I presently accept exactly one Law of Nature or Scientific Truth. This is the simple and obvious postulate that I Exist. No More and No Less. After making that conjecture, I am able to construct the entirety of our physical existence through mathematics alone. See my article on Cloud Cosmology.
On top of that i have also constructed the theoretical and mathematical foundation of Spirit and Soul and the resultant Ubermind all naturally derived content of existence. The way forward is clear enough although the path may be difficult.
All other so called Laws are estimates or limited to a narrow set of conditions. As an aside, the idea of energy becomes meaningless at this level of understanding.
The 10 False Assumptions of Modern Science (and How to Set Science Free With New Paths to Discovery)
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2013/09/30/10-false-assumptions-modern-science-set-science-free-new-paths-discovery/
Much of modern science remains stuck in an endless inward spiral of
false paradigms. That’s why “scientific” medicine, for example, offers
no real answers to the really big diseases: cancer, diabetes, heart
disease, Alzheimer’s, and so on.
More importantly, modern medicine will never solve these problems unless it abandons its false assumptions and embraces the “higher science” beyond reductionism and materialism.
This is the message of one of the most important books of our time: Science Set Free by Rupert Sheldrake.
This book, available both in hardcopy and audio formats (from
Audible.com), outlines 10 new pathways to discovery that promise to
allow human civilization to leap forward into a new era of
understanding, achievement and the harnessing of the power of nature and
the cosmos. (I own the audible.com edition and have been excitedly
listening!)
” Rupert Sheldrake may be to the twenty-first century what Charles
Darwin was to the nineteenth: someone who sent science spinning in
wonderfully new and fertile directions.” – Larry Dossey, M.D., author of Reinventing Medicine
The ten false assumptions of modern day science
Much like myself, Sheldrake is very much “pro science.” But he is
disturbed by how scientific advancement has become trapped in a cultural
tar pit of delusional beliefs and false assumptions.
These false
assumptions, listed below, hold science back and prevent human
civilization from progressing toward a more profound understanding of
nature, ourselves and our universe. (And that’s the whole point of
science in the first place. Not to enrich corporations but to deepen our
understanding of the universe.)
The following 10 items are Sheldrake’s, but the comments for each
item are my own. For the record, Sheldrake may or may not agree
completely with my own explanations for each heading here, but they are
written in the spirit of what I believe he is wanting to say. If you
want his full explanation of these ten items, read his book.
False Assumption #1) The universe is mechanical
Modern
science believes the entire universe is made of up “stuff” and nothing
else. There is no consciousness, no spirit, no mind and nothing other
than mechanical and chemical stuff.
This explains modern science’s obsession with finding smaller and
smaller particles at CERN. Many scientists actually believe that if the
smallest bits and pieces of a mechanical universe are finally identified
and labeled — because labels are really, really important to the
materialistic worldview — then the entire cosmos will finally be
understood and the “delusion” of God / creator / architect can finally
be dismissed forever (in their view). Their goal is the ultimate
pessimism: to destroy any belief in a higher intelligence and to doom
humans to living pointless lives that end in their total destruction at
the moment of death.
False Assumption #2) All matter is unconscious
The most astonishing delusion in modern science is the fact that most
modern scientists do not believe they are, themselves, conscious
beings. This is also true with Stephen Hawking, whom I have written about in some detail. (See my popular mini-documentary The God Within for a full explanation.)
Modern science assumes that humans are nothing more than biological
robots and that animals are not conscious either. They literally believe
that consciousness is an illusory artifact of the chemical brain. Not
surprisingly, they also do not believe that plants and other living
systems are conscious. Even further, the idea that inanimate objects
such as minerals or crystals might have some sort of consciousness is
considered heresy by most modern scientists.
This denial of consciousness is an assumption, however. There is no
evidence supporting the assumption. In fact, first-person evidence of
the human experience appears to directly contradict the false assumption
that humans are not conscious.
False Assumption #3) The total amount of matter and energy is always a constant
This assumption of modern science is especially suspicious given that
even conventional cosmologists readily admit that 96% of the universe
has yet to be detected at all. That’s the “dark matter / dark energy”
portion of the universe, and to my knowledge, neither dark matter nor
dark energy have ever been directly measured or seen by human
scientists.
Except for the theoretical Big Bang, there is no phenomenon by which
modern scientists believe the totality of matter and energy can come
into existence or exit our universe.
This assumption is especially bizarre considering the theoretical
framework of the Big Bang theory, which claims all the known matter and
energy in the entire cosmos spontaneously appeared without cause, all on its own, without any intention or reason. The Big Bang theory — and its accompanying theory of cosmological inflation –
are, by any definition, a bizarre kind of material mysticism that goes
to great lengths to deny the existence of a creator / designer /
engineer / intelligent advanced civilization / etc.
False Assumption #4) The laws of nature are fixed
This, too, is an assumption that looks to have already unraveled
thanks to the efforts of a few modern-day scientists themselves. As a
simple example, multiple physics experiments are now being conducted all
over the world — and widely replicated — which show “faster than light”
teleportation of information via quantum entanglement.
