I think that we are actually having just that simply because we are slowly becoming more tolerant. Yet we need to internalize the economic power of freedom itself.
It is my contention that proper engineering of the natural community will revolutionize economics itself. That natural community must empower the free individual and nurture that individual. The whole operating rule is to avoid coercion itself while supporting sound behavior. hunting bands are inclusive and maximally productive in adverse circumstances.
The rule of the Potlatch rewards the Big Man or Woman.
All such ideas apply across society as well.
The US Needs a Freedom Revival
Slowly and subconsciously, people are re-adopting the libertarian concepts that made the US great in the first place.
Wednesday, December 06, 2017
https://fee.org/articles/the-us-needs-a-freedom-revival/
It’s so easy to celebrate our “freedoms” with song singing, national holidays, and the obligatory pledging of allegiance to the flag. Don’t get me wrong; I’m happy to say the United States remains one of the freest places in the world to this day. Indeed, the United States has accomplished many great things as a nation. I’m happy to be an American who proudly celebrates my service in the United States Marine Corps. That said, we can and need to do much better.
I can’t say with certainty what our founding fathers would think about the United States leading the world in incarceration rates, serving as the world’s police force, or maintaining a welfare and regulatory state so immense that we now exceed $20 trillion in debt and ever growing. Cutting federal spending in any area now seems a task akin to trying to square the circle. I’m not sure our founding fathers would be singing along with us. To be fair, we surely have issues to resolve.
How to Win at Economics
A few years ago, I visited Cairo, Egypt. While touring the capitol, I was exposed to the unwealthy slums, and wondered why the standard of living there was so poor as compared to the United States. I have entertained the same thoughts as I’ve traveled throughout the world and visited many longstanding but horribly poor cities. Why do we have such a high standard of living while others in other countries, many established long before ours, struggle to deliver even basic life necessities to its people?
The answer is simple; freedom raises standards of living. Said another way, the libertarians are right! Tyranny works really well for the disgusting anti-social maniacs at the top of the inner circle who benefit by coercing their fellow humans into doing or not doing things against their will. Free markets work great for the moral and productive people of the world who thrive on voluntary transactions with others. It’s these people who benefit themselves and others simply by trading in their own self-interest.
The free market is what allows people to exchange things they value less for things they value more. In this way, both parties to the transaction are better off after the transaction. It’s a true win-win deal. The more of these transactions, the better for everyone. This is how standards of living rise. Free markets are also the only moral way to exchange goods and services because no force or coercion is employed in the exchange. People are free to trade or not to trade.
We need to get back to basics. The United States is the lone superpower in the world and maintains a relatively high standard of living as compared to the rest of the world because we have done a better job of preserving freedom over the years than many other countries. It’s that simple. Slowly, and mostly subconsciously, people are re-adopting the libertarian concepts that made the United States great in the first place.
Shifting Away from Tyranny
Marijuana legalization is a great example of our shift away from tyranny and back to libertarian principles. The majority of Americans now support legalization of marijuana. While this is certainly a good trend, the reasons underlying the shift are most important.
While I have absolutely no doubt marijuana has substantial medical uses, this is not the best reason to legalize it. Because free, competent adults ought to decide for themselves what substances, harmful or non-harmful, go into their own bodies, marijuana ought to be legal. This is the best argument for marijuana legalization. Only this position is compatible with a free society.
After all, free people wouldn’t tolerate the government deciding for us what substances are harmful and must be banned. There’s a strong case that drinking carbonated drinks is harmful to our bodies. I’m unaware of any argument for the medicinal uses of Coke or Pepsi. Personally, I choose not to drink carbonated beverages for this reason. However, I would be offended by any government effort to ban carbonated beverages based on an argument that it’s bad for my body. It’s my body. I get to decide.
I would strongly oppose any government effort to ban any substance for competent adults to ingest; especially in a case where I have personally decided not to use the substance anyway. It’s about my right to decide for myself. It’s a freedom thing! It ought to be an American thing too.3
People are starting to recognize that a free society can tolerate the concept that competent adults have a right to control their own bodies, their property, their money and their time. We have recently seen this philosophical belief give rise to the concept of same-sex marriage. It’s the same issue like marijuana legalization. Certainly, recent advances in the areas of legalized prostitution, euthanasia laws, gambling laws, freedom of religion, school choice and many other issues also prove the point. We are slowly becoming a more tolerant and open society. Someday, all victimless crimes will be abolished.
Peaceful Idiots
Concepts like racism still exist. Naturally, in a free society, people ought to be free to be peaceful racists. Brains and morality can never be legally imposed. However, free people must tolerate not just peaceful racists, but peaceful idiots of all types. So long as people are peaceful, a free society must necessarily tolerate all views; even idiotic ones.
Even in the midst of many examples of real racism, it remains the exception not the rule in the United States today. To be sure, racist people still plague us with their foolish views. However, most people today have adopted a position of tolerance toward people with differing levels of pigment in their skin or different philosophical worldviews. More sophisticated people realize the rights of others in a free society include the right to peacefully hold whatever views one wants on any issue at all.
I realize there are points to the contrary. Progress is never in a straight line. Indeed, we have had setbacks, and we will suffer more. However, this does not overthrow my point; we are slowly becoming a more libertarian society because people are becoming more tolerant of others. This is the big issue to keep your eye on.
I invite you to join the group of humans who respect the rights of all other competent adult humans to decide for themselves how to peacefully pursue their own happiness. Let’s work together to convince our fellow humans that freedom, peace, and love flow initially from true tolerance towards others.
"Marijuana legalization is a great example..." "legalization" is bad not good. Legalization itself implies that we are now allowed to do something by permit. "Someday, all victimless crimes will be abolished." The common law had no notion of a "victimless crime". The common law also had no notion of "legalization". Under common law the accused had the right to face their accuser and under common law a court could only be granted jurisdiction if all elements that make up a valid cause of action ( action = court action) were present in the accusation which included allegations of actual injury. If there was no accuser there was no jurisdiction for a court to hear a 'case' because there was no case. If an 'accuser' didn't allege any actual injury there was no accuser hence no cause for court action hence no jurisdiction. The fact that the common law recognized everyone as being innocent until proven guilty, requirement of an accuser alleging actual injury for a court to have jurisdiction to hear a case and the requirement for an agent to have a principal (principal being an accuser with valid cause to a law agent) means that there was no place in law for victimless 'crimes' and no place for anything to be 'legalized' because no matter what you were doing if you didn't have an accuser alleging actual injury then you weren't breaking the law thus no cause for court action.
ReplyDelete"Legalization" of any activity is going backwards not forwards because once something is 'legalized' means that criminals claiming to be 'government' can require you to 'contract' with them for a permit on their terms or can even deny you a permit thereby 'legalizing' crony crapitalism by selling permits to their cronies but no one else. "Legalization" of anything is a sham and is going backwards from where mankind once already was under common law. "Legalization" is for the intellectually bankrupt. While poppy, coca, kratom, cannabis, psilocybin, lsd and others are not 'legal' you can bet the cronies in 'law' enforcement are cashing in while they 'legally' kidnap you for doing what they are doing and for what is already lawful under common law. You are sovereign not government, government is servants, uphold that or there is no government and you are simply a slave to criminals.
You're being too pedantic. legalization, to nearly everyone, means from now on we are free to engage in previously prohibited behavior. By your account the common law would protect us from being charged with crimes without an accuser - except it didn't. Hopefully humanity is coming around to rejection of the notion that it is OK to initiate force to achieve social ends.
ReplyDelete