One would think that with the
huge advances in imaging technology, that we would have a superior grasp of the
relative positions of our stellar neighbors.
Most folks do not know we are part of a supergroup of some sort and
plenty of support suggests we are orbiting around Sirius or a companion.
Now the work outlined here
strongly suggests that the accepted local distances are seriously over stated
by a factor of around three.
Surprisingly when I reviewed work
on the likelihood of Sol orbiting Sirius, I felt disquiet because I intuited
that the apparent distance was much larger than it should be for the
maintenance of long term stable orbits.
That issue is eliminated if this work is correct. In other words I have an interest in this
work been right.
What is needed now is a full
press analysis of the location and true apparent motion of all stars inside the
sphere provided by our capacity to use parallax. Even more we need to launch a Hubble
equivalent to begin detailed mapping of near space preferably with another
scope following Earth at the Lagrange point to provide simultaneous parallax to
increase resolution.
We may even be able to discover
some of those gas giants zooming around out there.
Sirius Shift, Sirius (Parallax) Disclosure!
by Millennium Twain 24
October 2011, early draft proof
So what is Stellar Parallax, Annual Parallax?
How does it relate to Stellar Distance, the distance of Alpha
Centauri and Sirius in particular?
What is the difference between a distance of a mere Lightyear, and
that of a Parsec?
How does the Covert Institution of Astrophysics ACTUALLY
determine Stellar Distance from Parallax?
And how does that compare to the fluff, disinfo, they tell the
public?
Why does Aerospace & Astrophysics defraud the public?
###1
If you google Parallax (Google will help, sugges3ing terms like Parallax
Diagram, Parallax of Stars) or Stellar Parallax or Annual
Parallax you will find hundreds of public disinfo illustrations and
discussions.
These sites will almost always tell you, truly, that Stellar Parallax
is the change in apparent position of a nearby star, the change of angle
with respect to the viewer and the background stars, that we see. [In
particular, a century ago, from the displacement of the star image on a
photographic plate, with respect to the background stars. To the extent that
the difference was measureable, we could then make a rough estimate of the
distance of the nearby star.]
###2
The Covert Institutional websites will then tell you, again correctly,
that to get a big enough parallax angle, big enough to be accurate to 2 or 3
significant digits (99 percent to 99.9 percent accurate) -- we need a very
long baseline, distance, between the two different measurements. Thus the
term VLBA, Very Long Baseline Astrometry. Astrometry meaning astronomical
measurement.
Thus, as these diagrams show, the concept of measuring the
Parallax Angle from Earth at two different times, six months apart, at opposite
ends of the Earth's orbit around the Sun. At a, seeming, distance of 2 AU, two
Astronomical Units from each other. An AU is the distance from the Earth to the
Sun, about 8.3 light minutes average. [1 light year = 525,949 light minutes. 1
Parsec = 3.26 light years.]
###3
Now we begin to enter the realm of the Covert State
###4
The final dumbing down, stupyfying, 'simplying', which they will
relate is illustrated above.
D=1/P, Parallax in arcseconds, Distance in Parsecs.
After this, you have no Big Brother Gangster to guide you.
You have only me, and your self! (If you are able to do simple (US
Look again at the illustrations above, and the one below. What is
relevant in the measurement of the Parallax Angle: 1) from the Earth, 2) to the
Target Star, 3) with respect to the Reference Star?
Only the lateral, transverse, sideways, tangential movement,
displacement, due to velocity, between the Earth and Target Star and Reference
Star.
And here, and everywhere, the Covert State
What is simply, wholly, laughably, ludicrously, wrong with
that statement?
Do you hear the Scarlet Pimpernel singing, returned,
again?
###5
What ELSE is moving in this picture?
Hint, the absolute velocity of the Earth, around the Sun, is 30 km/sec.
Multiplying by 2 radians, and dividing by Pi, we get 19 km/sec as the lateral
velocity of the Earth, perpendicular to the Target Star, over the six months in
journeying from E1 to E2.
The absolute velocity of the Sun, however, is 220 km/sec, around the
Galaxy!
And so are the (average) absolute values of the Velocities of ALL
TARGET STARS, all local stars of the 'Local Fluff' or Solar Neighborhood, as
well as the Sirius Supercluster, Sirius Moving Group, Sirius-UMa Stream!!
###6
In this Hipparcos Parallax Database of 6,000 Neighbor Stars, you
will notice the VELOCITIES RELATIVE TO OUR SUN range from plus-or-minus 100
km/sec, the majority being about plus-or-minus 40-50 km/sec!!
