Monday, September 28, 2015

Egyptian Muslim Soldiers Murder Christian Comrades


Skip the whitewash.  This occurrence represents a serious breach in discipline in the Egyptian Army. Had a German soldier in WWII killed a fellow soldier for any reason whatsoever, he would have been shot forthwith.  That Copts are accepted in the military puts them under the full protection of the military justice system.

For the Egyptians, this is a potential catastrophe.  It sets up the Coptic population to revolt in any circumstance  forcing the army to fight.  Since it has not been stopped dead in its track it must quickly fester and tear the army apart.

We are brewing up something awful in Egypt unfortunately.

Egyptian Muslim soldiers murder Christian comrades

 Sep 14, 2015 | By Raymond Ibrahim

On August 23, a Coptic Christian soldier was killed in his army unit in Egypt. Baha Saeed Karam, 22, was found  with four bullet wounds at the headquarters of his battalion in Marsa Matruh. Although transferred to a hospital in Alexandria, he was pronounced dead upon arrival.

According to Baha’s brother Cyril, the Coptic soldier had recently told him that he had gotten into arguments with other Muslim soldiers in his unit, and that one had threatened him with death.

Baha is certainly not the first Coptic Christian serving in his country’s military to be killed over religion.

Only two months earlier, on June 24, Bahaa Gamal Mikhail Silvanus, a 23-year-old conscript, was found sitting dead in a chair with two bullet wounds in his chest and a gun at his feet. Relatives who later saw the body said he also had wounds atop his head, as if he had been bludgeoned with an object.

The military’s official position was that the Copt committed suicide — despite the fact that suicides are rarely able to shoot themselves twice, or first hit themselves atop the head with blunt objects. Moreover, according to Rev. Mikhail Shenouda:

A person who commits suicide is a disappointed and desperate person, but Bahaa was in very good spirits. He was smiling always. He was keeping the word of God.

He planned on entering the monastic life after his military service.

A friend of the deceased Christian said that Silvanus had confided to him that he was regularly pressured by other soldiers in his unit to convert to Islam:

He told me that the persecution of the fanatical Muslim conscripts in the battalion against him had increased … and that they would kill him if he wouldn’t convert to Islam.

On August 31, 2013, another Copt in the armed services, Abu al-Khair Atta, was killed in his unit by an “extremist officer” for “refusing to convert to Islam.” Again, the interior ministry informed the slain Copt’s family that he had committed suicide. However, Abu al-Khair’s father, citing eyewitnesses who spoke to him, said:

[O]ne of the radical, fanatical officers pressured and threatened him on more than one occasion to convert to Islam. Abu al-Khair resisted the threats, which vexed the officer more.

The deaths bring to mind horrific incidents from Egypt’s recent past.

Copt soldier Guirgus Rizq Yusif al-Maqar, 20, died on September 18, 2006. Without notifying him why, the armed forces summoned his handicapped father to the station in Asyut. After making the arduous journey, the father was verbally mistreated by some officers and then bluntly told: “Go take your son’s corpse from the refrigerator!” The father “collapsed from the horror of the news.”

Officials claimed the youth died of a sudden drop in blood pressure. Later, however, while family members were washing Guirgus’ body, they discovered wounds on his shoulders and a large black swelling on his testicles.

Coptic Christian conscript Baha Mikhail Silvanus supposedly committed suicide

Still assuming these were products of injuries incurred during harsh training, his family proceeded to bury him. Later, however, a colleague of the deceased told them that Guirgus was regularly insulted, humiliated, and beaten  – including on his testicles — simply because he was Christian. The dead youth’s irate family implored authorities to exhume Guirgus’ body for a forensic examination, but this was denied.

On August 2006, the mutilated and drowned body of another Copt serving in the Egyptian military, Hani Seraphim, was found. Earlier, he had confided to his family that he was being insulted and abused for being a Christian by his commander, both in public and in private: “His unit commander ordered him to renounce Christianity and join the ranks of Islam.” The Coptic youth refused, warning his Muslim commander: “I will notify military intelligence about this,” to which his superior replied, “Okay, Hani, soon I will settle my account with you.” His body was later found floating in the Nile, covered with signs of torture.

It should come as no surprise that some Muslim soldiers insist that the men fighting alongside them be Muslims as well. “Infidels” are seen as untrustworthy, as fifth columns. Islamic law holds that non-Muslim subjects are forbidden from owning weapons.

In Islam, allegiance belongs to the Umma — the abstract “Muslim world” that transcends racial, linguistic, and territorial borders — and not to any particular Muslim nation. It may seem reasonable that all Egyptian citizens — Muslims and Christians alike — would serve in their nation’s military. But for Muslims who equate “war” with “jihad,” having non-Muslims fighting alongside them is unacceptable.

This sort of thinking is not limited to Egypt. In Kuwait, no one can become a citizen without first converting to Islam. Indigenous Kuwaitis who openly leave Islam lose their citizenship.

In nations as diverse as Iran and Sudan, prominent church leaders are regularly persecuted — and some put on death row — on the accusation that they must be treasonous agitators working for the West because they are not Muslim. (The West, in the popular Muslim mind, continues to be conflated with Christianity).

These modern-day slayings of Christian soldiers who refuse to convert to Islam thoroughly contradict the historic narrative being peddled by Mideast academics in America. Once again, then, the present sheds light on the past.

In an attempt to whitewash the meaning of “jizya”  – the extortion money non-Muslims redeemed their lives with — Georgetown University’s John Esposito writes that jizya was actually paid to “exempt them [non-Muslims] from military service.” Similarly, Sohaib Sultan, Princeton University’s Muslim chaplain, asserts that jizya was merely “an exemption tax in lieu of military service.”

Such assertions are absurd: conquering Muslims never wanted their conquered and despised “infidel” subjects to fight alongside them in the name of jihad (holy war against infidels) without first converting to Islam.

That’s how it was in the past, and increasingly the way it is in the present.

No comments:

There was an error in this gadget