This is an extremely important revelation. We have effective multiple confirmation of carbon 14 dates that essentially overlaps full human presence on this planet from 200,000 BP through the present. It is not just one anomaly either but a consistent finding for partially unpetrified bone and also apparently some petrified bone.
Now this may mean that our C - 14 theory is even less reliable than ever thought. Yet i do not think so at all. After all we also have additional cultural evidence for triceratops at least into recent times. Our best conjecture is that remnant populations survived right up to the Pleistocene Nonconformity 12900 years ago. That also suggests that humanity hunted larger populations into near extinction during it first rise between 45,000 BP through 12900 Bp. Obviously earlier fossils would be outside the C14 window and automatically date all rocks to the expected time frames of millions of years in the past.
Add in the pre Nonconformity low sea levels giving us the Sahul ( Australia - New Guinea and sea floor ) as a natural continental sized Refugio that even today has evidence of Dinosaur Age survivals and this seriously works out. Most scientist have not understood yet the implications of 12900 BP and this confronts them with impossible evidence which has been simply ignored. Now we will ignore ample repeatable carbon 14 data. .
.
Did
Humans Walk the Earth with Dinosaurs? Triceratops Horn Dated to
33,500 Years
10
JANUARY, 2015 - 11:42 APRILHOLLOWAY
A
Triceratops brow horn discovered in Dawson County, Montana, has been
controversially dated to around 33,500 years, challenging the view
that dinosaurs died out around 65 million years ago. The
finding radically suggests that early humans may have once walked the
earth with the fearsome reptiles thousands of years ago.
The
Triceratops brow horn was excavated by palaeontologist Otis Kline Jr,
microscope scientist Mark Armitage, and microbiologist and
avocational palaeontologist Kevin Anderson, in May 2012, and two horn
samples (GDFM 12.001a and GDFM 12.001b) were given to the Glendive
Dinosaur and Fossil Museum in Montana. The samples were then sent to
the University of Georgia, Center for Applied Isotope Studies for
Carbon-14 dating, which yielded an estimated date of 33,570 ± 120
years for the first sample and 41,010 ± 220 years for the second.
Triceratops,
a name meaning “three-horned face”, is a genus of herbivorous
ceratopsid dinosaur that is said to have first appeared during the
late Maastrichtian stage of the late Cretaceous period, about 68
million years ago in what is now North America, and became extinct in
the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event 66 million years ago.
However, scientists from the Paleochronology Group, a team of
consultants in geology, paleontology, chemistry, engineering, and
education, who perform research relating to “anomalies of science”,
maintain that dinosaurs did not die out millions of years ago and
that there is substantial evidence that they were still alive as
recently as 23,000 years ago.
Until
recently, Carbon-14 dating was never used to test dinosaur bones, as
the analysis is only reliable up to 55,000 years. Scientists never
considered it worthwhile to run the test since it is generally
believed that dinosaurs have been extinct for 65 million years, based
on radiometric dating of the volcanic layers above or below fossils,
a method which the Paleochronology
Group states
has “serious problems and gross assumptions must be made”.
"It
became clear years ago that paleontologists were not just neglecting
to test dinosaur bones for C-14 content but were refusing to.
Normally a good scientist will be curious about the ages of important
fossil bones,” Hugh Miller, a research and consulting chemist and
Head of the Paleochronology Group, told Ancient Origins in an
email.
The
results of the Triceratops Horn analysis are not unique. According to
Mr Miller, numerous C-14 tests have now been carried out on dinosaur
bones, and surprisingly, they all returned results dating back in the
thousands rather than millions of years.
“I organized the Paleochronology group in 2003 to fill a void with regards fossil wood and dinosaur bones as I was curious as to their age by C-14 dating. We thus have used C-14 dating to solve the mystery why soft tissue and dinosaur depictions exist world-wide. Our model predicted dinosaur bones would have significant C-14 and indeed they did in the range of 22,000 to 39,000 years BP,” Mr Miller added.
Results
of C-14 tests on dinosaur bones provided by the Paleochronology
Group.