As
just one example of this, here’s a ScienceDaily.com article describing
faster-than-light quantum teleportation spanning 143km:
(In theory, instantaneous quantum teleportation could take place over
a billion kilometers. The distance makes no difference. Quantum
teleportation ignores the apparent laws of physics, including the “cosmological speed limit” known as the speed of light.)
According to classic laws of nature, such quantum teleportation is
impossible. In fact, all quantum computing should be impossible, and
come to think of it, transistors shouldn’t function either. But they do.
And they do it by breaking the classic laws of physics.
Yet the far stronger argument for challenging false assumption #4 is found in multiverse theory which
states that our known cosmos is just one of an infinite — yes,
infinite! — number of other universes, each with its own variation of
the laws of physics. Only in a small fraction of all universes is, for
example, the strength of the weak nuclear force set at precisely the
right number to result in the formation of stars, planets and
carbon-based life. But because there are an infinite number of
universes, there are also an infinite number of universes where the laws
of physics exactly equal our own… and even where “mirror” human
civilizations almost perfectly reflect our own.
Look up the “anthropic principle” if you’d like to dig into this subject a little more. Or read Goldilocks Engima: Why Is the Universe Just Right for Life? by Paul Davies.
I also recommend author David Deutsch.
False Assumption #5) Nature is purposeless, with no goal or direction
The Darwinian framework of biological science assumes that nature
achieves highly complex biological structures, social structures,
mechanical engineering and behavioral cultures simply through the
process of natural selection. While natural selection is constantly
taking place throughout nature, it alone is not sufficient to explain
the ability of plants, animals, humans and possibly even universes to
achieve remarkable end goals purely through chance and inheritance.
There appears to be a “driving creative force” behind much of what we
observe in nature, including in animals and humans. This driving
creative force, if you get right down to it, appears to have a
connection with spirit — a non-physical “mind” which gives consciousness
to physical beings of all kinds.
What
we see in the natural world — in ecosystems, plants, animals and even
humans — is not explainable through natural selection alone. There
exists intention, consciousness and a seeming desire to achieve
complex goals by taking fantastic evolutionary leaps which modern
science cannot explain.
As a simple example of this, consider the fact that although many
thousands of humanoid-like fossils have been unearthed in the last two
centuries, there are still no fossils that record the theoretical
“missing link” which is supposed to link humans to primates. Why have no
such fossils been found? Almost certainly because they do not exist.
False Assumption #6) All biological inheritance is material, carried in DNA
The idea that your DNA controls your body and your life is now an
ancient myth. Only in the materialistic circles of old school “science”
do people still think DNA alone controls your health, your behavior and
all your inherited attributes.
Today we know that there are epigenetic factors beyond DNA
which strongly influence the development of biological beings. We also
know that environmental factors (i.e. exposure to chemicals, heavy
metals, nutrients, etc.) strongly influence either the suppression or
the hyper-activation of genes. Vitamin D, for example, is one of the
most powerful gene activators in human biology, turning on “healing genes” light microscopic light switches.
Furthermore, consciousness and free will overrides DNA. While you may
have an inherited tendency toward a particular behavior, you can choose
to override that behavior as a matter of choice. The mind trumps the
mechanics, in other words, if the mind is sufficiently trained (through
meditation, typically).
False Assumption #7) There is no such thing as a “mind” other than an artifact of brain function
I find it bewildering that most modern-day scientists still do not
dare acknowledge the existence of the “mind” — a non-material awareness /
presence / consciousness that coexists with the brain but is not
derived from the mechanics and chemistry of the brain.
Comically, many scientists use their minds to attempt to disprove the
existence of all minds. They would like us to believe self-awareness is
an illusion or that terms like “mind” or “consciousness” are just “word
tricks” used to talk about brain chemistry, not actual concepts that
really exist.
But they have failed. To date, there is no scientific proof
whatsoever that supports the odd notion that consciousness does not
exist or that the mind is not present in a conscious being. “Science”
cannot disprove these things because the tools of modern-day science are
materialistic by definition and therefore incapable of proving or
disproving non-material phenomena. It’s like trying to measure the speed
of a moving object with a thermometer.
False Assumption #8) Memories are stored chemically in the brain and disappear at death
In
summary, modern scientists believe that memories are stored chemically,
using the brain as some sort of biological hard drive, and that if they
could only find the location of the brain in which these chemicals are
stored, they could literally “read your mind” like copying files from a
thumb drive.
This assumption is wildly off the mark. I’m convinced that memories are holographically stored across
not only brain matter itself, but also in a non-material spirit matrix
of some sort which interacts with the physical brain.
This is why the physical location of memories in the brain can never
be located by scientists. This is also why some people are shockingly
found to be fully functional in our world even though they have
virtually no brain matter whatsoever. For example, here’s a New Scientist story about a man who had almost no brain matter whatsoever but still possessed average IQ and was a normal part of society.