###7
From my discussions last year, with Walter Cruttenden and our Sirius
Sol discussion group, you will recall the devastating error to the Covert
State pronouncements of the distances of Alpha Centauri and Sirius -- the
difference in Parallax resulting from a change of Earth Velocity of 20 km/sec
to Solar or Target Star velocity of 220 km/sec could result, my first guess,
in D=1/P above being changed by a factor of eleven. Say from 8.6 covert
lightyears for Sirius, to 99 lightyears, or to 3/4 of a lightyear, 0.75 lightyears!
For Alpha Centauri the numbers could go from 4.3 lightyears to 61 lightyears,
or 1/3 of a lightyear, 0.37 lightyears!!
see the Photo Album and the Local Moving Groups thread with about 50
pdf articles referenced: Sirius Sol
###8
you can also see the Local Supercluster, Moving Group, Stream Velocity
articles listed here on the Thunderbolts Forum: Court of the 'Knights Parallax'
###9
So what was left out of the Black-Ops Parallax Algebra, the Covert
Parallax Calculus? Which of our Stellar Parallax Distance Determination
questions is yet unanswered? Is there a Parallax Shift that you and I can
derive, measure, determine ourselves? (Yes!)
All the data we want, the variables, the numbers we need are
available in the Hipparcos database, and will be a thousand times more so, more
accurate, with more stars, in the forthcoming GAIA database. The crux, of
course, is that unless you resdie 'behind the veil', are a upper level
owner/manager of the Intelligence State, the Security State, you will not know,
will not be given the correct 'gauge' (fudge factor) for correcting the
distance determination from Covert to Real. [Recall your history, the
'proprietary' hold that the Sumerian Kings, the Phoenicians, the
Celts, all Sea-Powers maintained on their Sea Maps; the recent rise of the
British 'Admiralty-based' United
Kingdom
The algebra and numbers are simple. Just take the vector sum of the two
EXTRA relevant velocities, the lateral (perpendicular) velocities of the Sun
and the Target Star with respect to each other. This will give you the net
correction to multiply the D=1/P result provided by the Hipparcos
Science Team. That is, add the Velocity of the Earth (about 19.1 km/sec) over
the six months, and do a vector add of the relative Velocity of the Sun and the
Target Star. [Add the velocities if they are in the same direction, subtract
the velocities if they are in opposite directions.] If the velocities ADD,
then that means that the Distance Determination is too small by the factor Ve +
Vst over Ve (Relative Velocity of the Sun and Target divided by the Velocity of
the Earth). Which is to say that in this case the Parallax was smaller than it
appeared. If the Velocities of the Earth and Sun/Target SUBTRACT, then the
Parallax is greater than it appeared, and the Covert Distance
Determination is too LARGE by the factor Ve over Ve + Vst.
###10
To understand it fully, simply, unforgettably, reference the
illustration above. Take the numbers Vs and Vt, velocity of the Sun and
Velocity of the Target Star. Add them vectorally. Their net Velocity, Vn, their
Vector total is a velocity which is transverse to the direction of the Target
Star, parallel to the Velocity of the Earth. Say it is 15 km/sec opposite to
the Velocity of the Earth. Then adding Ve + Vn, we get 19 km/sec - 15 km/sec =
4 km/sec net Velocity of the Earth with respect to the Target Star! If the
target star is Sirius, with a Covert Distance of 8.6 Lightyears, we multiply
that result by 4/19 -- 4 km/sec over 19 km/sec -- to get a CORRECTED
Distance for Sirius of 1.8 Lightyears! [If the Velocities of the Earth and
Sun-Target had added, then we would have found a corrected distance placing
Sirius further away than the Covert Gaugereported. Google gauge equation
"fudge factor".]
###11
Fortunately there are dozens of ancient 'sciences', disciplines,
which are as accurate, and far more accurate, than 20th century Covert physics,
aerospace, astrophysics, gauge theory, etc, etc. (as the latter are
'culturally' designed to give vastly wrong results to the public.) These,
sacred, older disciplines give us numbers for the periodic cycles
(wavelengths and frequencies) of the trajectories of our neighbor planets,
stars and moving groups -- by which we have MANY sets of distances and
velocities for Alpha Centauri, for Sirius, for the Sirius-UMa Stream, for the
Ursa Major Moving Group, for the Local Association.
###12
With our Sacred Data Sets we can determine the Covert Fudge Factors,
and thus the corrections to the whole Sirius Sol, Sirius-UMa, '4D
Filamentary Serpent Velocity Group' equations.
###13
A factor of 2.5 REDUCTION TO THE COVERT DISTANCE of our Local
Neighbor Serpent Stellar Deities being the convergence, as of today, of all the
numbers I have brought together over the last twenty years.
###14
Singing the PachaMama, all our Sacred Serpent Relations, returning
...
No comments:
Post a Comment