Aging this and other like artifacts is profoundly problematic and
always suspect. However they conform well with the Atlantean Global
Bronze Age between 5000BP and 3000BP when the appropriate tools
existed, including meteoritic iron and hardened Bronze. The actual
use of lines as an aid to retaining knowledge also conforms with the
contemporaneous Ogam script which may well have been used by seamen
for recording locations.
Earlier is also a possibility provided we precede the Pleistocene
Nonconformity of 12900 BP. Yet there is so far scant evidence to
compare while the Atlantean evidence conforms rather well. For that
reason the balance of probabilities suggest we are looking at
Atlantean work that is three to five thousand years old and the
script is sea farers notation.
The Atlanteans also were commonly working with very hard material as
well likely to ensure preservation of important information.
These chaps are doing excellent work although the elder age idea is
partially guiding their interpretation, but that is because the sheer
depth and fecundidy of the Atlanten age is barely understood as yet.
I also suggest that there was almost no chance of passing
information verbally from before 12900 BP and all oral traditions
arose since.
The Rock That May
Rewrite Chapters of World History
4th September 2014
By Dr Derek
Cunningham with Steven & Evan Strong
Contributing Writers
for Wake Up World
Dr. Derek Cunningham
made contact with us after reading our first article on the engraved
rock: An Original Engraving Made by Ancient Advanced Technology.
It soon became apparent his extensive work and research was a perfect
fit and an essential element in making sense of this unique artefact.
We now work in partnership and this article is one part of this
process.
Recently we presented
what is intended to be the first in a series of articles discussing
some of the implications associated with an amazing
engraved rock recently discovered in Australia that has
rightly drawn comparison with the Blombos Rocks of South Africa; an
engraved stone that is one of a select group of artefacts dating from
circa 400,000 years ago to 70,000 years ago that shows the earliest
evidence of conscious, non-survival related thought in early human
history.
In our quest to raise awareness of the existence of an archaic
worldwide civilization, we have been very frugal and cautious in our
release of information and have published predominantly through two
web site magazines, Wake Up Worldand Ancient Origins. We
are also ever mindful of the fact that care is required in developing
any new theory, and that the results must routinely match predictions
before making any bold declarations.
For most research
scientists studying the ancient world, it is in that pursuit – the
search for data that can draw definitive conclusions about
early pre-history - where the greatest difficulties occur; simply
because after so long a time there is now virtually nothing left on
this planet with which to now make a comparison.
Though it is our
intent to show these two samples are identical in design,
archaeologists it must be said are not good at measuring
“similarity”. Their training is the direct opposite, and that is
to identify, wherever possible, the differences between two
samples. This is done so that a sample can be “properly”
catalogued and entered into their database. They are now so good at
this process they have become unquestioned robots in their zeal to
classify and separate everything by the smallest and most obscure
differences. The problem now, to be blunt, is that unless two
artefacts are absolutely identical in every single respect the
archaeologists are by their training totally unable to state two
otherwise identical objects are related. They will argue intensely
about the perceived differences and then finish their argument with
the completely untestable assertion that it is simply a coincidence.
I am sorry but a coincidence argument is simply an opinion, and it is
normally employed as a last ditch attempt by the person that has
already lost the argument.
###
For most neutral
observers watching from the sidelines there is one other important
fact that is really difficult to accept, but it is actually a very
true reflection of the current position of “science”. The fact
is…there is absolutely no archaeologist who is an expert in ancient
writing, that is also an expert in astronomy and also an expert in
stellar navigation, that specialises in Australian ancient rock
carvings that can comment on an ancient carvings found in South
Africa that are both potentially 70,000 years old, and who could
comment on their similarities to the Lascaux cave paintings, and the
Atacama Giant in South America. Thus if anyone is waiting for an
“expert” to come forward, to give a green light and to say out
loud and clear that they were constructed by the same
civilization…you will be waiting until cobwebs have formed over
your dust-filled decomposing computer.
