The problem that I have with sea borne speculations before 12,000 years
or so ago is that they inevitably fail to make adjustment for the hugely lower
sea level that fluxuated up to three hundred feet lower than today.
This readily reduces the separation between South
East Asia and the Australasian plate to a few short miles easily
seen from each other. A dug out canoe,
or better yet, a skin boat would be easily able to venture the transit. The rest is a matter of walking and similarly
resolved river crossings.
The Greek islands, including Crete are
all on the continental shelf and all would have been accessed as easily. All this is no proof of seamanship
whatsoever. Cyprus evidence is all post 11,000
years ago and that is the one that needs to roll the times back to make a statement.
The interesting feat was the Arctic crossing 20,000 years ago into the Americas
on both coasts.
Also do not underestimate the actual utility of the humble canoe relied
on universally. Large trees allowed
large canoes if they were called for. We
had them on the Northwest
Coast up to one hundred
years ago as part of a true Stone Age culture.
Otherwise, it was no trick for someone well experienced to head out on a
good day and run with the wind in a small canoe and be a hundred miles away by
night fall. If a land fall is visible,
then one has a place to lie up until the wind reverses.
It is reasonable to expect that the first true canoes coexisted with the
use of the needle to make clothing and the invention of a chopping axe of
sorts. This all happened a very long
time ago regardless of whatever evidence we have found to date.
Greek
islands were inhabited 170,000 years ago
Neanderthals
and other extinct human lineages might have been ancient mariners, venturing to
the Mediterranean islands thousands of years
earlier than previously thought.
### Neanderthals or
other extinct human lineages may have sailed to the Mediterranean Islands
long before previously thought. Here, an excavation at Akrotiri Aetokremnos, a
site in Cyprus
dating back to about 10,000 B.C., where pygmy hippo fossils were found [Credit:
Alan Simmons]
This
prehistoric seafaring could shed light on the mental capabilities of these lost
relatives of modern humans, researchers say.
Scientists had thought the Mediterranean islands were first settled about 9,000 years ago by Neolithic or New Stone Age farmers and shepherds.
"On a lot of Mediterranean islands, you have these amazing remains from classical antiquity to study, so for many years people didn't even look for older sites," said archaeologist Alan Simmons at the University of Nevada at Las Vegas.
However, in the last 20 years or so, some evidence has surfaced for a human presence on these islands dating back immediately before the Neolithic.
"There's still a lot to find in archaeology — you have to keep pushing the envelope in terms of conventional wisdom," Simmons said.
Neanderthal sailors?
For instance, obsidian from the Aegean
"We found evidence that human hunters may have helped drive pygmy hippos to extinction on
Recently, research has hinted that seafarers may have made their way out to the Mediterranean islands even earlier, long before the Neolithic, and not only to isles close to the mainland, but to more distant ones as well, such as Crete.
###A pygmy hippo
skull found at Akrotiri Aetokremnos, a site in Cyprus dating back to about
10,000 B.C. Evidence suggests human hunters may have driven the animals to
extinction on Cyprus [Credit: Alan Simmons]
For
instance, stone artifacts on the southern Ionian Islands
hint at human sites there as early as 110,000 years ago.
Investigators have also recovered quartz hand-axes, three-sided picks and stone cleavers from
The exceedingly old age of these artifacts suggests the seafarers who made them might not even been modern humans, who originated between 100,000 and 200,000 years ago. Instead, they might have been Neanderthals or perhaps even Homo erectus.
"The whole idea of seafaring makes these extinct groups seem more human — they were going out to sea to explore places that were uninhabited," Simmons told LiveScience.
Dating artifacts
The problem with these ancient finds is determining their exact age. "They're well beyond the range of radiocarbon dating," Simmons said. Although researchers can also deduce the ages of artifacts based on the ages of surrounding materials, these artifacts weren't found in reliable contexts that could indisputably attest to their age, he added.
Although the idea that extinct human lineages possessed such advanced mental capabilities might be controversial, ancient seafaring has been seen elsewhere in the world. For instance,
"If the ancient finds in the
No comments:
Post a Comment