The surprise here is that the
friction produced by falling raindrops is a source of energy release equivalent
to the associated wind turbulence and can not be ignored as one is inclined to
do.
One only has to step out into the
weather of a hot day and look for relief from a thundercloud to understand the
reality of the atmospheric heat engine.
A tornado is merely a more exciting demonstration.
We now know that forty percent of
the contained energy is released through drag as the rain descends.
Rain drains energy from the atmosphere
Feb 24, 2012
When it comes to dissipating energy in the atmosphere, the humble
raindrop punches way above its weight. Researchers in the US have shown
that the energy lost as heat by falling liquid water and ice particles is on
par with the energy that the wind loses to friction. The team suggests that
with the increasing precipitation expected as a result of global warming, the
energy sunk into rainfall could reduce the amount available to generate winds.
Many climate physicists view the atmosphere as a giant heat engine that
drives a wind and water cycle. The Sun warms the Earth's surface, creating the
hot part of the engine with an average temperature of 288 K, and the
atmosphere does work by lifting water vapour towards the engine's cold side,
about 15 km up with an average temperature of 255 K. Taking the
atmosphere's inefficiencies into account, Olivier Pauluis of
New York University and Juliana Diasof the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Boulder, Colorado estimate
the total power per unit of surface area of the engine to be 5 Wm–2.
The rising water vapour then cools, condenses and falls as water or
ice. Without slowing from the atmosphere, rain would hit the ground at a few
hundred kilometres per hour. "You would need to buy a new umbrella,"
says Pauluis. Luckily, the atmosphere dissipates most of that energy in
microturbulence around the water droplets, keeping their speed at a gentle few
kilometres per hour.
On par with the wind
Since kinetic energy doesn't accumulate in the atmosphere, Pauluis and
Dias argue that the total power of its heat engine is roughly the sum of the
rate of energy loss due to air-on-air friction in the winds plus rate of energy
dissipation from the rain. The wind alone is estimated to disperse between
1–5 Wm–2, and the pair undertook the first analysis to discover the
dissipation due to rainfall. Finding it to be about 1.8 Wm–2 on
average, they showed that energy loss due to precipitation is as important as
the loss due to friction in winds.
Erich
Becker of the Leibniz-Institute of Atmospheric Physics in
Kühlungsborn, Germany, calls the study "ingenious". To his knowledge,
he says, "nobody has thought before about this frictional heating due to
rainfall".
Pauluis and Dias used data gathered by the Tropical Rainfall Measuring
Mission (TRMM), a satellite that spots water and ice particles by bouncing
radio waves off them. It looks at six different layers of sky – just above the
ground and then 2, 4, 6 10 and 15 km from the Earth's surface. The
reflected waves tell the researchers the size and concentration of the
raindrops. The size of the droplets indicates their maximum freefall speed,
which in turn gives the drag force required to maintain that speed. By
factoring in the distances that the raindrops fall, the pair could work out the
total energy dissipated by the drag on precipitation.
More dissipation over continents
Naturally, the local energy lost to rainfall friction is closely tied
to the amount of precipitation that the region receives, though Pauluis says
the patterns showed interesting features. "To be precise, there is more
dissipation over continents than over the ocean," he says, which is
consistent with the fact that convection is stronger over the continents,
driving water to greater heights.
Climate models predict that as the temperature of the Earth rises, the
amount of precipitation and the height from which it falls will increase as
well. This means the atmosphere would expend more energy lifting water vapour,
and that could leave less energy for driving the circulation of air around the
planet, says Pauluis.
From Becker's point of view, the study's key contribution to the field
is that it highlights significant source of entropy, or disorder, which was
previously ignored. The atmosphere's tendency to absorb and emit heat unevenly
– more comes in at the tropics and leaves at the poles – reduces its entropy.
Part of that entropy is made up by the turbulence of the wind, he explains, but
the contribution of the rain is equally important and was missing until now.
While neither Becker nor Dargan
Frierson of the University of
Washington , Seattle , believe that this adjustment to the
climate models will have a major impact on climate change predictions, Becker
says, "It's certainly worthwhile to take it into account."
Frierson instead emphasises the fundamental side of the result. He
points out that water vapour makes up just 1% of the atmosphere's mass, while
liquid water and ice particles in clouds are a much smaller portion – more like
0.01%. "And it turns out that just around that fraction of falling liquid
and ice particles, that's where much of the friction is dissipated in the
atmosphere," he says. "That, to me, is quite remarkable."
This research is published in Science 335 953.
About the author
Kate McAlpine is a science writer based in the UK
No comments:
Post a Comment