And this is where the
long-standing disconnect is. Others have looked at the exact same
evidence that the archaeologists work daily with and see the hands of
an ancient Stone Age Civilization that must have travelled the entire
breadth of the world. Archaeologists by their strong need to
categorize everything for museums create a science where it has
slowly become impossible to compare any similar object. They need
objects to be classified by region, by date and by material type.
Once that has been done any attempt to link any two similar objects
then automatically becomes controversial…for absolutely no obvious
reason. Being really blunt once more. Is it really impossible that
there were no tourist in the Stone Age? Did not one single ancestor
think of the shape of the world until finally the Europeans sailed
the oceans? Do not humans have legs and are capable of walking from
one end of the world to the other? In recent years people have walked
from one end of the Americas to the other. Here any honest
archaeologist would have to say that such long distance travel must
be possible, the only remaining problem then is agreement over common
features present on ancient artefacts.
The problem in
comparing an engraved Australian stone with a 70,000 year old stone
uncovered at Blombos Cave in South Africa is that academics state
that there is still insufficient evidence to argue that hominid set
foot on the soil of Australia until 60,000 years ago. With this one
single “fact” which produces a 10,000 year gap in dates, there is
thus no academic expert, even at this most basic level, to consult as
no “established” expert that studies Stone Age carved stones can
argue an earlier date for Australian occupation than that give
by experts that study Australian pre-history. Thus the Australian
stone is now in our hands, left unstudied, and entirely ignored by
academia. It is thus very embarrassing to established science that
mere amateurs can now show through a series of very careful
comparative tests that the Australian stone and the Blombos stone do
in fact match each other in design, and not only can we show this,
but we also can now show that the exact same logic used to
create the Blombos Cave pattern and the Australian engraved stone in
Australia is found worldwide, from the Lascaux caves in France, to
engraved stones found in North America.
If it can be proven
that the Australian stone was not fabricated within the last 2 years
(in other words it was discovered before the first papers deciphering
the linear patterns on these stones was published) it can also be
argued that the discovery of the Australian stone is amongst the
strongest evidence yet for a Stone Age global civilization. And for
the first time, it is now no longer possible for the established
archaeological community to ignore the results that we, a group of
international amateur historians present.
For us we are now
entering ‘unchartered waters. Our results are for the
first time showing such a large degree of internal consistency that
we can now begin to start working in isolation and not care what
established archaeologists think or say. As we stated,
there is no archaeologist with the experience that we have, and has
studied as many samples worldwide. Our hope is that this second
article will add a degree of clarity and perhaps narrow down the
possibilities that surround this controversial stone. Originally this
article was meant to be merely a progress report investigating some
of the avenues that seem to have promise, which came about through
the contacts made as a result of the first article. As a result of
the first article quite a few researchers of high standard from
overseas who have sought us out, sharing what they have discovered,
and some of this advice and direction now forms the main focus of our
present and future analysis of this unique engraved rock.
As encouraging and
edifying as their knowledge and suggestions have been, there is still
a continental recurring scholarly absence we just cannot escape, none
of the offers of recent assistance are from Australian sources. We
have made direct contact with one of the most prestigious
universities and museums of high repute, and again fully expect
absolutely nothing to come out of our approaches.
Lines with
“Astronomical Values”
With hopes held low of
breaching the divide, it makes no difference, as there is something
quite spectacular attached to the narrative that accompanies this
rock and in that respect we must thank Dr. Derek Cunningham, who was
the first of our overseas advisors to make contact. From the very
beginning we sensed he was navigating a similar path, in
his first email we learnt that he too selected the date of 400,000
years as a seminal point in the evolution of modern man, and also
believed that there was an extremely ancient global civilisation
which was far more advanced and sophisticated than we are led/lied to
believe.[
I am personally comfortable with 200,000 years but I certainly am
open to be convinced – arclein ]
As much as his take on
our ancient past was in synchronicity, it was Derek’s research and
a single, confident comment offered in his first email that left us
so pre-disposed to continue. When declaring that “I’m
betting the latest sample discovered will match the 70,000 year old
Blombos Ochres” he certainly sparked our interest, but
he then became more specific in supplying the potential key to
deciphering this collection of engraved lines, angles and
intersections. Derek maintains with now a considerable body of
evidence that:
“The
angles drawn by the lines are astronomical values. The angles the
lines are drawn at simply represent, in an angular form, the
astronomical values used to predict eclipses. In total there are only
several astronomical values, producing several lines, and agreeing
with our prior studies, samples with linear angular text has been
found world-wide.” ~ see Derek Cunningham’s work
on Lascaux, the Great Pyramids, and the Atacama Giant.
