tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1752027331714385066.post6912722556018568586..comments2024-03-19T14:38:21.141-07:00Comments on Terra Forming Terra: Sulfate, Sleep and Sunlight: The Disruptive and Destructive Effects of Heavy Metals and Glyphosatearcleinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05942529252160087271noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1752027331714385066.post-84984260016532714882014-08-31T15:51:04.252-07:002014-08-31T15:51:04.252-07:00I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that you are...I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that you are some combination of:<br />a fool, a liar, or just terribly sloppy and a "true believer' --- read Eric hoffers book by that name:<br /><br />http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-increase-in-autism-diagnoses-two-hypotheses/<br /><br />It should also be noted that all of this research, while supporting the hypothesis that the rise in autism diagnoses is not due to a true increase in the incidence but rather is due to a broadening of the definition and increased surveillance, does not rule out a small genuine increase in the true incidence. A small real increase can be hiding in the data. There is no evidence upon which we can conclude, however, that true autism rates are increasing.<br /><br />Of course the implications of this are profound. If there is no autism epidemic, if there is a “stable incidence” of autism over recent decades, then this alone is powerful evidence against the vaccine hypothesis – and in fact removes the primary piece of evidence for a vaccine-autism connection. Just as a true increase in incidence would have called out for an environmental factor causing autism, the lack of any increase argues strongly against any environment factor – especially when this is combined with the copious evidence for multiple genetic factors as the ultimate cause(s) of ASD.Factotumhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03527759941568644473noreply@blogger.com