Wednesday, January 4, 2017

Saddam Hussein’s CIA Interrogator: He Tried to Warn Us, but We Didn’t Listen

There never was a good case for going after Saddam and that has now been amply proven.  Any competent observer knew he was a typical bluff monkey who would back down at the last minute.  annoying but just that.

Yet we had a war industry hungering for those big contracts and we also had the deep state needing to hide huge funding as well. That is lots of motive, lots of paid lobbyists called Neocons, and cooperative operatives already used to not telling the president anything that he did not need to know.

What it did not include is competent State re builders as the British would have.  After all they have centuries of experience in that part of the process.

The problem with Iraq in particular and the Middle East in general is colonial history.  All the borders are artificial and fail to reflect good sense in terms of ethnic conflict.  Worse, the minority was always favored in order to keep the majority subdued.  All these states are natural time bombs and walking in is good enough to set them off.

All need a combination of ethnic nations or city states tied to commonly held lands, legal framework and free access for citizens of the nations or states.  That can end all this.

Saddam did not have the answers either and relied of war time suppression and direct attacks against ethnic groups.  Another strongman is no better.

Saddam Hussein’s CIA Interrogator: He Tried to Warn Us, but We Didn’t Listen

Home»Anti-Imperialism»Saddam Hussein’s CIA Interrogator: He Tried to Warn Us, but We Didn’t Listen

December 20, 2016 | Alice Salles

(ANTIMEDIA) After coalition forces captured Saddam Hussein in December 2003, John Nixon, a senior leadership analyst with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) from 1998 to 2011, interrogated the former Iraqi dictator. The detailed account of this interrogation is now available to the public in the form of a book, Debriefing the President: The Interrogation of Saddam Hussein.

In the publication, Nixon explains that Hussein was out of touch with the military reality of his own country in his final years. “When I interrogated Saddam,” Nixon told Time magazine, “he told me: ‘You are going to fail. You are going to find that it is not so easy to govern Iraq.’”

As Nixon pressed Saddam to explain why, the captured dictator said Americans would soon learn they “are going to fail in Iraq because [Americans] do not know the language, the history, and [they] do not understand the Arab mind.” To the former CIA agent, Saddam’s warning had a point.

In order to “maintain Iraq’s multi-ethnic state,” Nixon told reporters, the presence of a strongman like Saddam in Iraq was necessary. He added:

“Saddam’s leadership style and penchant for brutality were among the many faults of his regime, but he could be ruthlessly decisive when he felt his power base was threatened, and it is far from certain that his regime would have been overthrown by a movement of popular discontent.”

Reflecting on what he learned, Nixon told Time it was unlikely that “a group like ISIS would have been able to enjoy the kind of success under his repressive regime that they have had under the Shia-led Baghdad government.” He made the case against the U.S. invasion of Iraq, which led to Saddam’s ultimate fall.

According to Nixon, Saddam added that before his ascension to power, “there was only bickering and arguing [in Iraq]. I ended all that and made people agree!‘” Nixon eventually found he had developed “a grudging respect for how [Saddam] was able to maintain the Iraqi nation as a whole for as long as he did,” despite the CIA officer’s lack of sympathy for the fallen dictator.

To Nixon, Saddam Hussein was certainly a brutal dictator, but he wasn’t “on a mission to blow up the world, as George W. Bush’s administration had claimed to justify the invasion.”

Sign up for the free Anti-Media newsletter the establishment doesn't want you to receive

While many may argue Nixon’s explanation is rather “simplistic,” it undoubtedly reveals that there’s much more to the stories of how the U.S. government justifies invasions and military involvement abroad than meets the eye. In the specific case of Iraq, anti-intervention activists have been on record for years saying the invasion created a power vacuum, making the rise of ISIS more likely to occur.

As countless Iraq war enablers and supporters in the United States continue to defend their actions and claim Saddam had the will and the means to threaten the world, how this war came to be reality is still often ignored. As the former CIA agent Nixon publishes Debriefing the President: The Interrogation of Saddam Hussein, Americans are witnessing a fight between competing narratives as they shape the news the country consumes. These narratives could even impact our foreign and domestic policies. And even now, as we hear yet another account of an insider claiming the U.S. invasion of Iraq was unjustified and damaging, it’s incredible to see much of the media still ignoring what non-interventionists have been saying all along.

No comments: