This provides researchers with a
new bench mark variable that can be readily accessed and factored in without
putting excessive boots on the ground.
It is surely worth having.
Resolution of a square kilometer
is surely good enough. Also if you want any better, refer again to boots on the
ground. Any better needs to be counting
trees and that best needs a cutting license.
Otherwise the conclusions are
simple common sense anyway.
NASA Map Sees Earth's Trees in a New Light
ScienceDaily (Feb. 17, 2012) — A NASA-led science team has created
an accurate, high-resolution map of the height of Earth's forests. The map will
help scientists better understand the role forests play in climate change and
how their heights influence wildlife habitats within them, while also helping
them quantify the carbon stored in Earth's vegetation.
Scientists from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.; the
University of Maryland, College Park; and Woods Hole Research Center, Falmouth,
Mass., created the map using 2.5 million carefully screened, globally distributed
laser pulse measurements from space. The light detection and ranging (lidar)
data were collected in 2005 by the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System instrument
on NASA's Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat).
"Knowing the height of Earth's forests is critical to estimating
their biomass, or the amount of carbon they contain," said lead researcher
Marc Simard of JPL. "Our map can be used to improve global efforts to
monitor carbon. In addition, forest height is an integral characteristic of Earth's
habitats, yet is poorly measured globally, so our results will also benefit
studies of the varieties of life that are found in particular parts of the
forest or habitats."
The map, available at http://lidarradar.jpl.nasa.gov,
depicts the highest points in the forest canopy. Its spatial resolution is 0.6
miles (1 kilometer). The map was validated against data from a network of
nearly 70 ground sites around the world.
The researchers found that, in general, forest heights decrease at
higher elevations and are highest at low latitudes, decreasing in height the
farther they are from the tropics. A major exception was found at around 40
degrees south latitude in southern tropical forests in Australia and New
Zealand, where stands of eucalyptus, one of the world's tallest flowering
plants, tower much higher than 130 feet (40 meters).
The researchers augmented the ICESat data with other types of data to
compensate for the sparse lidar data, the effects of topography and cloud
cover. These included estimates of the percentage of global tree cover from
NASA's Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer on NASA's Terra satellite,
elevation data from NASA's Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, and temperature
and precipitation maps from NASA's Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission and the
WorldClim database. WorldClim is a set of freely available, high-resolution
global climate data that can be used for mapping and spatial modeling.
In general, estimates in the new map show forest heights were taller
than in a previous ICESat-based map, particularly in the tropics and in boreal
forests, and were shorter in mountainous regions. The accuracy of the new map
varies across major ecological community types in the forests, and also depends
on how much the forests have been disturbed by human activities and by
variability in the forests' natural height.
"Our map contains one of the best descriptions of the height of
Earth's forests currently available at regional and global scales," Simard
said. "This study demonstrates the tremendous potential that spaceborne
lidar holds for revealing new information about Earth's forests. However, to
monitor the long-term health of Earth's forests and other ecosystems, new Earth
observing satellites will be needed."
Results of the study were published recently in the Journal of
Geophysical Research -- Biogeosciences.
JPL is managed for NASA by the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena .
Recommend this story on
Que saco esse papo de homem e era astral. Você pode vibrar com as estrelas ou com os protozoários, tudo tem o mesmo princípio e organização de matéria. Agora, se quiser ser o protozoário em vida humanoide a escolha e sua! Ficam aí ditando aos treinados ao consumismo para depois deserdá-los, com falsa moralidade e discursos de responsabilidade ecológica. A base ainda é miserável e ao estreitar rumo ao pico o consumo é ainda menor a estes que detém as finanças. Operam na máquina com distorções no pensar a ocupar e a demanda de participações nas lutas de classe esvaziam. Então desprenda-se da matéria você que não é o consumidor e não é o extrator/extrativista. Sobra mais para esses. Caem economias e destacam-se outros investimentos na ressurgência, protozoarinos. Rumo aos de destaques. Mesmo aqui, fiz joguete com as palavras em difuso a pensar. Esse é o jogo! Qual é a sublimação, o relevar?!
ReplyDelete