In fact there was something much bigger to hide while they somehow removed Trump. Thus an active coverup was combined with a soft coup to remove the President. Instead time ran out on all of them and i do think that was deliberate as it allowed for the counter coup to collect Intel and to systematically remove multiple blockades necessary to fully drain the swamp.
That phase is well over and the silence is overwhelming now.
We have been able to partially track some of this fight, but only have the advantage of knowing it is really underway and we mostly see the results of success and sometimes the results of failure as well. What we see is likely only that part needed to sustain the public narrative. There is strong potential for thousands to be engaged well below the horizon..
By the by, this is clear evidence that Obama, Brennan and Clapper were engaged in a scheme to impose real control over the American People to further their progressive agenda not dissimilar to a Communist or Fascist takeover of the government as executed by Lenin and Hitler from a minority position politically..
Their actions after the elections suggests that they believed they had a clear path forward to do this. Today we do not know what actually went wrong for them, besides the stretching of time on them. The levers may have been cut unexpectedly for them as Mil Intel was really on top of this.
We are in the midst of a great historic change that will not be clear for a long time.
.
The Hidden Reason The ‘Russia Collusion’ Investigation Ever Got Started
By Richard Enos
Collective Evolution
June 26, 2019
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/06/no_author/the-hidden-reason-the-russia-collusion-investigation-ever-got-started/
If
the investigation into whether or not Donald Trump colluded with Russia
and the ensuing ‘special counsel’ headed by Robert Mueller is starting
to look to you like little more than a smoke screen, you are not alone.
If FBI agent Peter Strzok’s text message that ‘there’s no big there’
seems prophetically self-incriminating, you are on the right track. And
if Attorney General William Barr’s appointment of US attorney John
Durham to investigate how the probe into Russian meddling in the 2016
election began has you anticipating that maybe, finally, the floodgates
of truth are about to open wide, I would not be one to bet against you.
Nothing is guaranteed in the political arena, of course. Certainly
not in terms of the public being told the truth of what is really going
on in the chambers of power. Nor should we be looking to our elected
leaders or their appointees for our ultimate salvation. However, for
those with an ear to the ground and a sense of the rising dramatic
tension in political theatre, it seems that there is nothing else left but for the truth behind the weakening veils of deception to start gushing out.
There is now an abundance of riches when it comes to evidence that there is a shadow government, a Deep State,
that has long wielded the power behind the U.S. Government, and has
operated in its own self-interest to the detriment of the American
people and their liberties. The notion that the entire ‘Russia
Collusion’ narrative was founded on the desire of this shadow government
to hide its own activities from the public, and project its own crimes
onto innocent people, will start to make more and more sense to an
ever-widening audience in the coming months.
Whistleblower Dennis Montgomery
In a May 12th article by Mary Fanning and Alan Jones of theAmericanReport.org entitled “Comey Launched Trump Russia Investigation Day After General Exposed ‘The Hammer‘,” we learn about inventor and software designer Dennis Montgomery, a CIA/DOD/DHS/NSA/FBI contractor-turned-whistleblower.
Writer’s Note: As soon as I had written the
line above I clicked on the link to the American Report article as I
wanted to review it and select some quotes from it. Below is a
screenshot of the message I received:
This sort of thing can no longer be considered ‘coincidence’. These
technical glitches can only happen so many times before we are able to
presume that this is evidence of intentional sabotage to prevent people
from knowing the truth. In his radio show Operation Freedom, Dave Janda
warned about this very thing–that the deep investigative articles on
this site might soon be shut down by this ‘can’t provide a secure
connection’ message.
The Russia Hoax: The I...
If we add this to the well-known censorship, demonetization and
outright removal of accounts on mainstream social media sites like
Facebook, Youtube and Twitter, we see that the battle to suppress the
truth and keep people from awakening is raging right now. Hopefully this
is starting to become obvious to everyone.
I will try to construct my article on the basis of the notes I have
already gathered, and with the hope that the link to the American Report
will be restored when you are reading this.
First, Dennis Montgomery is a software design genius who was tasked
with overseeing the creation of a new super-surveillance system that
would employ new and growing opportunities provided by the latest
technologies large and small, including devices used by everyday
citizens like smartphones. When he was asked to create it, Montgomery
was told that it was only to be used for foreign surveillance, not to be
weaponized for domestic surveillance against the American people.
