My first though was that this cannot be true. Then I reconsidered. Let me spell it out simply. Twenty some years ago, a barrel of oil sold
for approximately thirty to forty dollars.
All that meant that you could fill up your car for less than fifty dollars. As well your car was the second most
important household expense. It was
possible to keep car expense as low as $500 per month, but normally it really
was $1,000 per month.
Yet the automobile was the one discretionary expense
that you can manage if you need to. In
fact, it is a clear sign that you have discretionary money. Yet when pressed, the car ages out and you do
not replace it. You have effectively
eaten your savings without replacing them.
Now the problem is really simple. The price of oil and thus the price of
gasoline have risen two and one half times.
At the same time the cost of car ownership has been pressed upward as
well. Thus the carrying cost of a car
has doubled if one is to attempt to drive as much as twenty years ago. Thus when pressed, you pull back on
usage. The first thing that you give up
is fuel.
Thus we have a real squeeze and gasoline is in the
center of it.
I have thought that USA reporting was mostly
fraudulent for some time, particularly in regards to the so called consumer
price index which is a carefully selected basket of obviously far too easily
manipulated indicators. Worse pension
payouts are adjusted with it so we have both a political and an economic reason
to lie. This shows that many commentators
have long since come to the same conclusion.
Guest Post: U.S. Gasoline Consumption
Plummets By Nearly 75%
05/30/2014 21:30 -0400
Submitted by Jeff Nielsen
via BullionBullsCanada
blog,
Regular readers are familiar with my narratives on the U.S. Greater Depression, and (in particular) some of the government’s own charts which
depict this economic meltdown most vividly. The collapse in the “civilian participation
rate” (the number of people
working in the economy) and the “velocity of money” (the heartbeat of the economy) indicate an economy which
is not merely in decline, but rather is being sucked downward in a terminal
(and accelerating) death-spiral.
However, even that previously published data, and the grim
analyses which accompanied it could not prepare me for the horror story
contained in data passed along by an alert reader. U.S. “gasoline
consumption” – as measured by the U.S. Energy
Information Administration (EIA) itself – has plummeted by nearly 75%,
from its all-time peak in July of 1998. A near-75% collapse in U.S. gasoline
consumption has occurred in little
more than 15 years.
Before getting into an analysis of the repercussions of this data,
however, it’s necessary to properly qualify the data. Obviously, even
in the most-nightmarish economic Armageddon, a (relatively short-term) 75%
collapse in gasoline consumption is simply not possible. Unless we were dealing
with a nation whose economy had been suddenly ripped apart by civil war, or
some small nation devastated by a massive earthquake or tsunami; it’s simply
not possible for any economy to just disintegrate that rapidly, without there
being some ultra-powerful exogenous force also at work.
So how can this raw data, produced by the government itself, be
explained? To begin with; the government chooses to measure U.S. gasoline
consumption in a very odd manner: by measuring the amount of gasoline entering the domestic
supply-chain rather than by measuring actual consumption at the other end of
the supply-chain – i.e. “at the pump”.
Why does the U.S. government, which (among other things) leads the
world in the manufacture of statistics not produce any simple/direct
measurement of gasoline consumption? How can the St. Louis
Fed produce nearly 100
different charts on gasoline and diesel prices (for
any/every price-category which can be imagined by these statistics geeks), but
not a single chart on gasoline supply/demand?
There are several reasons for this unbalanced, anomalous, and
simply absurd statistical methodology. First of all; the reason why the U.S.
government produces a near-infinite number of charts on prices is because
prices are what the Gamblers (i.e. bankers) use as the basis for their $100’s of trillions in gambling in the rigged casinos which the bankers call “markets”.
While supply/demand data is of utmost importance in the real
world; the banker-gamblers don’t dwell in the real world. As regular readers
already know; their derivatives casino, alone, is roughly twenty times as large as the entire
global economy. To the bankers; the “real world” is nothing but fodder for their insane
gambling.
Why use this data, at all, since it is such an inferior/distorted
means of measuring U.S. gasoline consumption? Because the EIA uses exactly the same data to publish
its own “estimates” of U.S. gasoline
consumption:
Note: Product supplied
measures the amount of gasoline that went into the supply chain and is used
as a proxy for gasoline consumption. [emphasis mine]
The other half of this ridiculous statistical hodge-podge, where
endless quantities of trivial/irrelevant price data are trumpeted, while
any/all data which actually measures the (real) economy is suppressed (if not
buried entirely) displays a government desperately trying to hide this
massive economic collapse.
If you choose to measure the amount of gasoline leaving U.S. refineries
and entering domestic
inventories and call this “gasoline consumption”; you can hide the actual
collapse in gasoline consumption – until those retail inventories are
overflowing, and there is simply no more room in the storage tanks.
This is what we see today in the U.S.: a gasoline market which had
been deliberately-and-dramatically over-supplied with gasoline
at the wholesale end of the supply-chain (the refineries) has now practically
ground to a halt. The same nation which previously amazed the world as it
accumulated more automobiles and more miles of highways per capita than any
nation on Earth (and by a huge margin) now has such an insane glut of gasoline
that it’s massive chain of refineries have had to simply turn off the taps –
until this pathetically anemic economy manages to burn-off some of that glut.
