What is described is awful, yet it is not clear that we have seen a clinical shift during the past twenty years. For some reason we are doing better than those rats.
That has been the main support for the cell phone industry. During an era in which exposure has rocketed, and technical improvements have worked possibly the other way, there has been no obvious clinical confirmation of a significant increase in plausible issues. Even the suggested brain pathology has not popped up anywhere as yet and it should. All this suggests that the experimental protocol must be extreme. .
Neurosurgeon Reveals Radiation from Wi-Fi, Smart Meters and Cell Phones Cause the Blood-Brain Barrier to Leak
September 23rd, 2016
By Marco Torres
http://wakeup-world.com/2016/09/23/neurosurgeon-reveals-radiation-from-wi-fi-smart-meters-and-cell-phones-cause-the-blood-brain-barrier-to-leak/
Dr. Leif Salford is a Neurosurgeon at
Sweden’s Lund University Hospital, and a Professor and Chairman of the
Department of Neurosurgery at Lund University. Since 1988 Dr. Salford
and his colleagues have conducted many studies on radio frequency
radiation and its effects on the brain, exposing over 1,600 experimental
animals to ‘low-level’ radiation.
Their results over time have been both
consistent and worrisome: Exposure to radiation, including that from
cell phones and wi-fi, causes leakage in the blood-brain barrier — the
brain’s first line of defense against infections and toxic
chemicals. Some of the most concerning conclusions result from the fact
that even the weakest exposure levels to wireless radiation caused the
greatest effect in causing the blood brain barrier to leak.
Researchers in 13 other laboratories in 6
different countries had reported the same effect, but no one had proven
whether it would lead to any damage in the long term. Then, in a study
published June 2003 in Environmental Health Perspectives, Salford’s team
repeated the experiment on 32 additional animals, but this time waited
eight weeks before examining their brains. In those animals that had
been exposed to a cell phone, up to two percent of the neurons in all
areas of the brain were shrunken and degenerated.
Dr. Salford called the potential
implications of this research “terrifying. We have good reason to
believe that what happens in rats’ brains also happens in humans.”
Referring to today’s children and teenagers, the study’s authors wrote
that “a whole generation of users may suffer negative effects, perhaps
as early as middle age.”
An argument is sometimes posed to those
who express concern about radiation from “smart” meters, Wi Fi etc.,
that the radiation emitted from these devices is at such low levels that
the public needn’t worry about it. However this is not necessarily
accurate. Dr. Salford’s studies showed opening up of the blood brain
barrier from even very low levels of radiation exposure. In fact, Cindy
Sage and Dr. David Carpenter explained in a 2008 paper published in the
peer-reviewed journal Pathophysiology, entitled Public Health Implications of Wireless Technologies, that it is actually “the weakest exposure level [which] showed the greatest effect in opening up the BBB [blood brain barrier].”+
Dr. Devra Davis, Ph.D, MPH, author of “Disconnect: The Truth About Cell Phone Radiation”
explains the science of cell phone radiation in a very comprehensive
way. For example she shows photos of two cells, one whose DNA has been
damaged by “gamma” radiation (which is what was emitted by the atomic
bombing of Hiroshima) and another cell damaged by low level pulsing non
ionizing radiation (from a cell phone). Both cells are very damaged
compared to a normal cell; but the problem extends beyond physical cell
damage. Dr. Davis explains that the DNA from the cell exposed to the cell phone radiation also shows signs of damage.
In her book,
Dr. Davis also discusses the campaign of disinformation waged
against reputable scientists and their studies — and points out that
some of the reputable studies which have been falsely discredited
actually showed the damage caused to the brain by radiation as early
as 1972 (Frey).
In May of 2011, the World Health
Organization (WHO) official recognized that wireless radiation such as
emitted by “smart meters” is a possible carcinogen. However, their
tentative stance does not reflect the scientific reality. After decades
of corporately-funded, biased research being held up as
“industry-standard”, there are now hundreds of independent
peer-reviewed scientific studies showing there is a clear health hazard
with technology that emits wireless radiation in the range that “smart
meters” do. Meanwhile, tens of thousands of people with a “smart meter”
installed in their homes have contracted illnesses, insomnia, rashes,
headaches, and worse. Many have been forced to leave their homes
entirely, due to the adverse health effects of radiation.
What’s more, in apartment buildings
where 30+ “smart meters” are installed in a single electrical room, the
dangers are even higher. And, while the work of Dr. Salford and Dr.
Davis is extensive, there have so far been no long-term health studies
done on such high levels of Electromagnetic Radiation.
In a PBS interview with Dr. Keith
Black, chairman of neurosurgery and director of the Maxine Dunitz
Neurosurgical Institute at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles,
commented on the WHO’s classification of RF Electromagnetic radiation as
a 2B possible carcinogen.
“We haven’t had any good studies in the pediatric population. A child’s skull is much thinner… and the amount of radiation that goes into the pediatric brain is much higher than in an adult. So we should be cautious with how we allow our children to use a cell phone. They’re going to be the ones that not only use [this technology] at a much younger age but at a much longer duration [than older generations].”
Let’s start connecting the dots and end this madness to our health, and the health of future generations.
No comments:
Post a Comment