More pertinent than even this is
that the burst of ultra violet light processed through the body in an apparent
plane of activity just as we scan a page to produce a Xerox copy. This is technology we cannot produce ourselves
and it will likely need another three decades or so. Such a process could tackle each cell
individually and plausible restore any damage and enliven the cell. It likely lasted less than a couple of
minutes to allow normal functioning to begin and not be additionally
damaged. My point here is that we can
imagine the resurrection process itself as a digital process that is plausible
in terms of our own technological efforts.
It is no longer mystical at all.
Yet it is categorical proof of
the resurrection and by extension the specific role of Jesus as an intervener
in the development of the Roman Empire . I think he died too soon even though he used
his death to empower a new movement that was revolutionary. The West remains his inheritance.
Had he gained political traction
in his time and place, he may have risen to influence the institutions of the Roman Empire in the midst of the Empire’s
consolidation. It is easy to posit
simple steps that could have led the Roman Empire
into the world of modernism having the benefit of historical hindsight.
It did not happen and his legacy
was a religion that set out one convert at a time to restructure the moral
ethos. That a third of the globe’s
population is today part of that ethos and that it continues to expand vigorously
as if it is as fresh as the day it was born is a remarkable achievement. The criticism that many in the developed
world have strayed is an error. No where
do we see a restoration of the old moral ethos and never will. In fact the constant pressure to protect even
wolves and lions is an example of the extremes of the Christian ethos.
My take home today is that every
human being on Earth today must now confront a new and also old truth. Jesus was resurrected with technology clearly
superior to our own technology today and plausibly beyond our reach for a long
time. His promise of immortality is surely a deliverable in the physical world
and coincides with our burgeoning knowledge of the spiritual world which we no
longer can safely dismiss. He offered a
route to immortality through a combination of faith (acceptance of Jesus as
mentor and master) and following his teachings.
Shroud of Turin :
Shroud Could Not Have Been Faked, Indicates a Supernatural Occurrence Reports
Say
Scientists who have tested the authenticity of the Shroud of
Turin, has finally released their results pointing to the fact that
the Shroud of Turin could not have been faked and that a
supernatural occurrence may be the reason for the occurrence. This was
disclosed by several international news sites, December 21, 2011.
Scientist tried to duplicate the Shroud of Turin but could only come near to
duplicating it by using a “short and intense burst of UV directional
radiation.” This fact indicates the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin because there
was no UV technology during those times, that could have created the
imprint, reports said.
The Shroud of Turin shows an
imprint of a double image of a man, who apparently, was scourged and
crucified.Christians believed that the shroud was the burial clothes
of Jesus Christ after His crucifixion in the Mount of Calvary .
Reportedly, Professor Paolo Di Lazzaro, the head of the research
said that:
“When one talks about a flash of light being able to colour a piece of
linen in the same way as the shroud, discussion inevitably touches on things
such as miracles and resurrection. But as scientists, we were concerned only
with verifiable scientific processes.”
Previous reports stated that a radiocarbon dating test, which was
conducted in 1988 at the University of Oxford, the University of
Arizona and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology,
showed that the Shroud of Turin was
dated between 1260 and 1390. Some experts say though that the shroud may have
been contaminated by clothing from the middle ages.
The latest result however as stated by the National Agency for New
Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Development of Italy points to the fact
that the shroud could not have been faked.
Shroud of Turin
Is Real, Scientists Claim, Citing New Evidence
By Stoyan
Zaimov | Christian Post Reporter
The Shroud of Turin, which many believe to be the burial robe of
Jesus Christ – is likely to be authentic in nature, Italian scientists have recently
claimed.
A negative version photo of the Shroud of Turin, Cathedral of Saint
John the Baptist in Turin, Italy, revealing a face commonly associated with
Jesus Christ, taken in August 1978.
The ancient 14-foot long piece of cloth is said to hold remarkable
imprints of a crucified man with long hair and a bearded face. However, critics
insist the shroud in question is a forgery created in the Middle Ages, somewhere
between 1260 and 1390.
Radiocarbon tests conducted in 1988 in Arizona, Oxford and
Zurich seemed to prove that theory to be true, but were disputed due to claims
that fibers from the cloth were used around that time period simply to repair
the shroud, which would explain the skewed findings, The Telegraph reported.
Attempts in the past had been made to replicate the relic in order to
prove that it is a fake, and although scientists from Italy's National Agency for New
Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Development managed to create
such a duplicate, they concluded that it would be impossible for anyone to have
done the same with technology available
in the Middle Ages:
"The double image (front and back) of a scourged and crucified
man, barely visible on the linen cloth of the Shroud of Turin , has many physical and chemical
characteristics that are so particular that the staining ... is impossible to
obtain in a laboratory," the experts said.
The leader of the project, Prof Paolo Di Lazzaro, explained that their
research was based purely on the scientific evidence at hand and left
theological interpretations up to the "conscience of individuals."
Between 1978 and 1981, a group of 31 American scientists, called the
Shroud of Turin
Research Project, conducted 120 hours of X-ray and ultraviolet tests that
arrived to the same conclusion.
"There are no chemical or physical methods known which can account
for the totality of the image, nor can any combination of physical, chemical,
biological or medical circumstances explain the image adequately," they
said, according to the Telegraph.
A professor of chemistry at Pavia
University , Luigi
Garlaschelli, shared with The
Independent: "The implications are... that the image was formed by
a burst of UV energy so intense it could only have been supernatural. But I
don't think they've done anything of the sort."
The Shroud of Turin is kept in the royal
chapel of the Roman Catholic Cathedral of Saint John
the Baptist in Turin , Italy , and preserved in a
temperature-controlled case. The relic, visited by millions of people each
year, has never been formally denied or accepted by the Catholic
Church.
Total BS!
ReplyDeleteCant beleive its even a topic.
Sad waste of money on foolish mysticism.
Oh Really
ReplyDeleteThe science was multidisciplinary and impeccable. Way more important is that this provides scientific direct evidence of the resurrection which is the key physical claim made in regard to the life and death of Jesus. This event is no longer about mysticism but about science we can imagine in the future.
This completely revolutionizes our understanding of the christian faith by outright removing any need to rely on faith to accept the reality of the event itself that drove the creation of the faith.