When I investigate political trends, my focus is always on the
numbers. Campaigns matter of course, but they rarely if ever change
the position of the die hard support which can be counted on the
rationalize the likes of Hitler, let alone a mere failed president.
Thus a considered democrat shifting his
position does need to be listened to because folks will be making up
their minds for much the same reasons unless something spurious is
thrown into the game.
As it stands, the two candidates are essentially neck and neck as we
now enter the true period of voter decision making. This totally
normal. It is a two horse race and Jesus Christ could not do better.
However, Romney has room to grow while Obama has room to shrink
simply because his track record is decidedly underwhelming on the
domestic economic file. Obama is fighting his record and has already
taken his best shots at the Romney record.
Romney's latest back down on repealing the Obama care legitimation is
a deliberate attempt to open the doors for wavering democrats to jump
ship. It is also the correct policy. Way more important, it has not
been noticed, but he plans specifically to down load as much of the
federal service bureaucracy unto the States as he can.
This offloads much of the entitlement problem from the federal
agenda. This surely were Obama care is going at mach speed. It also
introduces a healthy whiff of competition into the those massive
programs. I get profoundly annoyed with a medical system utterly
gamed by the insurance industry with its whole incentive system
wrapped around maximizing the gross billing. That is not competition
at all but private tax farming.
I think that even democrats can buy into that as most of the medical
entitlement coin actually misses their targeted constituencies. That
is presuming of course that they bother to check.
By Rob Taub
Published September
07, 2012
FoxNews.com
I wrote
an article last month for this website discussing how I –
along with other Democrats and independents – might just cast our
vote for Romney, although I didn't fully explain the rationale for
the change. While I'm not claiming there is a new wave of supporters
for Mitt Romney, there is no denying that there is a large number of
disgruntled Democrats and independents who are dissatisfied with
President Obama. And that may just be enough to elect Mitt Romney.
At this week's
Democratic Convention, president Obama spoke of his many hopes and
dreams for America. He has often said that he expects to leave a
legacy of great achievements, like those of Presidents John F.
Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson.
Kennedy was able to
galvanize the nation not simply because he wanted to do so, but as a
result of methodical campaigning and stumping that culminated with
a cross-country trip in 1956,
where he introduced himself to voters, delegates and politicians.
Lyndon Johnson was able to pass numerous bills into law, not
merely for the reason that they were morally right, but because he
was a skilled politician who understood and accepted the workings of
our political system.
JFK was a relentless and industrious campaigner. He came from a level of wealth and privilege that placed him at the top of the one percent of his day, yet instead of rejecting the mandatory campaign requirements of politicians of that era, he embraced the daily rigors of handshaking, personal visits and ward style politics, exploiting them further than anyone ever had before.
The president has a
wonderful vision for America, but it's nothing more than a delusion
that can't be achieved during a time of record – and climbing –
deficits.
Lyndon Johnson was the
consummate politician who truly understood that the art of the
deal was all about bipartisanship and
he worked tirelessly to unite our country. It’s been said
that while most men were content to read a book or watch a sporting
event for recreation, Lyndon Johnson would follow the results of a
local Texas school board election for fun. His love for
politics was unflagging. That was his tennis.
President Obama is said to abhor the daily machinations of Washington politics. He refuses to miss more than two dinners a week with his daughters. He prefers not to meet with senators, congressmen or significant donors, yet he still expects to reap the benefits normally provided by those circumstances.
Obama snubbed the
advice of George Soros (perhaps his wealthiest and most
influential donor) and has alienated many other important supporters.
What President Obama may perceive as altruistic is nothing more
than intractable behavior along with a refusal to accept the
reality of American politics and – ultimately – the basic job
description of president of the United States.
Perhaps President Obama should consider that his dislike of Washington politics has contributed to the inertia and current stalemate that exists in Washington. He promised hope and change, but his current campaign is divisive with negative advertisements and driven by class warfare.
In Thursday night's
convention address, President Obama reprised the same promises he
made in 2008, again with no feasible suggestions of how to pay for
them.
The president has a
wonderful vision for America, but it's nothing more than a delusion
that can't be achieved during a time of record – and climbing –
deficits. Our government has built roads, bridges and schools that
have educated us. However, it has also become a bloated money
burning machine in desperate need of reform – a word that does not
seem to exist in Obama's vocabulary.
Democrats are jumping
ship because President Obama is offering nothing but blame for the
previous administration and his own pipe dreams at a time when voters
need some real assurance if they’re going to believe the economy
can be saved. Unfortunately, speaking as one of those
Democrats, I have little hope that President Obama will change.
Rob Taub is a writer
and comedian. He is host of Tech Hub on WOR AM radio.
I do not suppose that anyone would like to make a bet as to the winner in November?
ReplyDeletedpaladin at ix dot netcom dot com
You will be asked to prove that you are human