In presenting very
much a global picture, Cunningham felt that the Blombos Ochres, which
are comprised “of a double row of square and diamond
patterns,” was a form of archaic symbolic text, with the angle
defining the consonant and the direction of offset of the line
defining the attached vowel, producing a written language very
similar to Japanese. This early use of angular values was
used, Derek contended, in creating a related, equally ancient star
map that could be used to navigate around Earth. Of course, as this
was our first contact through email it was all quite tentative, but
knowing as we do that Original Elders of degree are united in
insisting every earth-bound Original site, artefact and location of
significance must have a celestial counter-part, we already knew
Derek was right. Despite my intuition and Original tutoring there was
still the question of evidence, and perhaps a measurement of the
angles on this enigmatic rock by Derek would provide clues.
Apart from the obvious
similarities to the Blombos Rocks, and those we are now aware of at
Lascaux, my first reaction upon seeing this rock was to compare it to
Ogham Script-which is thought to be the earliest form of Irish
writing, something that Dr Derek Cunningham has also looked at with
some success. At the most simplistic level all Ogham Script appears
to be is an arrangement of lines, mainly vertical and not much else.
After all, as simplistic as this may sound, writing is merely
different ways of using formalised lines and angles arranged in a way
that can pass on all manner of information, and the lines on the rock
Ros found have the angles, lines and patterns needed to tick every
box in achieving those ends. Though Ogham has been around for a very
long time no one until Dr Derek Cunningham has ever took
the effort to measure the angles drawn by the Ogham script. All
agree the Blombos Rocks is an example of early thought out art, and
we, and those who have seen and touched this Australian rock, agree
that it is superior to the Blombos Rocks in quantity, quality and
manner of cut, hardness of surface and sophistication of message.
There are three panels or faces of engravings and each is distinctly
different in design and no doubt, message engraved.
Derek’s email
supplying his analysis and measurements of the angles on the first
face was doubly reassuring. That so many of these angles were
recognised by Derek in other locations in both Europe and Africa was
a more than pleasant confirmation, but what was intriguing was the
angle of a secondary value that dominated and was represented on six
occasions on the reworked photograph of the marked rock: it
drew the value thirty three degrees, a value linked to the first
reset point of the lunar and solar calendars.
Six Times Thirty Three
Equals One
Derek immediately
realised that “here the vast majority fit with prior studies.” To
assist us in identifying angles seen elsewhere, “those marked in
yellow are the offset values drawn. The lines marked in white are
offset either above or below the horizontal”.
After examining
Derek’s fine work I passed his photograph onto a select few that
accompany us on site and are involved in every aspect of this
research. Within minutes Sean Vandenberg emailed back pointing out
something that much to my disappointment I really should have picked
up within a millisecond after sighting, the place where the
artefact was recovered is not only situated within two kilometres of
the Bambara glyphs, but sits on the thirty-third latitude.
This fact may just be yet another coincidence, but it certainly
wasn’t through prior knowledge as Derek pointed out when responding
to Sean’s observation.
“Oh I love that …
That makes it an independent test, because I did not know the
latitude.”
No Less Than a Metal
Blade
A separate, but
obviously connected feature of this rock, relates to the fact that
the rock is incredibly hard and at the very least quite rare in the
region, while the incisions are clean, deep and precise. There is the
possibility that two blades of differing width were used, but at the
very least iron blades of considerable hardness are the bare minimum
requirement. Another possibility is obsidian,
which can produce incredibly sharp edges. Irrespective of
whatever translation is deemed acceptable, the question that needs to
be asked is what tools were used in chiselling these engravings? The
answer to that question is in many respects, more important than any
translation.
