You could not make this up. It is enough to provoke summary
execution in the minds and hearts of the greatest pacifists.
What has happened, is that pro Islamism sentiment has now taken a
sharp swing away and is in retreat throughout the Pakistani culture.
It is a hard way to go about doing this, but the result remains the
same. The Pakistani government can harden its attitude toward any
radicalism unless it is tightly reined in. I do not know though if
we have reached a threshold over which security agencies ferociously
suppress the Taliban.
What we now know though is that point can be reached.
Taliban Solution to
Bad Press: Kill Journalists
October 24,
2012 By Frank Crimi
The Pakistani Taliban,
Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), has declared war on Pakistani and
Western news organizations after blaming unfair press coverage for
the negative reaction to its failed assassination attempt on
14-year-old youth activist Malala Yousafzai.
The shooting of
Malala by a TTP death squad had generated immediate and widespread
international condemnation, including outrage from large numbers of
Pakistanis, many of whom had shown previous sympathy or fear toward
the Islamist terror group.
This Pakistani outrage
found its form in numerous fatwas issued by Islamic clerics
denouncing the attack as well as in million dollar bounties being
offered by the Pakistani government for the capture of the Taliban
members responsible for the shooting.
As Muhammad Amir Rana
of the Pakistan Institute for Peace Studies,said, “We (Pakistanis)
have seen a similar public sentiment in the past, but this time it is
quite unique. This case has provided a catharsis of the masses for
all the grievances that have been building up for years.”
For its part, however,
the Taliban was stung by the negative public reaction, unable to
fathom that shooting a young girl in the head for her outspoken views
would be generate such open and unified hostility toward the Islamist
terror group.
After all, the Taliban
has been viciously targeting Pakistani children for years, including
training thousands of children as suicide bombers, a practice which
has failed to generate the near universal revulsion in Pakistani
society as this one heinous act.
Instead, the
Taliban concluded that blame for its public relations
dilemma must lay squarely at the feet of a biased news media,
co-conspirators who, they claimed, have long been working with Malala
on a “pre-planned strategy” to “pollute the minds of youth
against the Taliban.”
As such, the Taliban
claimed the unholy partnership between Malala and the press had
unsurprisingly produced a media unwilling to provide fair and
balanced coverage of the shooting, a lack of objectivity which
included throwing hurtful insults at the Islamist terror group.
According to a
Taliban spokesman, “this filthy, godless media has taken huge
advantage of this situation, and journalists have started passing
judgment on us.” This includes calling the Taliban “derogatory
names” and labeling them the “worst people on earth.”
Now faced with what
one Pakistani journalist called “undoubtedly the worst press the
TTP has ever had,” the Taliban’s instinctual reaction to this
journalistic malpractice has been to kill the messenger.
Specifically, a
directive was recently seized by Pakistan’s intelligence
agencies in which TTP leader Hakeemullah Mehsud had ordered that
all current Taliban operations against Pakistani government
forces be halted, with attention now focused on attacking media
organizations and journalists that had denounced the murder attempt
of Malala.
To that end, the
Taliban had reportedly selected a dozen suicide bombers to target
television and radio stations, journalists, columnists, and TV
anchors throughout Pakistan, including the cities of Peshawar,
Islamabad, Lahore and Karachi.
As a Pakistani Taliban
commander in South Waziristan, who calls himself Jihad Yar, said,
“The Taliban will not spare journalists who focus on this one
girl,” adding that “99 percent of the reporters are using the
shooting as an excuse to attack the Taliban.”
Given all that, it’s
not surprising to find that Pakistan’s Committee to Protect
Journalists has reported, “Media houses, TV anchors and some
well-known journalists are under serious threat,” while the All
Pakistan Newspapers Society has requested extra security from the
government.
Unfortunately, the
Taliban threats aren’t idle chatter given it has previously killed
and kidnapped other journalists whose work it found issue with,
assaults which have killed 10 reporters and which have served to make
Pakistan the world’sdeadliest country for journalists. As one
Pakistani journalist said, “We are scared, but what can we do?
We have to work.”
Still, while the
Taliban may be working to eliminate unfavorable news organizations
and journalists from existence, it insists it will not harm those
media people who help get the Taliban message out.
One such person is
Hamid Mir, a popular Pakistani columnist, who recently published a
seven-page statement from Taliban spokesman Ehsanullah
Ehsan that detailed the Islamist terror group’s justification for
the attack on Malala.
For starters, the
media narrative had claimed the Taliban targeted Malala for her work
in advocating child rights in Pakistan, in particular for her focus
on educating girls, an issue decidedly frowned upon by the Taliban
given its rampant destruction of over 400 mostly girls
schools in northwest Pakistan.
Instead, the Taliban
strenuously denied it had tried to murder Malala for “raising voice
for education,” but rather because she was a “spy of the West”
who “propagated against mujahideen (holy warriors) to defame (the)
Taliban,” efforts for which the “infidels gave her awards and
rewards,” such as Pakistan’s 2011 National Peace Award.
As Ehsan then noted,
the Koran calls for the killing of “people propagating against
Islam and Islamic forces,” and “those who are spying for
enemies.” Therefore, Malala’s offenses against Islam left the
Taliban little choice but to carry out the stiff Sharia punishment.
Ehsan also chafed at
media accusations that the Taliban’s murder attempt on Malala
rendered the Islamist terror group child killers, arguing that
Sharia law allows for children to be killed if they are speaking out
against Islam.
Moreover, the
spokesman continued, Malala was in fact an adult despite being 14 at
the time of the shooting. “Even if no sign of puberty becomes
noticeable, this age of the girl marks the end of pre puberty phase,”
he said.
Yet despite its
attempts to amend the journalistic record and improve upon its deadly
image, the Taliban’s efforts to play the innocent victim of a media
conspiracy are likely to fall on mostly deaf ears.
That sympathy card is
best reserved for the true victim in this gruesome saga, Malala
Yousafzai, who currently lies recuperating from her gunshot wounds in
a British hospital. Hers is an all-too tragic and true story, one
even the barbaric Taliban can’t rewrite.
Let the journalists kill the Taliban--first!
ReplyDeleteNo loss.