Climate is about the surface heat engine. That heat is absorbed and
held by water, reflected a little by clouds and desert. Some is held
indirectly through water vapor in the atmosphere. The rest is in the
ocean.
All this means is that tracking temperature is tracking a derivative
of heat shifts and terribly misleading. It was this understanding
that led me to infer that we have an increased flow in the Gulf
Stream driving our current warm spell in the Arctic. El Nino is
about warmer waters first.
I do not expect the community to come to their senses on this anytime
soon however. After all, it is difficult to measure. Enjoy the
weather.
Temperature: The Blinding Obsession. It’s The Precipitation
Stupid.
by DR. TIM
BALL on MAY 1, 2013
in ATMOSPHERE,DESERTS,LAND,THEORY,WATER
“It
Occurred To Me…”Rules designed to facilitate operations bring
them to a halt when people work to rule.
Hijacking of
environmentalism for a political agenda centered on climate, but
specifically increasing temperatures. This was predetermined by the
goal of demonizing CO2, the byproduct of industrial nations, that the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and supporters claim
are destroying the planet. Their temperature predictions fail,
primarily because they ignore or lack data about water and
secondarily because they assume CO2 causes temperature increase.
I’ve long campaigned
to change the name of the planet from Earth to Water. When NASA seeks
life on other planets the key is water, because they know without
water there is no life as we know it. Regardless of temperature,
there are no plants without water. No plants, no oxygen, no life.
Temperature responds to the presence of water not CO2. Presence of
water modifies by reducing the range of temperatures. Continentalism
is a measure of the increasing range of temperature as you move away
from larger water bodies. Temperature ranges in deserts are high,
daily and annually. At In-Salah in southern Algeria the temperature
dropped overnight from 52.2°C to -3.3°C (range 55.6°C). This has
nothing to do with CO2. In deserts it remains relatively constant
because it is not absorbed plants.
The method of
temperature measurement creates considerable problems in constructing
the long term records necessary for analysis and understanding of
climate mechanisms. Three major segments are, a) the Instrumental
covering approximately 120 years, b) the Historic covering human
records of about 3000 years, and c) the Geologic/biologic that covers
the remaining 5 billion years. The most obvious problem is the degree
of accuracy. Most don’t know this exists even in the Instrumental,
the supposed ‘best’ segment. For example, modern thermocouple
thermometers can measure to hundredths of a degree, but the majority
of the data was obtained with human observed levels of mercury or
spirit in a tube to one half a degree.
All other
determinations of temperature are secondary indicators either as
proxy or phenologic records. Proxies are characteristics created by
climate and physically preserved, such as tree rings or lake
sediments. Phenology measures regular periodic biological phenomenon
determined by climatic conditions, such as first appearance of cherry
blossoms. Temperature is a factor in most cases, but more often
precipitation is more important. Most claims of climate change
attributed to temperature by the IPCC are primarily the result of
precipitation changes. Here is what The Center for
Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing says.
“Precipitation is
the key hydrologic variable linking the atmosphere with land surface
processes, and playing a dominant role in both weather and climate.
Three fourths of the heat in the atmosphere is contributed by the
global release of latent heat, while the distribution of water vapor
and clouds control the radiation balance (Water, 2002). Regional
precipitation plays a major role in weather patterns and is, of
course, the major renewable source of fresh water (both liquid and
frozen).”
“While some regions
have a history of ground-based operational measurements of
precipitation, poor spatial and temporal sampling over land as well
as over the ocean, is the globally prevalent condition. The spatial
extent and temporal resolution of ground-based precipitation
measurements are inadequate to support the creation of global
precipitation data sets that can help in detecting trends, or in
supporting process studies, let alone conducting adequate evaluation
of climate and weather models at global and continental scales.”
Misdirection began
with the IPCC definition of climate changes as only those caused by
human activity. They assume human input of water vapour to the
atmosphere inconsequential. As they note in the 2007 Report,
“Water vapour is the
most abundant and important greenhouse gas in the atmosphere.
However, human activities have only a small direct influence on the
amount of atmospheric water vapour.”
True, but that
downplays the role of variation of water vapour in the natural
climate system, which parallels their downplay of the role of water
overall. It is far more important than temperature.
IPCC projections
(predictions) are all based on computer models that either downplay
or lack adequate measures of the role of water. Hypocritically, they
tell people their science is sound while identifying all the
limitations. For example:
1.Evaporation, latent
energy and condensation are major components of energy transfer in
the atmosphere. Despite this the IPCC acknowledge in Chapter 8
“Unfortunately, the
total surface heat and water fluxes are not well observed.”