And yes, the man had memories, too. So if memories are “stored”
somewhere in the brain as modern-day scientists falsely believe, then
how could this man have memories if he had virtually no physical brain
to begin with? How could he function at all? (And his story is just one
of many…)
False Assumption #9) Unexplained phenomena such as telepathy are illusory
Modern-day “skeptics” go to great lengths to try to disprove anything
that even smacks of “mentalism” or telepathy. But they can’t rationally
refute the scientific work of people like Dean Radin, author of The Conscious Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena.
Radin has, over and over again, scientifically shown strongly
convincing evidence for low-level telepathy and other phenomena such as
premonition. Explanations for such phenomena are entirely consistent
with quantum non-localityand quantum entanglement, which Einstein called “spooky action [at a distance].”
The most likely explanation for all this is that the human brain,
being a holographic, hybrid physical / non-physical computational and
awareness engine of sorts, is also “entangled” with all matter in the
universe at a quantum level. The brainmind, if you will, seems to be
both a transmitter and receiver of quantum information that is
continually and instantly rippling across the cosmos. Tuning in to that
information is a lot like tuning to the correct radio station and
suddenly finding the music becoming crystal clear. (David Icke uses this same analogy to explain many of his own concepts about consciousness and the nature of reality.
” Skeptics” who attempt to refute the science of the work of people
like Dean Radin eventually end up declaring something like, “If that
were true, we would already know it” — a classic example of failed
circular reasoning bordering on self-congratulatory dogma.
False Assumption #10) Mechanistic medicine is the only kind that really works
On this point, much of the Natural News website is
dedicated to explaining why mechanistic medicine is a failed system of
medicine. Get this: most modern-day scientists do not believe that any
vitamin, any mineral or any food has any biological effect whatsoever on
the human body other than providing calories, sugars, proteins, fiber
and fat. This wildly delusional belief is enshrined in the FDA’s
regulatory framework and is practiced throughout hospitals and health
clinics across the planet.
Yet it is a truly moronic belief. How can vitamin D have no effect on
the human body when nearly every organ in the body has vitamin D
receptors? How can minerals play no role in human health when elements
like magnesium and calcium are necessary for the most fundamental
chemical processes of muscle neurology?
The physical part of the human being obviously requires physical
building blocks. Those building blocks are nutrients, plant-based
chemicals, minerals, proteins and water. They are not statin drugs,
blood pressure meds, chemotherapy and radiation. The mechanistic model
of medicine is an utter failure for human civilization. It has been a
huge success in generating profits for drug companies and hospitals,
however, which is exactly why this failed system is so desperately
defended by those who profit from it.
Get the book “Science Set Free” and learn more
In this article, I’ve only touched on some of these important concepts. To really delve into this, read Science Set Free by Rupert Sheldrake.
The ideas described in the book are truly revolutionary. They are
also perfectly natural — and in fact, many should be obvious to any true
scientist who isn’t brainwashed by academic dogma or corporate profit
agendas.
Albert Einstein is famously quoted as saying, “We cannot solve our
problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.” Yet
that’s what much of modern science is trying to do… let’s solve the
cancer problem by finding a chemical that kills cancer! Yeah, that’ll do
it!
Or let’s study the tiny particles created by an atom smasher, then we’ll know the mind of God, yeah!
But these approaches will never succeed in answering the really big
questions because they are rooted in 19th-century assumptions which we
now know to be false. There is more to our universe than mere
materialism. There is more to human consciousness than brain chemistry.
There is more to biology than genetics and natural selection.
How obvious does it have to get, folks? THERE IS MORE TO DISCOVER if
we only set ourselves free from the mental shackles of dogmatic,
permanently pessimistic “science” as practiced today in our westernized,
materialistic culture.
Join me in spreading the word about Rupert Sheldrake. This man is a true scientist taking part in the consciousness revolution which I believe to be a necessary step to the true uplifting of human civilization.
About the Author
Mike Adams is a natural health researcher, author and award-winning
journalist with a passion for sharing empowering information to help
improve personal and planetary health He has authored and published
thousands of articles, interviews, consumers guides, and books on topics
like health and the environment, reaching millions of readers with
information that is saving lives and improving personal health around
the world. Adams is an independent journalist with strong ethics who
does not get paid to write articles about any product or company. In
2010, Adams launched NaturalNews.TV, a natural health video site featuring videos on holistic health and green living. He also founded an environmentally-friendly online retailer called BetterLifeGoods.com that uses retail profits to help support consumer advocacy programs. He’s also the CEO of a highly successful email newsletter software company that
develops software used to send permission email campaigns to
subscribers. Adams also serves as the executive director of the Consumer
Wellness Center/a>, a non-profit consumer protection group, and
practices nature photography, Capoeira, martial arts and organic
gardening. He’s also author a large number of health books offered by Truth Publishing and is the creator of numerous reference website includingNaturalPedia.com and the free downloadable Honest Food Guide. His websites also include the free reference sites HerbReference.com and HealingFoodReference.com.
Adams believes in free speech, free access to nutritional supplements
and the innate healing ability of the human body. Known as the ‘Health
Ranger,’ Adams’ personal health statistics and mission statements are
located at www.HealthRanger.org
No comments:
Post a Comment