediated switch is not obesity and weight gain, but the metabolic effects that involve many of the common diseases occurring in western society (table 1) [16,18,25,38,41, 47,74,75,91,92,111,132,145,175–184]. This not only includes classic diseases associated with obesity such as diabetes, NAFLD and gout, but also hypertension, coronary artery disease, certain cancers, behavioural disorders and dementia.
Table 1.
Overactivation of the survival switch may drive metabolic diseases.
View inlineView popup
An example is the emerging role for the pathway in driving coronary artery disease. Recently, it has been recognized that systemic inflammation as well as inflammation in the atherosclerotic plaques play a role in coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction [185]. One potential mechanism is from the effects of soluble uric acid to activate inflammasomes and NFkB-mediated inflammation [98,102]. However, a more dramatic mechanism has recently been identified, as 85% of subjects with gout have uric acid crystals in their blood vessels where it appears to be concentrated in the atherosclerotic plaque [181,186]. Indeed, hyperuricaemia and gout are associated with increased cardiovascular mortality by both epidemiological studies and Mendelian randomization studies [187,188].
Another example is ageing. Fructose metabolism is associated with oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, loss of cytoprotective transcription factor nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and a reduction in sirtuins that characterize the ageing process [50,189]. Fructose also induces the generation of advanced glycation endproducts much more effectively than glucose [190,191]. As mentioned, we found that ageing-associated kidney disease did not occur in ageing KHK-KO mice [145].
There is also increasing evidence that Alzheimer's disease may be related to intracerebral fructose metabolism [75]. Alzheimer's disease is increased in those whose diet is enriched in foods that either contain or produce fructose (high sugar, high salt, high glycaemic and high processed red meat diets) or who have features of metabolic syndrome and diabetes. The administration of fructose can also induce features of Alzheimer's in laboratory rats (including decreased mental status and amyloid and τ protein deposition), and fructose is also elevated in the brains of individuals with early Alzheimer's dementia (reviewed in [75,88]). The mechanism appears to be secondary to the biological effects of excessive fructose to suppress certain regions of the brain to stimulate a foraging response [75,88].
One key finding is that the role of the fructose pathway is almost inevitably strongest in early disease states, for over time there is often fibrosis, inflammation or mitochondrial loss that results in persistence of the disease process (table 1). Thus, the best time for intervention may turn out to be in early disease before conditions become less reversible. Nevertheless, since much of the disease represents a metabolic disorder in which mitochondrial function is inhibited, one ideal approach is to try to regenerate mitochondria by exercise or other means. In this regard, while both low fructose and low salt diets improve mitochondrial function [192], another excellent approach is via exercise [23].
10. Limitations and challenges
There are challenges to the hypothesis. First, there has been a dispute over whether the thrifty gene hypothesis exists, as it seems most famines are too short to provide sufficient natural selection pressures to result in the emergence of a survival gene that would determine the fate of a species (discussed in [124,193]). Some have also argued that if thrifty genes existed, then everyone today should be obese. However, the mutations in uricase occurred during seasonal famine that lasted millions of years, and the mutation did not cause obesity but rather prevented starvation. Our hypothesis also suggests that obesity will not occur in everyone as it requires an interaction in which one becomes leptin resistant (from fructose metabolism) and then ingests high energy foods (such as fat).
We agree that during the period of modern humans, it is much less likely for a survival mutation to arise. Having said this, there was a period of 5 000–10 000 years during the Ice Age in which advancing glaciers and reduced big game availability led to episodic starvation and a contraction in the population that influenced the development of shamanism and art [194]. There was also a 200-year drought around 4.2 K BP that led to the fall of multiple kingdoms and resulted in the rapid spread of the lactase persistence gene where it carried survival advantages [195]. However, survival genes are much less likely to occur now, and increased fat stores are much less likely to confer benefit, and so it is more likely that today obesity genes may spread more by random drift (the drifty gene hypothesis [196]), especially since predation is less of a risk for those who are obese and sedentary in a civilized society [196,197].
