It
appears that they have taken the sonar data and successfully
reconstructed a 3D image of the structure lying on the ocean floor
just off Cuba. This is solid and completely convincing. I got this
link originally from Dale Drinnon in his recent Frontiers of
Antropology.
More
importantly these structures are certainly contemporaneous with the
Egyptian complex whatever is been said. This means inspired by the
Atlantean Bronze Age sea trade based civilization of which we have
posted extensively.
Way
more important in terms of my many interlinked conjectures, this
confirms a major subsidence event dating around 1159 BC. I had
linked it to an eruption at Hekla, but that looks like a side show.
At the time uplifted portions of the Mid Atlantic Ridge subsided also
including Lyonese and the home islands and land mass around the
Azores. Even if that had not happened, this subsidence was amply
large enough.
This
would have produced an orthogonal pressure forcing subsidence to
either East or West. Since the ridge between Cuba and Yucatan is the
natural point of weakness between the Gulf subsidence basin and the
Caribbean subsidence basin, it naturally subsided deeply. The driver
for all this was the hydrostatic changes brought about by both the
original crustal shift of 12900 years ago that I have called the
Pleistocene Nonconformity and the slow uplift of the Hudson Bay Basin
brought about by the ending of the Ice Age. I suspect that we are
all pretty safe now.
Even
if we only recognize the Hudson Bay Uplift the Cuban Subsidence is a
natural adjustment.
I
suspect that all these major subsidence events happened at the same
time although that is not necessary.
Pyramid Structures
Near Western Cuba.
Pyramids under the
waters of Cuba were discovered by two scientists Paul Weinzweig and
Pauline Zalitzki. They found the ruins of ancient
buildings for about a mile below the sea and considered
them to be Atlantis.
Paulina found
elsewhere in Cuba ancient descriptions and symbols that was identical
to those on the waterfront structures below.
The two scientists
used submarines to found tremendous pyramid structures
(that remainds giza in Egypt), built of stones
weighing hundreds of tons.
They found sphinxes,
stones that arranged like Stonehenge, and a written language
engraved on the stones.
Why it was not
discovered before?
The U.S. government
discovered the alleged place during the Cuban missile crisis in the
sixties, Nuclear submarines cruising in the Gulf (in deep sea)
met pyramid structures. They immediately shut down the site and
took control of him and the objects,in order that it will not come to
Russians hands.
A whistleblower
from the army,that used to serve in Montego Bay told they
are still working on the site and recover objects and instruments
(including those who still work) since the 60th.
This area in Cuba
could not be over waterfront less than 10,000 years ago…
Obviously fake
ReplyDeleteThis is an update out of wikipedia. The quoted depths are much easier to account for than the original estimation or lack thereoff.
ReplyDeleteCuban underwater city refers to a site thought by some to be a submerged granite complex structures off the coast of the Guanahacabibes peninsula in the Pinar del Río Province of Cuba.[1][2][3]
Sonar images interpreted as being symmetrical and geometric stone structures resembling an urban complex were first recorded in early 2001 covering an area of 2 square kilometres (200 ha) at depths of between 600 metres (2,000 ft) and 750 metres (2,460 ft).[1] The discovery was reported by Pauline Zalitzki, a marine engineer, and her husband Paul Weinzweig, owners of a Canadian company called Advanced Digital Communications,[4] working on an exploration and survey mission in conjunction with the Cuban government. The team returned to the site a second time with an underwater video robot that filmed sonar images interpreted as various pyramids and circular structures made out of massive, smooth blocks of stone that resembled hewn granite. Zalitzki said "It's a really wonderful structure which really looks like it could have been a large urban centre, However, it would be totally irresponsible to say what it was before we have evidence." [1]
After studying the images, National Geographic senior editor John Echave said "They are interesting anomalies, but that's as much as anyone can say right now, but I'm no expert on sonar and until we are able to actually go down there and see, it will difficult to characterize them." Professor of Oceanography Robert Ballard was quoted as saying "That's too deep, I'd be surprised if it was human. You have to ask yourself, how did it get there? I've looked at a lot of sonar images in my life, and it can be sort of like looking at an ink blot -- people can sometimes see what they want to see. I'll just wait for a bit more data."[5]
Marine Geologist Manuel Iturralde called for more samples before drawing conclusions about the site, saying "We have some figures which are extremely unusual but nature is much richer than we think." Estimating that it would have taken 50,000 years for such structures to have sunken to the depth at which they were said to be found, he said "50,000 years ago there wasn't the architectural capacity in any of the cultures we know of to build complex buildings." A specialist in underwater archaeology at Florida State University added "It would be cool if they were right, but it would be real advanced for anything we would see in the New World for that time frame. The structures are out of time and out of place."[4]
Anyone have GPS coordinates?
ReplyDeleteSi los elementos encontrados ofrecen suficiente razonabilidad para su publicación responsable como lo ofreció la Dra Zelinsky, convendría un esfuerzo más para corroborar el descubrimiento de la existencia de un asentamiento humano en el pasado a 700 metros de profundidad, o bien desecharlo.
ReplyDeletePara los geólogos eso estaría fuera de tiempo y lugar y requeriría una explicación alterna más razonable.
Pocos o quizás NADIE consideraría la posibilidad de que el NIVEL DEL MAR ESTUBIERA 800 METROS MAS BAJO DEL ACTUAL EN UN TIEMPO PASADO, ni pensarlo! Ni ponerlo sobre la mesa de discusión! Pero vean! Un registro escrito, es decir histórico ofrece esa posibilidad . Génesis 1:7,8 y Génesis 7:11,12,19 y Génesis 8:13 y 14, detallan la fuente de las aguas ( dearriba del cielo, no evaporación previa) magnitud (toda la tierra, no solamente una zona o región o varias) y la cantidad de agua que se agregó al nivel del mar de entonces pues tardó en escurrirse UN AÑO Y UN MES. ¿Suficiente para elevar su nivel 800 metros o más?
Sin duda el entorno de los continentes e islas habría sido más amplio de lo que hoy se sabe. Esto cambiaría la historia, no la moderna, sino la historia antigua de la humanidad.