What is really important here is
that the problems with the salmon fishery appear to be related to a serious
virus load that obviously produces high mortality.
The story about muzzling the
scientist is a non story unless you believe research sponsors’ do not have the
right to manage the media aspect. The
fact and the reality is that they do and must.
Legal and regulatory responsibility descends on one man (it will not be
the scientist) in our system and that means checks are mandated however unwieldy. This all sounds like someone had a hissy fit.
The key question is what actually
the nature of the virus is and what has been its historical significance. It may well be the salient determinant of
salmon survival. Do not just think that
it is a recent addition to the ecology.
It certainly tells us that even a
perfectly managed river system is vulnerable to population crashes from a
virus. We need to know that is true or
not.
Feds muzzle scientist over salmon study
Government fears influencing inquiry into declining stocks
By Margaret Munro, Postmedia News July 26, 2011 9:00 PM
Top bureaucrats in Ottawa have muzzled a
leading fisheries scientist based on Vancouver Island whose discovery could
help explain why salmon stocks have been crashing off Canada 's West Coast, according to
documents obtained by Postmedia News.
The documents show the Privy Council Office, which supports the Prime
Minister's Office, stopped Kristi Miller from talking about one of the most
significant discoveries to come out of a federal fisheries lab in years.
Science, one of the world's top research journals, published Miller's
findings in January. The journal considered the work so significant it notified
"over 7,400" journalists worldwide about Miller's "Suffering
Salmon" study.
Science told Miller to "please feel free to speak with
journalists."
It advised reporters to contact Diane
Lake , a media officer with the federal
Department of Fisheries and Oceans in Vancouver ,
"to set up interviews with Dr. Miller."
Miller heads a $6-million salmon genetics project at the federal
Pacific Biological Station on Vancouver Island .
The documents show major media outlets were soon lining up to speak
with Miller, but the Privy Council Office said no to the interviews.
The Privy Council Office also quashed a Fisheries Department news
release about Miller's study, saying the release "was not very good,
focused on salmon dying and not on the new science aspect," according to
documents obtained by Postmedia News under the Access to Information Act.
The Privy Council Office and the Fisheries Department said Miller has
not been permitted to discuss her work because of the Cohen Commission, a
judicial inquiry created by the prime minister to look into declines of the
famed Fraser River sockeye salmon.
Miller is expected to appear before the commission in late August.
The Privy Council Office has "management responsibility" for
the commission and decided Miller should not give media interviews about her
study because of the inquiry, said PCO spokesman Raymond Rivet.
"Fisheries and Oceans Canada is conscious of the requirement to
ensure that our conduct does not influence, and is not perceived to be attempting
to influence, the evidence or course of the inquiry," department
spokeswoman Melanie Carkner said in a written statement.
But observers say it is more evidence of the way the government is
undermining its scientists.
"There is no question in my mind it's muzzling," said Jeffrey
Hutchings, a senior fisheries scientist at Halifax 's
Dalhousie University .
"When the lead author of a paper in Science is not permitted to
speak about her work, that is suppression," he said. "There is simply
no ifs, ands or buts about that."
The Harper government has tightened the leash on federal scientists,
whose work is financed by taxpayers and is often of significant public interest
- be it about fish stocks, air pollution or food safety.
In one high-profile case reported by Postmedia News last year, Natural
Resources Canada scientist
Scott Dallimore had to wait for "pre-clearance" from political staff
in the minister's office in Ottawa to speak
about a study on a colossal flood that swept across northern Canada at the
end of the last ice age.
Researchers, who used to be free to discuss their science, are now
required to follow a process that includes "media lines" approved by
communications officers, strategists and ministerial staff in Ottawa. They vet
media requests, demand reporters' questions in advance and decide when and if
researchers can give interviews.
Environment Canada
now even has media officers in Ottawa
taperecording the interviews scientists are allowed to give.
Yet transparency as well as open communication and discussion are
essential to science, Hutchings said, and Ottawa 's
excessive control over communication is "really poisoning the science
environment within government."
To Hutchings, the muzzling of Miller is "all about control -
controlling the message and controlling communication."
The government released 762 pages of documents relating to the Miller
study to Postmedia News. Many passages and pages were blacked out before they
were released.
The documents give a glimpse of the way media strategists,
communication specialists and officials control and script what government
scientists say - or, in Miller's case, do not say - about their research.
The documents show the Fisheries Department wanted to publicize
Miller's study, which raises the spectre of a mysterious virus killing huge
numbers of Fraser
River salmon before they
reach their spawning grounds.
In November, two months before Miller's findings were published in
Science, Fisheries Department communications staff started preparing "media
lines."
The lines said Miller's findings "demonstrate unequivocally
that salmon are entering the river in a compromised state and that survivorship
can be predicted based on gene expression more than 200 kilometres before
salmon reach the river."
Miller's team has not yet identified a culprit, but her Science study
said one possibility was a virus associated with leukemia, which can be
transmitted from fish to fish.
Reporters from Postmedia News, CBC and many other media, including Time
magazine, asked to speak with Miller after receiving the Jan. 9 notice from
Science.
The documents show DFO communications staff firing off a series of
"URGENT" emails as they tried to get clearance from Ottawa for Miller's "media lines"
and the okay for her to speak with reporters.
They eventually got approval from DFO's deputy minister and the federal
fisheries minister's office but then had to go "to PCO for sign off,"
the documents say.
"You need to write a note for hotbutton approval," Rhonda
Walker-Sisttie, director of DFO public affairs and strategic communications in
Ottawa, told the Vancouver communications branch by email, advising them to use
the "PCO template for media requests."
As the reporters' deadlines loomed, Terence Davis, DFO's Pacific
regional director of communications, implored Ottawa to clear Miller to talk.
"If we are unable to set up a technical briefing or interviews for
later today, the opportunity for DFO to gain the profile we would like for
Kristi's work may be lost or very much diluted," Davis said in one email.
"We are pushing hard," Walker-Sisttie assured the Vancouver communications
office.
Then, weeks after the department learned Miller's findings were to be
published in Science and several days after 7,400 journalists were notified
about the study, the PCO decided not to let Miller talk about her findings and
their significance.
"PCO has decided that we can only respond in writing,"
Walker-Sisttie reported from Ottawa .
Another explained: "Kristi was not approved to provide interviews."
The reporters filed stories based on her highly technical Science
report and interviews with some of Miller's colleagues at the University of
B.C.
Miller is still not allowed to speak about the Science report, which
she wrote in a Nov. 12 memo "reflects only a fraction of what we
know."
But Miller will finally be able to discuss her work in late August,
when she is scheduled to testify at the Cohen Commission.
1 comment:
that photo is BS. No way he would casually hold a fish that size with his arms sticking all the way out.
Post a Comment