This is intriguing. As I have posted before, my preferred candidate
for sharp temperature drops come from a cyclic adjustment in the
Southern Ocean. Here we have specific evidence of changes acting on
the required time scales of millennia. Of course I am looking for
something nice and orderly but that is unlikely to be true.
Changes could easily precipitously notch back and forth over a few
centuries here to a few centuries there and be almost random but be
still clearly decisive. Because of our short data streams, we cannot
predict much but it is important to understand possibilities. For
that reason I remain haunted by the abrupt onset of the little Ice
Age and the fifth century freeze up that toppled the Western Roman
Empire in the fifth century.
What it means to me is that we should not worry about warm stable
conditions that are no problem at all, but about the abrupt down
kick that comes out of nowhere.
I do think that it will turn out that we have a seventy to eighty
year pulse cycle working its way around the Southern Ocean and that
induces a pulses of warm water into the Atlantic over the same period
and have even suck back cold waters as part of the same cycle.
It also has the charm of providing a natural adjustment between the
Northern and Southern hemispheres and acts independently of actual
solar input itself.
Rapid climate
change and the role of the Southern Ocean
by Staff Writers
Cardiff UK (SPX) Apr 09, 2013
Scientists from
Cardiff University and the University of Barcelona have discovered
new clues about past rapid climate change. The research, published
this month in the journal Nature Geoscience, concludes that
oceanographic reorganisations and biological processes are linked to
the supply of airborne dust in the Southern Ocean and this connection
played a key role in past rapid fluctuations of atmospheric carbon
dioxide levels, an important component in the climate system.
The scientists studied
a marine sediment core from the Southern Ocean and reconstructed
chemical signatures at different water depths using stable isotope
ratios in the shells of foraminifera, single-celled marine organisms.
They found that the
chemical difference between intermediate level and deep waters over
the last 300,000 years closely resembled the changes in atmospheric
carbon dioxide levels and the input of windblown dust.
Dr Martin Ziegler,
School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, explained: "The deep ocean
is by far the largest pool of available carbon on short timescales.
In the Southern Ocean, water from the deep rises to the sea surface
and comes in contact with the atmosphere.
These waters will
release their carbon to the atmosphere unless marine phytoplankton
captures this carbon through photosynthesis and transports it back
into the deep when it dies and sinks.
The efficiency of this
biological activity in the Southern Ocean is thought to depend on the
input of nutrients, namely iron, contained in wind blown dust. It is
also this efficiency that determines the strength of chemical
stratification in the Southern Ocean."
Professor Ian Hall,
School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, added: "Our study finds
large changes in chemical stratification of the Southern Ocean not
only across the shifts from ice ages to warm interglacial conditions,
but also on more rapid, millennial timescales. However,
changes in dust flux on these short timescales are much smaller.
"This could
suggest that the biological response to a change in dust input is
much more sensitive when the dust flux is relatively low such as it
is today. This iron fertilization process might be therefore more
important than previously thought."
These findings provide
an important benchmark for climate modeling studies and more research
will be needed to determine the significance and impact of future
changes in dust input into the Southern Ocean.
Interesting. As well as wind blown dust adding iron to the southern ocean there is biological recycling happening. I wrote this article about whales refertilising the oceans through their iron rich faeces, enabling algae to draw down more CO2.
ReplyDeleteWhales and Climate Change: the role of Whale poo in absorption of CO2 (April 2010)