The ‘Hammer’
The system created by Montgomery was secretly referred to as ‘The Hammer.’
Montgomery eventually discovered that his surveillance system was being
used against the American people. And so on August 19th, 2015,
Montgomery turned whistleblower and alerted FBI Director James Comey’s
office in 2015 that President Obama’s CIA Director John Brennan and
Obama’s Director of National Intelligence James Clapper had turned the
super-surveillance system that Montgomery designed for foreign
surveillance into a domestic surveillance system. Montgomery asserts
that Obama, Brennan, and Clapper used ‘The Hammer’ in a diabolically
intrusive manner in order to spy on the American people and collect
massive amounts of surveillance data for “leverage” and “blackmail.”
Montgomery turned over physical evidence in the form of 47 computer
hard drives containing 600 million pages of documents to FBI General
Counsel James Baker, who represented the office of FBI Director
Comey. Montgomery maintains that the data on the hard drives prove the
existence of THE HAMMER and prove that Brennan and Clapper engaged in
illegal domestic surveillance, despite the existence of safeguards that
were already in place.
The FBI provided Montgomery with a detailed receipt for the 47 hard
drives, including handwritten descriptions of each and every hard drive,
pictured below.
During a 2017 radio interview with
his attorney Larry Klayman, Montgomery explained the extent of this
program, including specific reference to how much spying had been done
on Donald Trump even before he ran for president:
I was a CIA contractor both under John Brennan and under James Clapper and these individuals were running domestic surveillance programs in the United States collecting information on Americans… they collected everything they could find. Bank accounts, phone numbers, chats, emails, and they collected a massive amount of it under the Obama administration.
I provided to the FBI seventeen businesses of Donald Trump, including the Trump Tower, the Trump leasing programs, all of these different programs, and including Trump himself and the various family members that had been wiretapped under these programs. There has been a wiretap on Trump for years.
Montgomery claims that Brennan and Clapper used the
super-surveillance system Montgomery designed to spy on Article III
federal judges, including the onetime head of the FISA court Judge
Reggie Walton, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, and Chief Justice
of U.S. Supreme Court John Roberts. In their article,
Fanning and Jones speculate about a particularly crucial flip-flop
decision Roberts made and the likelihood ‘The Hammer’ was involved:
Montgomery’s revelations about his super-surveillance system THE HAMMER call into question Chief Justice Robert’s strange and inexplicable 2012 decision that stood in direct opposition to his own stated legal argument. At the eleventh hour, Roberts flipped and supported the individual mandate for President Obama’s highly unpopular Affordable Care Act.
FBI Director Jim Comey took Montgomery’s evidence and buried it.
Montgomery Sues Comey And FBI
On June 6, 2017, Montgomery and his lawyer Larry Klayman sued the
FBI and its former director, James Comey, for the agency’s allegedly
having “buried an investigation” into Montgomery’s claims.
A press
release from Klayman dated June 20, 2017 announced that he asked the
court for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in
the case and reads, in part:
Today, Larry Klayman, the founder of both Judicial Watch and now Freedom Watch, and a former federal prosecutor, announced that he and his client whistleblower Dennis Montgomery have moved for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in their lawsuit against former FBI Director James Comey, the FBI itself, and the NSA and CIA, among other defendants. The underlying lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by Freedom Watch is styled Montgomery and Klayman v. Comey et. al, Civil Action Number 1:17-cv-01074 (RJL).
The case involves allegations that James Comey, in concert with the other defendants, buried an FBI investigation, caused by whistleblower Dennis Montgomery, a former NSA/CIA contractor, into mass illegal surveillance on not just President Trump, but the chief justice of the Supreme Court, other justices, 156 judges, and even Klayman. Montgomery came forward to Comey years ago with 47 hard drives containing classified information, under grant of immunity, and even was interviewed under oath by FBI agents Walter Giardina and William Barnett. Despite this, the complaint and the motion alleges that Comey buried the investigation and thus obstructed justice, since as recently alleged and revealed by Circa News and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the FBI was engaged in this illegal and unconstitutional surveillance under Comey, allegedly along with the intelligence agencies.
