For fifty years, North Korea has made fools out of all negotiation and has used massive bluster to force concessions for little in return. We still have no peace treaty either.
The Donald rightly surmised that two can also play this game because NK military options are actually bleak. So now we have the Donald using bluster, which immediately got China and Russia to tighten up their borders with advanced ready forces.
Now the USA has the option of showing up and making the whole affair about only the USA and NK. They can also have the SK rushing around attempting to stop it from going too far.
As i have posted in the past, it is possible to cause the NK to lose massive face over this while SK merely stays well out of the way. The USA could even land troops in Russia in order to support their Russian friends. Highly unlikely of course, but it is now possible.
In the meantime china is putting the economic pressure on NK because the USA actually has their back here and it will not be forever.
russia and china are right on north korea
Russia
and China must be applauded for trying to avert a nuclear holocaust on
the Korean peninsula whilst upholding international law, and advocating
for multi-party dialogue with the resumption of the 6 Party Talks
With
the nuclear standoff between North Korea and the United States having
heated up significantly over the summer, it has been the Governments of
Russia and China who have sought to be the responsible, mature and wise
international parties at the United Nations and throughout the
international community.
It has been the brilliant diplomacy of Moscow and Beijing who have been the voices urging restraint, calm and dialogue unlike the insane, ridiculous and totally counter-productive rhetoric of the American President Donald Trump and the US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley.
The leaders of Russia and China must
be given a strong round of applause for trying to avert a nuclear
holocaust on the Korean peninsula whilst upholding international law,
attempting to avoid a nuclear war and advocating for multi-party
dialogue with the resumption of the 6 Party Talks (which have been in
abeyance since 2009) and a cooling off period on the Korean peninsula
with the suspension of the US-South Korea military exercises.
This is the right policy going forward for the welfare, safety and
security of the Korean peninsula as well as regional and international
peace and stability. The wrong course of action and the wrong policies
of handling North Korea and the Kim Jong Un regime have been
consistently followed by the Trump administration and its allies on the
UN Security Council.
The American policy of constantly aggravating North Korea with US-South
Korea joint military exercises designed to unsettle, disturb and provoke
the North is counter-productive and has only increased tensions and the
possibility of all out war in Korea which would be a complete disaster
and must not be allowed to happen.
The American policy of deploying THAAD has also been like a red rag
to a bull in North Korea and again only adds to increasing tensions ans
the likelihood of armed conflict. While Russia and China have been
working with great effort to calm the situation down with the
restoration of dialogue, cooperation and stability it has been
unfortunately the Governments of the United States and to a certain
degree President Trump's ally in British "prime" minister Theresa May
who have actually in reality been increasing tensions, escalating the
situation, antagonising the North Koreans and not helping to decrease
tensions and deescalate the situation.
To be clear North Korea is also completely in the wrong and it is the
prime actor that must stop its nuclear tests and enter into talks. Yet
it is very difficult for the North to enter into the 6 Party Talks when
the United States will not countenance such talks.
One could also mount an argument that the only reason the North
Korean regime is behaving this way and seeking nuclear weapons is to
preserve its own security as it in all likelihood feels extremely
threatened especially in light of what happened with regards to Iraq
during 2002-2003 and beyond and Libya after 2003.
The rhetoric of the Trump administration whether it be from the
President himself or his Defence Secretary Mattis or UN Ambassador Haley
has not been helpful and has been full of hyperbole, no doubt sabre
rattling, but still it simply inflames and escalates an already
difficult, tense and fragile international and regional security and
humanitarian headache.
Imagine if the situation where reversed and it was Mexico on the
United States' southern border acting in this way. Do you really think
the American Government would want to deal with the fall out on its own
door step of a nuclear obliterated Mexico and the tremendous ecological,
environmental and human damage that would create.
I doubt it very much that the United States would take the same
approach to such a situation if the rogue party playing up was right on
its own southern border.
With regards to the role that the United Kingdom Government is playing, hopefully, it isa constructive role with
the aim to help reduce tensions and deescalate the nuclear crisis on
the Korean Peninsula not increase and exacerbate what is already a very
delicate situation.
Time alone will
tell if the current British "prime" minister Theresa May is fully
committed to such a course and is actually exerting (what little
influence and leverage) she may have over her new found best friend from
January President Trump.
Mrs. May made great hay out of her early visit to hold hands with
Donald Trump a week after he was sworn in. Let the international
community see now the Anglo-American "special relationship" in action
with the UK prime minister persuading the American President to change
tack.
No comments:
Post a Comment