This conclusion becomes even more visible/obvious when we view the
gasoline data just from the start of the mythical “U.S. economic recovery” to the present. At the start of the
“U.S. recovery”; U.S. gasoline consumption was at a rate of 52 million gallons
per day (already more than 20% below the 1998 all-time peak). In the five
years since the start of this pretend-recovery; U.S. gasoline consumption has
fallen all the way to 18 million gallons per day.
Since the beginning of “the U.S. economic recovery”; U.S. gasoline
consumption has plummeted by nearly 2/3. As the
pseudo-recovery began, and supposedly “strengthened”; U.S. refineries were
ordered to fill up the inventories of their dealer network, in anticipation of
the increased gasoline
consumption which would have occurred in any real “recovery”.
But there never was an increase in U.S. gasoline consumption,
because there never was a U.S. economic recovery. Rather, the Greater
Depression has simply (and relentlessly) continued to pulverize the U.S.
economy like a meat-grinder. To hide this devastation (as well as is possible),
the government produces a wide array of its pseudo-statistics, that all contain myriad “adjustments” – which make it possible
for these liars-with-numbers to distort the statistical picture of the U.S.
economy beyond recognition.
Meanwhile, any/all statistics which measure raw data (and thus cannot be
perverted with “adjustments”) are either suppressed (like the civilian
participation rate), or not even measured, at all – as is the case with U.S.
gasoline consumption. At the retail end; none of the “sales” statistics are
adjusted for inflation, not even with the absurdly-fraudulent “CPI” numbers.
By not deflating sales data (at all) the collapse in U.S. gasoline
consumption “at the pump” is hidden within all this unreported inflation. As explained in previous
commentaries; it is this same, unreported inflation which allows the U.S. to
convert its large, negative, GDP readings (which would otherwise reveal the
Greater Depression) into “economic growth”. It is this same,
unreported inflation which allows the government (and employers) to hide the
fact that U.S. wages have collapsed by more than 50%.
But what the liars-with-numbers cannot hide (any longer) is the
collapse in U.S. gasoline consumption which has accompanied the continued,
downward spiral of the Greater Depression. The storage tanks are now all full.
The only way to (temporarily) hide the collapse in U.S. gasoline consumption
any further would be to construct even more storage facilities. However, there
is no possible economic justification for increasing storage capacity in a
market of steadily/relentlessly declining demand.
Indeed, the exact opposite is true. The U.S. economy of the 21st century
(a mere hollowed-out husk of what it was only 20 years earlier) will require less and
less gasoline storage facilities over time, reflecting a supply network
for a steadily shrinking market.
As the One Bank completes its plundering of the U.S. economy, and completes
its transformation of the U.S. Middle Class into the Working Poor, it is also simply using
up more and more of its economic lies.
The Great Inflation Lie will continue to allow the U.S. government (and other Western governments)
to crank-out absurd/imaginary positive numbers for GDP. It will continue to
allow the U.S. government to crank-out absurd/imaginary numbers for retail
sales (and hide the ongoing collapse of the entire U.S.
retail sector).
But it can’t hide the fact that U.S. refineries have nearly
stopped producing gasoline for the most-motorized society/economy the world has
ever seen. It can’t hide the fact that there haven’t been so few people
working in the U.S. economy (on a percentage basis) in 35 years.
Readers who are stubbornly faithful to the plethora of
pseudo-statistics which the U.S. government uses to hide this collapse may have
been skeptical of my original denunciation of the “U.S. economic recovery”. They may have been more
skeptical with assertions that this Wonderland Matrix of lies is being used to hide a Greater Depression.
However, there is no further room for skepticism when official,
government numbers indicate a near-75%
collapse in U.S. gasoline consumption over a mere 15 years, and
a 65% collapse in
consumption since the start of the (supposed) Recovery. Numbers such as this
can only be encapsulated with acronyms like “DOA”.
When we look at the EIA’s “gasoline consumption” numbers, and when
we see the St. Louis Fed’s chart of the U.S. velocity of money (heartbeat of the U.S. economy); we don’t see an economy
which is dying. We see an economy which is already dead.
The author's chart shows simply retail sales by refiners - that is, direct sales through retail outlets owned by refiners. It does not show net gasoline consumption. EIA stats show a small reduction in refinery runs beginning 2008 which has fully corrected through the first six months of 2014. The author's claim of pipeline stuffing isn't born out by the storage stats, which are roughly constant from 1998 on, or total refinery runs. The huge crude supply glut (crude floating on idle tankers) of 2007-8 has been resolved. Jet fuel production took an 18% hit in 2001 and a further 20% hit in 2008, from which it has not recovered. So in truth the only conclusion you can draw is that business travel is reduced over the author's span, but actual driving consumption has been relatively constant from the 90c gas of 1998 through the $4 gas of late Bush years and early Obama.
ReplyDeleteI think you are looking at different historical price charts than I. While reading your intro, I thought I recalled buying gas for $1/gal in '96, so i looked it up and I was correct. That means that it cost about $11 to $12 to fill up, not $50. Holy cow, it was only a few years ago that they had to reprogram the pump from shutting off above $50 to shutting off above $75. There is NO WAY it cost $1000/mo to maintain a car in 1994. Further, crude cost about $20/barrel at that time, not $30-$50/ barrel.
ReplyDeleteI have to agree with anonymous. this article is just plain wrong about gasoline consumption. However, it is right about other gov't statistics. Too bad that he destroys his credibility with such a silly error...