First off, it makes complete sense to sink deep bases underground to make them immune to direct attack by nuclear weapons. It is the best strategy. Even better, their surface footprint can be negligible and easily misleading. Given all that it is certain that this program began in the early fifties and continued to this day.
The military has huge advantages doing this. First it will mine in seriously competent rock. This makes the mining relatively safe. Thus crews who are already experienced miners will not complain too much.
Presuming a twenty foot advance per day using blasting methods, we can have one crew or mining front produce a good mile of tunnel per year. Opening up caverns will be even faster and easier. All this produces several truck loads of waste every day which has to be dealt with. much of that would slide easily into the building trades. It is still hard to keep quiet, but then it is also not impossible.
What this shows us is that a mere one hundred mining teams could produce seventy years times one hundred teams times one mile to give us 7000 miles of working tunnels. This represents several thousand men at most continuously engaged. These numbers are easily lost inside the military.
It is clear that we have only seen the tip of the iceberg. Presume the Russians did as much as did just about every NATO power as well. Add in the rest once everyone understands just how easy it all is and what excellent training for manpower it happens to be.
The military has huge advantages doing this. First it will mine in seriously competent rock. This makes the mining relatively safe. Thus crews who are already experienced miners will not complain too much.
Presuming a twenty foot advance per day using blasting methods, we can have one crew or mining front produce a good mile of tunnel per year. Opening up caverns will be even faster and easier. All this produces several truck loads of waste every day which has to be dealt with. much of that would slide easily into the building trades. It is still hard to keep quiet, but then it is also not impossible.
What this shows us is that a mere one hundred mining teams could produce seventy years times one hundred teams times one mile to give us 7000 miles of working tunnels. This represents several thousand men at most continuously engaged. These numbers are easily lost inside the military.
It is clear that we have only seen the tip of the iceberg. Presume the Russians did as much as did just about every NATO power as well. Add in the rest once everyone understands just how easy it all is and what excellent training for manpower it happens to be.
Right Beneath Your Feet: The Hidden Reality of Deep Underground Military Bases
Posted: 27 Jun 2015 07:01 AM PDT
Right Beneath Your Feet:
The Hidden Reality of Deep Underground Military Bases
http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.ca/2015/06/right-beneath-your-feet-hidden-reality.html
The
U.S. Government alone classifies over 500 million pages of documents each year. As far as
transparency goes, there is none. How can we know anything about what is
happening on our planet if so much information is hidden from the public
domain? By now, the classified world has moved far beyond the reach of the
public, and far beyond in its power and capabilities with regards to
technology, scientific and cosmological knowledge and more.(1).
“According to our best estimates, more
than half of all U.S. government records are classified. For an archivist
seeking to preserve and understand our history, that means most of our history
is kept secret from us, think about that for a moment ”
– Richard Dolan (4)
\
\
The
United States has a history of government agencies existing in secret. The
National Security Agency (NSA) was founded in 1952, its existence was hidden
until the mid 1960’s. Even more secretive is the National Reconnaissance
Office, which was founded in 1960 but remained completely concealed for 30
years.
Recent
leaks from Edward
Snowden, a former intelligence contractor, have shed light on the black
budget world. This is a world full of Special Access Programs (SAP) that
garnishes trillions of dollars every year to conduct operations the general
public knows nothing about(2). These programs do not exist publicly, but they
do indeed exist. They are better known as ‘deep black programs.’ A 1997 US
Senate report described them as “so sensitive that they are exempt from
standard reporting requirements to the Congress (3)(1)”. One aspect of these
‘deep black programs’ is the development of deep underground military bases,
and they can go up to several miles underneath the surface.
There
are also known underground facilities in existence. Take for example, the
Swedish underground military facility at Musko. It’s a large naval base
built underneath a mountain. The hospital alone within this facility holds over
1,000 beds. Musko engineers blasted out 1,500, 000 cubic meters of stone in
order to build it (4)(5).