What only adds to the
intrigue, and narrowing of options, is that this rock is not the only
rock bearing evidence of technology supposedly foreign to this
country before the British Invasion. We know of four examples of cuts
into rock in the immediate area that appear highly refined.
The 300 odd glyphs
engraved into the sandstone walls at Bambara, along with two long
narrow cuts into vertical walls of the same material were in our
opinion chiselled by some type of blade.
Reading Between the
Lines
In trying to find any
meanings to what is engraved, we feel there could be much more to
this narrative than is apparent to the eye. The lines, angles and
intersections are plain to see, but what if one was to look more
closely and magnify proceedings? Richard Gabriel and Judith Ann had
already been liaising with us through his analysis of the walls of
the ten metre underground shaft positioned behind the Bambara walls
and other sites. Through the innovative application of a spectrum of
coloured lenses and magnification, he detected the remains
of an ancient gallery spread along the two walls of the tunnel
exhibiting exquisite artistry in the depiction of animals and objects
found both in Australia and other continents.
His work thus far on
this single rock has left him excited and astounded, and utterly
convinced that this artefact is of global significance and pivotal in
opening up new horizons and reacquainting humanity with histories
long forgotten by many. As it is with Derek’s research, Richard’s
investigation is nowhere near complete, and until he has completed
his first set of investigations we will hold back on further
commentary. Even so there was a comment Richard made when discussing
the impact of this discovery in setting the scene, spreading the
palette and opening up options rarely considered.
“The whole point
of the discovery is that here we have phenomenal artistry at a minute
scale, on a rock surface which is dated back to infinity-and done by
means at the hands of a highly advanced craftsman in a way we can
only speculate over. It is irrefutable proof of advanced people back
then.”
As we have conceded
this is a work in transition and at its early stages, and of course
we are waiting on the response of all Original Elders and Custodians
consulted before venturing a collective comment. The little that has
been revealed we are not at liberty to publish, but what can be
stated is that an Elder has declared the rock to be “very,
very ancient” and extremely sacred, and definitely an Original
artefact.
Fact or Fiction
Nowhere near complete,
this preliminary report is meant to set parameters and narrow down
the candidature. The rock exists, and to be honest its credentials
rest on the shoulders of Ros’ integrity and commitment in seeking
out the truth. And it Ros who is both the lynch-pin of this sacred
stone’s renaissance and weakest link in the narrative attached to
this discovery.
No doubt, cynic and
official minion alike will suggest and infer that this, just like the
hotly-debated Bambara hieroglyphs, is merely a hoax. Worse still,
what if it was Ros who found the rock days before the excavator came
to dig foundations and scratched into it with a chisel, then cleverly
dug down and placed it in a position sure to be disturbed soon after.
Waiting a good twenty years since the bogus act of chicanery, Ros now
presents her mischief as real and claims the limelight and her 15
minutes of notoriety. As utterly ridiculous as this scenario is, as
we have personally met Ros and will vouch for her sincerity, every
denial must be laced with degrees of this being bogus through her
deceit. Because if all of what we claim to be true is actually that,
then throw out the ancient history books and start again, because
there is nothing inside those pages that can do anything other than
get in the way.
The alternative is
that the rock is “very, very ancient,” Ros is telling the truth
and there isn’t another option on any table. Truth or fiction,
which label is to be given, it is that simple? Knowing the real truth
of the rock and Ros, we now need to offer a tentative take on what
these ancient engravings could actually mean.
At this stage we will
limit our interpretations and conjecture to Side 1, simply because it
is the only set of engravings Derek has measured and the repetition
six times of thirty three degrees has held centre-stage. Knowing the
Original mantra of ‘as on top so below’ holds fast for every
sacred site and object, the idea that this is some sort of map
bearing the latitude of the place where the rock was found, is so in
keeping with Original Lore and difficult to dismiss.
