I said a long time ago that Russia had no need whatsoever to buy USA uranium. Guess what? It was bought solely to supply a secret Uranium BOMB program for Iran in Syria.
First off all denials now are bull. the evidence displayed will be too rich and too deep to avoid and as noted the uranium can be traced and confirmation if not already complete is soon.
The only plausible response is to first respond to what is clearly an act of WAR. That means blow everything up in Syria and seize the evidence. This will lead to the Iranians been blown out of Syria and the establishment of Assad as a loyal ally or dead. There will now be no compromise on this.
DEEP state treason is now over the top and truly firing squad worthy. We are entering bracing times.
Warning! QOM complex may be flash banged.
..
Knowing what you know now.
re: Israel disclosure moments ago.
Authentic.
Why is Sec of State there?
WHY IS THE EU / OTHERS PRESSING TO REMAIN IN THE DEAL?
Think logically.
France & Germany came to the WH for the sole purpose of pressing POTUS to remain in the deal.
5% shared.
POTUS deCLAS Syria/Iran + U1 connection.
Where does EU fit in?
SICK!
Q
re: Israel disclosure moments ago.
Authentic.
Why is Sec of State there?
WHY IS THE EU / OTHERS PRESSING TO REMAIN IN THE DEAL?
Think logically.
France & Germany came to the WH for the sole purpose of pressing POTUS to remain in the deal.
5% shared.
POTUS deCLAS Syria/Iran + U1 connection.
Where does EU fit in?
SICK!
Q
Define the terms of the Iran nuclear deal.
Does the agreement define & confine cease & desist ‘PRO’ to the republic of Iran?
What if Iran created a classified ‘satellite’ Nuclear facility in Northern Syria?
What if the program never ceased?
What other bad actors are possibly involved?
Did the U.S. know?
Where did the cash payments go?
How many planes delivered?
Did all planes land in same location?
Where did the U1 material end up?
Is this material traceable?
Yes.
Define cover.
What if U1 material ended up in Syria?
What would be the primary purpose?
SUM OF ALL FEARS.
In the movie, where did the material come from?
What country?
What would happen if Russia or another foreign state supplied Uranium to Iran/Syria?
WAR.
What does U1 provide? [ USA Uranium ]
Define cover.
Why did we strike Syria?
Why did we really strike Syria?
Define cover.
Patriots in control.
Q
Does the agreement define & confine cease & desist ‘PRO’ to the republic of Iran?
What if Iran created a classified ‘satellite’ Nuclear facility in Northern Syria?
What if the program never ceased?
What other bad actors are possibly involved?
Did the U.S. know?
Where did the cash payments go?
How many planes delivered?
Did all planes land in same location?
Where did the U1 material end up?
Is this material traceable?
Yes.
Define cover.
What if U1 material ended up in Syria?
What would be the primary purpose?
SUM OF ALL FEARS.
In the movie, where did the material come from?
What country?
What would happen if Russia or another foreign state supplied Uranium to Iran/Syria?
WAR.
What does U1 provide? [ USA Uranium ]
Define cover.
Why did we strike Syria?
Why did we really strike Syria?
Define cover.
Patriots in control.
Q
No name out.
Now.
https://mobile.twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/990953165267681281
We love good singers.
Q
Now.
https://mobile.twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/990953165267681281
We love good singers.
Q
[ this means that Lindsay Graham is very much a cooperating witness who is working himself out of jail - an obvious prospect of course and he gets to survive - arclein ]
Israel Says Secret Files Prove Iran Lied About Nuclear Program
JERUSALEM
— Revealing a huge archive of stolen Iranian nuclear plans that dated
back more than a decade, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel
accused Iran on Monday of lying for years about its efforts to build a
nuclear weapon, days before President Trump is to decide whether to pull
out of the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran.
In
an extraordinary and highly theatrical televised presentation, Mr.
Netanyahu showed off a few samples of what he said was half a ton of
records Israeli spies obtained from a secret warehouse in Tehran, making
the case that Iranian leaders had deceived both the world and the
International Atomic Energy Agency when they insisted their nuclear
program was for peaceful purposes.
But
Mr. Netanyahu did not provide any evidence of violations by Iran since
the deal went into effect in early 2016, suggesting that the Israeli
prime minister — who has adamantly opposed the deal since its inception,
and even went to the American Congress to try to block it — was hoping
that the disclosures of Iran’s deceit would provide a basis for
President Trump to follow through on his threats to scuttle the
agreement on May 12.
Mr.
Trump, speaking at a Rose Garden news conference minutes after Mr.
Netanyahu’s presentation, gave no indication of whether he would scrap
the deal or continue his effort to force the European partners who
helped negotiate it — Britain, France and Germany — to try to reopen it.
“In
seven years, that deal will have expired, and Iran will be free to make
nuclear weapons,” Mr. Trump said, incorrectly stating the terms of the
deal. While some restrictions on Iran are relaxed starting in about
seven years, Iran cannot make nuclear fuel until 2030, and it is never
permitted to make nuclear weapons: It has signed the Nuclear
Nonproliferation Treaty, which bans it from weapons production. “Seven
years is tomorrow,” Mr. Trump added.
Iran’s
deputy foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, a top Iranian negotiator of
the nuclear agreement, called Mr. Netanyahu’s remarks “a very childish
and even a ridiculous play.”
In
a telephone interview with state-run television, he said Mr.
