I am posting on this item more
for my American readers because supplies an excellent insight into the
electoral process of the parliamentary system that Canada uses as opposed to the
American system instead. All such
systems ultimately provide some sort of an obstacle course for a leadership
aspirant to grind through in order to win the voter’s trust.
The US of course famously sets up a
primary system in order to shake out the candidates fairly quickly, but it has
and will be subverted by populism and the recent example of Obama leaps to
mind. He was untested in all aspects of
his past career and remained so until actually elected upon which only then was
it possible to begin to assemble a real track record.
Unsurprisingly, past governors have
made up a number of successful presidencies because they were presumably tested
elsewhere. Yet is has at times been
quite unsatisfactory and fa8iling presidencies are still able to ride out a
loss of confidence. Yet the parliamentary
system is also prone to capriciously remove a leader way to soon.
What is described here is the tortuous
path to political ascendency in Canada . One result of this system is that Canada has
rarely been led by a truly inexperienced leader and then only briefly. This has generally led to superior outcomes.
Why Justin Bieber will never be prime minister
For better or worse, our electoral system weeds out the pop stars
For the second time in as many years, a Grammy-winning pop star wants
to become president. Two years ago, it was respected rapper Wyclef
Jean who made an unsuccessful–though much talked-about–bid
for the presidency of Haiti. Today, it’s African singer-percussionist Youssou
N’Dour, currently a candidate in Senegal’s
upcoming presidential elections.
There are musician-politicians in Canada too, of course. Prime
Minister Stephen Harper is a decent pianist; interim Liberal leader Bob Rae is
another. And the late NDP leader Jack Layton loved to play music in his
off-hours. Admittedly amateurs all, the three leaders nevertheless gained a
certain creative credibility for their musical chops.
There have even been professional Canadian musician-politicians. The
current NDP caucus features a pair of roots rockers: onetime band-mates
(in L’Étranger) Charlie
Angus of Grievous
Angels and Andrew
Cash ofThe
Cash Brothers. Both, however, are a long way from snatching up the
country’s top job–and arguably just as far from becoming pop stars.
Which raises the question: is a pop star prime minister of Canada even
possible?
The answer has a lot to do with our electoral system. If Canadians were
allowed to pick the head of the executive directly (more or less as Americans
do in their presidential elections), we might imagine a sufficiently popular
musician—Bryan Adams? Celine Dion? Drake? BIEBER?!—translating her popular
appeal into a leadership role.
Alas, to become a Canadian prime minister, there’s no escaping the
slow, laborious rise through the ranks: first, win the party nomination in a
local riding; then win your riding in an election; then become a member of
Parliament; then put in time as a back-bencher; and take on key party roles,
possibly a cabinet post. That could take a couple of terms, if you’re lucky.
Keep at it for a number of years, standing in Question Period, facing
the press, stabbing the right backs and shaking the right hands, and you just
may have a chance to earn your party’s nomination at a leadership convention.
After that, you only have to go out and win your own seat in a federal
election—for the party that takes the greatest number of seats in Parliament—and
you’re in!
If you’re a pop star, it’s sadly obvious what that would do to your
rehearsal schedule and studio time. No more touring stadiums. As for a Juno,
let alone a Grammy: forget it.
Which raises a point worth pondering. Remember the scene of our own
prime minister, Stephen Harper, playing the piano in avuncular fashion?
Remember well, because Harper may be the closest Canada ever gets to having a a pop
star for prime minister.
No comments:
Post a Comment