Inasmuch as tweens do know the
negatives around substance abuse that is certainly not the problem. What may be needed is specific coaching at
this age in the practice of logical discourse that allows a person to fend of
social pressure as it arises. A tween
needs to understand that he has the right to ask if he respects the person who
is asking him to play with fire. And if so, why so?
A simple training in the control
of rational discourse could empower a tween to avoid bad choices. This is something to follow up on. Substance abuse is seriously damaging to the
developing mind on a physical level far beyond what is experienced by mature
adults, so this is a key health problem.
We have to be reminded that only
mature individuals act with conviction and that is often seriously wrong. This
means that the pathways are burned in and difficult to change.
Tweens Just Say 'Maybe' to Cigarettes and Alcohol
ScienceDaily (Mar. 12, 2012) — When it comes to prevention of
substance use in our tween population, turning our kids on to thought control
may just be the answer to getting them to say no.
New research published in the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs,
co-led by professors Roisin O'Connor of Concordia University and Craig Colder
of State University of New York at Buffalo, has found that around the tween-age
years kids are decidedly ambivalent toward cigarettes and alcohol. It seems
that the youngsters have both positive and negative associations with these harmful
substances and have yet to decide one way or the other. Because they are
especially susceptible to social influences, media portrayals of drug use
and peer pressure become strong allies of substance use around these formative
years.
"Initiation and escalation of alcohol and cigarette use occurring
during late childhood and adolescence makes this an important developmental
period to examine precursors of substance use," says O'Connor, who is an
Assistant Professor in Concordia's Department of Psychology. "We conducted
this study to have a better understanding of what puts this group at risk for
initiating substance use so we can be more proactive with prevention."
The study showed that at the impulsive, automatic level, these kids
thought these substances were bad but they were easily able to overcome these
biases and think of them as good when asked to place them with positive words.
O'Connor explains that "this suggests that this age group may be somewhat
ambivalent about drinking and smoking. We need to be concerned when kids are
ambivalent because this is when they may be more easily swayed by social
influences."
According to O'Connor, drinking and smoking among this age group is
influenced by both impulsive (acting without thinking), and controlled (weighing
the pros against the cons) decisional processes. With this study, both
processes were therefore examined to best understand the risk for initiating
substance use.
To do this, close to 400 children between the ages of 10 and 12
participated in a computer-based test that involved targeted tasks. The tweens
were asked to place pictures of cigarettes and alcohol with negative or
positive words. The correct categorization of some trials,for example, involved
placing pictures of alcohol with a positive word in one category and placing
pictures of alcohol with negative words in another category.
"From this we saw how well the participants were able to
categorize the pictures in the way that was asked. Using a mathematical formula
of probabilities we were able to identify how often responses were answered
with impulsive and thoughtful processes as they related to drinking and
smoking," says O'Connor."
The next step in this study is to look at kids over a longer period of
time. The hypothesis from the research is that as tweens begin to use these
substances there will be an apparent weakening in their negative biases toward
drinking and smoking. The desire will eventually outweigh the costs. It is also
expected that they will continue to easily outweigh the pros relative to the
cons related to substance use.
"We would like to track kids before they use substances and follow
them out into their first few years of use and see how these processes play
out," says O'Connor. "Ultimately, we would like to help kids with
that thoughtful piece. There is such a big focus now on telling kids substances
are bad, but from our study we are seeing that they already know they are bad,
therefore that is not the problem. The problem is the likelihood of external
pressures that are pushing them past their ambivalence so that they use. In a
school curriculum format I see helping kids deal with their ambivalence in the
moment when faced with the choice to use or not use substances."
Por que usar biochip em personagem biochipada em falso BBB. O BBB do crime! Para destruir a saúde de mulher de vida de recato. Poi ao sentir cheiro de cigarro na residência - não sendo fumante, não comprando cigarros, como poderia fumar? Só cretinos fariam isso. Eles pagam pelo cigarro e levam até a vítima. Por que não fizeram com pessoas de igual atração? Seria fácil ao invés de aprisionar uma família por décadas hipnotizados para altos faturamentos da mídia. Pegassem marginais e políticos, atores e realeza que gostam e precisam da fama e auto promoção! Por que a sociedade é psicopata e detonar pessoas certinhas é vontade de todos, só para se divertirem. Então são marginais e tão curradores quanto os que nos agridem em cárcere da própria existência.
ReplyDelete