The lawsuit is ongoing.
Birth of the ‘Russia Collusion’
Now if we go back a few months prior to the lawsuit being launched,
we can see that some very important information was coming out that may
have sparked the ‘Russia Collusion’ investigation into action. On March
4th, 2017, Donald Trump put out the following tweet:
Only two weeks after, on March 17th, 2017, Fanning and Jones completed an investigation and wrote “Whistleblower Tapes: Trump Wiretapped ‘A Zillion Times’ By ‘The Hammer,’ Brennan’s And Clapper’s Secret Computer System”
(this link appears to work, for now). On the same day, U.S. Air Force
Four Star General Thomas McInerney appeared on Dr. Dave Janda’s “Operation Freedom”
that broadcasts from terrestrial radio station WAAM 1600. McInerney
read the above article over America’s airwaves, revealing “The Hammer”
to the public.
FBI Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence Division
Peter Strzok and his supposed paramour, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, exchanged a
cryptic text message only twenty-six minutes after McInerney’s radio
appearance, and later another text message that explicitly referenced
Dennis Montgomery and Montgomery’s attorney Larry Klayman.
The following morning, Monday, March 20, 2017, FBI Director Jim Comey
announced before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
that the FBI Counterintelligence Division, where Strzok served as Deputy
Assistant Director, was investigating Trump’s connections to the
Kremlin, and that the FBI had “no information” to support Trump’s tweet
claiming that President Obama wiretapped Trump.
On April 24, 2017, the FISA court let Brennan, Clapper and others
amend their statements and ordered the destruction of criminal case
records. It should come as no surprise that Brennan and Clapper had
their fingerprints all over the promotion and dissemination of the
‘Steele Dossier,’ which was the unverified (and since proven unreliable)
piece of evidence that was used as a primary data source for the
“Russian Collusion” investigation.
The Deep State: How an...
And it is worth noting that only a day after the release of the May 12th Fanning/Jones article on
which this article is based, Attorney General William Barr appointed
John Durham, the U.S. attorney in Connecticut, to explore the origins of
the Trump Russia collusion investigation.
Where We Are Today
Today, while James Comey and John Brennan are out on mainstream media
trying to frame the narrative that there is still evidence of
Trump-Russia collusion and that there was no domestic spying program,
they probably know the end of their massive coverup is near.
One of the reasons, and perhaps the primary reason that the whole
‘Russia Collusion’ investigation was undertaken, was to try to flood the
media airwaves and information being shared with the public to keep
attention away from the domestic spying program. There was likely a hope
at the launch of the Russia probe that there would be some compelling
information, either uncovered or fabricated, that would lead the public
at large to suspect the Trump was guilty of collusion or, at minimum,
of obstruction of justice. To the detriment of Comey, Clapper, Brennan
and their co-conspirators, this did not come to pass.
AG Barr and prosecutor Durham undoubtedly know full well about many
of the circumstances around the inception of the Russia collusion probe.
However, great care is being taken at present not to provide Deep State
forces with any evidence of bias or prejudice.
It appears that the Attorney General is trying to prepare the public
to digest and process this information bit by bit so that the public
is well informed by the time charges are brought. This will help to
mitigate efforts by mainstream media to obfuscate what is really going
on.
In our latest episode of ‘The Collective Evolution Show’ on CETV,
Joe and I discuss the revelations of inventor/whistleblower Dennis
Montgomery and the urgent need for the public to become aware of the
full scope and implications of the domestic surveillance system that is
in place in the US.
<span
data-mce-type="bookmark" style="display: inline-block; width: 0px;
overflow: hidden; line-height: 0;"
class="mce_SELRES_start"></span>
The Takeaway
It is important for the public to become aware of what is really
going on in the hidden halls of power, and how the advancement of a
domestic surveillance system has us far closer to fictional portrayals
of dystopian societies than we might have ever been willing to
admit. That being said, there is no reason to shy away from this in
fear. The light of our collective awareness, once a critical mass is
reached, is strong enough to expose and eventually remove these affronts
to our natural liberties.
Reprinted with permission from Collective Evolution.
No comments:
Post a Comment