Significance of this
limitation is that
“These errors in
oceanic heat uptake will also have a large impact on the reliability
of the sea level rise projections.”
2.Tropical cyclones
are a major mechanism for transport of surplus tropical heat, but the
IPCC say
“The spatial
resolution of the coupled ocean-atmosphere models used in the IPCC
assessment is generally not high enough to resolve tropical cyclones,
and especially to simulate their intensity.”
3.Accurate measurement
of atmospheric water is far more difficult than temperature. It
varies more spatially and temporally and occurs as a gas, solid and
liquid. Again the IPCC models fail.
“For models to
simulate accurately the seasonally varying pattern of precipitation,
they must correctly simulate a number of processes (e.g.,
evapotranspiration, condensation, transport) that are difficult to
evaluate at a global scale.”
4.The interaction
between the Atmosphere and the Oceans is critical to the dynamics of
the movement of water through the hydrologic cycle. The IPCC tell us,
“The evaluation of
the hydrological component of climate models has mainly been
conducted uncoupled from AOGCMs (Bowling et al., 2003; Nijssen et
al., 2003; Boone et al., 2004). This is due in part to the
difficulties of evaluating runoff simulations across a range of
climate models due to variations in rainfall, snowmelt and net
radiation.”
5.Monsoons are a
massive mechanism for energy and moisture transfer but,
“In short, most
AOGCMs do not simulate the spatial or intra-seasonal variation of
monsoon precipitation accurately.”
6.Place a sheet of
plastic on the ground and watch how much moisture accumulates as it
evaporates from the soil and condenses. Soil moisture is a major
contributor to the atmospheric, but the IPCC say,
“Since the TAR,
there have been few assessments of the capacity of climate models to
simulate observed soil moisture. Despite the tremendous effort to
collect and homogenize soil moisture measurements at global scales
(Robock et al., 2000), discrepancies between large-scale estimates of
observed soil moisture remain.”
In most cases proxy
measurements used to claim temperature variation are actually
representing precipitation variation. Tree rings were the classic
example used in the 2001 IPCC Report to ‘prove’ human CO2 was
causing temperature increase. Tree ring studies began as
dendrochronology, an absolute dating technique, then evolved through
a measure of solar activity in to dendroclimatology. Early work
involved determining precipitation patterns as the principle growth
factor. Astronomer A. E. Douglass, observed as early as 1890 that
Douglas firs grew thicker rings in periods of heavy rain than dry
years. He also connected the pattern to sunspots. Tree rings are
primarily determined by precipitation. As Anthony Watt notes,
“If “the
total growth response of a tree is the product of all environmental
factors”, and forest modelers have to separate temperature
and precipitation diameter increments, plus create different models
for different forest regions, how can then one accurately divine
temperature over millennia from width analysis of tree ring growth
from trees in a single region?”
The record is
inadequate to determine temperature as Watt’s knows; it is much
worse for precipitation.
Retreat of glaciers is
attributed purely to temperature. Actually, most of the glacier
dynamics are precipitation related and determined. A glacier is
created above the altitude and latitude defined snow line. As snow
accumulates reaches a critical depth it becomes plastic and starts to
flow. A glacier snout doesn’t retreat because internally ice is
constantly flowing forward. It appears to retreat with increased
temperature but it also occurs when snowfall and therefore ice
formation decreases.
Melting ice on
Kilimanjaro became the image of warming. Its iconic status suited the
public relations component of global warming. Now it underscores what
was wrong with the claims because the snow has returned. The snow
disappeared because of drought exacerbated by forest clearing and
blowing dirt that increased the albedo and melt rate.
Stalactites and
stalagmites form by water infiltrating through soil and rock to drip
down from the ceiling of a cave. Some sediment is deposited on the
ceiling to form stalactites and some on the floor forming
stalagmites. Presumably each layer represents one season, but they
are mostly the precipitation not temperature season.
Sedimentary layers
only reflect temperature when precipitation patterns are seasonal.
This is most evident in glacier fed lakes.
Melting ice on Kilimanjaro became the image of warming. Its iconic status suited the public relations component of global warming. Now it underscores what was wrong with the claims because the snow has returned. The snow disappeared because of drought exacerbated by forest clearing and blowing dirt that increased the albedo and melt rate.
ReplyDeleteHmmm... and what may have caused that drought? It could not possibly be global warming could it?
AGW deniers are dumber and less aware than your average collection of plants. Plants are aware of GW and if they are in temperate areas are either moving towards the poles, or up mountain slopes. And they are moving up fairly fast, at 3 to 10 ft per year.