There is also some evidence that intake of sugary beverages have decreased in the last decade, resulting in less overall intake of added sugars [198]. However, intake of added sugars remains extensive and still accounts for 15 per cent of overall dietary intake. Processed foods still contain excessive added sugars and salt in over 70 per cent of the products [199,200]. Thus, it is likely that exposure to foods that either contain or stimulate fructose production remains over the threshold necessary to induce leptin resistance in most individuals.
There is also some evidence that fats may drive obesity on their own in the absence of fructose. We have noted that saturated fats (butter) can induce some modest obesity in our mice lacking fructokinase, and this was associated with mild liver steatosis [144]. Saturated fats appear to be able to induce hepatic steatosis much better than other fats due to their ability to inhibit lipolysis and increase free fatty acid delivery to the liver [201]. Another study found that diets high in animal fat (especially butter and cheese) might increase the risk for diabetes [202]. Nevertheless, the lack of obesity and diabetes in the Inuit on their diet of meats and saturated fat make us think that this is not a dominant mechanism driving obesity and insulin resistance. Indeed, intake of saturated fats fell last century and does not correlate with the epidemics of obesity, diabetes and NAFLD [203], whereas NAFLD correlates with sugary beverage intake [204].
Another confusing finding is that subjects on a low carb, ketogenic diet often develop hyperuricaemia resulting from ketonuria that interferes with uric acid excretion. While the high uric acid can occasionally precipitate gout, it is not known whether the hyperuricaemia has any other deleterious effects. There is some thought that it might be present to help stimulate gluconeogenesis from amino acids [48], but it is also possible that it is not inflammatory due to the countering effects of ketonaemia [205] or because uric acid-induced fructose generation is less likely in the setting of a low carbohydrate diet. We do know that in the situation of starvation, and quite possible severe carbohydrate restriction, that fructose no longer stimulates fat storage but is rather preferentially converted to glucose for immediate energy needs [52]. Clearly, more studies need to be done to address the role of hyperuricaemia in people on a ketogenic diet.
Finally, it is known that not all hibernating animals ingest fructose as their triggering event to increase their food intake, and some animals in hibernacula may eat the same chow yet still undergo an apparent switch in which they dramatically increase their fat stores. It is not clear what is the trigger in these animals, although it could relate to alterations in hydration status, food insecurity, genetic factors or other unknown mechanisms [206–208]. We do know that ground squirrels that enter hibernation despite being on the same diet nevertheless show metabolic changes in their liver similar to that observed with fructose metabolism, in which weight gain is associated with activation of AMP deaminase and uric acid in the liver, followed by stimulation of AMP-activated protein kinase when they oxidize fat during hibernation [80]. Clearly, more studies are needed.
11. Testable predictions
While there remains a lot of supportive evidence for the fructose survival hypothesis, there are also testable predictions. First, there is a major need to confirm the importance of the endogenous fructose pathway in the human population, and to determine the magnitude of the effect on biological outcomes. One potential way is to develop drugs that can interfere with the pathway, such as to develop effective inhibitors of KHK, AMP deaminase-2, or other enzymes in the survival pathway. Studies to investigate the role of the endogenous fructose pathway in hibernating mammals and long-distance migrating birds would also be helpful. A second step is to better understand the mechanisms driving the transition from an early more reversible state to one that is more permanent. One way is to identify biomarkers that document this transition. For example, the importance of the vasopressin pathway can be tested most effectively by assessing serum copeptin as part of the initial workup of a subject at risk for metabolic syndrome and to perform a study in which it is either inhibited by hydration and salt and sugar restriction or inhibited using a vasopressin 1b receptor blocker [93]. Likewise, studies investigating the role of uric acid might be most likely to show benefit on metabolic features early in the course of the disease [176,209].
12. Summary
Obesity and its associated metabolic diseases have had devastating health consequences on modern society. Here, we link these diseases with the activation of a major survival pathway developed in nature to help animals prepare for times of scarcity. Unfortunately, we have unknowingly adopted the foods that activate this switch in our everyday diet, and coupled with the thrifty genes we picked up, we are now suffering the consequences of putting this survival pathway in overdrive. The tragedy of our success is even greater than thought, for newer studies suggest that the fructose pathway may also increase our risk for cancer, pregnancy-related disease and neurological disorders. We recommend proceeding with studies such as outlined above to better understand the role of fructose metabolism in health and disease.
No comments:
Post a Comment