That recurrence of
angles/latitudes also negates another criticism, incredibly
superficial and quite surprising as it was, that this rock bore the
brunt of natural processes and the scratchings are merely the outcome
of uncontrolled abrasion against sharp objects. But that would be
random in nature and haphazard by design, one look at Derek’s
reading show some lines slowly segmenting in an arch, others
perfectly straight and often parallel with some at opposing angles,
all inter-locking and formed at the same time. In what also runs
counter to any erratic interplay with a combination of natural
agencies, all the engraved lines are of the same depth and width.
If indeed the first
side is what we suspect, a block of text relating to potentially an
archaic map, what of the other two sides? At first glance we feel
neither serves that function, each engraved side is different in
setting, number of marks and pattern. As such, to assume that each
section relates to something different seems logical.
Whatever it means and
whenever it was engraved is still under consideration, what is not
debatable is the large amount of time and skill required. Many, many
hours were spent in engraving, which of itself is quite remarkable.
Being part of a hunter-gatherer society where staying alive is a
daily issue and the tribe’s dietary intake is limited to what is
found or hunted on any given day, this could seem to be a total waste
of time as it serves no utilitarian purpose. There must have been a
very good reason, and an even more important message to pass on, if
willing to sacrifice many hours that could have been spent adding to
the chances of the tribe eating more.
We can offer no
conclusion at this stage beyond some incremental steps. We know that
Ros is telling the truth, the rock is genuine and being
found one metre beneath the surface, must have been engraved at a
time well before Cook sailed up the east coast of Australia. Whatever
tools were used are not supposed to be in existence anywhere within
this continent until 1788, but it is obvious they were being used on
this rock. Derek, Richard and Judith are hard at it with more to
come. We are chasing up Elders and others with skills that may
assist, and Derek made reference to other grid engravings in
Australia, and in America, which may provide additional data to aid
our work
Where to Next?
Apart from continuing
to consult with our world-wide network of talented advisors, in the
meantime we are compelled to once again trudge down a weary road.
Pardon our jaded enthusiasm and justifiable cynicism, but this
Original artefact is of such immense significance we are duty-bound
to vainly try and convince mainstream media and educational
institutions how important this artefact is and the ramifications
that emerge out of that acknowledgement. To that most probably
frustrating end, we are continuing in our attempt to contact both
academics and media outlets, by extending them an invitation to be
present when this artefact will be first presented to the public. At
present it is locked away in a safe and will remain secured and
hidden until October 1.
On 1st October 2014 at
the Wesley Centre, Pitt Street, Sydney, from 7-10 pm, with the
assistance from the good people of the Global Freedom Movement,
we will be presenting a three hour overview discussing some of our
research. Due to the quite recent appearance of this rock, other
items to be presented on the night will be discarded, and there has
been an addition of one to our roster of speakers on that night. Ros,
the lady who originally found this sacred object, will join us on
stage and place herself under public scrutiny while briefly sharing
details of how, where and who. We are inviting representatives from
mainstream academic, political and media organisations, and any
person genuinely interested in such developments, to view this
artefact and many other amazing artefacts on the night. Throughout
our presentation of Original Elders’ wisdom and history,
underpinned by the latest advances in science, genetics and
archaeology, hopefully people will begin to understand why the
Original Elders know as a fact “that all other peoples of the world
come from us.”
At this early
juncture, apart from repeating that our investigation and
collaborations have barely begun, all we can state is that this rock
is utterly without precedent in this country and there is nothing
else that can be concluded in absolute terms, yet. All we know for
certain is that this artefact is part of a package that just does not
fit into any accepted take of Australian pre-history, of which so
much has been deliberately repressed or badly misunderstood. But
amongst the collateral damage there is a glimmer of light at the end
of the tunnel, and we now have the key in hand to unlock the
entrance. All we have to do is read the instructions engraved into
this rock and the path ahead is clear.
No comments:
Post a Comment