Netanyahu’s presentation was “a prearranged show with the aim of
impacting Trump’s decision, or perhaps it is a coordinated plan by him
and Trump in order to destroy the J.C.P.O.A.,” the initials of the
nuclear agreement, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
Mr.
Netanyahu, speaking from the Israeli Defense Ministry in Tel Aviv,
played clips of Iranian leaders repeatedly attesting that their country
harbored no ambition for building nuclear weapons — and then pointed to
photos, videos, blueprints and other evidence Israeli agents had
harvested, he said, that showed the Iranians had been deceitful all
along.
“These
files conclusively prove that Iran is brazenly lying when it said it
never had a nuclear weapons program,” Mr. Netanyahu said, pointing to
copies of what he said were 55,000 printed pages and 183 compact discs.
He said Israel had passed the information on to the United States, which “can vouch for its authenticity.”
Mr.
Netanyahu said that Iran had intensified its efforts to hide evidence
of its weapons program after signing the nuclear deal in 2015, and in
2017, moved its records to a secret location in Tehran that looked like
“a dilapidated warehouse.”
“Few Iranians knew where it was, very few,” Mr. Netanyahu said proudly. “And also a few Israelis.”
The
Iranian program to design and build nuclear weapons was hardly a
secret; its existence was the reason that the United States, under
President George W. Bush and then President Barack Obama, moved to block
it. Both presidents said publicly that Iran had a bomb project
underway, and the United States mounted, with Israel, a vast covert
program to undermine the Iranian effort with one of the world’s most
sophisticated cyberattacks.
American
intelligence agencies concluded in 2007 that Iran suspended the active
portion of the bomb effort after the beginning of the Iraq war, in 2003,
and Mr. Netanyahu confirmed that in his presentation. But he said that
other elements of what Iran had called “Project Amad” went ahead,
directed by Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, an Iranian scientist.
The documents he showed were not the first to leak out of the Iranian archives, or to document Mr. Fakhrizadeh’s role.
A
decade ago, in early 2008, the chief inspector of the International
Atomic Energy Agency gathered diplomats from around the world to a
meeting at the agency’s Vienna headquarters and showed them images from a
similar trove, including sketches of bomb designs and memos and budget
documents from Mr. Fakhrizadeh’s project. That presentation included
sketches of a “spherical device” that could be detonated using high
explosives, similar to plans Mr. Netanyahu showed on Monday.
The
I.A.E.A. presentation included documents showing the arc of a missile
that detonates a warhead at an altitude of about 600 meters, roughly
that at which the Hiroshima bomb was detonated.
Mr. Netanyahu went beyond that on Monday, and brandished what he described as Iranian plans to build up to five nuclear weapons.
But he cited no evidence that those plans were pursued.
Under
the nuclear deal that Secretary of State John Kerry reached in the
summer of 2015 in Vienna, Iran was required to ship about 97 percent of
its nuclear fuel out of the country — a task it accomplished the next
year — and to dismantle all but a small portion of the nuclear
centrifuges that enrich uranium.
Mr.
Netanyahu’s best case for a violation of the Iran deal came when he
insisted that the Iranians had falsified their declarations to the
I.A.E.A. in late 2015, by denying they had ever planned to build a
weapon.
Still,
even that would come as little shock to those who negotiated the deal:
In effect, the agreement was made possible by allowing Iran to lie about
the past, while imposing verification on it for the future.
Mr.
Netanyahu had a spring in his step as he strode back and forth in front
of a large projection screen and yanked back a black cloth to reveal
shelves and cases stacked with copies of what he said was the evidence
his spies had retrieved. He described the cache as “one of the biggest
intelligence achievements ever by the state of Israel.”
He
is awaiting what is likely to be an indictment on corruption charges.
He is damaged politically, and has counted for his political survival on
being seen as the only leader who can be trusted to keep Israelis safe.
He has been agitating single-mindedly against the nuclear deal, even at
the risk of fraying Israel’s close ties with the United States during
the Obama administration.
Iranian diplomats greeted Mr. Netanyahu’s accusation with derision.
“Ha,
ha, ha,” said Mohammad Marandi, a University of Tehran professor who is
close to Iran’s leaders and participated in the nuclear talks in
Vienna. He said that Israel had “fabricated evidence” before and might
have again. He called the timing of the Israeli disclosure suspect, and
raised the idea that it might have been orchestrated in cooperation with
the Trump administration.
“It’s
very convenient to bring this up two weeks before the decision on the
nuclear deal is made,” Mr. Marandi said. “No one in their right mind
will take this seriously, unless there is a prearranged deal with the
White House.”
According
to a senior Israeli official, the discovery of the Iranian archive was
related to President Trump by the Mossad chief, Yossi Cohen, on a visit
to Washington in January. The official attributed the delay in making it
public to the time it took to sift through and analyze the material,
the vast majority of which was in Persian.
The
Israeli official also said that Israel’s government believed that Mr.
Trump had already decided to abandon the nuclear agreement. Israel was
thus not hoping to “pressure” Mr. Trump by publicizing evidence of
Iran’s lies but rather to “support” him, the official said.
The
official also said that Mr. Netanyahu had intended to publicize the
Iranian nuclear files a day later, but moved it up partly in response to
missile strikes in Syria late Sunday night, for which suspicion has
fallen on Israel. The Israeli government calculated that Iran would feel
less confident in retaliating militarily, possibly setting off a
full-fledged regional war, if it were on the defensive in the
international arena.
No comments:
Post a Comment