This is a seriously neat idea. You run 30 - 40 at a time and while a group is boarding another group is setting up. those boarding are in proper order for an efficient boarding and are not even over crowded. Thus taking your seat becomes efficient as well.
Best it is easy to implement and to train up.
Assuming that seat numbering for different planes can be integrated as well, this will be a great boost to travelers. It actually does not have to be perfect either. close enough can do, as the intent is to order the group that is loading without any fuss.
.
Best it is easy to implement and to train up.
Assuming that seat numbering for different planes can be integrated as well, this will be a great boost to travelers. It actually does not have to be perfect either. close enough can do, as the intent is to order the group that is loading without any fuss.
.
‘Flying Carpet’ Could Be Simple Solution to One of Flying’s Biggest Annoyances
Nine years ago, Rob Wallace, a 74-year-old design engineer
from Australia and a frustrated flyer, was sure he’d hit upon the
ultimate solution to speeding up the slow, tedious process of airplane
boarding.
The only problem was, he couldn’t find any airline willing to give it a try.
“Innate conservatism,” was the only explanation he could summon to
explain why not a single carrier wanted to even test an idea that could
save them millions of dollars per year.
“It’s kind of a chick and egg argument—nobody wants to be first,” Wallace said.
But Wallace finally got a chance with the help of Vlad Kolesnik, a
researcher at St. Petersburg State University of Civil Aviation in
Russia.
Kolesnik helped organize three tests of Wallace’s “Flying Carpet”
boarding system at the Pulkovo Airport in St. Petersburg with Siberian
carrier S7 Airlines. The trials weren’t conducted with official approval
from the airline’s head office and were tacked on at the end of an
already planned series of 62 trials comparing boarding systems over four
weeks. But the results, which were just released, show promise.
The Flying Carpet proved to be the fastest system; one trial broke
the elusive 10-minute barrier while boarding 151 passengers onto an
Airbus A320.
Kolesnik believes the carpet has the potential do even better than that.
“Of course, if the carpet was famous and everyone knew what to do and
why we use it, the carpet would show 10 minutes or even less for the
180 passengers,” he was quoted as saying.
To compare, in 2013 Spirit Airlines boasted being able to board an
A320 in just 20 minutes, which was roughly 10 minutes faster than other
major airlines like American or US Airways, according to an article at the time in Forbes.
How the Flying Carpet Works
Boarding Time Matters
Airlines care enormously about boarding times because every second an aircraft spends at the gate costs dollars.
Wallace calculates that saving one minute is worth about $40. While
that may not seem like a lot, if an airline can save 5 minutes per
flight, and it operates 100 planes, each making six short-haul flights
per day, that’s a savings of $36 million over a year. Across the entire
industry, that’s about $4 billion annually.
The savings matter even more when you consider that boarding times have only been increasing.
Research by Boeing
shows that it takes twice as long to board a plane today as it did in
1970, going from 18 to 20 passengers per minute back then, to as low as
nine passengers per minute now.
A variety of factors have contributed to the trend, including two big ones.
Checked-baggage fees, which are now commonplace, mean more carry-on
luggage—luggage that blocks aisles and takes longer to cram into
overhead compartments.
Flights are also fuller now. In the 1990s, planes were generally 65 to 70 percent full; today, airlines aim for a load factor of 80 percent or more.
Next Steps
With those trends not looking to change on their own, the magic carpet offers a promising solution.
Wallace says he’s hoping word of the positive results will attract attention from other airports and airlines.
Ideally, he’d like to test the carpet in different countries with
different types of passengers to see if the results are the same. He’d
like to see whether, with more exposure, proper explanation, and
signage, his method can indeed board 180 passengers in under 10 minutes
as Kolesnik predicts.
Given how frustrating boarding can be, which is what prompted Wallace
to dream up his invention in the first place, Wallace sees airlines as
the biggest block, not passengers. “I think most of the traveling public
would be happy to go along with the system,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment