This actually explains a lot. To
start with it has been our own inclination to accept the idea that DNA
retention is conservative. Thus we view
change as a positive selection choice when it may actually due to the dropping
of an unneeded function.
It also allows us to rethink the process of domestication. Domestication gives up a wide range of
critical functions in exchange for the security provided by the
domesticator. This is a pretty huge
alteration. Yet they just as easily can
be clawed back if it became necessary but usually with some serious loss. We would find it difficult to recover our
Baboon jaws though much else is obviously recoverable.
Thus shedding specific responsibility for one's environment onto
another participant is a viable strategy that allows other strengths to be
improved at even the genetic level. The
black queen rule actually works very well though it is obviously a selective
tool that must have a narrow focus. On
the other hand, it also suggests the application of self directed choice far
more than for the usual examples.
We have been posting on the application of a parent's choice in the
enhancement of its offspring's DNA choices allowing a new niche to be
penetrated. In most cases choice best
explains what happens, yet it is empirical choice in terms of what is in front
of the creature, thus implying parental direction subconscious or
otherwise. It clearly allows me to
explain how a a baby camel can be born
with a useful callus on its knees for kneeling.
Useful, but occurring soon enough anyway. Yet it saves the mother the grief of maternal
concern for the calf's bloody knees in the early going with no other real
advantage.
A University of Tennessee
professor's hypothesis may be game changer for evolutionary theory
by Staff Writers
Knoxville TN (SPX) Apr 10, 2012
The authors formed their theory after studying
photosynthetic bacteria called Prochlorococcus.
A new hypothesis
posed by a University of Tennessee, Knoxville, associate professor and
colleagues could be a game changer in the evolution arena. The hypothesis
suggests some species are surviving by discarding genes and depending on other
species to play their hand. The groundbreaking "Black Queen
Hypothesis" got its name from the game of Hearts.
In Hearts, the goal
is to avoid "winning" the Queen of Spades (the Black Queen), which is
worth a lot of points. Subsequently, players allow others to take the
high-point card while they enjoy low-score tallies.
This same premise
applies in evolution, the scientists say.
According to the
hypothesis, evolution pushes microorganisms to lose essential functions when
there is another species around to perform them. This idea counters popular
evolutionary thinking that living organisms evolve by adding genes rather than
discarding them.
"A common
assumption about evolution is that it is directed toward increasing
complexity," said Erik Zinser, associate professor of microbiology.
"But we know from analysis of microbial genomes that some lineages trend
toward decreasing complexity, exhibiting a net loss of genes relative to their
ancestor."
Zinser's opinion
piece is published in mBio, the online open-access journal of the American
Society for Microbiology. Jeffrey Morris and Richard Lenski of Michigan State
University are co-authors. Morris was Zinser's doctoral student at UT.
The authors formed
their theory after studying photosynthetic bacteria called Prochlorococcus.
"This marine
microorganism continued to mystify us because it is the most common
photosynthetic organism on Earth, but it is extremely difficult to grow in pure
culture," Zinser said. "A major reason for this difficulty is that
Prochlorococcus is very sensitive to reactive oxygen species such as hydrogen
peroxide and relies on other bacteria to protect them by breaking down these
toxic substances for them."
Prochlorococcus had
once performed this function itself, but natural selection decided it was too
costly, like carrying the Queen of Spades, and discarded this ability. Instead
Prochlorococcus benefits from the hard work of others within its community
allowing it to concentrate its energies elsewhere-such as multiplying.
The hypothesis offers
a new way of looking at complicated, interdependent communities of microorganisms.
"We know that
certain microbial activities, such as hydrogen peroxide scavenging, are
'leaky,' meaning their impacts extend beyond the cell and into the
environment," Zinser said. "What the hypothesis suggests is that this
leakiness can drive a community toward greater interdependence, even if some
members are unwitting participants in this process."
This interdependence
could lend itself to vulnerabilities. The scientists say the work highlights
the importance of biological diversity, because if rare members are lost,
"the consequences for the community could be disastrous." This would
be analogous to attempting to play Hearts without the Queen of Spades.
Currently, the
hypothesis is limited to microorganisms, but Zinser thinks the hypothesis could
be extended to larger free-living organisms. All that is needed is a card which
no player wants yet is crucial for the game to be played.
I am beginning to believe that I live in a world of mind numbing stupid. Yes, evolution does favor complexity, but it does not work on a single level It works at the genetic, cellular, organism, and tribe. levels simultaneously.
ReplyDeleteApparently the author, (How did he ever get a degree?) is not aware of this. His idea of evolution and complexity is as wrong as the creationists ideas about entropy and equally symplistic