“The
military utility for underground construction is obvious. I recall years ago
studying the matter in the context of American Cold War military strategy.
during the 1950’s, motivated by a fear of Soviet missiles striking American
installations and cities, military planners recognized the value of secure
facilities deep underground” (1)
– Richard Dolan
In 1987 Deputy Director of Engineering and Construction for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Lloyd A. Duscha, gave a speech at an engineering conference entitled “Underground Facilities for Defense – Experience and Lessons.” In the first paragraph of his speech he states the following:
After
World War II, political and economic factors changed the underground
construction picture and caused a renewed interest to “think underground.” As a
result of this interest, the Corps of Engineers became involved in the design
and construction of some very complex and interesting military projects.
Although the conference program indicates the topic to be “Underground
Facilities for Defense – Experience and Lessons,” I must deviate a little
because several of the
most interesting facilities that have been designed and constructed by the
Corps are classified. (4)(6)
He
then went into a discussion of the Corps’ involvement in the 1960’s in the
construction of the large and elaborate NORAD base buried deep beneath Cheyenne
Mountain, in Colorado. This is just a public statement, but you will not find a
more significant public admission of secret, underground bases than this one.
People speaking is not the only evidence available, there are actual documents
obtained by researchers through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) that shed
more light on the subject, and clearly outline plans for the contraction of
underground facilities(4).
There
are documents available which expose a deep underground command center that was
to be built far below area’s such as Washington, D.C. and China Lake,
California during the Cold War. Documents available show that in 1964 the
military was considering building a huge underground cavity 4,000 feet deep
beneath China Lake (4). It’s well known that the United States and the Soviet
Union created a vast infrastructure to support a complex of offensive and
defensive weapons during the Cold War. This infrastructure included sites and
facilities for developing, testing, storing and manufacturing weapons. There
was also a host of communication and command centers(7).
The
worlds most prominent researcher on Underground Military Facilities (in my
opinion) Richard Sauder, Ph.D, told of an interesting story in his book Hidden In Plain Site (4)
that I’d like to share with you.
“As it
happens, after giving a public talk a couple of years ago, I was approached by
a man who had been a uniformed member of the United States Navy. We chatted for
a while and when he mentioned that he had spent some time at China Lake my ears
perked up. I asked him if there was an underground facility at China Lake. He
said that indeed there is, and that it is impressively large and deep. I asked
him if he had ever been in it, and he said that he had, though not to the
deepest levels. I asked him how deep the deepest part extended. He looked at me
soberly and said very quietly, “It goes one mile deep.” I then asked him what
the underground base contains. He replied, “Weapons.” I responded, “What sort
of weaponry?” And he answered without pausing, “Weapons more powerful than
nuclear weapons.” (4)
Photo of United States Air Force tunnel boring machine at Little Skull Mountain, Nevada, USA, December 1982. There are many rumors of secret military tunnels in the United States. If the rumors are true, machines such as the one shown here are used to make the tunnels. (Source: U.S. Department of Energy.)
Deep Underground Command Center (DUCC)
The very first TOP SECRET memo on the subject was issued by Robert McNamara, on November 7th 1963 from the office of the Secretary of Defense. This took place right before the Kennedy murder (4).
There is a
very grave danger that an announced need for increased secrecy will be seized
upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official
censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit, to the extent that
it is in my control. We are opposed around the world by a system which has
ocnscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly
knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic,
intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations
are concealed, not published. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No
expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed (7).
In
this memo McNamara discusses the topic of the National Underground Command
Center. The memo was addressed to McGeorge Bundy, Kermit Gordon and Dr. Jerome
Wiesner. Bundy was the special assistant for National Security Affairs of
President Kennedy. Gordon was the Director of the Bureau of the Budget and
Wiesner was Kennedy’s science adviser. McNamara stated that they would meet
sometime during the end of November, unfortunately Kennedy was dead by then.
