Actually, i do not think it does that at all. It allows peers to eyeball the other side and force them to make their case. We have here a body of evidence and positions that might not have been so widely publicized.
It has now become abundantly clear that plausible opponents of the regime are incarcerated in China. It does not just apply to Falun Gong although they became much too visible. Any such prisoners are then considered potential feed-stock for organ transplants. This makes 1984 look like child's play.
The result is a steady reliable flow of organs for sale. No legitimate effort exists to change this practice because they cannot without establishing a black market instead.
None of this remains a secret and sadly it will not end until artificial organ production is properly mastered which is actually close. Is it wrong? Of course, but so is infanticide also known as abortion. as said the sooner we grow organs the better and the sooner we end poverty the better as well. pregent women need to know they will be nurtured.
.
Vatican Conference Spreads Misinformation About Organ Harvesting in China
http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/2223115-vatican-conference-spreads-misinformation-about-organ-harvesting-in-china/?
Much commentary has emerged on the recent conference on
combating organ trafficking and transplant tourism hosted by the
Pontifical Academy of Sciences at the Vatican.
Professor Maria F. Singh MD of Doctors Against Forced Organ Harvesting (DAFOH) notes that participant Dr. Huang Jiefu of China:
violated the ethical principles governing
the World Medical Association, the World Health Organization, the
United Nations, The Transplantation Society and the Declaration of
Istanbul. As a high-ranking official of the Chinese Communist Party
(CCP) and liver transplant surgeon, he designed and implemented a vast
system of state-sanctioned organ harvesting from executed prisoners and
prisoners of conscience across China. He admits that virtually all
transplanted organs up until recently came from executed prisoners, and …
that he himself was personally engaged in this practice, transplanting
more than 500 livers during years when there were no voluntary organ
donors at all.
Anyone waiting for a new transplantation law in China must
acknowledge that any notion of Chinese “law” is fictitious. Clive Ansley
of Canada, who practiced law in Shanghai for 14 years until the
mid-2000s, states:
China is a brutal police state…Our
position is based on irrefutable evidence of what is actually
happening…we can prove the statistics on actual transplants carried out;
we can prove that these numbers are utterly irreconcilable with the
available sources, in the absence of mass murder perpetrated against
prisoners of conscience. We are interested only in the evidence of what
is actually happening; we have only a passing interest in the content of
Chinese legislation attempting to paper over reality, and we have no
interest whatsoever in the palpable falsehoods of Huang Jiefu.
As spokesperson for China’s organ transplant network, Huang is barred
from providing an honest account of the source of organs for
transplantation. By inviting him, the Vatican was implicitly endorsing a
murderous large scale procurement of organs underway across China since
at least 2001. Organ trafficking today is certainly an international
black market scourge, but it appears to be only in China that innocent
citizens are killed for their organs by the government and its agents.
\
\Dr. Jiefu Huang, Chairman of the Chinese National Organ Donation and Transplantation Committee, at the Chinese embassy in Rome on Feb. 6, 2017. (AP Photo/Andrew Medichini)
\
The Vatican earlier experienced a deeply troubled history in
confronting the Holocaust while it was occurring until 1945. It should
not now turn a blind eye to compelling evidence of mass murder of
innocents occurring across China. Pope Francis should not be faulted for
what occurred. His Holiness has termed “trade in human beings, a modern
form of slavery.” He also abstained from addressing the Vatican
conference.]
\
The International Coalition
to End Organ Pillaging in China requested unsuccessfully that Huang’s
presence be balanced by evidence about past and current organ harvesting
in China from prisoners of conscience, who are killed expressly for the
purpose of retrieving their organs, rather than death row criminals.
These include Uyghurs, Tibetans, practitioners of the Buddha-school
Falun Gong, and some house Christians, who are detained in Chinese
labour camps and are inhumanly subject to summary execution for their
organs.
Huang claimed that China would cease using organs from executed
prisoners as of Jan. 1, 2015, but the Chinese regime has created no new
orders outlawing the use of such organs. Nor has it acknowledged using
the organs from prisoners of conscience.
A detailed “Update”
published last June cites evidence from numerous sources to document
contemporary practices and estimates the current volume of transplants
in China to far exceed either the number of persons subject to the death
penalty or the number of volunteer citizen donors.
Confidence in the “Update’s” findings has been expressed. The U.S.
Congress passed House Resolution 343 condemning the practice. Similarly,
the European Parliament has held hearings and passed
various resolutions, notably the Written Declaration 0048/2016. The UK
parliament has held hearings on the question and the Conservative
Party’s Human Rights Commission has also produced a report documenting
the practice.
The alleged reform of China’s transplant system is supported solely
by promises made by Huang Jiefu, which are taken to represent state
policy. But with no statutory or regulatory framework outlawing use of
prisoner organs, and no punishment or accountability for those who have
engaged in such homicidal conduct, these claims are scarcely credible.
The conference should have considered the plight of incarcerated
prisoners in China who are treated as expendable human organ banks.
There is no evidence that this practice has ceased in China. On the
contrary, there is much evidence from official websites across China
that it continues. Officials from China should not be given the
prestigious platform of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences to spread
misinformation about reform in China.
David Kilgour, a lawyer by profession, served in Canada’s House
of Commons for almost 27 years. In Jean Chretien’s Cabinet, he was
secretary of state (Africa and Latin America) and secretary of state
(Asia-Pacific). He is the author of several books and co-author with
David Matas of “Bloody Harvest: The Killing of Falun Gong for Their
Organs.”
Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Epoch Times.
No comments:
Post a Comment