In my own work, I have reduced
the moment of creation to the simple decision to be. Thereafter the mathematica alone imposes the world we know and if another creation is initiated, it is the same laws and generally convergent to any sister universe.
What remains to be discussed is the nature of the decision itself. The mathematica that I have laid out shows us that it is immensely simple and thereafter entirely inevitable.
Simple as creation is, it is also
clear that GOD is naturally post creation, claims to the contrary notwithstanding. In addition time as we understand it is post creation. Thus it is clear that our
present only insists on an act of creation however simple. The logic is simple. We exist so an act of creation took place.
The only plausible answer is that
the past is created by the present and let us leave it at that.
Recall that in my paper, I pointed
out that the mere act of forming the first neutral neutrino produces a sphere
of curvature and boundedness that precipitates additional decays into photons
and neutral neutrinos forever expanding at the induced light speed. It really is that easy.
I only wish assembling life were quite as easy.
Stephen Hawking lays out case for
Big Bang without God
By Rod Pyle
PASADENA, Calif. — Our universe didn't need any divine help to burst
into being, famed cosmologist Stephen Hawking told a packed house here at the
California Institute of Technology Tuesday night.
Many people had begun queuing up for free tickets to Hawking's 8:00 p.m
lecture, titled "The Origin
of the Universe," 12 hours earlier. By 6:00 p.m. local time, the line
was about a quarter-mile long.
Also on NBC News.com: Stephen
Hawking says God’s not needed. So what?
A second auditorium and a Jumbotron-equipped lawn, which itself was
jammed with an estimated 1,000 viewers, were needed to handle the crowd. At
least one person was observed offering $1,000 for a ticket, with no success.
Stephen
Hawking began the event by reciting an African creation myth, and
rapidly moved on to big questions such as, Why are we here?
He noted that many people still seek a divine solution to counter the
theories of curious physicists, and at one point, he quipped, “What was God
doing before the divine creation? Was he preparing hell for people who asked
such questions?”
After outlining the historical theological debate about how the
universe was created, Hawking gave a quick review of more scientific
cosmological explanations, including Fred Hoyle and Thomas Gold’s steady-state
theory. This idea hypothesizes that there is no beginning and no end and that
galaxies continue to form from spontaneously created matter.
Hawking said this theory and several other ideas don't hold up, citing
recent observations by space telescopes and other instruments.
After giving a brief historical background on relativistic physics and
cosmology, Hawking discussed the idea of a repeating Big Bang. He noted that in
the 1980s, he and physicist Roger Penrose proved the universe could not
“bounce” when it contracted, as had been theorized.
Therefore, time began at the moment of singularity, and this has likely
occurred only once, Hawking said. The age of the universe — now believed to be
about 13.8
billion years — fits that model, as the number and maturity of
observed galaxies seem to fit in the general scheme.
In another observation of modern religion, Hawking noted that in the
1980s, around the time he released a paper discussing the moment the universe
was born, Pope John Paul II admonished the scientific establishment against
studying the moment of creation, as it was holy.
“I was glad not to be thrown into an inquisition,” Hawking joked.
He closed by outlining "M-theory," which is based partly on
ideas put forward years ago by another famed physicist, Caltech’s Richard
Feynman. Hawking sees that theory as the only big idea that really explains
what he has observed.
M-theory posits that multiple universes are created out of nothing,
Hawking explained, with many possible histories and many possible states of
existence. In only a few of these states would life be possible, and in fewer
still could something like humanity exist. Hawking mentioned that he felt
fortunate to be living in this state of existence.
Hawking closed the event with a familiar plea for continued
exploration of the cosmos: “We must continue to go into space for the
future of humanity,” he said, adding, “I don’t think we will survive another
thousand years without escaping our fragile planet.”
Hawking has been battling the debilitating neurological disorder amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, also known as Lou Gehrig's disase, for 50 years.
The physicist has been spending a month or so at Caltech, as he does
each year, sequestered with colleagues, such as fellow theoretical physicist Kip
Thorne, to discuss many great mysteries of the cosmos.
No comments:
Post a Comment