A
Second memo was issued on the same day concerning a proposed Deep Underground
National Command Center that would be approximately 3,500 feet underground
Washington. (4) The memo also mentioned elevator shafts below the State
Department and White House that would descend to 3,500 feet with high speed,
horizontal tunnel transport to the main facility. Remember we are talking about
the 1960’s, what type of technology would be available for them to complete a
project like this?
The
reality of Deep Underground Military Bases is extremely fascinating. There is
an enormous amount of evidence that proves their existence. Secret military
bases used to be labelled in the conspiracy theory category. Not long ago, the
Department of Defense officially declassified the existence of Area 51. (8)\
There
are hundreds of military bases, and underground military bases spread all over
the world. Dr Richard Sauder documents this phenomenon well in Hidden In Plain Sight,
among his other works. What I’ve provided above is not even the tip of the ice
berg. In his book he goes on to illustrate the technology behind such
developments, under ocean bases, and more. This is a fascinating topic to
explore, and the next question to ask is what goes on in underground military
facilities?
We
know that the military operates at these defense installations, and it’s safe
to assume that a number of classified projects go in within them. One that
seems to be a common occurrence that’s related to Deep Underground Military
Facilities are UFOs and extraterrestrials.
Best
selling British author and researcher, Timothy Good, has written several books
dealing with the question of possible extraterrestrial interaction with Earth.
Another one that comes to mind is historian and UFO researcher Richard Dolan.
Both have hinted to having been privy to some very interesting information in
some of their books.
In
After Disclsoure,
Dolan shares an experience he had with a politician who was deep underground in
a military base.. He was briefed on the extraterrestrial reality and said that
ETs and UFOs are just the tip of the ice berg when it comes to information
that’s concealed from the public.(1)
Timothy
Good has been privy to information from a variety of sources, including private
ones that discuss a variety of locations around the world for alleged undersea
and underground extraterrestrial bases. Abductees and contactees constantly
refer to deep underground installations within the Planet. Could the
extraterrestrial phenomenon be directly related to Deep Underground Military
Facilities?
I’ve
had two personal encounters with Canadian Military Personnel. One of them was a
Coast Guard veteran, he personally told me that if I would like to know about
extraterrestrials, “come work for us and you can ask them yourself.” This is
something I’ll remember for my entire life. The second one was bizarre, I
encountered a senior Canadian Air Force officer, had a short conversation with
him and brought up UFOs. He instantly turned around and started walking away
from me. About an hour later, in a completely different location, he walked
right by me and didn’t even look at me, accompanied by two men in suits.
Below
is a video of Phil Schneider. Much of what he says with regards to methods of
underground base development correlates with the research I’ve done. He was
murdered shortly after giving a few lectures as he did here below.
I
just wanted to get across that Deep Underground Military Facilities are not a
conspiracy. What happens beneath our feet is garnishing trillions of dollars
from the black budget for special projects that the majority of the human race
knows nothing about.
Sources
(4) Sauder, Richard. Hidden In Plain Sight, Beyong the
X-Files.
Keyhole Publishing Company. March 2010 (This was my primary source for the
article. Most of the information within the article comes from this book.
Please check out Richard Sauder if you want to know more about this topic)
(5)Salo,
Ilkka; Svenson, Ola (September 2003), Safety Management:
A Frame of Reference for Studies of Nuclear Power Safety Management and Case
Studies from Non-Nuclear Contexts (PDF), Nordic nuclear safety research
(NKS), NKS-88, Roskilde, Denmark: NKS Secretariat, pp. 9–13, ISBN 87-7893-146-0,
retrieved 2010-11-27
(6)
Lloyd A. Duscha, “Underground Facilities for Defense – Experience and Lessons,”
in Tunneling and Underground
Transport: Future Developments in Technology. Economics and Policy, ed.
F.P. Davidson (New York: Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc., 1987), pp.
109-113.
No comments:
Post a Comment