Numerous
independent researchers have long argued that there is evidence man
and dinosaur once walked the Earth together, such as hundreds of
ancient artworks and artifacts that appear to depict dinosaurs, long
before modern science had pieced together dinosaur fossils and
conducted analyses to produce detailed reconstructions of their
appearance.
Top left: Relief carving at Angkor Wat, Cambodia (1186 AD). Top Right: Textile from Nazca, Peru (700 AD). Bottom: Tapestry in the Chateau de Blois (1500 AD)
However,
even more intriguing is the discovery of soft tissue in dinosaur
fossils. In the March
2005 issue of Science,
paleontologist Mary Schweitzer and her team announced the discovery
of soft tissue inside a 68-million-year-old Tyrannosaurus rex leg
bone from the Hell Creek Formation in Montana, a controversial
finding considering scientists had thought soft tissue proteins
degrade in less than 1 million years in the best of conditions. After
recovery, the tissue was rehydrated by the science team and testing
revealed evidence of intact structures such as blood vessels, bone
matrix, and connective tissue.
More
recently, Mark Armitage and Kevin Anderson published results of a
microscopic analysis of soft tissue from a Triceratops horn in the
peer-reviewed journal Acta
Histochemica.
Mr Armitage, a creationist, claimed that the preservation of cells is
a scientific impossibility if the dinosaur really walked the Earth
over 66 million years ago. On this basis, he opened a discussion with
colleagues and students about the implications of such a finding
being that the creationist perspective is correct and that dinosaurs
existed much later than mainstream science maintains, a move that
promptly saw him fired
by the University of California.
While
the Paleochronology Group says it is not “of any particular creed
or denomination”, there are undoubtedly those with creationist
beliefs among the group, a fact which critics may say could bias
their results. Nevertheless, the group has urged any and all
scientists to replicate their results by carrying out rigorous C-14
testing on any dinosaur sample.
“Every sample tested yielded significant original Carbon-14 by extensive cross-checking of their ages in bone collagen, bulk organics and carbonate from bone bioapatite on AMS units and obtained concordance. Thus, the overwhelming odds are that most if not all unpetrified or even supposed petrified dinosaur bones in museum and university collections will show the same result,” Mr Miller told Ancient Origins. “We urge therefore that all those in charge of such collections see if they can replicate our findings. The implications are immense.”
The
challenge, so far, has been met with rejection, and previous attempts
to publish C-14 test results were repeatedly blocked. Raw data
without interpretation was blocked from presentation in conference
proceedings by the 2009 North American Paleontological Convention,
the American Geophysical Union in 2011 and 2012, the Geological
Society of America in 2011 and 2012, and by the editors of various
scientific journals. The Center for Applied Isotope Studies at
the University of Georgia, who conducted ‘blind’ C-14 tests on
dinosaur bones, without knowing what they were, refused to conduct
further C-14 tests after finding they were testing dinosaur bones.
Paleontologist Jack Horner, curator at Montana State University’s
Museum of the Rockies, who excavated the Tyrannosaurus Rex remains
that contained soft tissue, even turned
down an offer of a $23,000 grant to
carry out a C-14 test on the remains.
“[T]he public should be made aware that the discovery of soft tissue, C-14 in dinosaur bones and dinosaur depictions world-wild renders current beliefs about how old they are obsolete,” said Mr Miller. “Science is about sharing evidence, and letting the chips fall where they may.”
While
there is a possibility that the C-14 test results were a result of
contamination or error, (even though the results were replicated and
rigorous pre-treatments were carried out by the University of
California to control for this), or are perhaps due to some other
factor not currently understood by science, it seems reasonable to
expect scientists to attempt replication of such groundbreaking test
results. Failure to investigate or even acknowledge such significant
findings unfortunately suggests that some scientists are more
interested in holding on tight to current perspectives, rather than
seeking to advance knowledge and understanding in this field.
Featured
image: Triceratops horn discovered in Dawson County, Montana, which
yielded C-14 results of around 33,500 years.
No comments:
Post a Comment